Electron cloud measurements in Cesr-TA during the July-August run for the SPSU Study Team, 29.09.2009 report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo thanks to J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of the two-stream instability session G. Rumolo, R. Cimino Based on input from the presentations of G. Iadarola, H. Bartosik, R. Nagaoka, N. Wang,
Advertisements

Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
2006/09/25-28 ILCDR06, Cornell University 1 Experimental Study on Suppression of Electron Cloud Effect at the KEKB Positron Ring Contents Introduction.
RedOffice.com Presentation templates Slide No. 1 RFA Detector Data of Electron Cloud Build-up and Simulations Eric Wilkinson Mentor: Jim Crittenden Cornell.
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modelling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD 1) Comparison with CesrTA.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.
E-CLOUD VACUUM OBSERVATIONS AND FORECAST IN THE LHC Vacuum Surfaces Coatings Group 03/07/2011 G. Bregliozzi On behalf of VSC Group with the contributions.
Electron Clouds at SLAC Johnny Ng ILC Damping Rings Collaboration Meeting March 4, 2009.
SPS scrubbing experience: electron cloud observables L. Mether on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, September 8, 2015.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
Electron Cloud Mitigation Studies at CesrTA Joseph Calvey 10/1/2009.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
CERN, LIU-SPS ZS Review, 20/02/ Brief review on electron cloud simulations for the SPS electrostatic septum (ZS) G. Rumolo and G. Iadarola in LIU-SPS.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
Recent Electron-Cloud Mitigation Studies at KEK E-cloud mitigation mini-workshop on November at CERN Kyo Shibata (for KEKB Group)
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
November 18, 2011David L. Rubin1 CESR Test Accelerator – Investigation of the physics of charged particle beams Circumference = 768m - Beam energy
CesrTA Vacuum System Conversion and Operational Experiences Yulin Li for the CesrTA Team Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
CesrTA Status Report Mark Palmer Cornell University September 2, 2009.
Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update on Modeling Results / J.A. Crittenden 23 August / 4 Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Electron cloud measurement in Cu/Al chambers with/without TiN coating at KEKB positron ring ILC DR Working Group Meeting Kyo Shibata (KEK)
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 ELECTRON CLOUDS AND VACUUM EFFECTS IN THE SPS Experimental Program for 2004 J.M. Jimenez Thanks.
2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference September 4–9, 2011, San Sebastián, Spain LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle.
RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Updates of EC Studies at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results 1.Clearing Electrode 2.Groove surface 3.TiN coating 4.Measurement of EC in solenoid.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
Benchmarking simulations and observations at the LHC Octavio Domínguez Acknowledgments: G. Arduini, G. Bregliozzi, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte and.
Mg Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition as Photocathodes: QE and surface adsorbates L. Cultrera INFN – National Laboratories of Frascati.
Two beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
CESR-c Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO) Mark A. Palmer David L. Rubin Second ILC Accelerator Workshop August 18, 2005.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Recent Studies on Electron Cloud at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results –Clearing Electrode –Groove surface –EC measurement in Q and solenoid field.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Mark Palmer for the CESRTA Collaboration
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Measurement of Electron Cloud in KEKB LER with RFA
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
Recent Electron Cloud Studies at CESR and Future Plans
CESRTA Measurement of Electron Cloud Density by TE Wave and RFA
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Electron Clouds at SLAC
CesrTA Wiggler RFA Measurements
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Chicane and Bunch Spacing Scans
Presentation transcript:

Electron cloud measurements in Cesr-TA during the July-August run for the SPSU Study Team, report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo thanks to J. Calvey, J. Crittenden, Y. Lin, J. Livezey, M. Palmer

From: M. Palmer & D. Rubin, in ILCDR2008

A quick glance to the CesrTA target parameters... ParameterValue Energy GeV No. wigglers12 B max 2.1 T  x (geometric) 2.25 nm  y (geometric) 20 pm (~40 nm normalized) QxQx 0.59 QyQy 0.63 QzQz zz mm  E/E x Rf voltage7.6 MV  x,y ~ 60 ms pp 6.2 x NbNb x Bunch spacingMultiples of 4 ns and 14 ns

North IR South IR wigglers CESR Modifications CLEO 15W: C-coated chamber 15E: Reference Al chamber

New gate valves were installed at Q15W&E during Summer 2008 Shutdown to create two short sections in CESR vacuum system. Vacuum chambers at Q15E and Q15W, with a length of 1.43m, may be replaced with any test chamber that meets specific requirements Q15E Chamber Q15W Chamber Initial SEY of a-C coating = 0.98

Both chambers are hit directly by synchrotron radiation Following slides show: o Frequency spectra of the hitting synchrotron radiation o Intensity of the hitting radiation (in number of photons/beam particle/meter) for 15W, 15E, different energies (2 and 5 GeV), different types of beam particles (e + and e - )

15E, positrons, 2 GeV 0.18 RFA location 15W, positrons, 2 GeV RFA location 0.44

15E, electrons, 2 GeV 0.36 RFA location 15W, electrons, 2 GeV 0.15 RFA location

15W, positrons, 5 GeV (CHESS) RFA location 15E, positrons, 5 GeV (CHESS) RFA location

15W, electrons, 5 GeV (CHESS) RFA location 15E, electrons, 5 GeV (CHESS) RFA location

15W vs 15E Current Scans 15W: Carbon coated, sees more radiation for e + (see previous slides) 15E: Uncoated Al, more radiation for e - (see previous slides) Scans done on 26/07/2009 and 28/07/ D plots, comparison of e + and e -, comparison of Sunday and Tuesday’s e + scans and summarizing plot. Data were acquired with a 45 bunch train, 14ns spacing, 2 GeV Data acquired on 30/07/2009 with a 45 bunch train of e +, 14ns spacing, 5 GeV, 15W vs. 15E Data from 01/08/2009, solenoid in 15W on and off, dogleg off and on, different bunch spacings.

15W, e+15E, e+ 15W, e- 15E, e-

15W, e- Plots show mean of inner 3 collectors (4,5,6) and outer 6 collectors (1,2,3,7,8,9) for positrons (left) and electrons (right)  Outer collectors ~ primary photoelectrons  Inner collectors ~ primaries + secondaries (?)

15W, e- Plots show comparison of positron runs done on Sunday and Tuesday  15E (left) sees significant conditioning  15W (right) does not

Comparison of sum of all collector channels (summarizing plot)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Wednesday 29/07/2009)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Thursday 30/07/2009): singling out inner and outer collectors

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Thursday 30/07/2009): sum of all the collector channels 15E 15W

Run with positrons at 5 GeV on Saturday 02/08/2009. Several intensity scans. Main studies which were done: 1.Dogleg in 15W on and off. The dogleg is a short dipole with 100G field between the C-coated chamber and the dipole upstream. Its purpose is to avoid contamination from the electrons upstream. 2.Solenoid in 15W on and off 3.Change bunch spacing from 14 to 28ns and make a train of 75 bunches (instead of 45) 4.Monitor the electrons with 9 bunches almost perfectly uniformly distributed around the machine (3 x (280/280/294)) Pending: o Decrease bunch spacing (to 4 ns) o Run with e - at 5 GeV

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): first scan (noisy data because several times there were losses during the fill) with dogleg on

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data from the second (clean) intensity scan with dogleg on with Thursday’s data (dogleg off)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data from intensity scan with solenoid in 15W off and on (no change in 15E). There is a change in the electron distribution in the collectors

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data from intensity scan with solenoid in 15W off and on (no change in 15E)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, (last week), data from solenoid field scan: the shape of the electron distribution changes while increasing the intensity of the B-field (4000 -> 70 G)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data from intensity scan with solenoid off and two bunch spacings and train lengths (45 x 14 ns, 75 x 28 ns)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data in 15W from intensity scan with solenoid off and two bunch spacings and train lengths (45 x 14 ns left, 75 x 28 ns right)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data in 15E from intensity scan with solenoid off and two bunch spacings and train lengths (45 x 14 ns left, 75 x 28 ns right)

Run with positrons at 5 GeV, intensity scan (Saturday 02/08/2009): comparing data from intensity scan with solenoid off and two bunch spacings and train lengths (45 x 14 ns, 9 x 280 ns). Both the sum of all channels and only the sum of the inner collectors are displayed.

5.3 GeV Scrubbing

Total pressure

Beam ONBeam OFF

Scrubbing

CESR-TA Sample: contamination? 12/6/2009 (Initial SEY measured on a CERN sample) /7/2009 (Witness back from USA)1.5 14/7/2009 (CERN sample) /7/2009 (Witness back from USA; before 200C for 2 h) /7/2009 (After 200C for 2 h)1.38 2/8/2009 (After 150 for 48 h)1.44 Less silicon remained after 200C heating than after 150C heating. Cannot remove the silicon contamination via 150C/200C bakeout. Cannot heat the sample at higher temperature because the maximum temperature allowed for UHV Al chamber is 200C. Will not go on with the heating experiment. Slide from CYV

CArp14_A Heated up to 150C with kapton tape for 24 h. Directly stored in a plastic bag from Cornell. The silicon contamination obviously comes from the kapton tape during heating. Slide from CYV

Before installation in Cesr-TA the Vacuum Lab performs acceptance tests by baking at 150 °C It is possible that the use of adhesive tape has contaminated with Si the inner wall of the chamber. Tests at CERN are supportive of this possibility The RGA shows in the 15W chamber peaks for the masses of H 2, C, CO, CO 2, CH 4, H 2 O, and various hydrocarbons at lower level, but no signs of Si- containing residual gases. It is possible that the contamination contributes with levels of Si in order of partial pressure when degassed, which is invisible to the RGA but can change significantly the surface properties. However, do we really see the effect of the SEY in the electrons measured by the RFA, or are we only dominated by photoelectrons? The nonlinear behavior of the electron flux measured over an intensity scan seems to suggest that there is multipacting, at least in the central part of the chamber Preliminary ECLOUD simulations do not predict multipacting dominated electron cloud for SEYs up to 2.0. It appears that the nonlinear behavior of the electron flux as a function of the beam current in the central region of the chamber can also occur for an electron cloud dominated by photoelectrons. Perhaps a better modeling of the RFA in simulations is needed. Comparison of values of RFA current between bare aluminum chamber and the carbon coated one during e - runs indicate the lower photoemission yield of the latter by a factor larger than 2.

15W, positrons, 2 GeV15W, electrons, 2 GeV  x = 4.5 m  y = 30 m D x = 1.35 m  x = 4.5 m  y = 30 m D x = 1.35 m

15E, positrons, 2 GeV15E, electrons, 2 GeV  x = 5 m  y = 27.5 m D x = 1.5 m  x = 5 m  y = 27.5 m D x = 1.5 m

15W, positrons, 5 GeV15W, electrons, 5 GeV  x = 5 m  y = 31 m D x = 1.32 m  x = 5 m  y = 31 m D x = 1.32 m

15E, positrons, 5 GeV15E, electrons, 5 GeV  x = 5.2 m  y = 36.5 m D x = 1.3 m  x = 5.2 m  y = 36.5 m D x = 1.3 m