The Definition of the Relevant Market Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law School of UIBE UIBECLC Dalian, China,June 11, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
Advertisements

IDRC Forum in KyotoApril 13, Challenges in Enforcing Chinese Antimonopoly Law Prof. Dr. Wang Xiaoye Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
 Section 1 of Sherman Act regulates “horizontal” and “vertical” restraints.  Per Se vs. Rule of Reason.  Per Se violations are blatant and substantially.
COMMISSION For The SUPERVISION Of BUSINESS COMPETITION The REPUBLIC Of INDONESIA REGIONAL ANTITRUST WORKSHOP ON ABUSE OF DOMINANCE.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
Tentative Exploration by SAIC on Regulating the Abuse of IPR to Exclude and Restrict Competition Yang Jie September 16, 2013 State Administration for Industry.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE. Government regulation on banking market in Russia Competition aspects.
© 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 14 Monopoly.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOJ/FTC Hearings on Market DefinitionWashington, D.C. March 7, 2007 Technology Markets Richard Gilbert Professor of Economics University of California.
Understand the prospects of China's competition law related for intellectual property from the perspective of technical standards Wang-xiao ye Researcher.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class IV, 27th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
 How firms compete Easy as PIE: Presenting in English 09/03/2011.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Mergers and Acquisitions: China's New Anti- Monopoly Law Edward Lehman Managing Director – Lehman, Lee & Xu Gerson Lehrman Group.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
Practical application of industrial economics: Antitrust Law November 24, 2008 By Kinga Guzdek.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
International & Foreign Law Search, Liu 1 Separation of Powers? Commission—executive? Council—Legislative? Parliament—Legislative? Court--Judiciary.
Patent License Agreements under the new EU Block Exemption Regulation H. Ulrich Dörries and David Molnia df-mp Dörries, Frank-Molnia & Pohlman Munich,
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Patent Pooling What is patent pooling? When is patent pooling anticompetitive? Can others be excluded from.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
ABA China Inside and Out September , Beijing The interface between competition law and intellectual property Nicholas Banasevic, DG Competition,
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Chapter 7 Market Structures Industry=Market. Four Types of Market Structures  I. Perfect Competition  II. Monopolistic Competition  III. Oligopoly.
New Development of China’s Anti-monopoly Regulations on the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights WANG Xianlin Shanghai Jiao Tong University KoGuan Law.
IPR Acquisition and Concentration IPR Acquisition and The Business Concentration Professor Huang Yong UIBECLC Dalian,June 10,
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
Identification of Abuse of dominant market position involving IPR Wang Xianlin, KoGoan Law School of Shanghai Jiaotong University Dalian,June 11,2010.
Legal Framework of China Regulating the Abuse of Intellectual Property in License He Zhonglin IP Tribunal of Supreme Court Da Lian, June 10, 2010.
Sangmin Song, Director, Anti-Monopoly Div., KFTC MRFTA & IP Rights 1.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
Principles and methods of antitrust analysis of the abuse of intellectual property rights Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law school of UIBE UIBECLC March.
The Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights Abuse and Monopoly Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
12.1 Chapter 12 Antitrust © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
Identification of Monopoly Agreement involving Intellectual Property Rights Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
competition rules in inland transport
Dialogue on Competition Policy and Intellectual Property *
Wang Xianlin, Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Five Years Anti-monopoly Work of SAIC Retrospect and Prospect
Time Warner Rules Manhattan
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
“Revisiting Abuse of Dominance & IPRs: Emerging Jurisprudence of the Indian Competition Law” “Plenary 2: A comparative perspective to IPR and Competition:
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Review Slides – Unit 3 Chapter # Questions
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Economics Chapter 7.
Merger Control : Basics of Substantive Assessment Horizontal and Non-Horizontal Mergers Definition of Relevant Market.
Presentation transcript:

The Definition of the Relevant Market Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law School of UIBE UIBECLC Dalian, China,June 11, 2010

Ⅰ.The necessity of defining the relevant market The defining of the relevant market is the beginning of anti- monopoly analysis. 1.Concentration of undertakings 2. Abuse of dominant market position 3.Monopoly agreements Article 12 of Anti-monopoly Law: For the purposes of this Law, a relevant market consists of the range of the commodities for which, and the regions where, undertakings compete each other during a given period of time for specific commodities or services ( hereinafter referred to, in general, as “commodities” )。

Guidelines for the defining of the relevant market Anti- monopoly Commission under the State Council, May 24, There are 4 chapters and 11articles. The application of the defining of the relevant market: 1.Concentration of undertakings – the announcements of Ministry of Commerce ( 1 prohibits; 5 imposes additional conditions) 2.Judicial practices of the people’s courts – Medicine for the Whole People Net vs. Baidu.

Announcements of Ministry of Commerce From the defining of the relevant market in the announcements of Ministry of Commerce, we can see: 1.Vertical merger: defining the upstream and downstream relevant markets (Announcement 76) 2.Horizontal merger: carrying out a substitutive analysis to define the relevant market, on the basis of the overlapped business scope of the two parties involved in the concentration (Announcement77 and 28)

Medicine for the Whole People Net vs. Baidu The judge defined the relevant market as : “search engine service”, because “the search engine service can promptly search, locate and supply massive information for network users, and this character can’t be replaced by other internet application services.” Traditional function (demand) substitutability The limitation of SSNIP – many network products are free.

The basis of defining the relevant market In the process of the enforcement of the Anti- monopoly Law, the range of the relevant market mainly depends on the substitutability of the commodities (region). Substitutability analysis: 1.Demand substitutability 2.Supply substitutability

Methods of defining the relevant market More than one method is used to define the relevant market. Demand substitutability analysis, supply substitutability analysis, “presumed monopolist test” analysis Some issues of presumed monopolist test: benchmark prices, increasing range

Guidelines for enforcing Anti-monopoly Law in the field of IP Article 9 the definition of relevant market in the field of IP When analyzing the exercise of IPR by undertakings which is suspected to violate the Anti-monopoly Law, the authority for enforcement of the Anti-monopoly Law under the State Council, for specific cases, will define the relevant market, which generally includes the relevant product market and the relevant technology market, and effect on innovation by the exercise of IPR is also considered. The specific method of defining the relevant market is in accordance with Guidelines for Defining the Relevant Market promulgated by Anti- monopoly Commission under the State Council.

Ⅱ.American IP Guidelines In 1995, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission of US jointly promulgated Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. the product market the technology market the innovation market

Firstly, the administration shall make sure whether there is enough information in the market by analyzing the product market to assess the influence of the license agreement over competition. If there is not enough information to analyze in the product market, and if IP and the products made by the aforesaid IP are traded separately, the administration will analyze the second market —— technology market. When the administration can’t assess the influence of the license agreement over petition from those two markets —— the product market and the technology market, analyzing by using the innovation market will be appropriate.

Technology Market Technology market includes the licensed IP and its extremely similar substitutes, the latter refers to the functionally similar alternative technology or the technology that can be used to produce alternative products, and these technologies can effectively restrict the market control related to the licensed IP. The definition of technology market and product market are similar, if the royalty of the license IP rises by 5%-10%, all the technologies access the market are in the scope of the related technology market. The territorial scopes of technology market are usually international, except when there are restraints of technology import and export.

Innovation Market Innovation market includes the research and development (R&D) for a certain special utility model or modified product or method, and the similar substitutes of the aforesaid R&D. The similar substitutes refers to the R&D attempt, technology and products that can effectively restrict the market control over the related R&D. Only when the ability of the related R&D is connected with the specific property or feature of a manufacturer (R&D needs the support of specific resources), will the administration define innovation market. Practically, the definition of innovation is still controversial.

Example Three biggest disposable plastic manufacturers plan to jointly carry out the R&D of a new type of plastic which can biodegrade fast. The joint venture will grant the investor (but not anyone else) all the patent rights and know-how.

The relevant innovation market – the R&D of biodegradable (or other environmental friendly) containers. The authority will define the scope of the real or potential competitors of the joint venture, including the manufacturers that have the capability and motivation to carry out substitutable R&D which is similar to the joint venture.

Step One The process of determining the dominant market position Hold a dominant market position or not Investigate other factors to see whether the undertakings can control price, quantity or hinder or affect market access Defining the relevant market, investigate the market share of the undertaking and the competitive condition of the relevant market Whether the undertakings can give disproof and prove effectively that they don’t hold a dominant market position Holding a dominant market position Deducing a dominant market position There is one of the following circumstances: 1.the market share of one undertaking accounts for over half of the total in a relevant market; 2.the joint market share of two undertakings accounts for over two-thirds of the total in a relevant market; or 3.the joint market share of three undertakings accounts for over three-fourths of the total in a relevant market. Additionally, the market share of any of the undertakings a ccounts for over one-tenth of the total in a relevant market. Not holding a dominant market position If Yes No Yes No Yes No

Thanks Q&A Contact information: