After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
JYFLTRAP: Spectroscopy with multi-trap facility Facility Mass purified beams In-trap spectroscopy Future plans.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simultaneous Delivery of Parallel Proton Beams with the EURISOL Driver
Experiments on beam deflection by crystals Masataka IINUMA Department of Quantum Matter Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter Hiroshima University.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
DE/dX measurement by OPERA film Tsutomu Fukuda (Nagoya Univ) Emulsion work shop (11/12,2005)
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
M. Aoki Translation of slides in 2010 JPS meeting (Okayama) By K. Shimomura and M. Aoki M. Aoki A , T. Ebihara A , N. Kawamura , Y. Kuno A , P. Strasser.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
B Grants-in-aid KIBAN-B (FY2014~) Magnetic Dipole Moment g-2 Electric Dipole Moment EDM Utilize high intensity.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Detector for the After Proton Measurement M. Aoki.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Plan for Beam Extraction using strip-line kicker with pulse bump orbit Present extraction kicker system Strip-line kicker system for ILC Beam extraction.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
2016/3/31 Fast kicker Experiment at ATF ATF2 - 40nm beam production, measurement Extraction kicker The difficulty of the beam extraction is that the kick.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Status Report of the Realignment for J-PARC 3GeV RCS N. Tani, H. Hotchi, M. Yamamoto, J. Kamiya, K. Horino, M. Kinsho J-PARC Center, JAEA 1 Outline 1.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
Introduction: FCC beam dumping system
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
FCC-hh injection group 7

Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Damping Ring Kicker Tests at AØ
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
I-LHC NOMINAL ions beam in 2007
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.
Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8
Presentation transcript:

After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division

Contents DeeMe request of RCS performance Source of After Proton Measurement system of After Proton Principle Setup Preliminary result Conclusion

DeeMe request of RCS performance ->Required rate of after proton : < >Correspond to less than few protons within 1 hour = 9*10 4 shot(Rep. = 25Hz) (1 pulse ~ 1*10 14 protons) ->It is impossible to measure such slight protons by ordinary monitors ->In order to develop new measurement system, we considered what particle becomes after proton ①High Power : 1MW ->Demonstrated more than 500kW-eq. output with 181 MeV injection. ->Space charge force at 500 kW operation with 181 MeV injection is equivalent to more than 1.5MW operation with 400 MeV injection. ②No proton existence after extraction(=No after proton)

RCS STR+BPM To 3-N BT STR+BPM QFLQDL Pulse KM 1~3 Pulse KM 4~8 Begin Ext. Ins Source of After Proton Layout of Extraction Line Magnetic field by the Kicker First BunchSecond bunch Time structure of extraction beam and after proton Halo->after proton Σ KM Kick angle ≈ 17 mrad 1 8 Naive estimation: If the rest proton exists and extracts without pulse kicker magnets, a particle needs to have an inclination (x’) ≧ 17 mrad  An emittance of ≈ 2200  mm mrad!  4 times of the RCS physical aperture (486  mm mrad) or 7 times of the RCS collimator aperture (324  mm mrad).

Source of After Proton ( Con’t ) We estimated the possible initial conditions that the proton can extract with no kicker excitation. As a result, the protons that has 2500  mm-mrad. emittance can partially extract. however, some particles hit the branch chamber. →We can catch the existence of after proton by monitoring scintillator signals near this point! 324  Normal operation Red: Kicker, septum OFF Green:Kicker, septum ON 1000  2500  Red: Kicker, septum OFF Green:Kicker OFF, septum ON Red: Kicker, septum OFF Green:Kicker OFF, septum ON Kicker always off Beam outer ellipse (H) at the “begin Ext. INS”. (324 ~ 5000  mm mrad)

Measurement system of After Proton -Principle- Estimation of scattered proton trajectory by G4BeamLine -> Assume 324 ~ 5000  mm-mrad. emittance uniform beam Ratio of the number of the proton that hit the outside scintillator to the number of the proton that pass through the 3NBT line N[scintillator hit]/N[Pass through 3NBT]=ε=0.025 scintillator

Measurement system of After Proton -Setup- Two scintillators are arranged along the beam line. →Detect after proton that is scattered to the outside of 3NBT line. When the signals coincide, that event is considered after proton. Al plate is put between two scintillators in order to reduce the low energy β background. Beam direction Third septum magnet

Measurement system of After Proton -Preliminary Result- Fitting the signals at after proton region: f(t) = p2 + exp( p0+ p1*t) ->p1 agreed the decay constant of muon. Perhaps, these signals were caused by the positrons produced by muon decay. If above signals were caused by the positrons, then these were neglect and after proton rate was estimated to R_AP < 1.1e-18 From the signal analysis during off-beam timing, it can be considered that at least 40% event would be independent of the beam. Then, R_AP After proton rate meets requirement (< 1e-18). If we carefully considered that the signals were caused by not the positron but the after proton, R_AP<4e-17 The maximum momentum of above positron is 53MeV/c. In this summer shutdown period, we installed additional iron plate(10cm thickness) in order to eliminate the positrons. (However, there is no data yet.) Loss by first bunch Loss by second bunch After proton region Time[sec]

Conclusion As a result of the after proton measurement, we found that the after proton rate was level even if we supposed bad case. We will try to specify the origin of signals and improve accuracy in the future. We will prepare a data acquisition system for the after proton estimation during DeeMe physics run.