M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Hadron Form Factors: Experimental Overview Mark Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002 Nucleon electromagnetic form.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electroweak Physics Mark Pitt Virginia Tech Electroweak physics is a broad subject. I will limit these lectures to: Low energies/momentum transfers 
Advertisements

Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
Exclusive   and  electro-production at high Q 2 in the resonance region Mark Jones Jefferson Lab TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Onset of Scaling in Exclusive Processes Marco Mirazita Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati First Workshop on Quark-Hadron.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
Electromagnetic Form Factors John Arrington Argonne National Lab Long Range Plan QCD Town Meeting Piscataway, NJ, 12 Jan 2007.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Quark-Hadron Duality Cynthia Keppel Hampton University / Jefferson Lab.
The Size and Shape of the Deuteron The deuteron is not a spherical nucleus. In the standard proton-neutron picture of this simplest nucleus, its shape.
TIME-LIKE BARYON FORM FACTORS: EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND POSSIBILITIES FOR PEP-N Roberto Calabrese Dipartimento di Fisica and I.N.F.N. Ferrara, Italy.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Richard MilnerDESY April 6, OLYMPUS Overview Motivation for the experiment Progress to date on the experiment The path forward.
The Structure of the Nucleon Introduction Meson cloud effects: two-component model Strange form factors Results Summary and conclusions Roelof Bijker ICN-UNAM.
Ralf W. Gothe Nucleon Transition Form Factors Beijing Transition Form Factors at JLab: The Evolution of Baryonic Degrees of Freedom Ralf W. Gothe.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction: Polarisation Transfer & Cross-Section Measurements.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
Photodisintegration of Few-Body Nuclei Ron Gilman Rutgers / Jefferson Lab What have we learned? What might we learn? Jefferson Lab User Group The Next.
UK Hadron Physics D. G. Ireland 10 October 2014 NuPECC Meeting, Edinburgh.
Spin-Flavor Decomposition J. P. Chen, Jefferson Lab PVSA Workshop, April 26-27, 2007, Brookhaven National Lab  Polarized Inclusive DIS,  u/u and  d/d.
Hadron physics Hadron physics Challenges and Achievements Mikhail Bashkanov University of Edinburgh UK Nuclear Physics Summer School I.
Determining Strangeness Quark Spin in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering at J-PARC T.-A. Shibata (Tokyo Tech) in collaboration with N. Saito (Kyoto Univ) and.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Size and Structure Mikhail Bashkanov University of Edinburgh UK Nuclear Physics Summer School III.
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
Two-photon Exchange John Arrington Argonne National Lab International Workshop on Positrons at Jefferson Lab, Mar 25-27, 2009.
Shape of Hadrons Athens April 2006 Real Photon Experiments  M. Kotulla MAMI and LEGS magnetic dipole moment of the   
Electromagnetic N →  (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physic, National Taiwan University  Motivations  Model for  * N →  N DMT (Dubna-Mainz-Taipei)
Dynamical study of N-  transition with N(e,e'  ) Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University Collaborators: G.Y. Chen, J.C. Chen (NTU)
Measuring the charged pion polarizability in the  →    −  reaction David Lawrence, JLab Rory Miskimen, UMass, Amherst Elton Smith, JLab.
Electromagnetic probes MAMI, Jefferson Lab & MAX-Lab Daniel Watts University of Edinburgh.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
Meson Photoproduction with Polarized Targets   production a)  0 at threshold b) Roper and P 11 (1710)   production a) S 11 -D 13 phase rotation.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
BINP '06 1 Nucleon Form Factors Strike Back R. Baldini Ferroli, Centro Fermi/INFN-LNF 2 e + e - collisions from  to  BINP 27 feb
Amand Faessler, Tuebingen1 Chiral Quark Dynamics of Baryons Gutsche, Holstein, Lyubovitskij, + PhD students (Nicmorus, Kuckei, Cheedket, Pumsa-ard, Khosonthongkee,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
Nucleon Elastic Form Factors: An Experimentalist’s Perspective Outline: The Fib and the Questions EM FF Strangeness Glen Warren Battelle & Jefferson Lab.
JLAB Program of Baryon Form Factors at High Momentum Transfer Current Status and Future Directions. Paul Stoler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Milos.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
Overview of Jefferson Lab’s Spin Physics Programme Stephen Bültmann - ODU RHIC/AGS Users Meeting, June 2007 Introduction Experimental Setup Asymmetry Measurement.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
DA  NE-2 plans for the study of Nucleon Form Factors Marco Mirazita INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Workshop on Nucleon Form Factors Frascati,
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
Georgie Mbianda 1 for the Baryon (E01-002) Collaboration 1 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Exclusive Electroproduction of π + and η mesons.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electromagnetic moments Electromagnetic interaction  information about.
DIS-Parity: Measuring sin 2 θ W with Parity Violation in Deep Inelastic Scattering using Baseline Spectrometers at JLab 12 GeV Paul E. Reimer.
Exclusive Vector Meson Electroproduction at 12 GeV Paul Stoler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
A unified description of hadronic form factors Preliminary Results Qian Wan Center for Theoretical Physics, Yale University August 20, 2004.
In the SM to the first order x: variable relevant to the nucleon internal structure Q 2 : Four-momentum transfer squared between the electron and the target.
Bryan Moffit PAC32 Dry Run Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2 PAC32 12 GeV Proposal : PR Spokespersons:Bryan.
Lecture 8: Understanding the form factor 30/9/ Why is this a function of q 2 and not just q ? Famous and important result: the “Form Factor.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
M. Radici - Time-like form factors
Nucleon Strangeness: What we know and what we are still missing
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Weak probe of the nucleon in electron scattering
Hadron Form Factors Rolf Ent Jefferson Lab
Exciting Hadrons Vladimir Pascalutsa
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
Patrizia Rossi - INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (ITALY)
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Scaling Study of the L-T Separated p(e,e’π+)n Cross Section at Large Q2 Tanja Horn Jefferson Lab APS/DNP meeting 2007 DNP07 October 2007.
Studying baryon resonances by meson electroproduction at high Q2
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
Presentation transcript:

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Hadron Form Factors: Experimental Overview Mark Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002 Nucleon electromagnetic form factors spacelike, including strange form factors timelike transition form factors, with focus on N   Meson form factors spacelike  + form factor spacelike K + form factor Other form factors Outlook

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon Spacelike (q 2 < 0) Electromagnetic Form Factors 1960’s – early 1990’s : G p E, G p M, G n E, G n M measured using Rosenbluth separation in e + p (elastic) and e + d (quasielastic): early 1990’s – present: Polarization observables and ratio techniques used Sachs:  Dirac  Pauli

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon Spacelike EM Form Factors, World Data Knowledge of nucleon spacelike EM form factors in 1993:  G p E, G p M, G n M follow dipole form G D = (1 + Q 2 /0.71) -2 at ~20% level  G n E ~ 0 (from quasielastic e-d data) GpM/pGDGpM/pGD GnM/nGDGnM/nGD G p E /G D Relative error ~ 2% ~ 10-20% ~ 5-10% (G n E ) 2 /G 2 D ~ %

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Ratio: G p E / G p M Older data: Rosenbluth separation JLab 2000: M. K. Jones, et al. JLab 2002: O. Gayou, et al. using measurements of recoil proton polarization in Hall A with e + p  e + p  Difference in the spatial distribution of charge and magnetization currents in the proton

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Proton EM Form Factor Ratio F p 2 / F p 1 : pQCD predictions pQCD prediction: As Q 2   F p 1  1/Q 4 F p 2  1/Q 6 Q 2 F p 2 /F p 1  constant  not being reached yet Ralston, et al. suggested different scaling behavior: F p 2 /F p 1  1/Q when quark orbital angular momentum included

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL G p E / G p M : Upcoming measurements  JLab experiment E01-109: C.F. Pedrisat, et al. Recoil proton polarimetry in Hall C  Extend Q 2 up to 9.0 GeV 2  At 12 GeV go to Q 2 ~14.0 GeV 2 JLab experiment E01-001: J. Arrington, R. Segel, et al. “Super-Rosenbluth” separation in Hall A  recently completed data-taking 

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Neutron Electric Form Factor G n E : Status in Early 1990’s Slope at Q 2 =0: well known from slow neutron-atom scattering: Platchkov, et al. (1990) deuteron elastic form factor measurements  ~50% systematic uncertainty from choice of nucleon-nucleon potential used in deuteron wavefunction calculation GnEGnE

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Upcoming experiments: E (Hall A) at JLab 3 He (e, e’ n) at Q 2 = 1.3, 2.4, 3.4 (GeV/c) 2 BLAST at MIT-Bates (Q 2 = 0.1 – 0.8 (GeV/c) 2 ) Generally expect ~<10% accuracy up to 3.4 GeV from the complete program of existing and proposed measurements G n E : Current Status and Future Prospects Data from: beam-target asymmetries recoil polarization in: d (e, e’ n) 3 He (e, e’ n) at: Mainz MAMI Jefferson Lab NIKHEF MIT-Bates

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL ND 3 DNP Polarized Target Apparatus of JLAB E93-026

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Neutron’s Magnetic Form Factor G n M : Current Status The most precise recent data comes from ratio measurements:  (d(e,e’n))  (d(e,e’p)) at NIKHEF/Mainz (Anklin, Kubon, et al.) and ELSA at Bonn (Bruins, et al.) Large (8-10%) systematic discrepancy between the two data sets : likely due to error in neutron detection efficiency Newest data: JLAB (Xu, et al. 2000) 3 He(e, e’) in Hall A agrees with NIKHEF/Mainz data at Q 2 = 0.1, 0.2 GeV 2  more data exists (Q 2 = GeV 2 ) but requires improved nuclear corrections (relativistic effects need to be included) (JLAB )

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Neutron’s Magnetic Form Factor G n M : Future Prospects CLAS detector in JLAB Hall B: Will measure  (d(e,e’n))/  (d(e,e’p)) E (Brooks, et al.): Q 2 = GeV 2, data taking completed 12 GeV upgrade: will allow for Q 2 = GeV 2 6 GeV Projections  12 GeV Projections

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon’s Neutral Weak Form Factors Invoke proton/neutron isospin symmetry 3 equations, 3 unknowns Parity-violating electron scattering: elastic e + p and quasielastic e + d G s E,G s M  nucleon’s vector strange form factors

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon’s Vector Strange Form Factors – Published Results < 5% of proton magnetic moment due to strange quark sea SAMPLE at MIT-Bates: HAPPEX at Jefferson Lab:

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL The G 0 Experiment at Jefferson Lab

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon’s Vector Strange Form Factors – Anticipated Results Ongoing experiments at JLAB (G 0 and HAPPEX), Mainz MAMI (A4) will provide: separated form factors G s E and G s M ultimate precision ~<3% of G p E and G p M in the next few years

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon timelike (q 2 >0) electromagnetic form factors Timelike EM Form Factors: s = q 2 > 0 Proton: pp  e + e _ (CERN LEAR, Fermilab) e + e _  pp (ADONE at Frascati, Orsay) Neutron: e + e _  nn (FENICE at ADONE) Existing data does not have adequate statistics to separate G E and G M  Either a) |G E |=|G M | (true at threshold where s = q 2 = 4 M 2 N ) or b) |G E |= 0 is assumed to extract G p M and G n M

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon timelike EM form factors – current status |G p M | |G n M | FENICE data proton FF  proton spacelike FF  Notable features of the timelike form factor data: Rapid fall of G p M just above threshold – sub-threshold NN bound state? G n M > G p M far above threshold, contrary to pQCD prediction ~ (q d /q u ) ~ 0.50 Timelike G p M > spacelike G p M for large q 2, contrary to pQCD expectation Generally, observation of  (e + e _  n n) >  (e + e _  p p) near threshold is considered surprising assumes |G p M | = |G p E | assumes |G n E |=0

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Nucleon timelike EM form factors – future prospects PEP-N initiative at SLAC: Asymmetric e + e _ collider at SLAC at E cm = 1 – 3.1 GeV 3.1 GeV PEP-II LER e + beam on 100 – 800 MeV e _ beam Asymmetric feature boosts nucleons for easier detection Possible measurements Proposed luminosity would allow for separation of |G E | and |G M | for both proton and neutron Polarization measurement of outgoing nucleons would allow for the complex phase difference of G E and G M to be measured

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Electromagnetic FF in the nucleon  resonance transitions:  * p   33 (1232) P 11 (1440) D 13 (1520) S 11 (1535) F 15 (1680)  * N   transition: Characterized by three multipoles: M 1+ magnetic dipole E 1+ electric quadrupole S 1+ scalar quadrupole 1.Low Q 2 : E 1+ /M 1+ and S 1+ /M 1+ measure deformation of N or   sensitive to tensor force between quarks 2. High Q 2 : pQCD helicity conservation predicts E 1+ = M 1+ Nucleon  Resonance Transition Form Factors

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL N   transition form factors – current status Experiments: (photoproduction)  p    p  0 (electroproduction) p(e,e’p)  0 Q 2 = 0 – 0.2 GeV 2 : Mainz MAMI, Bonn ELSA, LEGS at Brookhaven, MIT-Bates Q 2 = 0.4 – 1.8 GeV 2 : JLAB Hall B CLAS (Joo, et al., PRL88, (2002) ) Q 2 = 2.8 – 4.0 GeV 2 : JLAB Hall C (Frolov, et al., PRL82, 45 (1999)) E 1+ /M 1+ (%) S 1+ /M 1+ (%) G M /3G D Conclusions to date: G M falls faster with Q 2 than nucleon form factors E/M, S/M small, no transition to pQCD observed at this Q 2

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL N   transition form factors – future plans Where is the transition to pQCD? Future plans: 1. JLAB97-101: extend previous results to Q 2 ~ 7.5 GeV 2 (Stoler, et al.) 2. JLAB 12 GeV: possible to extend up to Q 2 ~ 14 GeV 2 (Stoler, et al.) Projections for JLAB at 12 GeV G M /3G D E 1+ /M 1+ (%)

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Charged Pion Electromagnetic Spacelike Form Factor Low Q 2 (up to 0.28 GeV 2 ): Scattering of  from atomic electrons High Q 2 (0.28 – 3.5 GeV 2 ): Extract F  from pion electroproduction p (e, e’  + )n Assumption: Pion-pole diagram dominates the longitudinal cross-section for small t, experimental L/T separation required  model for pion electroproduction required to extract F 

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Due to simpler valence structure, pQCD may become important at lower Q 2 for pion than nucleon pQCD prediction as Q 2   Charged Pion EM Spacelike Form Factor – Current Status and Future Plans Recent data: JLAB E93-021, Mack et al. from Q 2 = 0.6 – 1.6 GeV 2 Future data: JLAB E01-004, Q 2 = 1.6, 2.0, 2.5 GeV 2, data-taking 2002 JLAB at 12 GeV, Q 2 up to 6.0 GeV 2

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Charged Kaon Electromagnetic Spacelike Form Factor High Q 2 requires kaon electroproduction measurements: p (e,e’K + ) Y As in pion electroproduction, an L/T separation and a kaon electroproduction model are required to extract F K Existing data: from K-e scattering Projected results from JLAB E98-108: recently completed data-taking analysis in progress

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Other Form Factors Baryon form factors (besides p and n) spacelike: Only  - charge radius measured: =.91 .32 .40 fm 2 (WA89) =.61 .12 .09 fm 2 (SELEX) timelike: only  measured with poor statistics Meson form factors Timelike charged pion form factor (measured to Q 2 ~ 10 GeV 2 ) statistical accuracy of data above 1 GeV 2 is limited Timelike charged/neutral kaon form factors (to Q 2 ~ 4.4 GeV 2 ) statistical accuracy of data above 1 GeV 2 is limited  0 form factor: meson photon transition form factor  *    0 measured at CLEO from 1.5 – 9 GeV 2

M. Pitt, Virginia Tech Lightcone 2002,LANL Outlook Highlights of : Unexpected result for G p E /G p M Significantly improved determination of G n E First measurements of nucleon’s strange vector form factors Significantly improved measurements on N   transition FF First measurements of neutron’s timelike form factor Accurate determination of  + spacelike form factor Anticipated results in next several years Precise determination of nucleon’s strange vector form factors Extended Q 2 range for G p E /G p M, G n E, N  ,  + spacelike FF Other future possibilities JLAB at 12 GeV – extended Q 2 range for spacelike FF PEP-N at SLAC: timelike FF measurements of many baryons and mesons