Legal Implications of Background Checks Angela Preston | SVP & Counsel, Corporate Ethics and Compliance | SterlingBackcheck CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
/0403 © 2004 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLRs Training Presentations Privacy Issues in the Workplace.
Advertisements

HIPAA Privacy Practices. Notice A copy of the current DMH Notice must be posted at each service site where persons seeking DMH services will be able to.
Credit Checks: The Next Wave of Hiring Discrimination Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ©Copyright 2010 Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under.
Background Checks. Why Conduct Background Checks? INDIANA UNIVERSITY 1.
Disclaimer The views expressed are solely those of the author, and should not be attributed to the author’s firm or its clients. The following material.
EEOC Guidelines Presented by: Molly Powell Senior Trial Attorney.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA PRIVACY RULES Presented by: Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
BACKGROUND CHECKS. Background Screening Title VII Fair Credit Reporting Act National Labor Relations Act.
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids Meetup Laura D. Berger October 22, 2012 The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not represent the views.
1 What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You Selected Employment Law Topics Gerard Solis Associate General Counsel.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
PRESENTED BY: DENA H. SOKOLOW ALLEN, NORTON & BLUE, P.A Hiring the Best: Background Checks, References, & More.
INDIANA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training.
PRIVATE EMPLOYER “BAN THE BOX” LEGISLATION Commissioner Kevin Lindsey Minnesota Department of Human Rights September, 2014.
Ten Employment Law Issues for Small Businesses David M. Knasel, Esq. Dominion Business Law PLC Tysons Corner | Leesburg, VA
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Preparing for an Initial Client Interview.
NELP & CLS Training Series Maximizing Enforcement of the Employment Rights of People with Criminal Records Race Discrimination Claims for Criminal Record.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 6Slide 1 Steps in Filing a Complaint First, the necessary complaint must be prepared. Make sure you attach the: First,
Tenant Screening Avoiding Lawsuits & Regulatory Action.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
BACKGROUND CHECKS Cooperative Extension Volunteer Program Background Reviews.
Equal Employment Opportunity Principles of Discrimination Law.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
BACKGROUND SCREENING: What You Need to Know to Reduce Risk and Increase Return PRESENTERS Suzanne Moore, easyBackgrounds, Inc. Brian McElwee, easyBackgrounds,
Jeffery L. Thompson Telephone: Recruiting the Best Crew.
Employment Screening: CORI and Private Background Checks Presented by the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute 99 Chauncy St., Suite 500, Boston, MA
STEPHEN P. POSTALAKIS BLAUGRUND, HERBERT, KESSLER, MILLER, MYERS & POSTALAKIS, INCORPORATED OHIO ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY BOARDS.
1 Race Discrimination and Criminal Records Sharon M. Dietrich Managing Attorney Community Legal Services, Inc., Philadelphia, PA EEOC/FEPA Conference June.
Module 3 1x1 Class Mock Interview  Structured Interview ◦ Uses a set of standardized questions asked of all job applicants. ◦ Useful for initial.
8/30/2015 © APSCREEN, Leading the Way Since Adventures in Factual Employment Screening Presented by, Thomas C. Lawson, CFE, CII Wednesday, June.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Veterinary Practice Law Quiz J EFFREY L. R OTH FEES & BURGESS, P.C. 213 Green Street Huntsville, Alabama Telephone  Facsimile
© 2007 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC The Value of Employment Practices Liability Insurance Andrew L. Levy McNees Wallace & Nurick.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
EMPLOYEE TERMINATIONS Becky S. Knutson Davis Brown Law Firm.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
DRIVER SCREENING: A BREAKDOWN OF TWO NEW SOURCES OF LIABILITY 1.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
Kristine E. Kwong, Esq. PITFALLS OF SETTING MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS.
content/uploads/lawsuit34.jpg Keeping Your HR Department Out of the Courtroom by Maintaining New Hire Compliance.
Chapter 02: Legal Compliance
1 Recruitment and Hiring Practices A commitment to diversity recruitment is grounded in the conviction that better learning, greater creativity, and best.
How Does it Affect Me as an Employer? Beth Langley Hagan Davis Mangum Barrett & Langley PLLC Myth Busters Around the FCRA Jennifer Smith Director of Compliance.
Background Checks & Risk Management Presented to: Charity First 10/21/2015.
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
Is Your Background Check Process Compliant?. 2 © Copyright 2015 ADP, LLC. Proprietary and Confidential Information. Agenda Privileged & Confidential.
Choice Background Checks. PRODUCTSPRODUCTS FEDERAL FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT Users Must Have a Permissible Purpose Users Must Provide Certifications.
Unit 3 Seminar.  Used to predict acceptable or unacceptable behavior  Helps to assess level of skills/knowledge/ characteristics applicants have  Reduce.
TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE Deputy Alvis Prince
HIRING AND MANAGING EMPLOYEES Presented by Megan M. Ruwe (612)
Atlanta / Austin / Berlin / Birmingham / Boston / Charleston / Charlotte / Chicago / Cleveland / Columbia / Dallas / Denver / Detroit (Metro) / Greenville.
On the Front Lines: Building Skills for Reentry and Diversion March 31,
Their Past is Your Future. With easyBackgrounds You See Both. Background Checks Navigating the Legal Minefield Seacoast Human Resources Association Meeting.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Alan Kinsey Legal Landmines in Employment Screening The information presented by Inquirehire is not intended to be legal advice. Inquirehire recommends.
Northern New Mexico Human Resources Association November 13, 2012 Background Checks Scott D. Gordon.
Fair-Chance Employment : The Disparate Impact of Background Checks September 2016 Nayantara Mehta Senior Staff Attorney Berkeley, California
Background Checks - Banking The information presented by Inquirehire is not intended to be legal advice. Inquirehire recommends that you consult with legal.
Presented by With Special Guest Jaime Lizotte HR Solutions Manager
Catherine E. Ybarra, Esq Simone & Associates th Avenue
Indiana Access to Public Records Act (APRA) Training
Labor and Employment: 2017 CIOMA Legislative Update
Top Five Compliance “Must Dos” When You Get Home Tomorrow
Advancing the Employment Rights of Californians with Arrest and Conviction Records California Fair Employment and Housing Council Hearing Testimony August.
South Carolina AHEC Health Careers Academy
Legally-Compliant Practices Regarding Background Screening
Conducting Background Checks: Compliance Strategies and Client Support
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Presentation transcript:

Legal Implications of Background Checks Angela Preston | SVP & Counsel, Corporate Ethics and Compliance | SterlingBackcheck CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY This material constitutes confidential and proprietary information of SterlingBackcheck and its reproduction, publication or disclosure to others without the express authorization of Clare Hart or the General Counsel of Sterling Infosystems is strictly prohibited.

2 SterlingBackcheck is not a law firm, and does not dispense legal advice. The information provided herein is general business information, is not based on any particular facts or situations, and is not to be relied upon as legal advice, even if you are currently a client of SterlingBackcheck. You are encouraged to seek advice from your own legal counsel concerning matters covered in this presentation. Disclaimer

3 What’s in an Employment Background Check? ›Social Security Number Trace ›County Criminal Records Search ›Sex Offender Registry ›Motor Vehicle Report ›Employment Verification ›Education Verification ›Professional License Verification ›Credit Report

4 “FCRA class action cases are the new wage and hour.” ›Fair Credit Reporting Act US 1681 et seq. ›Applies to background checks when conducted by a third party consumer reporting agency (CRA) › spike in litigation against employers for technical violations of the statute ›Statutory damages: fertile ground for class actions. $100-$1000 per violation, actual damages, punitive damages and attorneys fees FCRA Litigation

5 FCRA Lawsuit Stats 2015: Over 1,500 FCRA Complaints Month of June 2015: 298 FCRA Complaints, 33 Class Action (11.1%) ↑ Up 67% over same period last year FCRA was up 22.7% in 2015 over 2014, which itself was a record year Dozens of cases pending and new cases filed weekly Consumers are aggressively recruited *Source:

6

7 Legal Compliance Issue

8 ›Authorization and Disclosure ›Adverse Action Process ›Ban the Box ›Discrimination Claims based on use of Criminal Records Issues Raised in Litigation or Enforcement Actions

9 Million Dollar Settlements

10 Consent: Disclosure and Authorization

11 ›Before an employer may obtain a consumer report from a CRA, it must make a “clear and conspicuous” written disclosure to the consumer in a document that consists “solely” of the disclosure that a consumer report may be obtained. 604 (15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)) ›Statute is silent on exact contents of disclosure, but it must stand alone ›604(b)(2)(A)(ii) states that the “authorization may be made” on the disclosure-possible exception to “stand alone” ›Courts are split, but most recent favor plaintiffs. Disclosure and Authorization Requirements

12 ›Disclosure is not provided prior to request for a background check ›Disclosure does not stand alone ›May contain state notices ›May be part of a job application ›May be part of a rolling, continuous online screen, without separation ›Disclosure contains a release of liability Disclosure and Authorization Common Errors

13 ›Review your consent forms. Consider having two separate forms-- both a “disclosure” form and an “authorization” form, signed by the applicant. Beware online systems. ›Confirm that the authorization and disclosure forms are signed prior to ordering the background check › Don’t include extraneous information, like a disclaimer, release of liability, or acknowledgments with the disclosure form ›Provide state requirements on a separate document, so as not to be confused with the FCRA disclosure. › Consult with legal counsel on what language can be included with the disclosure form. FCRA Disclosure and Authorization Best Practices

14 ›1681b(b)(3): Adverse Action ›An adverse action is a denial of employment or any other decision for employment purposes that adversely affects any current or prospective employee, ›Based in whole or in part, on the basis of information in a consumer report. ›If you have a report that has adverse information, some courts have upheld a presumption that the decision was made, at least in part, on the report. What Is Adverse Action?

15 Two Step Process STEP 1

16 Two Step Process

17 ›Pre-adverse notice is not provided in writing or is provided late ›Employer tells the applicant that they will not get the job before pre-adverse notice is sent ›Pre-adverse notice is incomplete and missing copy of the consumer report or current Summary of Rights or state notices ›Final adverse notice is not provided Common Adverse Action Mistakes

18 ›Develop a written policy for the adverse action process ›How to customize your notices ›Restrict communication with candidates while process is pending ›Is there an obligation to keep job open? ›What to include with the pre-adverse notice (full report, Summary of Rights, State notices NJ, WA, MA, NY) ›Ban the Box ordinance requirements (NYC, DC, SF, etc-reason for adverse action) Pre-adverse Action Policy Considerations

19 ›Timing of the second notice (reasonable amount of time) ›How is notice sent ( or snail mail) ›Ban the box considerations for timing of the second notice (some BTB laws state a time frame) ›Notice of individualized assessment (and how it differs in scope and purpose from pre-adverse notice) ›Avoiding any automated decisions (i.e. providing an auto pre- adverse notice after grading of a report) Adverse Action Policy Considerations

20 Ban The Box

21 What is Ban the Box? Basic Ban the Box: In its simplest form, ban the box makes it illegal to include a checkbox on a job application asking about criminal history.

22 ›Type of Employer/Employee Relationship ›Timing of criminal inquiry (post interview, after conditional offer) ›Job-related tests ›Private cause of action/penaties ›Limit on arrest or other record types ›Notice requirements Ban the Box on Steroids

23 The following cities or counties have enacted local ban the box ordinances that apply to private employers: ›Baltimore, MD ›Buffalo, NY ›Columbia, MO ›Montgomery County, MD ›Newark, NJ ›Philadelphia, PA ›Prince George County, MD ›Rochester, NY ›Seattle, SF ›Washington, D.C. ›New York, NY Ban the Box Jurisdictions to Watch

24 EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Use of Criminal Records (April 2012) Concern is Race Discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Disparate impact on protected classes (due to high arrest rates) EEOC relies on statistics EEOC guidance calls for a targeted screen that is job related and consistent with business necessity EEOC Discrimination Claims

25 Green Factors Nature and Gravity of the offense Time passed since the offense Nature of the job sought or held New Defacto Requirement: Individualized Assessment Compliance With EEOC Guidance for Criminal Background Checks

26 ›The facts or circumstances surrounding the offense or conduct ›The number of offenses for which the individual was convicted ›Older age at the time of conviction, or release from prison ›Evidence that the individual performed the same type of work, post conviction, with the same or a different employer, with no known incidents of criminal conduct ›The length and consistency of employment history before and after the offense or conduct ›Rehabilitation efforts, e.g., education/training ›Employment or character references and any other information regarding fitness for the particular position ›Whether the individual is bonded under a federal, state, or local bonding program Factors for Individualized Assessments

27 Questions

28 Angela Preston, Esq. SVP and Counsel, Corporate Ethics and Compliance SterlingBackcheck SterlingBackcheck is not a law firm, and does not dispense legal advice. The information provided herein is general business information, is not based on any particular facts or situations, and is not to be relied upon as legal advice, even if you are currently a client of SterlingBackcheck. You are encouraged to seek advice from your own legal counsel concerning matters covered in this presentation. THANK YOU!