Connected and Automated Vehicles April 28, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Next Generation Jenny Hansen, Contractor – NG9-1-1 Project Coordinator USDOT/NHTSA.
Advertisements

1 V2V Safety Research for Heavy Commercial Vehicles 2013 ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting Arlington, VA September 24, 2013 Alrik L. Svenson National.
What Transportation can be
1 IntelliDrive SM IntelliDrive SM for Transit 101 ITS America Annual Meeting May 4, 2010 Jeffrey L. Spencer FTA.
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
FGDC Coordinaton Group Connected Vehicles & Digital Infrastructure Carl K. Andersen U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 21.
THE RISE OF THE CRASH-PROOF CAR John Capp & Bakhtiar Litkouhi IEEE Spectrum May 2014 IS 376 September 4, 2014.
Original vision for Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII):
G4 Apps The Impact of Connected Vehicles on Traffic Operations ISMA Traffic Expo October 1, 2014.
11 April 2013 USDOT Research Data Exchange Dale Thompson, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, and Gene McHale, Federal Highway Administration.
Caltrans Interests in Connected Vehicles
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Alrik L. Svenson US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration IntelliDrive.
Connected Vehicles: The Future of Transportation Safety and Efficiency.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Advancing Safety Through Innovation University Transportation Centers Safety Summit March 19-20, 2015 Jeffrey Onizuk Intelligent Transportation System.
GeoResources Institute Spatial Technologies for Freight Transportation Efficiency, Planning, and Safety Chuck O’Hara, Ph.D. Associate.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
The Vision of Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) Ralph L. Robinson ITS Integration Office September, 2007.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
1 Paul Pisano FHWA, Team Leader Road Weather & Work Zone Management Weather and the Connected Vehicle Presentation at the Connected Vehicle Program Public.
Role of the Highway-Rail Intersection in the National ITS Architecture IEEE WG14 June 20, 2000 Bruce Eisenhart Lockheed Martin Architecture Development.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
HYBRID ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR VANET
Smart cities Rasmus Lindholm, Director, ERTICO – ITS
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
ITS ePrimer Module 13: Connected Vehicles September 2013 Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
Meeting of State Pooled Fund Partners April 20, 2005 "Reducing Crashes at Rural Intersections: Toward a Multi-State Consensus on Rural Intersection Decision.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
ITS Program Update Moving Towards Implementation of Wireless Connectivity in Surface Transportation Talking Freight Webinar January 19, 2011.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Busan, South Korea September 2, 2003 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
1 25 th International Conference on IIPS, AMS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ An Update on FHWA Road Weather Management Initiatives Paul Pisano Federal Highway.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Connected Vehicle Program – Dynamic Mobility Applications Highlights for Tech Scan Scrum.
NOAA: Promoting Safe and Efficient Commerce and Transportation January 2005 Charlie Challstrom.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development Executing the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Research Program: Enabling Technology September 25, 2013 Deborah.
1 IntelliDrive SM Connectivity − the Future of Surface Transportation June 7, 2010 AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport Kate Hartman Research and Innovative.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
FHWA Perspectives on VII Pat Kennedy Road Weather Management Program Federal Highway Administration VII Weather Applications Workshop II June 21, 2006.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
1 Outlook for Intelligent Transportation Systems and Public Transit Best Practices Workshop ITS World Congress Orlando, FL October 16, 2011 Jeffrey L.
VII Applications Mike Schagrin, VII Applications Manager ITS Joint Program Office Research & Innovative Technology Administration USDOT Mike Schagrin,
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
VII Applications Mike Schagrin, VII Applications Manager ITS Joint Program Office Research & Innovative Technology Administration USDOT Mike Schagrin,
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
January 21, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
TransInfo First Annual Conference University of Buffalo August 13-14, 2015 Rick McDonough New York State Department of Transportation Office of Modal Safety.
Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy ITS Joint Program Office, USDOT April 10, 2013 Inputs to USDOT’s ITS Strategic Research Plan,
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 VII & Road Weather Pat Kennedy, Transportation Specialist FHWA/Office of Operations,
USDOT ITS and Operations Training Grant Zammit Operations Technical Service Team Manager Office of Technical Services – Resource Center
ITS: The Next Generation Shelley Row Director Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
ITS P ROGRAM O VERVIEW JEFFREY F. PANIATI ITS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Smart Columbus Overview
Connected Automated Vehicles
Vehicle to Infrastructure Deployment Coalition (V2I DC) & SPaT Challenge Overview January 8, 2017.
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
Presentation transcript:

Connected and Automated Vehicles April 28, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)

2 U.S. Department of Transportation Today’s Transportation Challenges Data Sources: Quick Facts: 2014 Data, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (January 2016); 2015 Annual Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute (Aug 2015); Centers for Disease Control Mobility 6.9 billion hours of travel delay $160 billion cost of urban congestion Mobility 6.9 billion hours of travel delay $160 billion cost of urban congestion Safety 32,675 highway deaths in million crashes in 2014 Leading cause of death for ages 11, Safety 32,675 highway deaths in million crashes in 2014 Leading cause of death for ages 11, Environment 3.1 billion gallons of wasted fuel 56 billion lbs of additional CO 2 Environment 3.1 billion gallons of wasted fuel 56 billion lbs of additional CO 2

3 U.S. Department of Transportation Dedicated Short Range Communications  What it is □ Low latency, Wi-Fi-like medium adapted for vehicle environment □ Original FCC spectrum allocation in 1999 □ FCC revised allocation in 2004 and 2006  How the technology works □ Data can be distributed in a broadcast mode (300m range – line of sight) □ Peer-to-peer data exchanges as well □ Engineered to work well in a moving vehicle environment □ Privacy is protected

4 U.S. Department of Transportation DSRC Spectrum Basics  Packet-based medium based on IEEE 802 family specifications for lower-layer definition  Additional network layer definitions and a cryptographic process for establishing trust and protecting confidentiality given in IEEE 1609 family  Payload definitions and performance requirements for common data units established in SAE standards  General IP transport available with certain priority requirements and packet size limitations Source: FCC Report and Order FCC

5 U.S. Department of Transportation Integrated DSRC Devices A device installed in a vehicle during the production process with the capable of sending and receiving DSRC messages.

6 U.S. Department of Transportation Aftermarket DSRC Devices A device installed in a vehicle in a post- production fashion capable of sending and receiving DSRC messages.

7 U.S. Department of Transportation Roadside Equipment Unit Devices installed along the roadway capable of sending and receiving DSRC messages…and can interface with traffic control systems (e.g., traffic signal controllers)

8 U.S. Department of Transportation Connected Vehicle Environment

9 U.S. Department of Transportation Organizing Principles  Privacy by design in all parts of the implementation, □ Users should trust that their private information will not be revealed or used without their knowledge and permission.  Security by design Information on how the Security Certificate Management System impacts privacy and security of data (SCMS)  Nation-wide interoperability of safety-related communications, □ Information that improves the safety of transportation services should be done the same way nation-wide.  Nation-wide interoperability of non-safety related communications, □ Information that provides improved mobility or environmental impacts should be presented in a consistent manner to all users, regardless of origin.  Equitable access for individual users to basic transportation data, □ Everyone should have access to data available for safety and mobility improvement using the equipment of their choice.

10 U.S. Department of Transportation Safety Pilot Model Deployment Program  73 miles of instrumented roadway with 27 roadside units in Ann Arbor, MI  Over 2,800 vehicles equipped with a variety of device types  Various V2V and V2I applications  Testing of prototype security mechanisms and device certification processes  1 year of data collection to support 2013 NHTSA decision  Transitioned to an operational environment

11 U.S. Department of Transportation  Participate in Concept Development Phase Webinars for the three Pilot Sites (see website for exact dates and times) Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program PROGRAM GOALS PILOT SITES U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office Feb 2016Mar 2016Apr 2016May 2016Jun 2016Jul 2016Aug 2016 STAY CONNECTED Concept of Operations Webinars Performance Measurement Webinars Comprehensive Deployment Plan Webinars

12 U.S. Department of Transportation O VERVIEW OF P ILOT D EPLOYMENT P ROPOSED CV A PPLICATIONS New York City (NYC) Curve Speed Warning Pedestrian in Signalized Crosswalk Warning (Transit) Red Light Violation Warning Reduced Speed/Work Zone Warning Blind Spot Warning (BSW) * Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL) * Forward Crash Warning * Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) * Lane Change Assist (LCA) * Stationary Vehicle Ahead (SVA) * Vehicle Turning Right in Front of Bus Warning (Transit) Advanced Traveler Information System Emergency Communications and Evacuation (EVAC) Freight-Specific Dynamic Travel Planning and Performance Measurement (F-ATIS) Intelligent Traffic Signal System (I-SIG) Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System (PED-SIG) Eco-Speed Harmonization ICF/Wyoming Work Zone Warnings Spot Weather Impact Warning Situational Awareness Freight-Specific Dynamic Travel Planning Automatic Alerts for Emergency Responders CV-enabled Weather-Responsive Variable Speed Limits Road Weather Advisories for Trucks and Vehicles Truck Parking Availability for Freight Carriers Tampa (THEA) Curve Speed Warning Pedestrian in Signalized Crosswalk Warning (Transit) Emergency Electronic Brake Lights (EEBL) Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Intersection Movement Assist (IMA) Vehicle Turning Right in Front of Bus Warning (Transit) Intelligent Traffic Signal System (I-SIG) Mobile Accessible Pedestrian Signal System (PED-SIG) Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Probe-enabled Traffic Monitoring *Deployment of applications is dependent upon Final ConOps and funding

13 U.S. Department of Transportation ICF/Wyoming Pilot Deployment Overview Objective:  Reduce the number and severity of adverse weather- related incidents (including secondary incidents) in the I-80 Corridor in order to improve safety and reduce incident-related delays. □ Focused on the needs of the commercial vehicle operator in the State of Wyoming Approach:  Equip fleet vehicles (combination of snow plows, maintenance fleet vehicles, emergency vehicles, and private trucks) that frequently travel the I-80 corridor to transmit basic safety messages (BSMs), collect vehicle and road condition data and provide it remotely to the WYDOT TMCs  Deploy DSRC roadside equipment (RSE) to supplement existing assets and initiatives  Road weather data shared with freight carriers who will transmit to their trucks using exiting in-vehicle systems Source: Wyoming DOT Deployment Team:  Prime Consultant: ICF International; Partner State: Wyoming DOT  Sub Consultants: Trihydro Corporation, National Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Wyoming, Catt Laboratory and McFarland Management

14 U.S. Department of Transportation ICF/Wyoming Pilot Deployment Vision

15 U.S. Department of Transportation Research Data Exchange (RDE)  The RDE is a Web-based resource that collects, manages, and provides access to multi-source and multi-modal transportation data  Quality-checked, well-documented, and freely available to the public  Currently has ITS and connected vehicle data from 17 locations  More data environments will be added, including data from Dynamic Mobility Application (DMA) prototypes.  The Saxton Traffic Operations Laboratory may hold data that cannot be released to the public Connected vehicle, mobile device, and infrastructure sensor data captured during the Smart City Demonstration are expected to be broadly shared with the community to inform prospective deployers of Smart City applications

16 U.S. Department of Transportation Remember: DSRC – a Key Part of Communications  Large-scale pilots are underway that will exercise the complete system architecture with the full capability of DSRC  We have arrived at a consensus of interpretation of standards for the next generation of installations  Production programs are underway DSRC is ready to be part of the next Generation of Wireless Media

17 U.S. Department of Transportation What are the Next Steps?  Identify and engage stakeholders and technical experts!  Follow the CV Pilot Deployers ( □ ICF/Wyoming □ New York City □ Tampa (THEA)  Seek out Training Opportunities ( □ CV 101 Connected Vehicle Basics □ CV 102 Applications and Planning for Implementation □ CV 201 Deployment Planning for Implementing a Connected Vehicle Environment

18 U.S. Department of Transportation Levels of Automation

19 U.S. Department of Transportation What Makes Automation Easier?  Low speeds  Good GPS visibility  Good weather  Known routes  Simple environment and road rules  Simple interactions with other road users  Possibility of human monitoring and intervention

20 U.S. Department of Transportation Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Video Link -

21 U.S. Department of Transportation CACC Car Following Model- Longitudinal Control

22 U.S. Department of Transportation CACC Car Following Model - Lateral Control  Lagging_Gap > Critical lagging gap  Leading_Gap > Critical leading gap  V0-V1<Leading Critical Speed Differential  V2-V0<Lagging Critical Speed Differential

23 U.S. Department of Transportation Automated Lane Change/Merge  Research Question: Can the use of automated control, V2V, I2V, and/or vehicle sensors to execute traffic movements such as lane change and merge maneuvers assist in fully realizing the identified mobility and safety benefits of other connected automated applications (e.g., CACC)?  Work to Date: A connected, automated lane change maneuver was successfully demonstrated on a close course with three vehicles. □ The maneuver took approximately 10 s to complete □ The vehicles were able to maintain desired spacing with minimal error (within 2 m), speed oscillation, or passenger discomfort. Freeway Entrance with Infrastructure Support Joining into Car Convoy - Lane Change/Merge Weaving (Cloverleaf Enter/Exit Lane) Zipper Merge

24 U.S. Department of Transportation Stay Connected Brian Cronin Director, Office of Operations Research, FHWA Contact for CV Pilots Program: Kate Hartman Team Lead, Program Management and Evaluation Contact for Knowledge Transfer Program: Kevin Gay Team Lead, ITS Knowledge Transfer and Policy Website: operations/