Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
Advertisements

Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform PFM Performance Measurement Framework And Procurement Pamela Bigart World Bank.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Module 5.3 Measuring the performance of PFM systems.
1.1 PFM objectives and budgetary approaches
Liberia – Duke University Program PFM reform strategy Duncan Last Public Financial Management Division March 4, 2011.
Public Financial Management Architecture in Central Asia: International Reform Advice and Domestic Reform Practice: Case of Tajikistan Ismoil Khujamkulov.
ICGFM Conference Miami May 3, 2005 Monitoring Public Financial Management System Performance: Lessons and Future Directions Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank.
The World Bank SBO Vilnius, Lithuania March 21, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach.
Module 5.2 Measuring the performance of PFM systems
PEFA Performance Measurement Framework A Tool For Budget Reforms THE GEORGIA EXPERIENCE.
The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT Module 3.1 – Special issues: Payroll, Procurement and IT.
PFMRP Phase IV Brief Overview  PEFA, other diagnostic reports along with the CAG and PAC reports provided the frame of reference for development of PHASE.
DRAFT: Budget Transparency and Country Systems December 4, 2013, Seoul Forum on Using Country Systems to Manage Climate Finance.
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach PEM reforms in PRSP countries from Europe and Central Asia Warsaw, February 6-9, 2005 David Biggs DFID.
Strengthening Financial Scrutiny Les Kojima Senior Financial Management Specialist The World Bank 53 rd Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference New Delhi.
EXPERIENCE SHARING ON LOCAL PFM & CURRENT REFORM INITIATIVES Babu Ram Shrestha, MOFALD.
Budget support training Module 4 Assessment of PFM (Third eligibility criterion) Version October 2013.
INDONESIA BUDGET REFORM (Priorities and Challenges) International Conference Budgeting for Performance-Modernizing PFM in Indonesia May , Hotel.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 4: The Assessment Process, Stakeholders Involvement & Quality.
Slide 1 GAC HOB Training Course - Essentials of Budget execution Addis Ababa, June
CPIA 2006 Q13: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management BBL Ivor Beazley/Steve Knack, 6 December 2006.
Fiduciary Risk Management Evolving principles and practice in DFID DFID India - 15 January 2002.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
Measuring PFM Performance The PEFA program and tool CReCER Managua, October 29-31, 2012 Charles Seibert, PEFA Secretariat.
Module 1.2 Introduction to the Budget Cycle
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
1 PEFA Performance Measurement Framework Case Study - Ghana Presentation by Marcelo Andrade The World Bank November 16, 2006.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 5: Understanding PEFA Scores and Analyzing a PEFA Report.
Page 1 Budget Execution and Financial Accountability Course January 10-12, 2005 Country PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Nicola Smithers PEFA.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT Module 4.3: Internal Control & Audit.
Page 1 The PFM Performance Measurement Framework A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Workshop on Applying the PFM Performance Measurement.
Baseline Indicators and Performance Measurement Framework for Procurement Regional Workshop on Procurement Capacity Development Lima, Peru April.
The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 5: Interpreting a draft Assessment Report.
1 Public Finance Management Reform The Georgian Experience 2008 ICGFM Winter Conference December, 2008.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 8: Use of PEFA Assessments for Reform formulation & monitoring 1.
Improving public financial management. Supporting sustainable development. PEFA and fiscal transparency OECD CESEE SBO Ljubljana, Slovenia July 8, 2016.
Approaches to PFM reform Module 1.3
Country Level Programs
Introduction/Background Aim of the assessment was to assess the impact of the 3 institutions MOHCDGEC, PO-RALG and MOFP in the flow of funds from national.
PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
Budget Transparency A New, Global Toolkit
Assessing a national PIC system
A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring
Presentation on Expenditure Management By Team GVF
Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
Module 5.3: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
and example of its recent application in Albania
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
PEFA Performance Measurement Framework Case Study - Ghana
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Pubic Financial Management Financial Management in Sub national government Rajendra Prasad Nepal.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF GEORGIA
Finding A Common Scale: An Overview of PFM Performance Indicators
Summarizing the Assessment
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
What do PEFA assessments tell us about intergovernmental fiscal relations? PEMPAL plenary meeting of BCoP March 14—16, 2018; Vienna, Austria.
Debt Management Performance Assessment Tool (DeMPA)
2018 National PEFA Assessment Budget Community of Practice of PEMPAL
Financial Control Measures
Financial Control Measures
Presentation transcript:

Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

Module outline  Assessment of PFM systems and diagnostic tools  The Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability (PEFA) diagnostic tool  PEFA scoring  The 2015 revision to the PEFA framework

PFM Assessment PFM Reform Strategy PFM Reform action plan Capacity Development PFM diagnostic tools

Toolkit What diagnostic tools to assess PFM systems are you familiar with?

Standard diagnostic assessments of PFM systems:  Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability Assessment (PEFA) – multiple organisations;  Fiscal Transparency Assessment (FTA/FTR) – IMF;  Operational Assessment (OA) for Macro-Financial Assistance – DG ECFIN  Public Expenditure Review (PER) – World Bank;  Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS) for Sectors – WB;  Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) – OECD/DAC;  Debt Management Performance Assessment (DeMPA) – IMF & WB;  Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool (TADAT) - IMF. PFM diagnostic tools

6

1 policy design & review 2 strategic Planning 3 budget Preparation 4 budget Execution 5 accounting & Reporting 6 external audit & scrutiny FTA PEFA/FTA PETS, TADAT MAPS, DeMPA PER

PEFA FTA ECFIN/ OA PER PETS MAPS DeMPA TADAT Identification of PFM strengths & weaknesses XXXXXX Focused on part of the Budget Cycle XXXXX Integrated FocusXXX In-depth analysis of capacity factors XXXX Recommendations for reform XXXX Assess fiduciary risk to public/external funds XX Track progress over timeX XXX PFM diagnostic tools

OECD Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) How does the procurement work? Background Need for a detailed procurement tool and consistent approach Introduced in 2006 following the PEFA approach 12 indicators, 54 sub-indicators Base Line Indicators (BLIs) Compliance/Performance Indicators (CPIs) Enables tracking progress over time PFM diagnostic tools

OECD Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) PFM diagnostic tools

Debt Management Performance Assessment (DeMPA) How is public debt managed? Background Limited coverage of debt management in other tools No insight into underlying causes of weak performance Methodology designed by WB ( revision in 2009) DeMPA modelled on PEFA 6 core functions 15 indicators, 35 dimensions Enables tracking progress over time PFM diagnostic tools

Module outline  Assessment of PFM systems and diagnostic tools  The Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability (PEFA) diagnostic tool  PEFA scoring  The 2015 revision to the PEFA framework

Introduced in 2005, revised in 2011, further revision in 2015 (test version) 2011 framework 31 indicators of which 3 donor indicators 74 dimensions The PEFA diagnostic tool 2015 test framework 30 indicators; 4 indicators added, 3 donor indicators discontinued Dimensions increased from 76 to 90 New pillar on asset and liability management

Focus on high level standardised performance indicators applied to the central or sub-national government level; Widely applicable: relevant to countries at all levels of development; Assessment must be evidence based; Capable of capturing progress over time and facilitates PFM reform; Uses data that can be collected cost effectively; Comprehensive: cover all aspects of the PFM cycle; Basis of sound PFM rests on the three PFM objectives. 22 Operating Design Principles The PEFA diagnostic tool

By December assessments prepared in 149 countries, 119 led by EU... includes 46 self assessments and 136 sub-national assessments (44 led by EU) more than 142 repeat assessments Used by: 92% of Low Income Countries (LIC) 92% of Lower Middle Income Countries (LMIC) 80% of Upper Middle Income Countries (UMIC) and 31% of High Income Countries The PEFA diagnostic tool

Six core dimensions: Credibility of the budget Comprehensiveness and transparency Budget Cycle Policy-based budgeting Predictability and control in budget execution Accounting, recording and reporting External scrutiny and audit An open and orderly PFM system that supports the 3 PFM objectives: Aggregate fiscal discipline Strategic allocation of resources Efficient service delivery Key elements of operational PFM performance: 31 performance indicators: 28 for governments and 3 for donors The PEFA PMF: Operating Design Principles The 2011 PEFA diagnostic tool

The PEFA Model The 2011 PEFA diagnostic tool

Central Government Budget The 2011 PEFA diagnostic tool Sub-National Government Budget

Comprehensiveness of the PEFA PMF PFM The 2011 PEFA diagnostic tool

The PEFA Iceberg – how comprehensive? 20 PEFA 2011 Framework Fixed asset register Supply chain management Financial administrative network Capacity Procurement Political context Market Quality of expenditure management Engaged civil society The PEFA diagnostic tool

Module outline  Assessment of PFM systems and diagnostic tools  The Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability (PEFA) diagnostic tool  PEFA scoring  The 2015 revision to the PEFA framework

Indicators and Dimensions Scores of indicators use a four point ordinal scale (A, B, C and D) Certain indicators may have more than one dimension Intermediate scores (B+, C+, D+) only for multi- dimensional indicators i.e. differences in dimension scores Arrow ▲ may be used to indicate improvement not captured in change of indicator score Two scoring methods: Method M1 ‘weakest link among dimensions’ Method M2 ‘average of dimensions ’ PEFA Scoring

NB:Dimensions reflect important elements, that may or may not register significant improvement or deterioration. Such changes may not be reflected in the overall score of a multi-dimensional indicator! PEFA Scoring Mini Exercise Let us try to score a multi-dimensional indicator Please refer to pages 10 and 11 of the PEFA Guidelines (2011) in your participants’ packs

Interdependencies PFM linkages are analogous to foundation footing linkages – the strength of a foundation is determined by it weakest footing That is the reason why the Tower of Pisa leans. The performance of a PFM system is determined by the strength of its weakest PFM activity As a general rule PFM scores, like the strengths of foundation footings, cannot be averaged PEFA Scoring

Module outline  Assessment of PFM systems and diagnostic tools  The Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability (PEFA) diagnostic tool  The revision to the PEFA framework

January 2015 test framework 30 indicators; 4 indicators added, 3 donor indicators discontinued Dimensions increased from 76 to 90 New pillar on asset and liability management 2015 a test year! The final version will be refined in the last quarter of 2015 based on results from 16 country tests. The final new version will be officially adopted in the beginning of 2016 and replace the 2011 framework. The PEFA revision

Seven core dimensions: Credibility of the budget Comprehensiveness and transparency Asset and liability management Budget Cycle Policy-based budgeting Predictability and control in budget execution Accounting, recording and reporting External scrutiny and audit An open and orderly PFM system that supports the 3 PFM objectives: Aggregate fiscal discipline Strategic allocation of resources Efficient service delivery Key elements of operational PFM performance: 30 performance indicators The PEFA PMF: Operating Design Principles The PEFA revision

B(1 ) Comprehensiveness and Transparency (PI:4-9) B(2) Asset and Liability Management (PI:10-13) C(1) Policy-based budgeting (PI:14-18) C(1) Policy-based budgeting (PI:14-18) C(3) Accounting, Recording and Reporting (PI-26-28) C(3) Accounting, Recording and Reporting (PI-26-28) C(4) External scrutiny and audit (PI-29-30) C(4) External scrutiny and audit (PI-29-30) C(2) Predictability and control in budget execution (PI:19-25) C(2) Predictability and control in budget execution (PI:19-25) Budget Credibility (PI:1-3) C. Budget Cycle A. PFM Outturns B. Cross-cutting Issues The PEFA revision The PEFA Model

(More) attention to: Credible fiscal strategy Fiscal risk Internal control framework Management response to audit Independence of Supreme Audit Institution Public Service performance The PEFA revision

The PEFA Iceberg – how comprehensive? 30 PEFA 2015 Framework Fixed asset register Supply chain management Financial administrative network Capacity Procurement Political context Market Quality of expenditure management Engaged civil society The PEFA revision

The upgraded PFM Performance Report… Executive summary 1.Introduction 2.Country background information 3.Assessment of PFM systems 4.Cross-cutting analysis 5.Government PFM Reform Process Annexes i. Performance indicator summary ii. Sources of information s.2.5 Description of the internal control framework s.4.2 Effectiveness of the internal control framework The PEFA revision

Summary points  The PEFA Framework measures the performance of PFM systems in achieving their objectives, but does not assess the causes of performance.  It focuses on the “basics” of PFM systems.  It monitors progress in systems.  It does not deal with policy issues.  There are several more PFM diagnostic tools to assess in detail specific PFM areas. NB: There is a dedicated PEFA course.