Make Listening Safe TM Initiative World Health Organization and International Telecommunications Union Brian Fligor, ScD, PASC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Every Child Matters: Change for Children Building a world-class workforce for children and young people David N Jones Children’s Services Improvement.
Advertisements

HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Binge Listening Is exposure to leisure noise causing hearing loss in young Australians? Harvey Dillon, Warwick Williams, Megan Gilliver, Elizabeth Beach.
Assessment and eligibility
HEARING CONSERVATION (PART 1) Noise Assessment, Interpretation of Results and Noise Reduction Options.
Assistive Technology Competencies for Educational Personnel.
The purpose of this Unit is to enable individuals to develop the key principles, values and attitude which are central to high quality care practice Key.
ISO Current status of development
WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT IMPLICATIONS FOR SMALL BUSINESS
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
OVERVIEW 1 HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM 28 Jan 2013.
Crisis and Risk Communication Course Development Update Damon Coppola June 7, 2011.
Guardianship for children deprived of parental care A handbook to reinforce guardianship systems to cater for the specific needs of child victims of trafficking.
Hazard Identification
Challenges of Global Alcohol Policy Developments FIVS Public Policy Conference 7-9 April 2014 Brussels, Belgium.
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE Day NOISE.
The Community Investment Triangle Targeting Our Resources Part 2: Targeting Future Investments.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
Noise at Work. Definitions Leq: Fluctuating instantaneous noise level is averaged over a period of time. Similar to TWA. Lepd: Daily personal noise exposure.8.
Petra Engelbrecht Stellenbosch University South Africa
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Control Of Noise At Work Regulations 2005 By Josh & Vishal.
Robert E. Novak Ph.D., CCC-A Clinical Professor- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences Director of Clinical Education in Audiology and Interim.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act and Regulations NT WorkSafe Anna McGill.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
Do negative attitudes towards loud music prevent music- induced hearing loss? Stephen Widén University West, Sweden Soly ErlandssonUniversity West, Sweden.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
20th IUHPE World Conference on Health Promotion, July 2010, Geneva, Switzerland Dr Heather Gifford Whakauae Research for Maori Health and Development.
Teens at Risk for Hearing Loss By Sonia Montalvo.
Strategic Plan Kidsafe NSW Inc.. ‘A Safer World for Kids’ Kidsafe NSW Inc.
Cochlear Implants American Sign Language Children & Cochlear Implants Psychological Evaluation of Implant Candidates James H. Johnson, Ph.D., ABPP Department.
Unit 3: Promoting Your Program CERT Program Manager.
Hearing and ipods Dr. Marshall Chasin, AuD., M.Sc, Reg. CASLPO, Aud(C), Doctor of Audiology.
Revising priorities in the statistical programme Management Group on Statistical Cooperation * 24 & 25 March 2011 * Carina Fransen.
Supporting self care A training package for health and social care professionals Matthew Critchlow.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
Regional Strategy on Human Resources for Health (WHO Western Pacific Region) Presentation by Dr Ezekiel Nukuro Regional Adviser, Human Resources.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
New Rules for the Digital Age NSW Ombudsman Symposium 26 May 2009.
Noise. Objectives Understand effects of noise Identify at risk personnel Identify ways to reduce noise exposure Identify hearing protection devices.
Global policy framework and standards on ICT accessibility UNDESA/DSPD FPRUM DISABILITY INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT Nairobi, Kenya 28 October.
Change for Children IN Salford. Salford City Council Review of governance 2004 Key drivers -Think customer -“Every child matters” -Vision for adult social.
Qualitative Target Audience Formative Research for Health and Development Communicatio n Presentation for SBCC Skills Building Training 8-10 Feb 2016 Agnes.
RISK COMMUNICATION VELIA ARRIAGADA RIOS INGENIERO AGRONOMO SERVICIO AGRICOLA Y GANADERO CHILE.
Comprehensive School Health: (CSH) An Integrated Approach to Promoting Wellness in a Healthy School Setting.
SDF Conference & Projects Fair 29 th October 2014 Rosie Kerr, Manager, North Lanarkshire Integrated Addiction Service Eleanor McDermott, Development Officer,
A primer on ear care and hearing loss prevention Occupational Noise Exposure 29 CFR Presented by Larry Sailer Can You Hear Me Now?
Toolbox presentation: How can we stop noise damaging hearing.
Situation Analysis on Standards for Safe Listening Simão Campos ITU-T Study Group 16 "Multimedia" ITU-T Workshop on Standards for Safe Listening Geneva,
NOISE Team Activities Working together for a sustainable future since 1889 CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA Noise Team.
Workshop on Standards for Safe Listening Standardized measurements of headphones/earphones Lars Birger Nielsen WP1/12 Chairman SG12 WP1:Terminals and multimedia.
Changing Behaviours for Safe Listening (to music on personal devices) Elena Altieri, World Health Organization, June 6, 2015.
A: You betcha!. It is possible for temporary or permanent hearing impairment to occur to those who use headphones at high volume.
Epidemiology of occupational diseases
NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS
Fitness and Conditioning
Criteria for Assessing MHPSS Proposals Submitted through the CAP, CERF and HRF Funding Mechanisms to the Protection Cluster.
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Adults
National Standards for Athletic Coaches
1 November 2017 Serious Case Reviews
World Hearing Day 2018 Hear the future.
Make Listening Safe.
Promoting healthy Hearing in musicians
Stephen Wheatley – CEO & Co-Founder
What you need to know about IEC/UL/EN Safety Standard
This presentation was delivered to the National Hearing Conservation Association annual conference 9th February 2019.
Introduction to the Review of the SI MQs NatSIP Associate/Scrutiner
Handset Manufacturers
Presentation transcript:

Make Listening Safe TM Initiative World Health Organization and International Telecommunications Union Brian Fligor, ScD, PASC Shelly Chadha, MD, MPH

WHO-ITU Stakeholders' Consultation for Safe Listening Devices Held on 1 October 2015 Participants: Academia Industry Standardization agencies (IEC, CENELEC) Professional organizations NGOs Governments

Outcomes Established the need of standards for safe listening devices Shared views and experiences Explored emerging technologies for safe listening. Gained an understanding of the importance of behaviour modification as part of the initiative

WHO-ITU Expert Consultation for Safe Listening Devices Held on 2 October 2015 Participants: Invited experts Standardization agencies (IEC, CENELEC) Audio Engineering Society WHO, ITU

Outcomes Agreed on the overall leadership of WHO and ITU in the process. Gained an understanding of the standardization process, including the need for coordination with other standardization agencies. Identified key areas of focus regarding standards for safe listening devices. Established the need to focus on behaviour modification, in parallel with development of technical standards.

Considerations for ITU Standards WHO working group on Safe Listening Devices’ standards Role of WHO and this working group is to ensure that the standards developed are in line with WHO’s vision and objectives (users can enjoy listening while keeping hearing safe). The working group is a group of experts who will advise and guide WHO on what are the most appropriate measures for safe listening and to review the technical information available. Members: Shelly Chadha, Brian Fligor, Christian Giguère, Christian Huggonet, Chuck Kardous, Michael Santucci, Warwick Williams

Considerations for ITU Standards WHO working group on Safe Listening Devices’ standards Need to involve all stakeholders in this effort (standardization organizations, professionals and industry) Standards under development require discussion on methods which maintain the quality of music and provide the user with information and option to exercise control. Standards should focus on: Dosimetry: integration of sound level over time Volume limitation: only under specific need Health communication messaging on user interface, packaging, manual Parental notification and/or controls

Dosimetry: Not just the level, it’s the “level over time” Sound-induced auditory injury follows dose-effect relationship Sound “overdose” results in metabolic overload, leading to apoptosis of structures in cochlea and primary auditory nerve fibers Well established damage risk criteria in workplace noise exposure studies 85 dBA for 8-hour daily exposure, 40-hr weekly exposure over working lifetime (8% at risk for “Material Hearing Impairment”) 90 dBA for 8-hour daily exposure, 40-hr weekly exposure over working lifetime (25% at risk for “Material Hearing Impairment”) Single-number level limiting ignores well-established science

Level alone matters when risk for acoustic trauma* * defined as a single exposure resulting in immediate injury to auditory system Generally, threshold level for acoustic trauma accepted as 140 dB SPL (peak) Literature suggests in highly susceptible individuals, this threshold might be as low as 132 dB SPL (peak) (Price, 1981)

Considerations for ITU Standards WHO working group on Safe Listening Devices’ standards There may be a need to provide stricter norms for children, as compared to adults Child specific directions/controls could be included (Damage Risk Criteria based on 40-year exposure). Assumes 40-years of exposure (“working lifetime”) – long enough? What is an acceptable degree of hearing loss/hearing loss risk? Tinnitus? Hyperacusis? Diplacusis?

Considerations for ITU Standards WHO working group on Safe Listening Devices’ standards WHO is initiating a review of current norms and limits and as a first step will explore whether these are suitable or need revision, based on existing research. Based on the outcomes of this, a plan will be developed to establish the most appropriate criteria. Standards under development currently will be based on current knowledge. These will have the possibility of revision should the risk criteria change in future.

Considerations for ITU Standards WHO working group on Safe Listening Devices’ standards Other than the music player itself need to focus on the ear/headphones and introduce ambient sound exclusion (e.g., passive sound isolation, active noise reduction) for consideration as part of the standards. CLL 72dBA CLL 72dBA, café (74 dBA) CLL 72dBA, airplane (82 dBA) CLL 72dBA, lawnmower (90 dBA) CLL 72dBA, café CLL 72dBA, airplane CLL 72dBA, lawnmower No Sound Isolation Passive Sound Isolation CLL 87 dBA, café (+13dB SNR) CLL 92 dBA, airplane (+10dB SNR) CLL 97 dBA, lawnmower (+7dB SNR) One can extrapolate the risk for hearing loss

Summary: a “wishlist” for a PLD Partnership between manufacturers, health promoters, and end users PLD provides tools for users to inform them of listening behaviour and potential risk over time Focus on dosimetry Level limiting against acoustic trauma, preserves music fidelity Ambient noise control (active noise reduction, passive sound isolation, or both) User interface that provides accessible interpretation to users and/or parents Controls for parents, options for users

All of the following are supporting materials: these slides are for explanatory purposes only

Headphone type and Chosen Listening Level Portnuff, Fligor & Arehart (2011)

Influence of Ambient Noise on Listening Level Estimated Ambient Noise Level in the Ear Canal in dBA Free-field Equivalent CLL in dBA Fligor and Ives: NIHL Prevention in Children, Oct 2006, Cincinnati, OH, USA

Acceptable HLPP strategy with PLD? Passive sound isolation: custom vs. non-custom Images used with copyright holders’ permission

Acceptable HLPP strategy with PLD? Active Noise Reduction and/or Passive Isolation

CLL 72dBA CLL 72dBA, café (74 dBA) CLL 72dBA, airplane (82 dBA) CLL 72dBA, lawnmower (90 dBA) CLL 72dBA, café CLL 72dBA, airplane CLL 72dBA, lawnmower CLL 87 dBA, café (+13dB SNR) CLL 92 dBA, airplane (+10dB SNR) CLL 99 dBA, lawnmower (+7dB SNR) No Sound Isolation Active Noise Reduction Influence of ambient noise on chosen listening level Earphones providing no sound isolation vs. earphones that provide active noise reduction to block ambient noise One can extrapolate the risk for hearing loss