Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Production by IDS120h with Focused Gaussian Beam and Fixed Emittance (Update) X. Ding, UCLA AAG June 27, 2012 16/27/12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of ERL R&D Towards Coherent X-ray Source, March 6, 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL 1 Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS.
Advertisements

Representation of synchrotron radiation in phase space Ivan Bazarov 1.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
6/30/20091 Meson Production with Different Directional Incident Proton Beam X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL.
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
Proton Position Tracking X. Ding, D. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Phone Meeting on Aug. 25, 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Polarity of the MERIT Magnet H. Kirk (Feb 7, 2008) Update 12 Feb: The CERN power supply group claims that the RED lead of the magnet was + (as per usual.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Proton Position Tracking X. Ding, UCLA Aug. 11, 2009.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Internal target option for RHIC Drell-Yan experiment Wolfram Fischer and Dejan Trbojevic 31 October 2010 Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Status of Scaling FFAG Phase Rotation ICOOL Simulations Ajit Kurup ISS Machine Group Meeting 27 th July 2006.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015.
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Context of the Neutrino Factory Neutrino factory (2018) –4MW proton driver –p +   +   +  e + e  Linear e + e − collider (2014/5) –Leptons at 0.4.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Lecture 3 Transverse Optics II
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Alejandro Castilla CASA/CAS-ODU
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Presentation transcript:

Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Production by IDS120h with Focused Gaussian Beam and Fixed Emittance (Update) X. Ding, UCLA AAG June 27, /27/12

Focused Incident Proton Beam at 8 GeV (Beam radius is fixed at 0.12 cm at z=-37.5 cm) 26/27/12 Relative normalized meson production is 0.84 of max at β* of 0.3 m for  x =  y = 5  m. For low β* (tight focus) the beam is large at the beginning and end of the interaction region, and becomes larger than the target there.

Focused Incident Proton Beam at 8 GeV (Cont’d) (Beam radius is fixed at 0.12 cm at z=-37.5 cm) Non-Linear Fit (Growth/sigmoidal, Hill) Y=N/(1+K2/beta -2 ) N=1.018 Sqrt(K2)= Linear emittance is 5 μm with beam radius of cm and β* of 0.3 m. 36/27/12

Gaussian distribution (Probability density) In two dimensional phase space (u,v): where u-transverse coordinate (either x or y), v = α u+β u ’ α, β are the Courant-Snyder parameters at the given point along the reference trajectory. In polar coordinates (r, θ): u = r cosθ v = r sinθ u ’ = (v-α u)/β=(r sinθ-α u)/β 6/27/124

Distribution function method Random number generator: Θ = 2π*rndm(-1) R = sqrt(-2*log(rndm(-1))*σ 6/27/125

Gaussian distribution (Fraction of particles) The fraction of particles that have their motion contained in a circle of radius “a” (emittance ε = π a 2 /β) is 6/27/126

Fraction of particles k=a/σε Kσ F Gauss 1π (σ) 2 /β39.5% 2π (2σ) 2 /β86.4% 2.5π (2.5σ) 2 /β or ~ 6π σ 2 /β95.6% Normalized emittance: (βγ)ε Kσ 6/27/127

Focused beam Intersection point (z=-37.5 cm): α * = 0, β *, σ * Launching point (z=-200 cm): L = = cm α = L/β * β = β * + L 2 /β * σ = σ * sqrt(1+L 2 /β *2 ) These relations strictly true only for zero magnetic field. 6/27/128

Setting of simple Gaussian distribution INIT card in MARS.INP (MARS code) INIT XINI YINI ZINI DXIN DYIN DZIN WINIT XINI = x0 DXIN = dcx0 YINI = y0 DYIN = dcy0 ZINI = z0 DZIN = dcz0 = sqrt(1-dcx0 2 -dcy0 2 ) (Initial starting point and direction cosines of the incident beam) 6/27/129

Setting with focused beam trajectories Modeled by the user subroutine BEG1 in m1510.f of MARS code x v or x h (transverse coordinate: u); x' v or x' h (deflection angle: u ’ ) XINI = x 0 + x h DXIN = dcx 0 + x’ h YINI = y 0 + x v DYIN = dcy 0 + x’ v ZINI = z 0 DZIN = sqrt(1-DXIN 2 -DYIN 2 ) 6/27/1210

Optimization of target parameters Fixed beam emittance (ε Kσ ) to π (σ) 2 /β Optimization method in each cycle (Vary beam radius or beam radius σ *, while vary the β * at the same time to fix the beam emittance; Vary beam/jet crossing angle; Rotate beam and jet at the same time) We also optimized the beam radius and target radius separately (not fixed to each other). 6/27/1211

Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Productions at 8 GeV (Linear emittance is fixed to be 4.9 μm ) Radius (cm) Beam/jet crossing angle (mrad) Beam angle/Jet angle (mrad) Initial0.404 (target) / st Run0.525 (target)25120/145 Old 2 nd Run (vary target radius and beam radius is fixed to be 0.3 of target radius) (target) /145.4 New 2 nd Run (vary beam radius with fixed target radius of cm; vary target radius with fixed beam radius of 0.15 cm.) Beam radius: 0.15 Target radius: / /27/1212

Optimize beam radius and target radius separately (Linear emittance is fixed to be 4.9 μm ) 6/27/1213 We found almost no improvement in optimized meson production if the beam radius is not fixed at 30% of target radius and optimized separately!

Optimized Meson Productions at 8 GeV (Linear emittance is fixed to be 5 μm ) Gaussian DistributionMeson Production Simple (0.404cm/20.6mrad/117mrad) Focused beam with fixed beam radius of cm at z=-37.5 cm (0.404cm/20.6mrad/117mrad) (-15.6% less than Simple) Focused beam with fixed Emittance at 5 μm (0.544cm/25.4mrad/120mrad) (-7.8% less than Simple) (8.9% more than Focused beam of radius at cm) Focused beam with fixed Emittance at 5 μm (0.15 cm (beam)/0.54cm(target)/26.5mrad(crossing)/1 27mrad(beam) /27/1214

Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Productions at 8 GeV (Linear emittance is fixed to be 10 μm ) Beam Radius (cm) Target Radius (cm) Beam/jet crossing angle (mrad) Jet angle (mrad) Initial0.404* st Run nd Run /27/1215 Gaussian DistributionMeson Production Focused beam with fixed Emittance at 10 μm ( cm (beam)/0.65cm(target)/32mrad(crossing)/135 mrad(beam) (-15% less than Simple) (60 % more than Focused beam of radius at cm )

Procedure of Simulation without Angular Momentum 1). Create a beam (simple Gaussian or focused) with target radius of cm, beam angle of 117 mrad and jet angle of mrad at z=-37.5 cm. 2). Track back the beam to z=-200 cm under the SC field and no HG Jet. 3). Based on the backward beam at z=-200 cm, create the forward beam at z=-200 cm. 4). Read the forward beam and run MARS15. 6/27/1216

Procedure of Simulation without Angular Momentum (Cont’d) Meson production with emittance of 5 μm is *10^5. (Old Method with single centroid particle track back and using Twiss formulae at z=-200 cm w/t SOL field, Meson production is *10^5.) 6/27/1217

Meson Productions without Angular Momentum 6/27/1218

Formulae Related with Angular Momentum q=1.6  (C), c = 3  10 8 (m/s) 1 (GeV) = (10 9  1.6  ) (J) = (10 9  q) (J) 1 (J) =1/(10 9  q) (GeV)  Px= qBcy/2 (J)  Py= -qBcx/2 (J)  Px=Bcy/(2  10 9 ) (GeV)~0.15By (GeV)  Py=-Bcx/(2  10 9 ) (GeV)~-0.15Bx (GeV) 6/27/1219

Estimation of Angular Momentum Effect Proton Beam: E0= GeV KE=8 GeV ET= GeV P=(ET 2 -E0 2 ) 1/2 = GeV (x0,y0,Px,Py), without angular momentum (x0,y0,Px+  Px,Py+  Py), with angular momentum 6/27/1220

Estimation of Angular Momentum Effect (Cont’d) Z = cm, B ~ T Z = -50 cm, B ~ T Z = -100 cm, B ~ T Z = -150 cm, B ~ T Z = -200 cm, B ~ T Pz = (P 2 -(Px+  Px) 2 -(Py+  Py) 2 ) 1/2 6/27/1221

Procedure of Simulation with Angular Momentum 1). Create simple Gaussian distribution at cm. 2). Transform each particle according to px -> px + qBy/2, py -> py> - qBx/2, using the x and y of the individual particle. (Use the B at the point we generate the particles, so cm) 3). Track the resulting distribution backwards to z=-50 cm,-100 cm, -150 cm and -200 cm under the SC field and no HG Jet. Based on this, create the forward beam at different position. 4). Read the forward beam and run MARS15. 6/27/1222

Procedure of Simulation with Angular Momentum (Cont’d) Meson production (simple Gaussian distribution) without angular momentum for launching point at z=-200 cm is *10^5. 6/27/1223 Launching pointMeson Production Z=-200 cm89179 Z=-150 cm91952 Z=-100 cm92783 Z=-50 cm98840

BackUp 6/27/1224

Courant-Snyder Invariant 6/27/1225

Emittance (rms) and Twiss Parameters 6/27/1226

Effect of Solenoid Field [Backtrack particles from z = cm to z = cm.] (Could then do calculation of α, β, σ at z = -200 cm, but didn’t) 6/27/1227

Effect of Solenoid Field 6/27/1228