Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International.
Advertisements

Community Choice Aggregation In San Mateo County San Mateo County Board of Supervisors February 24, 2015.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
4 “Buckets” -- Political, Community, Technical, Financial
Sonoma Clean Power Cordel Stillman Deputy Chief Engineer Steve Shupe Deputy County Council.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Community Choice Energy A Local Energy Model to Green the Grid, Provide Customer Choice and Boost Local Economies April 26, 2015 Presented by: Jim Eggemeyer.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
System Benefits Charge in New York: Technology & Market Development Program 2012 – 2016.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Transformation of the Electric Power Industry: Value of Regulatory Impact Assessments Greg R. White Commissioner.
Expanding Local Energy Options through Community Choice Aggregation National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) December 18, 2012.
Greening The Grid Through Community Choice Aggregation US EPA Webinar March 6, 2012.
Community Choice Energy In San Mateo County County CCE Advisory Committee May 28, 2015.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
1 Clean Energy, A Strong Economy, and a Healthy Environment William J. Keese Western Governors’ Association June 1, 2007 European Insulation Manufacturers.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Application for New or Different Service South San Joaquin Irrigation District (SSJID) Case Study San Joaquin LAFCo CALAFCO 2010 Annual Conference October.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
Local and Regional Govt Programs Jeremy Battis Regulatory Analyst, Energy Division May 7, 2015 Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Workshop California.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Southern California Edison SM Southern California Edison Company Proposed AB920 Net Surplus Compensation Rate [NSCR] July 9, 2010.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
1 Strategic Plan | May Decisions on rates, budgets, investments, programs and services for six years ( ) The Strategic Plan.
CONSUMER CHOICE AGGREGATE Presented to the Counties General Services Association - August 13, 2015.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Projections: Revised Cases 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission December.
Community Choice Energy (CCE) In San Mateo County
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
Lessons Learned from Existing RTOs John Moore January WCEA Meeting January 7 th, 2016.
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Renewables Portfolio Standard Status Report California Public Utilities Commission February 26 th, 2008.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Community Choice Energy In California May 24 and June 9, 2016.
Aggregated Energy Data Community Planning December 16, 2015.
Village of La Grange Municipal Aggregation Hearing January 28, 2013 and February 11, 2013 What is Electricity Aggregation?
June 22, 2006 Development of the Marin County Community Choice Aggregation Project Agenda Background Project Overview Schedule.
PARTNERSHIP INTRODUCTION | 1 Introducing the Silicon Valley Community Choice Energy Partnership Saratoga City Council Wednesday, November 4, 2015 Melody.
COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING July 29, 2015 Summit County 2015 Climate Action Plan.
DPS Data Technical Conference Empire State Plaza, Albany December 16, 2015.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
May 9 th, 2016 California Public Utilities Commission Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) Workshop.
PCE Program Debrief Jim Eggemeyer, Director, Office of Sustainability Shawn Marshall, LEAN Energy US March 24, 2016.
Community Choice Aggregation Update
City and County of San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission
Western Riverside Council of Governments
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
Phase 3 Solar Feasibility Study Findings and Recommendations
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Stevenson 5 Capacity Planning.
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
Presentation transcript:

Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015

Benefits for Local Governments Local control over energy mix – Meet or exceed Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS). Economic development – Create quality jobs and local, renewable generation assets. Environmental – Meet or exceed Climate Action Plan goals. Local energy programs – Integrated Demand Side Management. Rate stability – Lower costs for homeowners and businesses. Consumer choice – Competition for lower rates.

Steps Required to Launch CCA Technical Feasibility Study – Ongoing. CCA Ordinance – All entities must opt-in. Implementation Plan – Must be certified by the CPUC. Utility Service Agreement – Filed with CPUC establishes CCA/IOU relationship. Governing Entity – Legal body (JPA) that manages CCA operations. Customer Enrollment – Must give consumers the opportunity to opt- out and return to IOU bundled service.

Establish Regional CCA Task Force Develop a Regional CCA Task Force. Share other jurisdictions’ experiences in implementing CCA. Discuss potential CCA governance and financial models for CCA operations. Work with cities in the County to gauge interest in CCA. Explore issues related to scale in a County-wide program. Develop risk mitigation strategies. Host regular meetings. Send updates to Task Force members. Track action items and next steps.

Develop a 20-Year Budget Procure aggregated load profile data from SCE for unincorporated LA County and all cities served by SCE. Develop a 20-year Budget projecting all costs associated with operating a CCA. Develop modeling which will determine retail rates. Electricity loads to be served within CCA jurisdictions. Costs to procure wholesale power to serve the electricity loads (traditional and clean power). Scenarios for the number of customers to be served. Other costs associated with operating a CCA.

SCE Data Required Information Normally Provided at No Charge Number of accounts in each Rate GroupNo Charge Aggregate annual consumption for each Rate GroupNo Charge Aggregate annual consumption for each Rate GroupNo Charge Aggregate coincident demand in each Rate GroupNo Charge Coincidence peak factors which estimate coincident demandsNo Charge Standard system average load profiles by Rate GroupNo Charge The proportional share in a CCA’s territory or proposed territory as defined in the Commission’s Energy Efficiency Policy Manual No Charge

SCE Data Required (continued) Additional Information Monthly Energy Efficiency participation data provided for Commission reportingNo Charge Mapping of Rate Schedules by Rate GroupNo Charge Public Goods Charge, Residential Tier Data, Generation Revenue Information$ Special Requirements Data Base Processing Fee (required for any report below)$ Aggregate by Zip Code$ Aggregate by Customer Status (Direct Access vs. Bundled Customers)$ Aggregate by Rate Schedule$ Total Cost of Data Requested Payable to SCE$801.60

Comparison to SCE CCA customers will pay the CCA’s cost for generation and SCE’s cost for non-generation (transmission and distribution). CCA customers will pay the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) fee and other regulated charges. CCA rates must be at or below SCE’s rates for the analysis period. Study will forecast SCE’s generation and non-generation rates as well as projecting the PCIA based on the most recent CPUC decision regarding the calculation of the PCIA.

Financing Options Some level of working capital financing will be necessary to support startup of the CCA program. Financing costs will be recovered through retail rates. The current study will explore options for financing and determine the associated costs to be recovered through rate design.

Economic Development One goal of the CCA will be to invest in local renewable resources and integrated demand side management. The CCA will have a positive impact on the local economy and create quality jobs in the service area. The current study will model the economic impact of CCA and estimate the direct and indirect benefits. The modeling will identify potential changes in economic activity in the CCA service area based on different scenarios, and determine the resulting CCA specific economic development potential.

Cash Flow Analysis Cash Flow Analysis estimates the level of working capital that will be required during the start-up and customer phase-in period through full implementation. The analysis will focus primarily on the costs and revenues associated with implementation, and will account for the transition or “Phase-In” of CCA Customers from SCE’s service territory. The Cash Flow Analysis identifies funding requirements while recognizing the potential lag between payments received and payments made during the implementation period.

Marketing and Notifications Statute requires minimum customer enrollment/notification within a 120 day window. Minimum 60 days prior to launch. Within 60 days post launch. Marin and Sonoma differed greatly in marketing approach. Need to establish a brand. Develop marketing strategic plan. Local, community based vs. regional. Determine level of marketing and outreach.

Reports A draft report with the results of the feasibility analysis will be provided after the preliminary analysis is finalized. Comments will be incorporated and a final report will be submitted to LA County. The final report will have sufficient analytical data to allow local governments to make a decision to adopt CCA.