Principal Observation May 2014 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Growing Leadership to Provide Teacher Feedback Matthew.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Advertisements

Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Educator Effectiveness Framework Associate Executive Director, AWSA
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Pilot Implementation Data: What We’ve Learned So Far Gretchen Weber Director of.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. CASEL/NoVo Collaborating Districts Initiative for Social and Emotional Learning:
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Teacher Evaluation Systems: Opportunities and Challenges An Overview of State Trends Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Teacher Evaluation in Rural Schools Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS, and Principal Investigator for the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 2 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
©IRRE First Things First : A Framework and Supports For District and School Reform William Moore, Ph.D Institute for Research and Reform in Education Boston,
L EADERSHIP : Contributions to Student Outcomes. Context: Michelle White, FLPBSClark Dorman, FL PS/RtI.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
1 Lodi Unified School District High Priority Schools Grant (HPSGP) Review of Progress for Live Oak, Needham, and Washington Elementary Schools Mary Camezon,
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research: Principal Characteristics Time Out: §3012-d Planning Forest or the Trees? Making a “To-Do”
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Director of Mathematics, Coppell ISD Mary Kemper.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Growing Leader Practice: Observing Data Discussions
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
Community of Practice and Calibration for School Administrators
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
The District Role In Raising Student Achievement
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Curriculum Selection Process
Presentation transcript:

Principal Observation May 2014 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Growing Leadership to Provide Teacher Feedback Matthew Clifford, Principal Researcher National Summit for Principal Supervisors, May 2016

A national leader in teaching and learning improvement, AIR provides research, assessment, evaluation, and technical assistance to ensure that all students—particularly those facing historical disadvantages— have access to a high-quality, effective education. American Institutes for Research 2

3 What We Do Evidence-based coaching Principal supervisor support Leadership measure design Principal evaluation support Leadership studies

The Performance Equation 4 We all need people who will give us feedback. That’s how we improve. - Bill Gates

5 The Improvement Cycle Improvement Cycle StudyFeedback Planned Support Improvement

6 Even if ratings are accurate, teacher evaluation will be ineffective if feedback is poorly delivered. Principals struggle to Accurately rate practice Make sense of scores Facilitate feedback Connect results to learning plans What we’ve learned from studies

7 What we know (and research confirms) Delivered well, feedback motivates, builds trust, improves relationships. Strong feedback qualities: Evidence use Professional interactions Differentiated questions Two-way conversation Feedback is an evidence- based conversation about practice quality that leads to a plan for improvement.

8 Strong feedback qualities: Evidence use Professional interactions Differentiated questions Two-way conversation

No problem can be solved with the same level of consciousness that created it. -Albert Einstein Pair up … Was this an example of a good postobservation conference? Is this conference representative of conversations occurring in your district or state?

10 Principals do receive training on delivering feedback and do not experience systematic performance feedback themselves Clifford & Mason (2015) NAESP & NASSP (2013) Goldring and associates (2011)

11 Improvement Cycle StudyFeedback Planned Support Improvement Experience is the best teacher

12 Instructional Feedback Observation 1of 3 principal supervisor tools 3 years in development Input from 200 educators Literature review Used in 41 districts

13 What Principal Supervisors Do Engage principals in the observation process Step 1: Preobservation Step 2: Collect evidence (video & written) Step 3: Analyze via rubric Step 4: Discuss Step 5: Rate and Plan.

14 What Principal Supervisors Do Five Ratings Evidence use Professional interactions Differentiated questioning Leading conversations Written feedback review

15 Strong alignment with Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (2015) for… Standard 4: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Standard 5: Professional Capacity of School Personnel Also contributes to judgements about… Standard 7: Professional Community for Teachers and Staff Standard 10: School Improvement Aligns with several frameworks and standards

Pair up … Review sample tools Read the “quick form” and consider what evidence will be used for ratings Raise questions/concerns Learners need endless feedback more than they need endless teaching. -Grant Wiggins

17 Evidence types Speech Time allocation Frequency count Written word examples/

Debrief What were the areas of strength for the principal? What evidence did you use? What were areas of weakness for the principal? What evidence did you use? What would be the focus of your feedback to the principal?

19 Using the process Supervisors need training and support to observe accurately Initial training (7 hours) Online coaching (2 hours) Making sense of data (1 hour) Targeted feedback rapidly improves principal feedback quality and teacher evaluation practice

20 Closing What questions do you have? What concerns do you have? What strengths do you see in the tool?

Final Thoughts and Questions 21

Matthew Clifford American Institutes for Research 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW Washington, DC Phone: TTY: