C-CDA Scorecard Rubrics Review of CDA R2.0 Smart C-CDA Scorecard Rules C. Beebe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) eDoC Administrative Documents Templates for HL7 Orders October 25, 2013.
Query Health QRDA Requirements
C-CDA Constraints FACA - Strategy Discussion June 23, 2014 Mark Roche, MD.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Clinical Document Architecture R2 and C-CDA Comparison April 24, 2013.
VSAC Users’ Forum Thursday, January 15 2:00 – 3:00 PM, EST.
Update on Vocabularies and Value Sets for Meaningful Use Betsy Humphreys, MLS, FACMI Deputy Director National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
3/18/19990© 1999, Health Level Seven, Inc. Introduction: Vocabulary domains Marital Status –single (never married) –married –divorced –separated “Vocabulary”
1 Definitions Value set: A list of specific values, which may – or may not – contain subsets of one or more standard vocabularies, that define or identify:
Stage 2 EHR Certification: NLM Vocabulary Update Betsy Humphreys, MLS, FACMI Deputy Director National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
The Final Standards Rule John D. Halamka MD. Categories of Standards Content Vocabulary Privacy/Security.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
1 SPL Technology Presentation The Technology of Structured Product Labeling Presented by Robert H. Wallace 06 June 2004.
© 2011 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document are confidential and proprietary to Octagon Research Solutions,
Dual-Conformant C-CDA
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Work Group Workgroup Update Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University 30 June, 2010.
Topic 6 Topic 6 PDC 264, Revise DS 867I and MILSTRAP Issue Transactions to Support Navy Requirements for Reason for Reversal Code SDR Committee Meeting,
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Our Joint Playing Field: A Few Constants Change Change Our missions (if defined properly) Our missions (if defined properly) Importance of Community Engagement.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Stage 2 EHR Certification: NLM Vocabulary Update Betsy Humphreys Deputy Director, NLM.
Referral request - data classification Patient information – Patient demographics, covered by MU2 and CCDA requirements – Patient identifier (Med Rec Number)
Betsy L. Humphreys Betsy L. Humphreys ~ National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
Stage 2 EHR Certification: NLM Vocabulary Update Betsy Humphreys Deputy Director, NLM.
S&I Framework B Data Elements (Harm. Team) October 6, 2011.
Lecture 7 Integrity & Veracity UFCE8K-15-M: Data Management.
March 27, 2012 Standards and Interoperability Framework update.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
Clinical Document Architecture. Outline History Introduction Levels Level One Structures.
PREPARED BY Connected Care Standard for transfer of care and shared care applications 7 November 2012.
HIT Policy Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School 16 July, 2009.
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
HIT Standards Committee S&I and CDA – Update and Discussion November 16 th, 2011 Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
AMIA 2007 Monday, Nov :30-1:30 National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services UMLS ® Users Meeting.
MATT REID JULY 28, 2014 CCDA Usability and Interoperability.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
SHOPS is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. Abt Associates leads the project in collaboration with Banyan Global Jhpiego Marie Stopes.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup, Vocabulary Task Force Update on Vocabulary For Stage 2 Jamie Ferguson, Kaiser Permanente Betsy Humphreys,
HL7 SDWG Topic October 29, 2015 David Tao.  HL7 Success! C-CDA 2.1 is cited, and Care Plan is in 2015 Edition Certification Final Rule  Common Clinical.
S&I PAS SWG March 20, 2012 Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Presentation 1.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.
HIT Standards Committee Vocabulary Task Force Task Force Report and Recommendation Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente Betsy Humphreys National Library of.
1 October, 2015 HL 7 Working Group Meeting. FDA UDI Rule – 9/24/2013 Unique device identifier (UDI) means an identifier that adequately identifies a device.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
Query Health Technical WG 6/14/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm RI and Spec Updates2:05 – 2:10 pm QRDA Discussion2:10 – 3:00 pm.
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
HTML5 and CSS3 Illustrated Unit C: Getting Started with CSS.
Virginia Administrative Training Module 1: Processing, Online, Scoring and Reporting Training Presentation Training Presentation Working Within PearsonAccess.
NAACCR CDA Pilot Project - Overview, Status, and Findings 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, Co-Chair, NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group; Health Scientist,
Implementation Workgroup Udayan Mandavia, iPatientCare, Inc. With: Kedar Mehta and Arnaz Bharucha July 28, 2014 Constraining the CCDA User Experience Presentation.
3M Health Information Systems 1© 3M All Rights Reserved. 3M Health Information Systems Data Standardization Interoperability.
Patrick McLaughlin National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
Table core Part file Answer file Group file
T3/Tutorials: Data Submission
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
Getting Started with CSS
Procedure Note (V3) ** = Required sections
Networking and Health Information Exchange
QRDA I STU R5 Updates Since pre-ballot content Review
UDI Key Features: Medical Device Integration
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
CDA Discrete Entry concepts
Using Templates and Library Items
4. Allergy severity The severity of an allergy is not displayed by the CDA Display Tool, and this is considered relevant to the HP. PT MAJOR The severity.
Evidence of Infection (Dialysis) Reporting in CDA and greenCDA:
Presentation transcript:

C-CDA Scorecard Rubrics Review of CDA R2.0 Smart C-CDA Scorecard Rules C. Beebe

Think about… What items can be removed? What items need to be revised? What additional rules should be considered for C-CDA R2.1?

General Dates Document uses sensible date time precision. C-CDA's date times should use ISO8601 strings to express appropriate precision. Correct use of time zone offsets from GMT. Ensure offsets in US are –nn and not +nn syntax Validate the date / time values, YYYY within human lifespans, dates as valid dates and times as valid times.

Physical Quantities Physical units are valid UCUM expressions. Any time a physical unit is used, it should be a valid UCUM expression. This should take into account proper case for the characters. 10 Powers use one of these two syntax Validate syntax, inclusive of preferred power syntax (ex. 10^3 or 10*3) UCUM codes used for given LIONC codes, match recommended units. Propose that for at least the 2000 most common LOINC codes in use, that a preferred UCUM units code be defined and validated against. (need to discuss LOINC)

General Codes SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm, ICD9 and ICD10 codes validate against UMLS Codes that claim to be from SNOMED CT, LOINC, and RxNorm should be present in UMLS 2014AA. SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm, ICD9 and ICD10 codes match their displayName Codes in a C-CDA should assign a that reflects the meaning of the underlying concept. A best practice is to use preferred labels from UMLS. Document uses official C-CDA templateIds whenever possible C-CDA's prescribed templateIds should be used whenever possible. Additional templateId elements are allowed, but official C-CDA templateIds should always be present when they apply.

Vitals Codes Vitals are represented using structured entries Vitals in C-CDA should be represented with individual structured entries corresponding to BP, Heart Rate, BMI, etc. Vitals are expressed with LOINC codes Vitals in C-CDA should be coded with LOINC. Specifically, with codes from the HITSP Vital Sign Result value set. Vitals are expressed with UCUM units Vitals in C-CDA should be represented with physical quantities that have appropriate UCUM codes. From C-CDA guide the recommended UCUM units.

Vitals Codes Best practices for Organizer need to be followed. Appropriate Effective date (low/high) for contents Observations found in vitals signs should be those recommended. Ensure that only recommended vitals are found and that results and other observations are placed in more appropriate sections.

Social History Smoking Status Observations have the correct template ID Smoking status observations should have template ID Structured Smoking Status Observations use correct SNOMED CT Codes Smoking Status observations should be coded according to an explicit list of eight SNOMED CT Codes. Only structured Smoking Status Observations are used Smoking status should be recorded in a discrete 'smoking status observation', not in the more generic, less-computable 'social history observation‘.

Problems & Problem Codes Problem statuses are internally consistent Each concern act can contain more than 1 problem. If there is a status attached to the concern act as well as the problem, these should not contradict. A concern status of 'completed' is compatible with a problem status of 'Resolved' or 'Inactive'. A concern status of 'active' is compatible with a problem status of 'Active'. Concern act.status of completed or suspended, shall have a problem concern act.effective time high A Concern act.active shall not have an act.effective time high (repeat the above for Observation class, if this can be done given the status value in the depreciated Problem status observation value set) Problems coded with CORE Subset of SNOMED Each problem in the problem list should be coded with a SNOMED code from the CORE Subset of SNOMED.

Medications / Immunizations Codes Medications coded with RxNorm SCD, SBD, GPCK, or BPCPK codes C-CDA medication lists should contain medications coded as RxNorm Semantic Clinical Drugs, Semantic Branded Drugs, and packs. This means prescribable products on the level of 'loratadine 10mg oral tablet'.) Immunizations should be in the immunizations section and not medication section. Immunizations coded with CVX codes Lab Results Codes Lab Results coded with LOINC's top 2K codes. Lab results should be coded using LOINC. In practice LOINC is huge, but 2000 codes cover 98% of real-world usage. This means that most results should be covered by the most common LOINC codes published by Regenstrief.

Allergy Coding Allergy codes should come from a common limited set of codes Allergies. Need a defined limited subset of allergy codes, that are recommend for clinical documentation. ( this may not be possible at this time) codes from DOD / VA ?? It would be very helpful to enable the tool developed to be downloaded and used within local sites to improve the quality.

Entries links to Narrative For each entry, get points for linking the entry to the related narrative text. You should loose a lot of points if you are not valid to the CDA R2 Schema. Future capability : Special stylesheet Provide an ability to show the entry data next to associated narrative. This would allow a user to review and assess the presentation of the structured content. Example sections where this would be useful: Medications / Allergies

Entry / Author Reference That a entry reference made in the document can be mapped to the destination class with the same ID. Every author reference should point to an instance of the author fully specified with the same assignedAuthor ID in the document.

Procedures / Results Can any additional rules can be established which validate what go into procedure section, what goes into result section? C-CDA indicates that Procedure Section contains contents are broader than the RIM concept of procedure. C-CDA indicates that Results Section contains only observations. No specific rubrics identified.

Unique Instance Identifiers Generally, the identifiers found within a CDA document should be unique and non-reoccurring within the same document. Exceptions are where the Encompassing Encounter in the header is identified in the Encounter Section, then the same encounter id should be expressed. Exceptions are where devices implanted, are maybe identified in two locations, the Procedure Section and the Medical Devices Section.

References UCUM: Table of Example Codes (Update 2014): (you should be able to download pdf & excel file from this site, no login required) This pertains to the discussion of which code might be preferred when multiple are available (e.g. “10*3” over “10+3” or “10^3”) Top 2,000 LOINC codes (Update 2015): (you will need to login to LOINC site for these) CORE Subset of SNOMED (Update 2016): (you will need UMLS login for these) While the above list appears to be maintained by UMLS & IHTSDO, here’s the original article from when the work was done to establish the subset (published in JAMIA 2010): (free publication on PubMed, no login required) The participating organizations were: · Kaiser Permanente · Mayo Clinic · Intermountain Healthcare · Regenstrief Institute · University of Nebraska Medical Center · Hong Kong Hospital Authority

Wrap up… Summary & Next steps