Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | www.nist.gov/baldrige New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 Code of Professional Conduct: Relationships with Colleagues/Our Public Reputation Introduction Topic 1 of 1 Welcome to Relationships with Colleagues/Our.
Advertisements

Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Site Visit Review Just-in-Time Training. Pre-work and Training Judging Examiner Evaluation Process Stage 1 Independent Review Stage 2 Consensus Review.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
June 2002QPRC 2002, Tempe, Arizona A Workshop on Assessing to the Baldrige Criteria Cheryl L. Jennings, Motorola Lynn Kelley, Textron.
© Pathways Forward Transitional Ministry Consulting 2010 An Introduction to Transitional Ministry A Resource for Churches in Transition.
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Introduction to the Baldrige Criteria Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
TNCPE Site Visit Opening Meeting. Site Visit Agenda Introductions What is TNCPE? Where we are in the process Site visit expectations Confidentiality and.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Self-Assessing Your Organization with the Baldrige Criteria.
INITIAL ON BOARDING COACHING
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework (Health.
WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 1: Mentoring role and responsibilities.
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Gold Overview - Jeri Reinhardt Ed McMahon Tim Case.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence.
Slide 4.1 Chapter 4 Managing for Quality and High Performance.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING Helen Barefoot Learning and Teaching Institute.
JUDGES MEETING 1. Judges Meeting The Judges Meeting –Each Team will be assigned a date and time. Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Self-Assessing Your Organization with.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Induction of New Board Members September 14 th, 2010 Trainer: Caroline Egan, Carmichael Centre for Voluntary Groups.
Ensuring an Equitable Review AmeriCorps External Review Training.
New Faculty Orientation Needs Assessment Report
Site Visit. 2 Process Intent Observation (IO) Strength to Comment Intent Observation: “Double plus on the process used for strategic planning.” Comment:
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
COMMUNICATION Visioning Inspiring STRATEGY Developing Enabling
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing a High-Quality Scorebook 2015 Presentation for Senior and Alumni Examiners.
Michigan Quality Leadership Award New Examiner Training 2014.
Board Workshop February 13 th Background Journey started with the adoption of the Sterling Management Criteria Pursuing the Baldrige Education Criteria.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Quality Counts!! GOAL “Provide our customers with the highest levels of quality and service in all aspects of PTO operations”
Application Workshop – Session One April 26, 2011.
Community Foundation of the Ozarks December 1 st, 2009 Webinar Professionalizing Board Development Brad Toft – Ozarks Regional YMCA.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Working with the BOSS (Baldrige Online Scoring Solution) Wisconsin Forward Award Examiners
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
1 ©2002 Minnesota Council for Quality Evaluation Techniques for Team-Leaders and Judges August 2002.
2008 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Step III Overview - Jon Frantsvog Ira Schoenberger Tim Case.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
1 1 Richland College The Role of Leadership and Culture in Richland College’s Baldrige Journey Michigan Community College Assn October 7, 2011 Stephen.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Peer reviewer Workshop Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hussein Mahmoud El Magraby National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project.
STS International, Inc. PERSONAL LEADERSHIP A framework for exploring and evaluating Leadership Competency for the 21 st Century. COMMUNICATION Visioning.
Welcome, Examiners! Washington State Quality Award Return Examiner Training 2009.
Site Visit Opening Meeting. Washington State Quality Award Council2 WSQA MISSION Make Washington State a better place to live, learn, and work by helping.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Writing High-Quality Feedback for 2016 Baldrige Award Applicants.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 6 Performance Management.
©SHRM SHRM Speaker Title Bhavna Dave, PHR Director of Talent SHRM member since 2005 Session 2: Relationship Management Competencies for Early-Career.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Examiner Preparation
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing “Straight A” Feedback for Baldrige Applicants 2016 Presentation for Senior.
IMS Implementation Project
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding
Finalizing Award Recommendations
Sustaining Continuous Improvement
Sterling Examiner Preparation
Competency Based Learning and Development
Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
Sterling Examiner Preparation
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
Quality Management MNGT 420
Presentation transcript:

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda  Welcome & Introductions  Course Overview  Award Process Overview/Examiner Role  Begin with the End in Mind  Code of Ethical Conduct  Key Factors  One-on-one Coaching  Wrap-Up

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |

5–7 months Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding Preparation Assignment Baldrige Program Orientation Case Study New Examiner Orientation Examiner Preparation Team Assignment Planning for Year 2 Complete online modules. Participate in LinkedIn Discussions Complete pre work Participate in LinkedIn discussions Complete classroom training Peer coaching, improvement Complete classroom training. Peer learning, reflection, & feedback Complete IR Scorebook Possible Site Visit Peer learning, team leader cooaching Reflect on experience. Seek feedback from examiner peers & team leader. 1 st month 2 nd month

5–7 months Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding Preparation Assignment Baldrige Program Orientation Case Study New Examiner Orientation Examiner Preparation Team Assignment Planning for Year 2 Complete online modules. Participate in LinkedIn Discussions Complete pre work Participate in LinkedIn discussions Complete classroom training Peer coaching, improvement Complete classroom training. Peer learning, reflection, & feedback Complete IR Scorebook Possible Site Visit Peer learning, team leader cooaching Reflect on experience. Seek feedback from examiner peers & team leader. 1 st month 2 nd month

5–7 months Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding Preparation Assignment Baldrige Program Orientation Case Study New Examiner Orientation Examiner Preparation Team Assignment Planning for Year 2 Complete online modules. Participate in LinkedIn Discussions Complete pre work Participate in LinkedIn discussions Complete classroom training Peer coaching, improvement Complete classroom training. Peer learning, reflection, & feedback Complete IR Scorebook Possible Site Visit Peer learning, team leader coaching Reflect on experience. Seek feedback from examiner peers & team leader. 1 st month 2 nd month

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Examiner Roles New Examiner – 1 st year - team member Returning Examiner – years 2 – 5 - team member Senior Examiner - years 3 – 5 – team leader Alumni Examiner – 6 or more years, coach

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Code of Ethical Conduct Protect the integrity of the award process Exhibit professional conduct at all times Protect the promise of confidentiality Protect the program’s intellectual property

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scenario 1: the answer is …… Examiners should not exploit their selection to the Board of Examiners. (BOE). There are no “secrets” for receiving the award and no guarantees for receiving a site visit. Also, the program prefers to understate the “winning” aspect of the process; it encourages a focus on continued self-improvement and the sharing of best practices to help organizations achieve performance excellence. Examiners may not use the MBNQA logo in any advertising/promotion (and business cards may not include “Baldrige examiner” or the MBNQA logo). Principles: Protecting the integrity of the award process, the program’s intellectual property, and the reputation of the BOE.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scenario 2: the answer is …… Any assistance with an organization’s Baldrige Award application would result in a conflict of interest for an examiner. The examiner would be considered an employee of the organization and should list the organization on the Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest form. If the organization reapplies, the examiner would not be permitted to evaluate the application. Examiners advising or participating with an organization in preparing an award application shall not reveal or discuss that participation with other examiners during training or at any other time. Principles: Protecting the promise of confidentiality and the integrity of the award process.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scenario 3: the answer is …… No. At no time during Independent Review or Consensus Review should an examiner contact the applicant. Examiners shall not communicate with the applicant organization or in any manner seek additional documentation, information, or clarification. This includes Internet searches or other external sources of information. Examiners shall safeguard the confidences of all parties involved in the judging or examination of current or former applicants. Principles: Protecting the promise of confidentiality and the integrity of the award process.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scenario 4: the answer is …… No. Examiners must avoid disclosures that may in any way influence the award integrity or process, currently or in the future, and treat as confidential all information about the applicant. While this information has been publicly released, it is not part of the application, and, therefore, it is not relevant to the evaluation. While potentially interesting, this information should not be discussed and must not be considered in the evaluation. The Baldrige Program does a press and background check on each site- visited applicant. The program shares with the team leader any information that could affect selection as a role model, and the team leader seeks clarification during the site visit. Principle: protecting the integrity of the award process.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scenario 5: the answer is …… Yes. Examiners may use the Internet and other sources to familiarize themselves with common or generic terminology. Examiners shall not communicate with the applicant organizations or in any manner seek additional documentation, information, or clarification specific to the applicant. This includes Internet searches or other external sources of information. If questions arise, contact NIST. Principle: protecting the promise of confidentiality.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | What is a Key Factor? l A key factor is an attribute of an organization or its environment that influences the way the organization operates and the key challenges it faces. It indicates areas of strategic importance. l Examples may include the organization’s mission, vision, and values; strategic challenges; workforce groups and segments. l Key factors do not include descriptions of processes.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | How Do Examiners Use Key Factors? l To focus assessments on what is strategically important to the applicant. l To activate understanding of the applicants, its business, and the environment in which it operates, resulting in applicant-specific, evidence-based, value-added feedback. l To use in juxtaposition with Criteria items. Key factors are selected thoughtfully in the context of the specific Criteria item.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Directions to Exercise l Independently, read the Criteria requirements in P.1a-Organzation Environment. l Independently, read P.1a from your organization’s Organizational Profiles. l As a table, discuss the significance of the Key Factors identified for your organization on the matrix and compare them to the KFs for the other two organizations. l As a table, identify additional KFs that might facilitate better understanding of the organizations.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Six-Step Evaluation Process

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 1: Ground yourself in the Criteria item.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 2: Select the relevant key factors for the item.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 3: Read the relevant section of the application.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 4: Draft around six strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 5: Draft feedback-ready comments.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 6: Determine the scoring range and score for the item.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | UNDERSTANDING “SYSTEMATIC APPROACH”

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Reflection ……….. What did this day mean for you? What did you learn? What are your strengths and opportunities? What are your next steps? What will you change? What questions need to be answered? Seniors/Alumni: What are you going to improve upon in coaching others?