ASENT 13 th Annual Meeting Mega Clinical Studies - Lessons from CSPS2 - Norio Tanahashi Saitama Medical University International Medical Center , Japan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
Advertisements

Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
Role of Cilostazol in Stroke Prevention Philippine Heart Association 43 rd Annual Convention & Scientific Meeting Landmark Trials Session May 24, 2012.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Antiplatelet Guidelines
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
1 Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in elderly Japanese patients with atherosclerotic risk factors: a randomized clinical.
The ONTARGET Trial Reference The ONTARGET investigators. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:15.
Blood Pressure Reduction Among Acute Stroke Patients A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Tan Xu, Weijun Tong, Shaoyan Zhang,
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention Beyond One Year Following ACS or PCI Working Group: Anil Gupta MD, FRCPC,
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides PRoFESS ® Trial Prevention Regimen For Effectively avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS ® )
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Terutroban versus aspirin in Patients with Cerebral Ischaemic Events (PREFORM): a Randomized, Double- blind Parallel-group Trial Daniel Wells Mercer University.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Lancet 2013;382: Albers G et al. Chest. 2001; 119 (suppl): 300S. Ischemic stroke 85% Hemorrhagic stroke 15% Other 5% Cryptogenic.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
* Based on post hoc analysis of individual outcome events (N=19,185). 1 Data on file, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2 Gent M. Circulation. 1997; 96 (suppl):
Aggrenox Is it as good as the ads?. ESPS-2: European Stroke Prevention Study s Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial s 6,602.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
Naotsugu Oyama, MD, PhD, MBA A Trial of PLATelet inhibition and Patient Outcomes.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
A Review of – Clopidogrel and Aspirin versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ted Williams Pharm D Candidate Monday Lab.
Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial PEACE Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Perindopril Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction PREAMIPREAMI Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Hot Line Session, September.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
ESPS-2: European Stroke Prevention Study s Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial s 6,602 patients randomized within 3 months.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Rikki Weems, PGY III August 20, 2015
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
FOURIER Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis  Stavros Stavrakis, MD  The American Journal.
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
The following slides highlight a discussion and analysis of presentations in the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session from the 55th Annual Scientific.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Multiple Atherothrombotic Risk Factors and for Those with Established Cardiovascular Disease Deepak L.Bhatt, et al,
Presentation transcript:

ASENT 13 th Annual Meeting Mega Clinical Studies - Lessons from CSPS2 - Norio Tanahashi Saitama Medical University International Medical Center , Japan #28-Tanahashi

Background The efficacy of aspirin and other antiplatelets in secondary prevention of cerebral infarction has been demonstrated in various studies and meta- analyses, mostly conducted in the US and EU. A significant reduction in risk of recurrence of cerebral infarction for cilostazol compared with placebo was demonstrated in the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study ( CSPS ) Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study Ⅱ ( CSPS Ⅱ) is the first, long-term, large-scale, phase4 clinical trial in Japan. #28-Tanahashi

AntiplateletImprovement of endothelial functionVasodilation Anti-atherosclerosis CilostazolCilostazol Antiplatelet Improvement of endothelial function Vasodilation Anti-atherosclerosis Treatment strategy for atherothrombotic cerebral infarction #28-Tanahashi

Cilostazol is Superior to Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention : Results of CSPS Ⅱ Multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparative study in Japan #28-Tanahashi

Outline of study plan Objective : This study was designed to investigate whether cilostazol is superior to aspirin in secondary prevention of cerebral infarction in stroke patients in Japan. Number of participants : 1300 in each group, for a total of 2600 Number of study institutions : 294 Study period : 5 years, ( December 2003 to December 2008 ) #28-Tanahashi

Aspirin 81mg Cilostazol 200mg R Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, comparative study 1300 Duration of treatment: 1–5 years Primary endpoint : Occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) Study period : December 2003-December 2008 Study design #28-Tanahashi

Main inclusion and exclusion criteria Main inclusion criteria Patients in stable condition within 182 days ( 26 weeks ) of occurrence of cerebral infarction Patients with infarct-related foci detected by x-ray CT scan or MRI Patients aged years ( inclusive ) at time of consent Patients having no cardiac diseases possibly associated with cardiogenic cerebral embolism Main exclusion criteria Patients with hemorrhage or bleeding tendency Patients with ischemic heart failure Patients with peptic ulcer Patients with severe blood disorders Patients with severe hepatic or renal disorders Patients with malignant neoplasm or who have received any therapy for malignant neoplasm within 5 years prior to study enrollment #28-Tanahashi

Criteria for Evaluation Primary endpoint Occurrence of stroke ( cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage ) during the treatment period Secondary endpoints Recurrence of cerebral infarction during the treatment period Occurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular diseases ( cerebral infarction or TIA ) during the treatment period Occurrence of all-cause death during the treatment period Occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization during the treatment period #28-Tanahashi

Cilostazol (n =1337 ) Aspirin (n =1335 ) P value Male sex - n (%) 959 ( 71.7 ) 957 ( 71.7 ) 0.98 Age * ( Yr ) 63.5± ± BMI * ( kg/m 2 ) 24.0± ± Stroke subtypes - n (%) Atherothrombotic Lacunar Undetermined 435 ( 32.5 ) 869 ( 65.0 ) 33 ( 2.5 ) 420 ( 31.5 ) 874 ( 65.5 ) 41 ( 3.1 ) 0.57 Days after onset - n (%) - 28 days days days 113 -< days 414 ( 31.0 ) 354 ( 26.5 ) 343 ( 25.7 ) 226 ( 16.9 ) 419 ( 31.4 ) 338 ( 25.3 ) 320 ( 24.0 ) 258 ( 19.3 ) 0.35 * Mean±SD Patients characteristics1 #28-Tanahashi

Cilostazol ( n=1337 ) Aspirin ( n=1335 ) P value Severity at baseline ( Classification by Modified Rankin Scale ) n (%) 0.55 Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade ( 15.5 ) 612 ( 45.8 ) 406 ( 30.4 ) 73 ( 5.5 ) 39 ( 2.9 ) 0 ( 0.0 ) 186 ( 13.9 ) 613 ( 45.9 ) 432 ( 32.4 ) 69 ( 5.2 ) 35 ( 2.6 ) 0 ( 0.0 ) Smoking - n (%) 385 ( 28.8 ) 403 ( 30.2 ) 0.43 Alcohol intake - n (%) 640 ( 47.9 ) 624 ( 46.7 ) 0.56 Complications - n (%) Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Diabetes mellitus Dyslipidemia 976 ( 73.0 ) 11 ( 0.8 ) 382 ( 28.6 ) 560 ( 41.9 ) 991 ( 74.2 ) 18 ( 1.3 ) 393 ( 29.4 ) 599 ( 44.9 ) * Mean±SD Patients characteristics 2 #28-Tanahashi

Cilostazol (n =1337 ) Aspirin ( n=1335 ) Antihypertensive agents ARB Ca antagonists ACE inhibitors 900 ( 67.3 ) 617 ( 46.1 ) 627 ( 46.9 ) 111 ( 8.3 ) 999 ( 74.8 ) 723 ( 54.2 ) 753 ( 56.4 ) 121 ( 9.1 ) Lipid-lowering agents Statins 401 ( 30.0 ) 362 ( 27.1 ) 452 ( 33.9 ) 402 ( 30.1 ) Antidiabetic agents 271 ( 20.3 ) 278 ( 20.8 ) Digestive agents 863 ( 64.5 ) 908 ( 68.0 ) n (%) Concomitant medications #28-Tanahashi

Primary and secondary endpoint Cilostazol ( n = 1337 ) Aspirin ( n = 1335 ) Hazard ratio ( 95% confidence interval ) Hazard ratio Log-rank test P value No of patients (%) 【 Efficacy end point 】 Primary endpoint Stroke ( Cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage ) 82 ( 2.76 ) 119 ( 3.71 ) 0.74 ( ) 0.04 Secondary end point Cerebral infarction 72 ( 2.43 ) 88 ( 2.75 ) 0.88 ( ) 0.42 Ischemic cerebrovascular disorder ( Cerebral infarction, TIA ) 86 ( 2.90 ) 103 ( 3.21 ) 0.90 ( ) 0.46 Death from any cause 13 ( 0.42 ) 13 ( 0.39 ) 1.07 ( ) 0.86 Composite secondary end point * 138 ( 4.66 ) 186 ( 5.81 ) 0.80 ( ) 0.04 【 Safety end point 】 Bleeding events ( cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding requiring hospitalization ) 23 ( 0.77 ) 57 ( 1.78 ) 0.46 ( ) < Cilostazol better Aspirin better *Cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, death #28-Tanahashi

(%) 5 10 Aspirin Cilostazol P= Log-rank test RRR=25.7 % Aspirin Cilostazol Primary end point : Occurrence of stroke ( cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage ) n No of occurrence Estimate Incidence /year Cilostazol % Aspirin % No. at Risk Cumulative incidence Days after randomization #28-Tanahashi

P= Log-rank test RRR=20.1 % Occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization (%) n No of occurrence s Estimate Incidence /year Cilostazol % Aspirin % Aspirin Cilostazol Aspirin No. at Risk Cumulative incidence Days after randomization Cilostazol #28-Tanahashi

Occurrence of bleeding events ( cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding requiring hospitalization ) 5 P= Log-rank 検定 RRR=54.2 % (%) n No of occurrence s Estimate Incidence /year Cilostazol % Aspirin % Aspirin Cilostazol Aspirin No. at Risk Cumulative incidence Days after randomization Cilostazol #28-Tanahashi

* : Fisher の正確検定 Summary of adverse events Cilostazol (n =1337 ) Aspirin (n =1335 ) P value * n (%) Headache 313 ( 23.4 ) 217 ( 16.3 )< Diarrhea 164 ( 12.3 ) 85 ( 6.4 )< Palpitations 156 ( 11.7 ) 71 ( 5.3 )< Dizziness 129 ( 9.6 ) 97 ( 7.3 ) 0.03 Tachycardia 89 ( 6.7 ) 21 ( 1.6 )< Hypertension 120 ( 9.0 ) 185 ( 13.9 )< Constipation 110 ( 8.2 ) 155 ( 11.6 ) #28-Tanahashi

Results Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of stroke ( cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage ) compared with aspirin. ( P=0.0357,RRR=25.7 % )。 Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of cerebral stroke, TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, or hemorrhage requiring hospitalization compared with aspirin. ( P= 、 RRR=20.1 % ) Cilostazol significantly reduced occurrence of bleeding events ( cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, bleeding requiring hospitalization ) ( P= 、 RRR=54.2 %) #28-Tanahashi

Conclusions Cilostazol demonstrated efficacy in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with cerebral infarction, with less bleeding compared to aspirin for the first time. Cilostazol is a suitable first option for the prevention of recurrent stroke. #28-Tanahashi

Occurrence of Stroke Occurrence of Stroke -CSPS2 Sub analysis- -CSPS2 Sub analysis- ( n=869 ) ( n=874 ) ( n=435 ) ( n=420 ) RRR 32% RRR 25% (% /person ・ year ) Cilostazol Aspirin Atherothrombotic Lacunar #28-Tanahashi

Occurrence of Cerebral Infarction -CSPS2 Sub analysis- -CSPS2 Sub analysis- ( n=869 ) ( n=874 ) ( n=435 ) ( n=420 ) RRR 28% RRR 7% Atherothrombotic Lacunar (% /person ・ year ) Cilostazol Aspirin #28-Tanahashi

Incidence of Hemorrhagic Stroke among Ischemic Stroke Subtypes CSPS2 sub-analysis ( n=869 )( n=874 )( n=435 )( n=420 ) p= AtherothromboticLacunar (% /person ・ year ) Cilostazol Aspirin #28-Tanahashi

Occurrence of Intracranial Hemorrhage Stroke subtype Lacunar Atherothrombotic No. at risk Stroke subtype Lacunar Atherothrombotic No. at risk Days after randomization Atherothrombotic infarction Lacunar infarction Atherothrombotic infarction Lacunar infarction P=0.829, log-rank test P=0.114, log-rank test Cilostazol group Aspirin group (%) (%) Cumulative incidence #28-Tanahashi

n= years – mean follow up Aspirin 81mg / day (n=757) Sarpogrelate 100mgTID (n=750) Design of S-ACCESS R ● Subject : Ischemic stroke patients -Primary Endpoint: Cerebral infarction -Secondary Endpoint: Clusters of serious vascular events (stroke, acute coronary syndrome, or vascular event-related death) ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study conducted in Japan Shinohara Y, et al. Stroke 2008; 39: #28-Tanahashi

Results of S-ACCESS Incidence (%/person-year) Intracranial hemorrhage Cerebral infarction P=0.19 #28-Tanahashi

n= years – mean follow up Aspirin 325mg/day (n=9586) Clopidogrel 75mg/day 3 (n=9599) Design of CAPRIE R ● Subject : Patients with ischemic stroke, MI, or symptomatic PAD -Primary Endpoint: Composite of ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death -Secondary Endpoint: Amputation, vascular death ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: #28-Tanahashi

Results of CAPRIE Incidence (%/person-year) Intracranial hemorrhage Ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death P=0.043 #28-Tanahashi

Design of CHARISMA n= months - median follow up Aspirin mg/day (n=7801) Clopidogrel 75mg/day + Aspirin mg/day (n=7802) R ● Subject : Patients with clinically evident vascular disease or multiple risk factors -Primary Endpoint: Composite of MI, stroke or deaths from cordiovascular causes -Secondary Endpoint: Composite of MI, stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, or hospitalization for unstable angina, TIA, or a revascularization procedure ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study Bhatt DL, et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: #28-Tanahashi

Results of CHARISMA Incidence (%/person-year) MI, stroke or deaths from cordiovascular causes Intracranial hemorrhage #28-Tanahashi

Design of ESPRIT n= years – mean follow up Aspirin mg/day (n=1376) Aspirin mg/day + Dipyridamole 200mg BID (n=1363) R ● Subject : TIA or minor stroke -Primary Endpoint: Composite of death from all vascular causes, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, or major bleeding complication -Secondary Endpoint: Death from all causes, death from all vascular Causes, death from all vascular causes and non-fatal stroke, all major ischemic events, all vascular events ● Multi-center, double-blind, randomized study The ESPRIT Study Group. Lancet 2006; 367: #28-Tanahashi

Results of ESPRIT (%/person-year) Incidence Intracranial hemorrhage Death from all vascular causes, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, or major bleeding complication #28-Tanahashi

Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage ― Western vs. Japan trials - Incidence (%/person-year) Trials in Western PopulationTrials in Japanese Population #28-Tanahashi

Modified from Toyoda K.: Drugs, 69, , 2009 Hisayamacho, Japan Male Hisayamacho, Japan Female Shibata, Japan Changsha, China Beijing, China Shanghai, China New Mexico, USA Giessen, Germany Framingham, USA Rochester, USA East Asian Hispanic Caucasian Annual incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (/100,000 person) Annual incidence of cerebral hemorrhage in general population Anti Thrombotic Therapy – 2010 Recurrent stroke prevention considering risk/benefit Kazunori Toyoda : Nikkei Medical on-line ( as of October 2010) #28-Tanahashi

Mechanism of Cilostazol on less bleeding Protective Effects of Cilostazol on Barrier Function of Vasculature ● Inhibition of MMP-9 expression which degrade peri-vascular matrix ● Improvement of Endothelial Barrier function PLoS ONE 1 December 2010, Volume 5 e15178 Pharmacological Research 55 (2007) 104–110 #28-Tanahashi

Intracranial hemorrhage was more frequent in S-ACCESS and CSPS2 compared with the trials conducted in western in the aspirin group Cilostazol decrease Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage Compared with Aspirin In CSPS2, more intracranial hemorrhage was observed in patients with lacunar infarction compared with those with atherothrombotic infarction. High bleeding tendency in Japanese population might be attributable to high rate of lacunar patients ( > 60%) enrolled in these trials. Summary #28-Tanahashi

Conclusion Japanese population are considered to have higher bleeding tendency That ‘s reason why Lacuna infarcton is higher rate in japanese population Thus results of western trials may not be applicable to Japanese population. #28-Tanahashi