Aiym Kaiyrlykyzy 1, MD, Sharon Welburn 1, BS, Igor Linkov 2, PhD, Kyle Freese 3, MPH, Dana Bovbjerg 4, PhD, Faina Linkov 3, MPH, PhD University of Pittsburgh,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ideal Setting Collaboration School Parent Medical Team.
Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
Informatics priorities and strategy Chris Carrigan Deputy to the PHE Chief Knowledge Officer, Information Services.
Carroll County Local Health Improvement Coalition LHIC Annual Conference November 12, 2014.
1 Supported self management for people living with cancer Stephen Hindle Cancer Survivorship Programme Lead 16 th April 2010.
Cancer Epidemiology: The need for Global Information sharing in obesity and cancer ? Edinburgh, August 2011 Faina Linkov, PhD Research Assistant Professor.
Department of Health and Human Services Measuring Clinical Lab Ordering Quality: Theory and Practice Steven M. Asch MD MPH VA, RAND, UCLA April 29, 2005.
Report Tile HealthierFeds. A Message From the President “…we've already discovered what works. And what works is to encourage people to exercise on a.
Health and Wellbeing Health Service Executive Healthy Ireland – The policy context for addressing health inequalities in Ireland Dr. Stephanie O’Keeffe,
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
Collaborating Partners –Edward R. Roybal Comprehensive Health Center (East Los Angeles) –Hubert H. Humphrey Comprehensive Health Center (South Los Angeles)
Strengthening partnerships: A National Voluntary Health Agency’s initiatives in managed care Sarah L. Sampsel, MPH* Lisa M. Carlson, MPH, CHES* Michele.
FORCE XRAY PROGRAM Evaluating Reports on Breast Cancer in the Media.
School of Nursing Health Literacy: A Factor in Translation of Evidence Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob, PhD, RN, FAAN J. Erlen, L. Burke, C. Stilley, C. Bender,
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
The Business Case for Bidirectional Integrated Care: Mental Health and Substance Use Services in Primary Care Settings and Primary Care Services in Specialty.
Obesity a Growing Problem! CAPT Martha Culver Acting Deputy Regional Administrator Nurse Consultant CDR Madelyn Reyes Senior Nurse Consultant Health Resources.
Why Wellness. Chronic Diseases related to lifestyle accounts for 75% of healthcare spend, and 96% of pharmacy spend. Major opportunity for impact is keeping.
Capabilities Briefing March 6, About Us Fully integrated marketing communications Team of 50+ #14 on O’Dwyer’s list of largest healthcare PR firms.
What You Will Do Identify changeable risk factors that affect your levels of health and personal fitness. Describe lifestyle choices that can improve overall.
Joe Selby, MD MPH EBRI December 15, 2011 What Might Patient (Employee)- Centered Research Look Like?
Patient Driven Healthcare Choices: The Role of the Healthcare Industry E Loren Buhle, Jr. PhD. Creator: OncoLink, Managing Your Diabetes, Medicine Online,
Education & Training Curriculum on Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) Strategies & tools to support health professionals caring for people living with MCC.
CMS as a Public Health Agency: Effective Health Care Research Barry M. Straube, M.D. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services January 11, 2006.
CTxCPCRN Central Texas Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Kick Off Grantee Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 15-16, 2009.
IN Shape Indiana Indiana State Department of Health Community Nutrition Obesity Prevention Division Community Resource Guides Project.
Shared Decision Making MAGIC — Making Good decisions In Collaboration — Shared decision making the norm — Multi-centre, large scale implementation programme.
Prostate Cancer Coalition of NC A statewide collaborative effort by concerned organizations and individuals to support awareness, early detection, and.
The KU Wichita Center for Breast Cancer Survivorship Judy Johnston, MS, RD/LD Research Instructor Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,
Using Quality Improvement to Insure Equality in Healthcare Quality Kevin Fiscella, MD, MPH University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry Departments.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
1 Comprehensive Cancer Control In Action COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CONTROL: How It Began A decade ago, state and national organizations began linking.
Childhood Overweight & Obesity DANA BURNS APRIL 7, 2014.
Warm-Up In your notebook complete the following statement: In your notebook complete the following statement: –When you have good health you… Give me more.
Plan For Change By Group 5. Identified problem: Obesity Ineffective Health Maintenance The people of Grand Traverse County have a lack of familiarity.
CANCER IN THE WORKPLACE: HOW EMPLOYERS CAN HELP Lynn Zonakis Principal, The Zonakis Group LLC October 23, 2015.
The Power of the Well-Being Assessment Using the Well-Being Assessment to Measure and Transform the Well-Being of an Organization Buyers Health Care Action.
Evaluation of Psychosocial Support Services for Adolescent and Young Adult Patients at Roswell Park Cancer Institute Allison Polakiewicz, MPA Project Proposal.
Mt. Hood. IOM Report: 10 Years After & More Coming Mitch Greenlick, Ph.D. Oregon State Representative April 21, 2010.
Self-Management Support Strategies for Improving your Patients’ CVD Risk Bonnie Jortberg PhD, RD, CDE Robyn Wearner RD, MA Department of Family Medicine.
 Define Survivorship  Demonstrate understanding of the history of cancer survivorship  State the requirements of the Commission on Cancer of the American.
Chronic Disease Tracking System  Problem  The current healthcare model focuses on one patient at a time in the office.  Chronic disease leads to higher.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9c: Quality Indicators.
Reaching Tobacco Treatment Providers Through Online Training INTRODUCTION  U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines recommend that health care professionals.
+ Patient Engagement Toolkit: Boosting Patient Knowledge, Skills and Self-efficacy Mary R. Talen, Ph.D. Director, Primary Care Behavioral Health Northwestern.
Textbook of Palliative Care Communication Section VIII: Opportunities for the Future.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
By Sherri Eldreth November 21, 2011 Kaplan University Introduction to Health Education HD Amy Thompson Ph.D., CHES.
Burden of Disease Research Unit (BOD) Towards a National Procedure Coding Standard for South Africa Lyn Hanmer Health Informatics R&D Co-ordination (HIRD)
Managing Patient-Centered Care. Outcomes Look at patient-centered care and the impact on health care delivery systems. Analyze the implications of are.
Evaluation of Health Care-Community Engagement
PAUSE to Learn Your Epilepsy
PATIENT CENTERED CARE- BUZZWORD OR REALITY?
Module 3: Orientation to Research
Mahsa Parviz, BS1 and Jennifer K. Cheng, MD, MPH1
Believed discrimination occurred because of their:
Development of Exercise Interventions for Healthy Adult Females with Overweight and Obesity: An Integrative Review Hannah Lee, B.S. School of Nursing Overweight.
Does One Size Fit All in Obesity Management?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Component of Standard Diabetes Care 1, 2 “… Ongoing patient self-management education and support are.
Health Services Research Postdoctoral Fellowship
Chapter 28 Cancer.
PCORI Research Priorities and Relevant Examples
What You Will Do Identify changeable risk factors that affect your levels of health and personal fitness. Describe lifestyle choices that can improve overall.
What You Will Do Identify changeable risk factors that affect your levels of health and personal fitness. Describe lifestyle choices that can improve overall.
Community Scientist Academy
What You Will Do Identify changeable risk factors that affect your levels of health and personal fitness. Describe lifestyle choices that can improve overall.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support: Component of Standard Diabetes Care 1, 2 “… Ongoing patient self-management education and support are.
An Association Between Provider Stigma and Metabolically Healthy
Presentation transcript:

Aiym Kaiyrlykyzy 1, MD, Sharon Welburn 1, BS, Igor Linkov 2, PhD, Kyle Freese 3, MPH, Dana Bovbjerg 4, PhD, Faina Linkov 3, MPH, PhD University of Pittsburgh, Department of Epidemiology 1, Consultant 2, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Ob/Gyn 3, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry 4 Introduction Method Discussion Results We worked with a diverse group of endometrial cancer/weight loss stakeholders to collect information about factors involved in the decision- making process that aids in patient centered obesity care. Stakeholders 3 gynecologic oncology providers, 2 bariatric surgery providers, 4 researchers, 5 endometrial cancer patients and caregivers N = 13 One stakeholder was not present to complete the survey. Measure A laboratory-developed, self-report 4 question survey–2 questions had 9 choices, 1 question with 3 choices, and an open-ended question–that focused on factors important in making decisions about enrolling in weight loss/lifestyle intervention programs. Data Analysis Descriptive statistics were used to determine which factors were important in the decision-making process for lifestyle changes This work was supported by Magee-Womens Research Institute & Foundation. Correspondence should be directed to Aiym Kaiyrlykyzy, Sharon Welburn, or Dr. Linkov at the MWRI, 3380 Boulevard of the Allies, Suite #334, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, or by at or Important factors identified through this research were consistent with what has been described in the literature. During the stakeholder meeting, providers and endometrial cancer patients alike were interested in future collaboration through research process and implementation. In the future, these findings can be used to develop a patient centered decision support framework that will aid obese endometrial cancer survivors in choosing a weight loss intervention to help avoid future obesity-related complications. This decision support tool will increase the likelihood of patient adherence to treatment, as it will empower endometrial cancer patients to select treatments most consistent with their values and needs. Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the U.S. Nearly two thirds of endometrial cancer survivors are overweight or obese, and most do not adopt healthier lifestyle after diagnosis. Traditional clinical research is shifting towards improving patient centered outcomes research (PCOR) strategies - helping patients make better informed health care decisions. PCOR potentially improves health care delivery and outcomes research by involving the voices of stakeholders. Learning more about decision-making process of obese endometrial cancer patients when considering weight loss interventions is important in reducing risk of recurrent cancer and other chronic diseases associated with malignancies. Our objective was to identify important factors in the decision making process about lifestyle interventions for endometrial cancer survivors. % of Stakeholders rating each factor as important Intervention Associated Factors The data collected will be used to implement an individualized tool to help patients determine which intervention is best for them. The tool will allow patients to choose between 5 alternatives presented (healthy eating, lifestyle intervention, bariatric surgery, online educational program, or no treatment). Availability on mobile device Effort Knowledge about existing interventions Ability to do with family Finances/Cost of weight loss programs Time Availability Convenience Family Support Understanding the need to lose weight Personal Factors: Convenience (69.23%), effort (61.54%), and finances (61.54%) were ranked as most important personal factors. Intervention Associated Factors: Overall effectiveness (76.92%), ease of access (69.23%), and reduction of disease (69.23%) were ranked most important intervention-associated factors. Healthcare Provider Factors: Provider knowledge (76.92%) about available options was ranked as the most important provider factor followed by provider support (62.54%) and availability (53.85%) of lifestyle change program at the provider’s office were ranked as the most important healthcare provider factors. % of Stakeholders rating each factor as important Personal Factors that Affect Lifestyle Change Ease of access to facilities Pain Reduction of disease Interest in behavioral interventions Parking availability Side effects Overall effectiveness in weight loss Perception of effectivenessSurgical consideration Healthcare Provider Factors Availability of lifestyle change program at provider’s office Knowledge of the healthcare provider about available options Provider supportive of lifestyle change % of Stakeholders rating each factor as important Factors Figure 3. Frequency of healthcare provider factors Figure 2. Frequency of intervention associated factors Figure 1. Frequency of personal factors that affect lifestyle change decision Factors Stakeholder group meeting picture. May 16, 2013 Figure 4. Decision support tree using DECERNS Software. More information can be found at