ELearning & Its Potential Tito O.OKUMU E-Learning Manage E-Learning Manager Presentation to College of Health Sciences on 9 th August 2012

Scope Current Trends in Higher Education Institutions Internationally Locally

Teacher- Student Relationship

The Interactions Learners interact directly with content that they find in multiple formats, and especially on the Web Video, audio, computer conferencing, chats, or virtual world interaction. The environments are rich, and allow for the learning of social skills, the collaborative learning of content, and the development of personal relationships among participants. Many choose to have their learning sequenced, directed, and evaluated with the assistance of a teacher.

Course Design Course Materials Learner Support Services and responsibilities of learner expectations Learning strategy to be followed Monitoring & Evaluation Areas to be Considered

In Makerere University Adaptation  Domesticate to fit your facilitation mode  Domesticate to fit the Personal Learning Environment of the student Use it in Teaching & Learning  Design the courses to take this in effect  Bring the students on board Identify the usage among students Identify challenges faced by the student Examine alternatives that are available

References Anderson, T. (2008), The Theory And Practice Of Online Learning, Accessed Online edited-by-Terry-Andersonhttp:// edited-by-Terry-Anderson Beetham, H (2007), Chapter 2: An approach to learning activity design. In H Beetham and R Sharp (eds) Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Designing and delivering e-learning p26-40, London, Routeledge. Berlach, R. G. (1997). The portfolio approach to evaluation; In Pospisil, R. and Willcoxson, L. (Eds),Learning Through Teaching, p Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University, February Perth: Murdoch University. Black, P and D. Wiliam, (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment, in Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1(1), URL Bower, M (2008), Affordance Analysis, Matching Learning Tasks with Learning Technologies, Educational Media International, 45(1), 3-15 Calfee R. & Perfumo, P. (1993), Student Portfolios: Opportunities for a revolution in Assessment, Journal of Reading, 36, , URL onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ /tl.7408/pdf Churches, A (2008), Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy, URL Article in readerhttp://edorigami.wikispaces.co/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy Connole, G., Dyke M., Oliver m., & Seale, J (2004), Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design, Computers and Education 43(1-2), available on URL Hammond, M (2009), What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Communication Technologies, URL Hauser, J. (1994), College Entries into Portfolio Assessment- Why, How and What to watch for? Kemp, J.E., G.R. Morrison & S.M. Ross (2004). Designing effective instruction, 4th Edition, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Kennewell, S (2001)'Using Affordances and Constraints to Evaluate the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching and Learning’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 10:1,101 — 116, Routledge, London, Khan, B. (2005), Managing e-Learning: Chapter 5 Pedagogical Issues, Design, deliver, implementation and evaluation. Pp Hersey: Information Science Publishing. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Mcgriff, S.J. (2006), Standards And Competencies For Graduates Of Instructional Technology Education Programs, Association For Educational Communications And Technology Bloomington, Indiana Merriam, S. and Caffarella (1991, 1998) Learning in Adulthood. A comprehensive guide, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Siemens, G. & Tittenberger, P (2009), Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning, available from URL

Thank you