IPv6 Status Stuff Phil DeMar Summer 2011 JointTechs meeting July 14, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICANN Strategic planning process Draft key priorities for the July 2006 – June 2009 Plan for community comment November 2005.
Advertisements

Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Upgrading the Oracle Applications: Going Beyond the Technical Upgrade Atlanta OAUG March 19, 1999 Robert Cooney.
IPv6 at Fermilab Keith Chadwick Fermilab Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359.
IPv6 Planning and Implementation at PSU.  1986 – PSU gets Class B network ( ) & 5 Class C networks  1988 – Department of Computer.
IPv6 7/18/ Road map for IPv6 Migration in an Organization.
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
US Labs IPv6 Planning & Deployment Status Phil DeMar Oct. 4,
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Technical Review Group (TRG)Agenda 27/04/06 TRG Remit Membership Operation ICT Strategy ICT Roadmap.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
PRESENTED BY: WARREN PONCSAK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ROZ KELSEY, PRINCIPAL PROJECT CONSULTANT.
Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.
Developing Enterprise Architecture
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Enhancements University of Manitoba February 14, 2012.
IPv6 Survey: Taking the Federal Pulse on IPv6 Summary Results Market Connections, Inc. June 2006.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Date Coordinator Name(s) Other Leadership Name(s) ABC Coalition Clean Cities Re-designation.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Update on IPv6 Transition U.S. Federal IPv6 Task Force Jane Coffin Co-Chair of the U.S. Federal IPv6 Task Force August 2011 – CITEL PCC.I, Mar del Plata,
August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting September 10, 2013.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Richard Huffine September 15, 2009 Council for Data Integration Planning Team Summary.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Steven Newhouse EGEE’s plans for transition.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Harnessing a multi-stakeholder platform for improved land governance in Malawi Ivy Luhanga – Principal Secretary, Paul Jere – Land Governance Consultant,
ESnet Site Coordinators Committee (ESCC): IPv6 Activities & Directions Phil DeMar (ESCC Chair) HEPix IPv6 Workshop (CERN) June 22, 2011.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier 1 The RISCA Toolkits Approach to Implementing Comprehensive School Counseling Programs.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Capacity Building Committee Architecture and Data Committee Meeting Seattle – July 2006.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Introduction to the Continual Service Improvement Toolkit Welcome.
Low Emission Strategies in Practice Rob Pilling (London, 12 th May 2009) web:
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Meeting September 12, 2013.
Using OMB Section 508 reporting in addressing your agency's program maturity. How to Measure Your Agency's 508 Program.
1 Updating the ESnet Site Coordinator Model (Presented to SLCCC, June, 2004) Joe Burrescia Mike Collins William E. Johnston DRAFT FOR COMMENT 7/19/04.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Implementing Local Action Strategies and the Puerto Rico Resolution Proposal to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force October 3-5, 2003 Saipan, CNMI.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
ORNL Site Report ESCC July 15, 2013 Susan Hicks David Wantland.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT - PART 2 MODULE 7
DOE /ESnet-related IPv6 Activities Phil DeMar HEPix IPv6 Workshop (CERN) Sept. 6,
Esnet Customer Satisfaction Survey (III) Phil DeMar Summer ESCC meeting July 14, 2010.
TeraGrid’s Process for Meeting User Needs. Jay Boisseau, Texas Advanced Computing Center Dennis Gannon, Indiana University Ralph Roskies, University of.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
GCOS communication strategy
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Status Stuff Phil DeMar Summer 2011 JointTechs meeting July 14, 2011

Site IPv6 Status (Survey…)

Site IPv6 Survey (7/13/2011) 14 responses, including most of the Open Science labs Site IPv6 WAN connectivity:  IPv6 WAN connectivity in place11 Four have some level of production network support  No IPv6 peering in place 3 Two indicated no plans to do so  Feb 2011 ESCC survey: 6 of 10 sites had ESnet IPv6 peering

Site IPv6 Survey (II) Level of current planning efforts:  Identified project, with organized planning effort 6 (4)  Recognized project, organized planning not under way4 (3)  Informal/adhoc planning effort2 (2)  No significant ongoing planning effort1 (1)  Other1  Comments:  Structured for h/w; applications is a challenge  IPv6 included as part of core network upgrade

Site IPv6 Survey (III) Upper management buy-in:  Actively engaged7 (4)  Aware, but not actively engaged6 (1)  Not yet on their radar0 (1)  Other1 Resource availability for planning / deployment:  Active project with budgeted effort in FY11 & FY127  Identified project; no FY11 budget, but expect FY123  Opportunity cost; out of general support effort4  Question: what about non-networking staff IPv6 effort?

Site IPv6 Survey (IV) Scope of current IPv6 planning:  Network infrastructure & staff136  Computer security infrastructure & staff115  System support & staff 63  Web services 7\  DNS 9 2  Mail services 5 /  Other 4  Comments:  HPC – aware, but not actively engaged  Network research group involved  IPAM application support

Site IPv6 Survey (V) Projections on OMB deliverables (2012): Previous survey (2/1/2011): no reported IPv6 services  Comments: going to cloud (Google)

Site IPv6 Survey (VI) Preparation for 2014 deliverables:  Focusing tightly on 2012 deliverables7  Studying impact(s) of 2014 deliverables5  Actively planning for 2014 milestones0  Other2

Site IPv6 Survey (VII) Most significant barriers to 2012 compliance:  Communications and awareness of impact to the research and scientists  Getting coordinated effort across the spectrum of the IT enterprise.  Will consider 2012 as milestone goal, not necessarily required mandate.  Decentralized IT organizations.  Determining what must be done to make all public facing systems compliant.  Replacing/upgrading the core network infrastructure.  I don't think we have any barriers. IPv6 to the main facility website will be via an F5 to translate IPv6 addresses on the outside to IPv4 on the inside.  Resources  People resources.  Lack of funding and tools (e.g. IPAM, Security)  Resources, training, management directive, a business case.

Site IPv6 Survey (VIII) ESCC role in helping sites to meet 2012 milestones:  Continue to provide IPv6 technical forum environment.  Help motivate the NLCIO to provide a directives and funding.  Help in information campaign, spread awareness, importance, urgency of IPv6 adoption to IT communities.  A cookbook for compliance would be VERY helpful.  Facilitate best practices, common approach & lessons learned between SC Labs  Provide money!

ESCC IPv6 TF Activities

DOE IPv6 Activities Update Working groups setup to deal with aspects of IPv6 support:  IPv6 IT Management  IPv6 Technology  IPv6 Cyber Security  IPv6 Outreach Scope of DOE IPv objectives defined:  “Public-facing interfaces” defined as intended for the general public  IPv6 services limited explicitly to web, , & DNS Labs place in DOE IPv6 plan is ‘fuzzy’  Included in the scope of the overall plan  Not included in DOE response to OMB data call on public services  Expected to ~meet OMB deadlines & contribute IPv6 knowledge

ESCC IPv6 Task Force Activities IPv6 Planning Process TF  Phil DeMar, Paul Martinez, Louella Panaga, Jim Schroeder, Ted Sopher  Document not completed, but significant progress 2. IPv6 Technical Implementation Checklist TF  Mike Sinatra, Kevin Oberman, contributions by many others…  Progress toward a checklist, umhhh, not so good… 3. IPv6 Implications for Security Infrastructure TF  Farmed out to Network Security Monitoring (NSM) group…  They are supposed to develop a checklist from a cyber security perspective

Preliminary Site IPv6 Planning TF Checklist 14 Objective: Develop structured checklist as a planning template Basic structure: Ordered set of steps to follow in planning Drafted from a 2012 deliverables perspective Guidance and/or recommendations on each step

Site IPv6 planning checklist (II) 15 Establish initial IPv6 impact assessment group Scope spectrum of site effort w/ cost guesstimate Management buy-in process Key technical decisions of a strategic nature Test / development environment Draft target (2012) deployment Lay out roadmap(s) to achieve target deployment Implementation planning guidance Documentation & training

Site IPv6 technical checklist (preliminary) 16 Strategy: Organize IPv6 implementation guidance & recommendations into distinct components:  A structure for developing tutorials & checklists  Allows a tighter focus on target audience Mike Sinatra (ESnet) working on corresponding tutorials Basic structure within each component: Identify specific issues or areas of concern Differentiate between 2012 & 2014 implications Provide guidance and/or recommendations

Site IPv6 technical checklist (preliminary) 17 Addressing checklist  Address block selection & acquisition  Subnet allocation model  Address configuration model (static & stateful/stateless autoconfig)  Use of site/local addresses (ULAs)  Site multi-homing considerations Routing checklist:  Selection/configuration of routing protocols  WAN connectivity / peering issues  Neighbor discovery & Stateless Autoconfig (SLACC)  IPv6 tunneling considerations  NAT issues

Site IPv6 technical modules (II) 18 Host IPv6 Address Management (IPAM) Domain Name Service (DNS) issues Guidance on IPv6 implementation for public services IPv6 performance issues & considerations Test / Development Environment(s) IPv6 network (service?) management & monitoring Host IPv6 considerations