We evaluated the length of time (in days) between the reported monitoring End Date and the date of submission to REMS Of the 33 sites (including Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference EAB Effectiveness Survey Results David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 9, 2006.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Module 8 The Optional Protocol.  Understand the main features of the communications and inquires procedures in the Optional Protocol  Identify the main.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
ESOS COMPLIANCE PROCESS 26 FEBRUARY REGULATORY APPROACH.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
1 Southern Connecticut State University Graduate Council Academic Standards Committee Procedures for Southern Connecticut State University.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
ARAVIND EYE CARE SYSTEM Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology ARAVIND EYE CARE SYSTEM Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute.
Survey Results MAPA Summary of February 2010 Survey.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
Options for Evaluating the Performance of a Tax Administration Agency
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
Module 6 Exposure Control and Personnel Monitoring.
CEDARS Validations Review and address data quality errors.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
OSS Reconciliation Billing December 2004 Project Operation Support System (OSS) Cost Recovery Billing TOMMY WILLIAMS, SR. PRODUCT MANAGER TITANIA ALEXANDER,
Chapter 5 Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
CBER CDISC Test Submission Dieter Boß CSL Behring, Marburg 20-Mar-2012.
1 Please log-in to your Comprehensive Plan  Visit:  Under “I Would Like To”, select “Access My PDE Applications”
Program Adds for RSS Webinar Presentation Version 1
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
Working with Projects Internal Perspective. Communication makes it easy Phone Local Indian chapter Telecons Monthly follow up Respond timely Direct.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-133 Presented to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
SPCAA Head Start & Early Head Start Mental Health and Disability.
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update August 25, 2015 Presenters: Amy Kearney, BA Director, Research and Analysis Team Thomas Miller, MA.
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.
Monitoring, supervision and quality control IDSP training module for state and district surveillance officers Module 11.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
Risk Management in premarketing phase Anshu Vashishtha MD PhD (in individual capacity employer : Watson Pharmaceuticals)
Ruth Carrico PhD RN FSHEA CIC Associate Professor Division of Infectious Diseases.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Outpatient Rehab Questionnaire Presented To: OP Rehab Providers May 2015 INTEGRATED CARE MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
Association Management Services. Comprehensive Management Services HOA Board Totem Creek Management Financial Oversight And Management General Day to.
Monitoring and 638 Contract Close-out. Contract Monitoring and Close-out After Award ▫ Meet with Tribe to discuss the Agreement  Include Monitoring Plan.
Data Management for Students with DisabilitiesData Management for Students with Disabilities Rachel Wilkinson – Data Coordinator, TDOERachel Wilkinson.
FTA D&A Audits: Tales from the Field and Experience of Your Peers Jack Mastrangelo, Senior Auditor John Spelman, Audit Team Leader FTA Drug & Alcohol Conference.
1 RIC 2009 Licensing Action Acceptance Review Stephen Sands and Donna Wright Division of Operating Reactor Licensing March 11, 2009.
Cyclical Monitoring Presented to State and Local Task Force.
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
INFORMAL REPORTS. 2 SPECIFIC GUIDELINES 3 III. SPECIFIC GUIDELINES TYPES of INFORMAL REPORTS A. Problem Analyses B. Recommendation Reports C. Equipment.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Nutrition. Triggers for Nutritional Services Referral  Growth and Weight Management  Health Conditions  Needs for Specialized Supports  Economic Problems.
John Kraman, Oklahoma SDE Nancy J. Smith, DataSmith Solutions Thursday, 2/14/2013 Oklahoma Data Pipeline Project Needs Assessment Survey: Process and Findings.
FRYSC CONTINUATION PROGRAM PLAN. NEEDS ASSESSMENT COVERSHEETS RATIONALE Consistency across the state, while allowing for individual school and.
Focused Monitoring SPR & I Training October 2009.
The Salvation Army Canada & Bermuda Territory, 2016.
Refine and Analyze Search Results In the ISI Web of Knowledge.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
ENERGY REGULATIONS IN KENYA. Who Are We & Who we have Served >120 Energy Audits NITA Licensed to conduct Energy Training Energy Project implementation.
Joint Contracting and Accreditation Process Nottingham City Council and NHS Nottingham City CCG.
SAC Meeting, February 4, 2016 School Accountability Committee Roles & Responsibilities.
The FTA Drug & Alcohol Audit Process George Gilpatrick & Michael Redington.
11/23/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.
PSYCH 550 Week 3 Learning Team Classical Conditioning Paper Prepare a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you examine the concept of classical conditioning.
PSYCH 570 Week 6 Individual Organizational Design Article Analysis Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
Information for Workers Issued a Radiation Monitoring Badge
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Secondary Attendance Clerk Appendix D Training
Message Center Training
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Accreditation Pathway
Title I Program Monitoring: Common Findings from FY18
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Presentation transcript:

We evaluated the length of time (in days) between the reported monitoring End Date and the date of submission to REMS Of the 33 sites (including Service Centers), 14 have reported Special Individual activity since Of those 14 sites, all but a few have reported consistently in the three-year period. Of the 14 reporting sites, 6 of them have had turnarounds (number of days between end of monitoring and file submission) greater than 50 days in at least one of the three analyzed years. 45 days appears to report SI records appears to be a reasonable time frame to expect the sites to be able to collect and process and report the records Special Individual (SI) Reporting Analysis Summary 1

Using DNFSB personnel rosters as an indicator of the presence of Special Individuals (SI), we found fairly consistent reporting of SI’s where there was DNFSB personnel dose records. –There were at least three sites that reported DNFSB records at the end of the year in 2010, but did not submit the interim records during the year. The DOE O 231.1B directs them to submit during the year and at the end of the year. This issue appears to have improved for 2011 and –There was at least one site that reported interim DNFSB activity during a year but did not submit the annualized records of said activity. We are examining this more closely Special Individual (SI) Reporting Analysis Summary (continued) 2

Our initial focus for contacting sites centered on the sites that had no SI reports submitted in the last three years. Of the 19 in this category, all but 5 have responded to our inquiry. Of those that responded, 6 sites reported they do not badge Special Individuals at their site. They may issue regular visitor badges that are processed with the annual submittal. 7 sites state that they have no process to submit SI individuals 1 site states that if SI visits, they are not badged – because they will not be in exposure areas. Several sites mentioned that SI is a gray area and causes confusion. All sites would benefit from further communication regarding the requirements for reporting Special Individual (SI) Reporting Analysis Summary (continued) 3

Areas of concern: Awareness of the requirements Clarification of the distinction between reporting interim records versus reporting an annualized summary record and the requirement to report both Defining and identifying Special Individuals Reconciliation of interim records to annual records 2012 Special Individual (SI) Reporting Analysis Summary (continued) 4