Susan Clark, BS, RHIT, CHTS-IM, CHTS-PW HIT Solutions Executive, eHealthcare Consulting Meaningful Use And The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
Advertisements

Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Electronic Health Records.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
CMS NPRM proposes requirements for Stage 3 of EHR Incentive Programs (in FR March 30, 2015) In conjunction with.
CMS Proposals for Quality Reporting Programs Under the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule PQRS, EHR Incentive Program, Physician Compare,
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
New Jersey Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Professionals Overview.
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Data Intermediaries and Meaningful Use: Quality Measure Innovation, Calculation and Reporting Recommendations from Data Intermediary Tiger Team.
Meaningful Use Security Risk Analysis Passing Your Audit.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
September 16, 2015 Antonio Vega Sandy Swallow
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
Meaningful Use and Merit Based Incentive Payment in 2019.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 15-Overview/ Introduction to the EHR This material was developed by The University.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
©2016 Oscislawski LLC Meaningful Use: Stage 3…and Beyond NJHIMSS/NJHFMA Winter Event January 28, 2016.
Copyright Medical Group Management Association ® (MGMA ® ). All rights reserved. MACRA: Next steps toward value-based payment in Medicare.
Payment Reform Update: Value Over Volume Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP.
© 2014 By Katherine Downing, MA, RHIA, CHPS, PMP.
Optimizing the Value-Based Revenue Cycle: The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) WI-HFMA, May 27, 2016 Tom S. Lee, Ph.D. CEO & Founder SA Ignite.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) is a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16,  Repeals the flawed Sustainable.
Psychiatric Clinical Nurse Specialists: Adopt, Implement, Upgrade (AIU) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program August 3, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Understanding and Executing the MIPS Four Domains: How do they apply to my practice? Presented by: Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, PCMH CCE Senior.
Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 MACRA
Value Based Payment Programs Quality Payment Program
MACRA UPDATE Presented by Judella Haddad-Lacle MD
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #9 – Secure Electronic Messaging Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s.
AGENDA Participating in MIPS in 2017 MIPS Performance Categories
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #2 – Clinical Decision Support Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 7, 2016 Today’s presenter:
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #6 – Patient Specific Education Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 14, 2016 Today’s.
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Death, Taxes and Meaningful Use Audits
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Secrets to Beating the Curve
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 – Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July.
OCC Fall Users’ Group Meeting MIPS/MU
WYOMING MEDICAID PCMH Summit January 24, 2019
Clinical Decision Support (CDS): Meeting the Meaningful Use Measures Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program May 14, 2019 & May 20, 2019.
[Practice Name Here] [Tax ID# Here]
Presentation transcript:

Susan Clark, BS, RHIT, CHTS-IM, CHTS-PW HIT Solutions Executive, eHealthcare Consulting Meaningful Use And The

▪ Introduction ▪ Meaningful Use program as it has existed and what led to prompts for change. ▪ Modification Rule impacts the 2016 Meaningful Use reporting year. ▪ Introduction to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment Program (MIPS) ▪ Recommendations to begin programmatic preparations prior to the MIPS rule becoming final. Introduction & Agenda

This presentation contains information currently available from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The intent of this presentation is to facilitate dialogue and is for informational purposes and is current at the time of presentation. Please be aware that changes occur within this program frequently, and without notice. Contact CMS resources for the most current set of regulations and updates. Disclaimer

▪ George W. Bush – 2004 Established ONC (Office of National Coordinator through HHS) Mission: “to support the widespread, meaningful use of health IT.” ▪ President Obama – 2009 – HITECH Act (ARRA/Stimulus) Established the EHR incentive-penalty programs ▪ MU has been a program of continual change ▪ Initiation of program activity (2010) ▪ 2015 – 2017 Meaningful Use Final Rule (October, 2015) ▪ MACRA (Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act) (April, 2015) ▪ MIPS (Merit Based Incentive Payment System) ▪ NPRM (Spring 2016) History of Meaningful Use

Stages of Meaningful Use

Incentives vs. Penalties Medicare no longer yields incentive payments, only assesses “payment adjustments” Medicaid is still paying incentives. This is the last year for which the first year payment of $21,250 may be obtained for AIU. There is no Medicaid penalty.

The Cost of Non-participation…or failing MU If the average provider billed Medicare FFS claims of $250,000 in 2015 = $7500 PENALTY in 2017 *Note – EP hardship exception applications for 2015 are accepted until July.

Reporting Periods ALL EP - Any Continuous 90 days 2016 NEW EP - Any continuous 90 days in the calendar year RETURNING EP - Full calendar year 2017 & Beyond ALL EP – Full calendar year

1.Protect Electronic Health Information 2.Clinical Decision Support 3.CPOE 4.E-Prescribe 5.Summary of Care 6.Patient Specific Education 7.Medication Reconciliation 8.Patient Electronic Access 9.Secure Electronic Messaging 10. Public Health Reporting Requirements at a Glance 10 Objectives

▪ January 11 th,2016 CMS Acting Director is quoted as saying: “The Meaningful Use program as it has existed, will now be effectively over.” Meaningful Use is DEAD!!!

No. It’s Not.

▪ “Technology must be user-centered and support physicians, not distract them.” ▪ “…the focus will move away from rewarding providers for the use of technology and towards the outcome they achieve with their patients.” ▪ “And finally, we are deadly serious about interoperability.” Using the word “deadly” – coincidence?? The rest of the story…….

The Audits Continue

Medicaid Audits Too

▪ Storage medium – mobile media, cloud, paper ▪ Establish Information Governance, ▪ Roles and Responsibilities ▪ Identify data owner, but should not be the only one with data access ▪ Retention period 6 years post attestation ▪ Includes Hardship Exception applications ▪ Documentation for EHR Certification/Vendor Issues (CEHRT Issues) or Lack of Control over CEHRT Availability Maintaining Documentation

▪ Medicaid eligibility encounter data, detailed patient specific reports ▪ Hospitals should maintain documentation that supports their payment calculations. ▪ Proof of certified EHR software ▪ More than 50% of patients recorded in CEHRT “If it wasn’t documented, it wasn’t done.”

▪ Reports must be from CEHRT, vendor logo displayed ▪ Consideration when switching EHRs and maintaining archived legacy data ▪ Display provider or hospital name, time period of report ▪ eRx – permissible and/or available for controlled substance ▪ If have upgraded the product, cannot reproduce the reports accurately to match what was reported. Calculated Measures

▪ Screen shots with dates that the functionality is available, enabled, and active in the system for the duration of the EHR reporting period. ▪ Medicaid audit has additional open-ended questions – e.g. what formulary does your EHR use? Describe workflow for CDS and how the EHR tracks compliance ▪ Vendor documentation ▪ Patient list actual list of patients PER provider Non-Calculated Measures

▪ Letter from ISDH portal ▪ Registration is completed during the 1st 60 days of the reporting period ▪ Exclusions – e.g. state does not do syndromic ambulatory, registry does not accept applicable day (GI – colonoscopy and EGD data from ASC, not ambulatory). ▪ Submitting providers via hospital feeds Public Health Measures CMS FAQs 14393, 14397, 14401

Public Health - ISDH Portal

▪ To qualify as a valid specialized registry in 2016, the registry must do the following: ▪ Publically declare readiness to accept data (by 1/1/16 or by day 1 of EPs reporting period) and be able to accept electronic submissions – manual data entry into a website does not count ▪ Be able to support the registration/onboarding and production processes ▪ Be able to provide documentation as evidence of data submission Specialized Registry Requirements CMS FAQs 13657, 14117, 13653

▪ Most common audit failure point ▪ Completed yearly within reporting year. ▪ Must show date, person completing assessment ▪ Show at least one item mitigated and plan for remaining items ▪ May be audited by OCR, OIG as well for this, along with HIPAA Privacy Assessment ▪ Assure BAAs in place for all outside companies Security Risk Assessment

▪ Selection of audit subject is based on a risk profile that CMS does not disclose. However, likely factors include: Red Flags Skipping program years, or only attesting once Numerator values of zero Denominator inconsistencies. E.g. unique patient measures. Previously failed audit

▪ MACRA, MIPS – the latest acronyms ▪ NPRM Status, expected final rule ▪ CMS Attestation website actively under construction MIPS – It’s coming

▪ Components ▪ VBM-measured quality (up to 30 points) – [PQRS] ▪ VBM (Value Based Modifier) - measured resource use (30 points) ▪ MU (25 points) – Meaningful Use ▪ Clinical Practice Improvement (15 points) ▪ Alternative Payment Model ▪ Qualified vs non-qualified ▪ Numerators now matter MIPS Basics

▪ The MACRA legislation only addresses Medicare physician and clinician payment adjustments. ▪ The approach to meaningful use under MACRA won’t happen overnight. In the meantime, our existing regulations – including meaningful use Stage 3 – are still in effect. ▪ Medicaid expected 2021, other payers also following suit. ▪ How are hospitals impacted? Is there a place to hide for non EP’s?

▪ MIPS scores and individual category scores will be available on the Physician Compare website. Physician Compare website ▪ Consumers will now be able to see their providers rated on a scale of 0 to 100 and how their providers compare to peers locally and nationally. Quality Scores Go Public

Gasp! Panic! What do we do now??

Implement certified EHR technology Meet Meaningful Use requirements Maximize PQRS quality performance scores Attain and maintain PCMH Best Practices to Qualify For Maximum Reimbursement?

▪ Program management ▪ MU ▪ PQRS ▪ PCMH ▪ ACO (APM) ▪ Maintain tracking and audit documentation by provider ▪ Information Governance This is NOT just another task……..

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Basics CMS guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/basics.htmlhttps:// guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/basics.html Medicare Registration & Attestation (includes links to the Medicare & Medicare attestation user guides (page-by-page screen shots): guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/registrationandattestation.htmlhttps:// guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/registrationandattestation.html CMS Supporting Documentation for Audits guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/downloads/ehr_supportingdocumentation_audits.pdfhttps:// guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/downloads/ehr_supportingdocumentation_audits.pdf CHPL-Certified Product List – 2017 Meaningful Use Final Rule programs-electronic-health-record-incentive-program-stage-3-and-modifications programs-electronic-health-record-incentive-program-stage-3-and-modifications Resources

Andy Slavitt speech 1/11/16 of-cms-acting-administrator-andy-slavitt-at-the-j-p-morgan-annual-health-care- conference-jan / of-cms-acting-administrator-andy-slavitt-at-the-j-p-morgan-annual-health-care- conference-jan / CMS FAQ CMS MACRA-MIPS Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and- APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.htmlhttps:// Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and- APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html More Resources

Questions?