STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

OR 42: County Line Curves Environmental Assessment Purpose and Need February 17, 2009.
Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis Findings Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee November 26, 2012.
Maryland Avenue and Arkwright Street Nick Fischer, EIT Ramsey County Jerry Auge, PE Project Manager Ramsey.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
TBITE 05/15/ Heather Sobush, Senior Planner Christopher Cochran, Senior Planner
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
11 Tunde Balvanyos, Ph.D. Bus Rapid Transit Coordinator, Pace APTA BRT May 2009.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD.
Agenda Final Modal Assignments Prioritization Supporting Network Financial Analysis.
State of Florida Department of Transportation SR 7 (US 441) Value Engineering Study September 24-28, 2001 Segment III - From North of Hollywood Blvd to.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT Transit & Growth Management Tara Bartee –FDOT Public Transit Office.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
ILLINOIS ROUTE 23 (LaSalle St.) DOWNTOWN RE-ALIGNMENT December 2, 2008.
All within 5 square miles and at the doorstep of ARTIC Study Area Approximately 73,000 employees Home for 25,000 residents Approximately 20 million visitors.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
May 10, 2007 Presented by: Bill Ball, AICP and Joel Rey, P.E., AICP BRT To Maximize Person Capacity Within Limited ROW Using.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
FlexBRT Project Briefing. Background Feasibility Study began in – $750,000 TEA-21 Grant to study an ITS Circulator in North Orange County/South.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Transportation Projects City Council Workshop May 14, 2013.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Regional Transit Framework Regional Council March 31, 2010.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Access Pasco 10-Year Transit Development Plan ( ) October 2013.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
I-4 Express Lanes Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From east of 50 th Street to the Polk Parkway (SR 570) WPI Segment No: Polk.
POINCIANA PARKWAY TPO BOARD MEETING APRIL 12, 2012.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Project Status & Right-of-Way Acquisition
Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
SR 417 Extension Sketch-Level Traffic & Revenue Evaluation
D Line TAC Meeting #1: D Line Rapid Bus Project Planning City of Richfield Transportation Commission July 12, 2017 Katie Roth, Project Manager.
Bus Rapid Transit Study
Lyle Parkway to SR 540 (Winter Lake Road)
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Presentation transcript:

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Project Location Map

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD General Scope Identified in Group One: TBARTA Regional Studies as: Route ID 6.56 – Express Bus in Mixed Traffic and Managed Lanes BEGIN END

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Purpose and Need Existing Conditions – SR 54/56 in Pasco County 4L and 6L Divided Roadway Constrained to Future 6L Divided 4L and 6L Divided Roadway Constrained to Future 6L Divided Major E/W Connection Major E/W Connection Connects 5 of Pasco’s Major N/S Thoroughfares Connects 5 of Pasco’s Major N/S Thoroughfares Future Plans – Pasco County “Gateway Opportunity Market Area” 19 Active DRI’s 19 Active DRI’s 11 Market Nodes, 4 Major Market Nodes 11 Market Nodes, 4 Major Market Nodes 579

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Transit Technologies for Consideration *Cost Per Mile based on an average of recent costs of completed at-grade fixed guideway projects, and do not include vehicles, maintenance facilities, or communications and signal systems.

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Pasco County MPO Pasco BOCC Pasco Planning/GM TBARTA FDOT D7 Stakeholder Involvement

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Initial Alternatives BRT “Light” in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps Express Bus in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps Express Bus in Managed Lanes (At Grade) Express Bus in Managed Lanes (Elevated) LRT on Dedicated Guideway (With and Without Managed Lanes) BRT on Dedicated Guideway (With and Without Managed Lanes)

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD General Scope - Complete Identify Goals and Operations for Transit Corridor Identify Specific Alternatives for Evaluation Develop Traffic Schematics Traffic and Toll Revenue Modeling Define Feasible Alternatives Evaluate Costs and Impacts

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Managed Lanes Alternatives AADT 2 Managed Lanes At-Grade (Alternative 3) $0.14/mile $0.21/mile

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Managed Lanes Alternatives AADT 2 Managed Lanes Grade-Separated (Alternative 4) $0.14/mile $0.21/mile

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Managed Lanes Alternatives AADT 4 Managed Lanes At-Grade (Alternative 5) $0.14/mile $0.21/mile

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Managed Lanes Alternatives AADT 4 Managed Lanes Grade-Separated (Alternative 6) $0.14/mile $0.21/mile

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Alternatives to be Eliminated All At–Grade Managed Lanes Alternatives All At–Grade Managed Lanes Alternatives Cross access is restricted to 15 priority locations Cross access is restricted to 15 priority locations Significant mobility and circuity of travel impacts result Significant mobility and circuity of travel impacts result Much lower traffic volumes than grade-separated Much lower traffic volumes than grade-separated Affected ElementNumber Number of Existing Traffic Signals Removed10 Number of Existing Emergency Signals Removed2 Number of Existing Directional Median Openings Removed 68 Number of Existing Full Access Median Openings Removed 38

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Alternatives to be Eliminated All Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternatives All Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternatives 1400 riders per day for Pasco County/IBI Land Use scenario (8 stations) 1400 riders per day for Pasco County/IBI Land Use scenario (8 stations) 4500 riders per day for enhanced transit scenario (23 stations and shorter headways) 4500 riders per day for enhanced transit scenario (23 stations and shorter headways) Pinellas AA LRT Alternative produced 21,000 to 24,000 riders per day for comparable corridor length Pinellas AA LRT Alternative produced 21,000 to 24,000 riders per day for comparable corridor length

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Alternatives to be Eliminated All At–Grade Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Alternatives All At–Grade Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Alternatives Cross access is restricted to 15 priority locations Cross access is restricted to 15 priority locations Significant mobility and circuity of travel impacts result Significant mobility and circuity of travel impacts result 1190 to 4000 riders per day 1190 to 4000 riders per day Affected ElementNumber Number of Existing Traffic Signals Removed10 Number of Existing Emergency Signals Removed2 Number of Existing Directional Median Openings Removed 68 Number of Existing Full Access Median Openings Removed 38

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Alternatives to be Further Evaluated BRT “Light” in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps Express Bus in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps Express Bus in Managed Lanes (Elevated) BRT on Dedicated Guideway (Without Managed Lanes)

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 1: BRT “Light” in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 2: Express Bus in General Use Lanes with Queue Jumps

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 4: Express Bus/Managed Lanes – 2 Lanes Elevated

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 6: Express Bus/Managed Lanes – 4 Lanes Elevated

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 8B: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated in the Median

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternatives Alt 8D: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated on the Shoulder

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Traffic and Ridership Feasible AlternativeRidership Managed Lane Toll Amount Managed Lane AADT Range General Purpose Lane AADT Range 1: BRT Light in General Use Lanes w/ Queue Jumps 940 LowN/A50,000 – 102,000 HighN/A50,000 – 102,000 2: Express Bus in General Use Lanes w/ Queue Jumps 940 LowN/A50,000 – 102,000 HighN/A50,000 – 102,000 4: Express Bus/Managed Lanes – 2 Lanes Elevated - Low18,200 – 51,30043,000 – 90,000 High6,800 – 45,00050,000 – 93,000 6: Express Bus/Managed Lanes – 4 Lanes Elevated - Low20,300 – 86,00039,000 – 80,000 High8,200 – 67,90050,000 – 87,000 8B: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated in the Median 1, ,000 LowN/A50,000 – 102,000 HighN/A50,000 – 102,000 8D: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated on the Shoulder 1, ,000 LowN/A50,000 – 102,000 HighN/A50,000 – 102,000

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD ROW Cost Calculation – Mainline & Stations Market Value (sq. ft.) Acquisition Cost TOTAL ROW COST Based on current Pasco Property Appraiser Data Based on current Pasco Property Appraiser Data Used Low, and High Acquisition Cost Factors to provide a range Used Low, and High Acquisition Cost Factors to provide a range Range of ROW Cost varies due to acquisition costs Range of ROW Cost varies due to acquisition costs

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Construction Cost Estimate Methodology Four Construction Cost Categories: 1. Roadway Improvements (Low and High) Derived from FDOT’s Roadway Costs by Mile Derived from FDOT’s Roadway Costs by Mile All Alts receive necessary improvements All Alts receive necessary improvements Low Cost: M/R restricted to intersections only Low Cost: M/R restricted to intersections only High Cost: M/R or reconstruction of entire segments High Cost: M/R or reconstruction of entire segments 2. Bridge Improvements Derived from FDOT’s Bridge Cost per Square Foot Derived from FDOT’s Bridge Cost per Square Foot Low, Medium, or High Level or Overpass Low, Medium, or High Level or Overpass

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Construction Cost Estimate Methodology 3. Transit Stations and Park-and-Ride Lots Based on costs from Pinellas AA Study/FTA Guidance rooted in national examples Based on costs from Pinellas AA Study/FTA Guidance rooted in national examples At-grade stations on each side of the roadway At-grade stations on each side of the roadway - OR - Elevated station located in the median Elevated station located in the median 4. Traffic Systems New signals for intersections, communication lines, fare collection systems at each platform New signals for intersections, communication lines, fare collection systems at each platform

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Environmental Impacts Assessment 1. Number of Potential Archaeological Sites 2. Number of Contamination Sites 3. Acres of Floodplains 4. Acres of Priority Habitats 5. Number of Potential Historic Sites 6. Number of Potential Section 4(f) Resources 7. Acres of Wetlands

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Feasible Alternative EVALUATION FACTORS 1: BRT Light in General Use w/QJ’s 2: Express Bus in General Use w/QJ 4: Express Bus/Managed Lanes, 2 Lanes Elevated 6: Express Bus/Managed Lanes, 4 Lanes Elevated 8B: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated in the Median 8D: BRT on Dedicated Guideway Elevated on the Shoulder PROJECT BENEFITS RIDERSHIP ,190 to 4,000 TRAFFIC ($0.14/MI TOLL)--18,200 to 51,30020,300 to 86, TRAFFIC ($0.21/MI TOLL)--6,800 to 45,0008,200 to 67, POTENTIAL IMPACTS NUMBER OF BUSINESS IMPACTS (PARCELS) NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL IMPACTS (PARCELS) NATURAL/CULTURAL/ PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MEDIUM LOWMEDIUM ESTIMATED COSTS ($ MILLIONS) TOTAL PRESENT DAY COST (Low)$160.60$160.67$1,299.49$1,770.71$906.30$ TOTAL PRESENT DAY COST (High)$365.05$365.13$1,501.67$1,972.68$1,108.64$1, TOTAL 2035 COST (Low)$338.87$339.01$2,741.92$3,736.20$1,912.29$1, TOTAL 2035 COST (High)$770.26$770.42$3,168.52$4,162.35$2,339.23$2, Evaluation Matrix RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD Questions