Alternative Approach to Enduring Exit Flat Capacity & Revenue Recovery Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code Brussels – 19 July 2011 Introduction.
Advertisements

UK Gas Entry Regime – Review of existing Interruptible Arrangements & Potential Reforms for this Winter.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Mod 0508 Revised Distributed Gas Charging Arrangements  Proposed change to take into account that flows from DN Entry points to DN Supply Points should.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Copyright 2003 PJM 1 PJM’s Annual FTR Auction.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
EU Tariff Code Update 23 rd June EU Tariff Code Update – early feedback  Informal ACER feedback:  Draft code not on line with FG and insufficient.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
NTS Update Gas Customer Forum 25 th September 2006.
I&P: Contracts Clinic 24/02/06 1 Minutes Table Derivation & Application of Overflow The focus of the presentation is on principles: How it works how we.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
UK GAS DISTRIBUTION DN Charging Methodology Forum NGGD Oct-14 Mod0186 Dave Chalmers / Mike Lapper.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
Transfer & Trades Special Transmission Workstream
A layman’s guide to the structure of LDZ gas charges 27 July 2009 Please note – in the interests of clarity and accessibility, simplifications have been.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
DN Update 24 th May 2007 LDZ System Charges Capacity/Commodity Split and Interruptible Discounts.
Review Group 291 – Balancing Arrangements Default Cashout Workshop 3 – 21 st June 2010.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Gas Balancing Alert Transmission Workstream – Oct 2005 Ritchard Hewitt.
10 November 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Modification Proposal 0086 “Introduction of gas demand management reserve arrangements” 1 st June 2006 Phil Broom and.
DNPC06 LDZ NEC Charges Denis Aitchison 25 th January 2010.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS NUMBERING Susan Horne Project Officer International Training Program 8 September 2006.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
DNPD04 LDZ Exit Capacity Charges- Discussion Report Denis Aitchison 27 th July 2009.
Presented by : Steven J Edwards, Head of Income and Pricing, Wales & West Utilities GDN Allowed and collected revenue awareness presentation for Shippers.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
The Future for Power Sector Regulation in Ontario Jan Carr Vice Chair, Ontario Energy Board APPrO Canadian Power Conference & Trade Show November 24, 2004.
Mod Clarifications Transmission Workstream 6 August 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Fundamental review of entry charging principles UNC Transmission Workstream - 6 th August 2009.
The calculation of the NTS Optional Commodity tariff (NTS Shorthaul) in the Enduring Exit Period Richard Hounslea/Debra Hawkin National Grid NTS, Gas Charging.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
Estimation of Long Run Capacity Costs Gas TCMF 26 th April 2006.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Meter Error – NTS Revenue Flows Gas TCMF – 2 nd December 2010.
Gas Transmission Charging Review: Final Capacity Charging Proposal Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
Draft Decision on the Reset of Prices for Electricity Distribution Businesses Presentation to Market Analysts 19 July 2011.
Background Current balance of LDZ System and Customer charges
Entry Capacity Overrun price calculation
Non-approved draft Transmission Workstream, 6th December 2007
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Danishtah Parker 0621 Workgroup 26 April 2018
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
The Proposals Restructure the LDZ system charges target capacity/commodity split from 50:50 to 95:5 Introduce partial capacity charges for Interruptible.
Presentation on behalf of all DNs Lorraine Goodall - SGN
Development Modification Proposal 0337: Introduction of a Inter-day Linepack Product – User Pays Options Review Group August th November.
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Flat, flex, assured pressures Network Development Statement
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Approach to Enduring Exit Flat Capacity & Revenue Recovery Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006

Issue  Indicative charges from NTS GCD 01 would recover approximately 45% of TO Exit revenue with the remainder recovered via commodity charges.  Responses consistently not in favour and suggest adjusting charges to collect majority of allowed revenue  How could we set Flat Capacity Charges to minimise any TO Commodity Charge?  Assumptions:  Zero Flexible Capacity Reserve Price  No Flexible Capacity target revenue

Enduring Capacity Allocation – Transportation Model Approach TypeProposal Prevailing NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Pay prevailing charge for year of use Annual NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Pay bid price, subject to reserve price equal to forecast price:  for Gas Year Y+1  for Gas Year Y+2  for Gas Year Y+3 Daily NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Pay bid price, subject to reserve price equal to prevailing charge for the Gas Year Daily Interruptible NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Pay bid price, subject to reserve price equal to 0 p/kWh

Proposal  Calculate target revenue (50% of TO Allowed Revenue) for Years Y, Y+1, Y+2, Y+3  Calculate Flat Capacity prices for Years Y, Y+1, Y+2, Y+3  Use additive adjustment as defined in NTS GCM 01  Redistribute Flexibility Capacity Revenue via negative (Flat) commodity charge.  NB Capacity Neutrality would create perverse incentive to procure excessive minimal priced capacity.

Option 1 - Reset prices each year  Calculate Flat Capacity price each year for Years Y to Y+3  E.g. In 2007 calculate Flat Capacity price for 2010  Recalculate 2010 Flat Capacity price in 2008 and 2009 and use for flat capacity auction Reserve price.  Calculate Prevailing 2010 Flat Capacity price in 2010  2008, 2009 & 2010 based on latest network, supply & demand and forecast TO revenue data  Retain network expansion cost estimates (Expansion Factor) from time of first application  e.g. use 2007 expansion factor to calculate 2010 prevailing prices and 2008 & 2009 auction reserve prices for 2010 capacity.

Option 2 – Only set prices once  Calculate Flat Capacity price each year for Year Y+3  E.g. In 2007 calculate Flat Capacity price for 2010  Use this price in 2008 and 2009 for flat capacity auction Reserve price.  TO Exit Commodity charge used to manage over/under recovery

Conclusions  Calculating Flat Exit Capacity charges to recover forecast TO revenue & Redistributing all Flexibility Capacity revenue through a negative commodity charge element should generate stable and cost reflective Flat Capacity charges.  While setting prices three years ahead of the relevant year (options 2) has merits, it might effectively prejudge the auction outcome and lead to less cost reflective charges. This would not be the case if charges were reset for each year (Option 1)  Retaining the network expansion cost estimates (Expansion Factor) from time of application would help to maintain stability & predictability