Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Deformations and stresses in the flux return yoke A.Efremov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov Darmstadt, 03.03.2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Advertisements

D2 conceptual design and field quality optimization Ramesh Gupta, BNL Slide No. 1 Nov. 13, 2013 D2 Conceptual Design and Field Quality.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
Structures and stress BaDI 1.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
IMPACT Phase II – 9/13/00 Activity Report Slide 1/20 University of Louisville IMPACT Architecture Team Glen Prater, Jr., Associate Professor Ellen G. Brehob,
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Task list for Magnet/Iron yoke Solenoid magnet Iron yoke Experimental hall and other facilities May 11, ’05.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Support and magnet coil KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Nov. 10, ‘04.
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting. Jefferson Lab. September 9 – 11, Review of Tagger System.
ILD Magnet & calorimeters integration meeting Questions to be addressed 01-02
Shield Module Design Considerations Adam Carroll Van Graves July 3, 2014.
Kapton module ass. Spacers for pins 3.6 m m 1.25 mm.
Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension ME 450: Finite Element Analysis Spring 2007 Presented by: Bart Sudhoff, Zachary Lightner, Jim Milligan, Brian.
Inner Triplet Review April 2007 Inner Triplet Supports Sonia Bartolomé Jiménez (TS/IC)
The BaBar Upgrade Load transfer of the Barrel and Endcap Calorimeters Richard F Boyce 21 October 2003.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
1. Introduction 2. Magnetic field design Optimization of yoke configuration in several conf. Boundary conditions -
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
Dual-Phase ProtoDUNE Detector Installation : Plans & Constraints Adamo Gendotti.
IPN Lyon ILD Mechanical structure February 2015 Design, Integration & Services J.C Ianigro - IPN Lyon -
Side Rail Sag Measurement T. Hayakawa, K. Inami, K. Suzuki (Nagoya) and T. Kohriki (KEK) PID upgrade meeting.
Status of the PANDA Magnet Yoke Presented by E. Koshurnikov GSI, February 7, 2013.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Status of the magnet for the PANDA Target Spectrometer Report from Dubna A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov,
12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.
Page 1 GSI, Hydraulic Actuators for PANDA Target Spectrometer Jost Lühning, GSI Darmstadt Functional Specifications for moving the TS: Two synchronous.
Status of the Yoke Interfaces Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov February 2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
PANDA Yoke unsolved Interface problems Presented by E. Koshurnikov (Dubna) December 9, 2011, GSI.
Status of the PANDA Magnet Yoke Presented by E. Koshurnikov GSI, June 26, 2013.
Summary of Platform and Hilman Rollers Deformation Studies John Amann ILC Mechanical Engineering 7/11/07.
preliminary magnet layout Renzo P.
Miscellaneous MEC Topics Mainz, CM September 2016, MEC Session J
PANDA Magnet Iron Yoke Strength Analysis
Roller/rail - System for PANDA
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Ferrara MECHANICAL SUPPORT for forward tracking detectors Federico Evangelisti INFN - Ferrara GSI – 2-6 march 2009.
TYPES OF CHASSIS FRAMES
Mechanical Design Review February 25, 2008 Université de Montréal
Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)
Platform Design for the Target Spectrometer using Heavy-Weight Rollers J. Lühning, GSI Darmstadt, Three design goals for Platform: Low construction.
Solenoid Yoke Door-Barrel Connection
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.
Mechanical Design Review February 25, 2008 Université de Montréal
HCAL preliminary analysis and results
Present status of the flux return yoke design
PANDA Yoke of the Magnet
PANDA Collaboration Meeting , BINP Sergey Pivovarov.
Platform for Target Spectrometer using linear montion drive Rexroth
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.
Status of the PANDA Magnet
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Assembly, survey, alignment of the CBM Dipole Magnet
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
The Bunker Steel Structure – Structural Analysis
Shipping Support Post Analysis
Dove-Tail Tack Block Design
Presentation transcript:

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Deformations and stresses in the flux return yoke A.Efremov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov Darmstadt,

2 Yoke and support front view

3 Yoke cross-section

4 FE model (1) Optimization purpose: minimization of the deformation difference between different cases of support point positions (wheels, lifts and permanent supports) minimization of deformation of the platform supporting the doors Door gravity load points (when the doors are attached to the barrel) The door halves are fixed to each other Cryostat and detectors weight application points (2 options) Iron yoke (distributed gravity load) The yoke weight is supported by the vertical frames

5 FE model (2) Door gravity load points (when the doors are attached to the barrel) The door halves are fixed to each other Optimization purpose: minimization of the deformation difference between different cases of support point positions (wheels, lifts and permanent supports) minimization of deformation of the platform supporting the doors Cryostat and detectors weight application points (2 options) Iron yoke (distributed gravity load) The yoke weight is supported by the vertical frames

6 Deformations due to gravity: 3 points of support  H = -0.1 mm  X 1 = +0.6 mm  X 2 = -0.4 mm The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks  y = -0.4 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  y max = -0.9 mm

7 Deformations due to gravity: 2 points of support  H = +1.0 mm  X 1 = -0.3 mm  X 2 = -1.7 mm The doors are supported by the side barrel beams  y = -1.7 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  y max = -1.7 mm

8 Deformations due to gravity: 3 points of support  H = -1.2 mm  X 1 = +1.9 mm  X 2 = +0.4 mm The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks  y = -0.1 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point Cryostat and detectors are mounted at the upper barrel beam  y max = -1.6 mm

9 Deformations due to gravity: 2 points of support  H = -1.0 mm  X 1 = +1.7 mm  X 2 = +0.3 mm The doors are supported by the side barrel beams  y = -0.3 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point Cryostat and detectors are mounted at the upper barrel beam  y max = -1.7 mm

10 Stresses due to gravity: 2 points of support The doors are supported by the side barrel beams Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam

11 Stresses due to gravity: 3 points of support The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam

12 Deformations due to gravity and seismic loads ( 3 points of support)  H = mm  X 1 = mm  X 2 = mm The doors are attached to the barrel Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  x max = 2 mm a X = 1.5 m/s 2

13 Deformations due to gravity: 2 points of support  H = +0.7 mm  X 1 = -0.1 mm  X 2 = -1.3 mm The doors are supported by the side barrel beams H  y = -1.5 mm X1X1 X2X2 Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  y max = -1.5 mm

14 Deformations due to gravity: 3 points of support  H = -0.2 mm  X 1 = +0.6 mm  X 2 = -0.2 mm The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  y max = -0.9 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point

15 Stresses due to gravity: 2 points of support The doors are supported by the side barrel beams Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam

16 Stresses due to gravity: 3 points of support The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks Support point Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam

17 Comparison of deformations (in mm) Magnet support option Application of cryostat and detectors weight The doors are fixed to the barrel The doors are staying on the supports HH X1X1 X2X2 HH X1X1 X2X2 2 supports Lower beam Upper beam supports Lower beam Upper beam Magnet support option Application of cryostat and detectors weight The doors are fixed to the barrel The doors are staying on the supports HH X1X1 X2X2 HH X1X1 X2X2 2 supports Lower beam Upper beam supports Lower beam Upper beam The lower frame with nominal cross section The lower frame with increased cross section

18 Deformations due to gravity: 4 points of support  H = -0.4 mm  X 1 = +0.8 mm  X 2 = 0.04 mm The doors are staying on the rails supported by the jacks Cryostat and detectors are supported by the lower barrel beam  y max = -1.1 mm H X1X1 X2X2 Support point

19 Summary The deformations of the yoke in the framework of the considered concept of the movable platform (4 pairs of the railing wheels) are reduced to about 1 mm. Increasing the thickness of the platform beam does not significantly reduce the relative deformation of the yoke, while leads to more complicated (and expensive) design The suspension system for cryostat and detectors should be designed so that their positions would not critically depend on the yoke deformations (their weight should be mainly transferred to the lower beam of the yoke barrel, etc) In order to ensure the rails supporting the doors to be straight-line (for the unhindered door sliding), the supports for them in the experimental hall should be provided (in addition to the jacks supporting the main platform) Further possible solutions of increasing the yoke stiffness (increasing the thickness of vertical support frames or upper horizontal frame; welding of units) will be analyzed The comprehensive analysis of deformations in the complete 3D FE model of the yoke will be performed; we need information on external (magnetic) forces as input data