L1 EG2 efficiency on superclusters Clémentine Broutin, Alexandre Zabi, Pascal Paganini LLR – Ecole Polytechnique.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron and muon reconstruction in single lepton tT events ( Analysis Note )  (short!) update of previous session  new definition of some observables.
Advertisements

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Single Particle Energy Resolution Vishnu V. Zutshi.
Simulation Work at Nevis Jovan Mitrevski Columbia University DØ Workshop July 10, 2002.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
New Run IIb L1Cal EM Algorithm Greg Pawloski Rice University Run IIb L1Cal Meeting May 31, 2005.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Cross Section meeting, 5 Nov 1999 Maria Girone1 Preliminary results on the WW fully leptonic cross section for the LEPC Maria Girone Imperial College.
PAT-driven Efficiency Measurements and Calculations A. Singh, Amandeep Singh, S. Beri, Pb. University(Chd.)‏ J. Berryhill, K. Misra FermiLab (U.S)
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
Presentation Title Spike problem.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
J/  production in p+p and 200 GeV as seen by the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Raphaël Granier de Cassagnac LLR – Ecole polytechnique Topics in Heavy-Ions.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
ENERGY RECOVERY OF THE CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER DEAD CHANNELS Daskalakis Georgios, Geralis Theodoros, Kesisoglou Stilianos, Manolakos Ioannis, Eleni.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
T. Orimoto, ECAL in CRUZET 1 ECAL in CRUZET CRUZET Data Analysis Jamboree 30 May 2008 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of the.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Status update of L1 Plots for note Hardeep Bansil, Juraj Bracinik, Paul Newman University of Birmingham Trigger E/Gamma Signature Group Meeting 08/07/2010.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Electron physics object tutorial C. Charlot / LLR Automn08 tutorials, 14 oct
Studies of Electroweak Interactions and Searches for New Physics Using Photonic Events with Missing Energy at the Large Electron-Positron Collider Marat.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Highest Q 2 Polarized Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron – E Presented by Jonathan Miller For the Hall A E Collaboration.
P. Ochoa, September Using Muon Removed files to assess the purity of the nubar-PID selection Pedro Ochoa MINOS Collaboration Meeting September 2006.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
1 A Study On Photonic Electrons In The Endcap EMC  Purity of electrons from MC simulation & real data  Reconstructed photonic electrons Naresh Subba,KSU.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
FEE studies of Carbon and CH2 using Ecal only Sebouh Paul 10/27/15.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.
P.Miné Visu CMS1 Philippe Miné LLR, Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3/CNRS, France Introduction Views and options Tutorial Demonstration Practice Visualization.
Sridhara Dasu115 April 2002 L1CaloTrigger Algorithms Sridhara Dasu University of Wisconsin Algorithms: Details, Updates and Simulation - 2 x cm -2.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
TrigEgamma Note L1 Plots Status Update Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 30/09/2010.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Phisymmetry in 2011 Phisymmetry was used:
Elena Bruna Yale University
EC south versus EC south asymetry studies with events
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
EGAMMA HLT Marco Pieri UCSD Meeting 12 June 2007.
Groups and Periods.
Song LIANG CMS-IHEP/Beijing group meeting
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

L1 EG2 efficiency on superclusters Clémentine Broutin, Alexandre Zabi, Pascal Paganini LLR – Ecole Polytechnique

Keeping only SC spread on 1 or 2 TT

Overview Run (good statistics, no timing scan, no EE energy features) Look for L1 candidate in same L1 region as highest energy crystal in SC Excluding masked regions (2.8% in EB, 5.4% in EE) Timing cut for SC (excluding out‐of‐time spikes) (13.4% in EB, 2.8% in EE) Excluding superclusters spread on more than 2 TT (17.3% in EB, 65.4% in EE)  Remove overall 33.3% of EB supercluster, 73.6% of EE superclusters 29/03/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 2

Precisions No double-counting of L1 candidates  for each event and each region, count only the highest E T supercluster Efficiency as a funtion of the supercluster raw E T :  E T corrections are not adapted to low energy (what we are looking at for the moment)  In the endcaps, raw energy, like trigger primitive, does not take the preshower into account 22/04/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 3

22/04/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 4 L1 EG2 efficiency on superclusters Run Look for L1 candidate in same L1 region as highest energy crystal in SC Excluding masked regions (2.8% in EB, 5.4% in EE) Timing cut for SC (excluding out‐of‐time spikes (13.4% in EB, 2.8% in EE) ) Excluding superclusters spread on more than 2 TT (17.3% in EB, 65.4% in EE)  Remove overall 33.3% of EB superclusters, 73.6% of EE superclusters

Back-up slides

No cut on the number of TT

22/04/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 7 L1 EG2 efficiency on superclusters Run Look for L1 candidate in same L1 region as highest energy crystal in SC Excluding masked regions (2.8% in EB, 5.4% in EE) Timing cut for SC (excluding out‐of‐time spikes (13.4% in EB, 2.8% in EE) )  Remove overall 16.2% of EB superclusters, 8.2% of EE superclusters

Same considerations, for SC belonging to electrons

22/04/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 9 L1 EG2 efficiency on electrons (EB) Run Look for L1 candidate in same L1 region as highest energy crystal in SC Excluding masked regions (3.4% in EB) Timing cut for SC (excluding out‐of‐time spikes (5.4% in EB) )  Remove overall 8.8% of EB superclusters

22/04/2010 Clémentine Broutin LLR -- Ecole Polytechnique 10 L1 EG2 efficiency on electrons (EB) Run Look for L1 candidate in same L1 region as highest energy crystal in SC Excluding masked regions (3.4% in EB) Timing cut for SC (excluding out‐of‐time spikes (5.4% in EB) ) Excluding superclusters spread on more than 2 TT (38% in EB)  Remove overall 46.8% of EB electrons