United Nations Development Programme | Management Consulting Team Horizon Scan Burkina Faso Version 0.1, 19 May 2016

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 1 COUNTRY CONTEXT 17.6 million 2014 population Low Income Country LIC Source: World Bank, as of 19 May Note on export data – “All other” includes footwear, wood, misc., hides and skins, chemicals, plastic or rubber, animal, minerals and food products.

Content: Horizon Scan | PROGRAMME AND COUNTRY OFFICE OVERVIEW Burkina Faso 2 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MANAGEMENT RESULTS

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 3 Country programme focusing on economic development, governance, and sustainability & resilience – 2015 CPD SUMMARY Outcome 1 | Pro-poor growth Build capacity for strategic planning and implementation with regard to poverty reduction measures, incl. micro-financing mechanisms, employment opportunities, and climate change adaptation Outcome 2 | Human capital development Provide training with regard to HIV/Aids prevention and protection especially among adolescents. Outcome 3 | Efficient public administration respecting human rights and gender equality Build government capacities on Rule of Law and development aid management; facilitate anti-corruption measures and local development. Source: CPD (extended by 1 year until 31 December 2016)

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 4 PROJECT GEOGRAPHICAL SPREAD Source: open.undp.org, accessed 19-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 5 3 largest projects accounted for 36% of budget and 39% delivery, with an average delivery rate of 83% PROJECTS Delivery % 0% 100% Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Note: Bubble size denotes budget. Color denotes delivery rate. Programme gouvernance – suus composante politique Budget: $2.6m Delivery rate: 85% Consolidation Gouvernance Environnemental e Locale Budget: $2.1m Delivery rate: 95% Programme d’appui aux Parcs de l’Entente Budget: $2.7m Delivery rate: 70%

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 6 3 largest projects accounted for 37% of budget and 74% delivery, with an average delivery rate of 90% PROJECTS Delivery % 0% 100% Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Note: Bubble size denotes budget. Color denotes delivery rate. Programme gouvernance – sous composante politique Budget: $2.1m Delivery: 97% Programme d’appui aux Parcs de l’Entente Budget: $1.6m Delivery rate: 74% Projet d’appui aux elections Budget: $4.7m Delivery rate: 99%

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 7 3 largest projects account for 24% of budget and 20% delivery thus far. Overall average delivery rate of 11% PROJECTS Delivery % 0% 100% Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Note: Bubble size denotes budget. Color denotes delivery rate. Systeme alerte preoce Budget: $1.2m Delivery rate: 1% Programme d’appui aux parxs de l’Entente Phase 2 Budget: $1.1m Delivery rate: 33% Projet Résilience Budget: $858k Delivery rate: 12%

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 8 Balanced portfolio dominated by medium-sized projects PROJECT FIGURES Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Share by # project Share by budget $

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 9 Further concentration around medium-sized projects, but overall no big changes compared to PROJECT FIGURES Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Share by # project Share by budget $

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 10 Significantly reduced portfolio with no projects > $1m PROJECT FIGURES Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Share by # project Share by budget $

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 11 Significant reduction of # of projects since 2012, and overall shrinking portfolio after peak in 2014 due to one large project – 2016 PROJECT PORTFOLIO Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 12 3 rd party cost sharing remains the most important resource type across years ( average: 45% ), with regular resources coming second ( 27% ) and vertical trust funds ( 12% ) third. PROGRAMME RESOURCE TYPES Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 13 Small but consistent donor base across years, with GEF increasing its engagement. PROGRAMME DONOR BASE Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 14 Management ratio comparatively high during , but continuously decreasing since COUNTRY OFFICE FUND TYPES Source: New Executive Snapshot. Retrieved 19-May Management ratio calculated as management expenditure vs. overall expenditure. 7.7% % Management Ratio

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 15 COUNTRY OFFICE PLANNED STAFF Source: Corporate Planning System, retrieved 19-May Note: planned, not actual, including vacant positions.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 16 COUNTRY OFFICE PLANNED STAFF Source: Corporate Planning System, retrieved 19-May Note: planned, not actual, including vacant positions.

Horizon Scan | Burkina Faso 17 COUNTRY OFFICE CURRENT STAFF Source: Old Executive Snapshot, retrieved 19-May Note: excludes any Service Contracts administered on behalf of other agencies. Service Contracts Breakdow n

Content: Horizon Scan | PROGRAMME AND COUNTRY OFFICE OVERVIEW Mongolia 18 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MANAGEMENT RESULTS

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 19 Continuous downward trend of revenue, while staffing costs increased significantly in XB REVENUE AND USE OF RESOURCES Source: ATLAS XB Status report. Retrieved 13-May The increase in Staffing Costs was across all three categories, though to different degrees: IP (87%), GS (44%), NO (41%)

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 20 XB BALANCE Source: ATLAS XB Status report. Retrieved 13-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 21 AGENCY SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT Source: ATLAS XB Status report. Retrieved 13-May-2016.

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 22 XB STATUS REPORT Source: ATLAS XB Status report. Retrieved 13-May-2016.

Content: Horizon Scan | PROGRAMME AND COUNTRY OFFICE OVERVIEW Mongolia 23 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MANAGEMENT RESULTS

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 24 PARTNER FEEDBACK Y-ON-Y: Source: Partnership Feedback. Graphs shows Share of Positive. Note that aspects A.a through D. refer to different comparable questions across years. Number of respondents per year: 2009 = 11; 2012 = 43; 2015 = 22. Graph shows Share of Positive (Strongly agree, agree). Positive trend of feedback across years for most dimensions. Exceptions: contribution to gender, poverty eradication and DRR.

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 25 PARTNER FEEDBACK Y-ON-Y: 2015 Source: Partnership Feedback. Graphs shows Share of Positive. Note that aspects A.a through D. refer to different comparable questions across years. Number of respondents per year: 2009 = 11; 2012 = 43; 2015 = 22. Graph shows Share of Positive (Strongly agree, agree).

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 26 PARTNER FEEDBACK Y-ON-Y: 2012 Source: Partnership Feedback. Graph shows Share of Positive. Note that aspects A.a through D. refer to different comparable questions across years. Number of respondents per year: 2009 = 11; 2012 = 43; 2015 = 22. Graph shows Share of Positive (Strongly agree, agree).

Horizon Scan | Mongolia 27 PARTNER FEEDBACK Y-ON-Y: 2009 Source: Partnership Feedback. Graph shows Share of Positive. Note that aspects A.a through D. refer to different comparable questions across years. Number of respondents per year: 2009 = 11; 2012 = 43; 2015 = 22. Graph shows Share of Positive (Strongly agree, agree).

UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in more than 170 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. One United Nations Plaza, New York, NY | Tel: (212) |