The State of Mentoring in Michigan Report on the Mentor Michigan Census: Wave I, Fall 2004 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to the U.S. Demographic System John F. Long
Advertisements

1 An Introduction to Mentoring and the Alberta Mentoring Partnership.
Prince George’s County Human Services Coalition Funders Panel Presenter: Renette Oklewicz Director, Foundation Programs January 11, 2012.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
Senior Assets for Optimal Living: Improving Quality of Life for Midland’s Seniors Jennifer Heronema President & CEO The Legacy Center Alan Brown Executive.
Youth mentoring and the well-being of young people: Evidence from an Irish mixed- methods evaluation Dr Bernadine Brady Child & Family Research Centre.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
Which factors make a difference when identifying pockets of under-immunization? Gayle Moxness Hennepin County Community Health Department Minneapolis,
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
ORC International Proprietary & Confidential Stress Awareness Month Survey Report April 7, 2015 EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:00 AM, April 13, 2015.
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
HART RESEARCH P e t e r D ASSOTESCIA Research Findings March 2004.
1 Michele Canning Director of Volunteer Services San Francisco, Conservatory of Flowers How the Internet Has Changed Volunteering: An Insiders Guide to.
Presentation to Community of Care July 28, 2015 Christa Anders & Laurie Davis, SPCC Co-Directors Data Prepared by Wilder Research St. Paul Children’s Collaborative.
Count us in! The growing role of learning support programs in achieving education outcomes for disadvantaged students Anne Pate Research Officer, Research.
Mentoring for Success: Essential Elements for and Models of Mentoring Programs.
Made4Me Employer Database Qualifications Requirements Training Assessment Made4Me MAtching Made4Me Student Database Made4Me Team Name: SuccessUFD Member:
Michigan Department of Community Health Bureau of Health Professions  Prevention  Regulatory  Disciplinary  Workforce Excellence.
1 Charles Garbowski Senior Director Research March 16, 2007 R E S E A R C H K P M G L L P ACI Second Annual Global Audit Committee Survey.
Welcome Rawlinson Road Middle School Parents and Faculty We have a dropout crisis ….. South Carolina has one of the lowest graduation rates in America.
AcademyHealth Public Health Systems Research Interest Group Meeting Public Health Data Panel.
“Challenges and Opportunities” Presented by: Dr. Jesus “Jess” Carreon Chancellor, Dallas County Community College District.
Measuring the Value of Your Volunteer Efforts Nikki Russell Volunteer Initiatives Manager United Way of King County.
Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum.
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS AMONG PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTS IN NORTH CAROLINA Candice M. Bruton, MA Myron F. Floyd, PhD Jason N. Bocarro,
FFY12 Activity Tracking Form Training Presented by: Alexis Narodovich, MPH Research Associate IV Research and Evaluation Unit Network for a Healthy California.
Recent Trends in Worker Quality: A Midwest Perspective Daniel Aaronson and Daniel Sullivan Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago November 2002.
Joseph J. McDowall © 2014 ACWA 2014: Children in a Changing World, Sydney, August 18 – 20, 2014 Contact between, and Placement of Siblings in Out-of-Home.
Porter and Stern (2002) asserted that firms operating in advanced nations whose economies are innovation-based would not obtain a sustained competitive.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
Introduction Smoking and Social Networks Joseph R. Pruis, Student Research Collaborator, Rosemary A. Jadack, PhD, RN, Professor Department Of Nursing,
The State of Mentoring in Michigan Report on the Mentor Michigan Census: Wave II, Summer 2005 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale,
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Salford Futures 2013/14 Evaluation John Reehill Dave Timperley.
Victor M. H. Borden Associate Vice President, University Planning, Institutional Research & Accountability (IU) Professor of Psychology (IUPUI) Using Evaluation.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
The State of Mentoring in Michigan Report on the Mentor Michigan Census: Wave I, Fall 2004 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale,
 Necessity for successful youth mentoring has grown in the United States substantially over the years  Indianapolis Star series focus “Our City Our.
The State of Mentoring in Michigan Report on the Mentor Michigan Census: Wave II, Summer 2005 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale,
Profiling exercise of internally displaced persons’ situations in_______ General presentation of the project Official project launch event Date.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
1 Public Library Use in Oregon Results from the 2006 Oregon Population Survey Oregon State Library March 2007.
Parental Involvement in Children’s Social Networking Activities.
Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Surveillance Report, 2008 Minnesota Department of Health STD Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health STD.
Education and the Workforce: Delmarva in the Rural-Urban Context Robert M. Gibbs Economic Research Service - USDA The views and opinions expressed in this.
Who’s Minding the Kids in the Summer? Child Care Arrangements for Summer 2006 Lynda Laughlin - U.S. Census Bureau Joseph Rukus - Cornell University Annual.
Index of Child Well-Being The Foundation for Child Development Index of Child Well- Being (CWI) 1975 to 2002 with Projections for 2003 A Social Indicators.
2016 St. Johns County Point In Time Count When: Thursday, January 28, 2016.
Washington Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
E-Mentoring for Self-employed Professionals Kim Rickard and Erin Wood APESMA Mentoring Summit November 2002.
Strategic Plan. 2006, 2009, 2012 Dr. Andy Hoh Agenda Establish Vision Identify the most critical issues Prioritize Issues Develop initiatives Set goals.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Oklahoma Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Oregon’s Early Learning Workforce: What is the data telling us? Oregon Association for the Education of Young Children Saturday, April 16, 2016 Megan Irwin,
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Robertson County School Volunteer Training Presented by Thomas Mitchell, Community Education Director & Diana Wells, FRYSC and Volunteer Coordinator.
New Survey for Congregations
GETTING INVOLVED: VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES AT CAEP
Research Findings March 2004 HART RESEARCH P e t e r D A S O T E C I.
Community Needs Assessment for United Way of Lamar County
Philadelphia’s Nonprofit Human Service Organizations: How African American-Led Organizations Differ from White-Led Organizations Presentation at Philanthropy.
Presentation transcript:

The State of Mentoring in Michigan Report on the Mentor Michigan Census: Wave I, Fall 2004 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale, MI (248) November 10, 2004 Robert W. Kahle, Ph.D. Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Ferndale, MI (248) November 10, 2004

Organization of This Presentation I. Background and Introduction -Objectives -Defining Mentoring -Conceptual Overview…Mentoring Funnel -Methods Used to Conduct the Mentor Michigan Census Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Organization of This Presentation (Cont’d) II. Key Findings -Overview of Key Funnel Measures -Mentee and Mentor Demographics -Organizational Profile - Michigan’s Mentoring Gap III: Strategic Challenges -Q&A and Discussion II. Key Findings -Overview of Key Funnel Measures -Mentee and Mentor Demographics -Organizational Profile - Michigan’s Mentoring Gap III: Strategic Challenges -Q&A and Discussion Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Mentor Michigan Census Objectives 1.Identify, count, describe and track - Mentoring organizations - Mentoring programs - Matches, Mentors and Mentees 2.Understand program components, processes, resources and needs 3.Encourage and support program evaluation 1.Identify, count, describe and track - Mentoring organizations - Mentoring programs - Matches, Mentors and Mentees 2.Understand program components, processes, resources and needs 3.Encourage and support program evaluation Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Defining Mentoring Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement aimed at developing the competence and character of the mentee. (National Mentoring Partnership) Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement aimed at developing the competence and character of the mentee. (National Mentoring Partnership) Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Defining Mentoring Responsible mentoring can take many forms: Traditional mentoring (one adult to one young person) Group mentoring (one adult to up to four young people) Team mentoring (several adults working with small groups of young people, in which the adult to youth ratio is not greater than 1:4) Peer mentoring (caring youth mentoring other youth) E-mentoring (mentoring via and the internet) Responsible mentoring can take many forms: Traditional mentoring (one adult to one young person) Group mentoring (one adult to up to four young people) Team mentoring (several adults working with small groups of young people, in which the adult to youth ratio is not greater than 1:4) Peer mentoring (caring youth mentoring other youth) E-mentoring (mentoring via and the internet) Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Recruitment Mentor Preparation and Selection Mentoring Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. The Mentoring Funnel

Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. The Mentoring Funnel

Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. The Mentoring Funnel Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer

Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. The Mentoring Funnel Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry

Outcomes for… Children Adults Mentoring Organizations Communities State of MI Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Method Mentor MI Registry 156 Organizations as of Oct. 1 Mentor MI Census Wave I 105 Complete Wave III – Fall 2005 Wave IV – Spring 2006 Wave V – Fall 2006 Wave II – Spring 2005 Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Special Thanks BBBS of Metro Detroit John Glenn High School Legacy Associates Foundation Twenty-first Century Sisterhood Amicus II, Inc. (Detroit Peace Makers) VIP RISE Mentoring Program Oakland County Youth Assistance Southgate Community Schools Life Directions BBBS of Metro Detroit John Glenn High School Legacy Associates Foundation Twenty-first Century Sisterhood Amicus II, Inc. (Detroit Peace Makers) VIP RISE Mentoring Program Oakland County Youth Assistance Southgate Community Schools Life Directions

Method On-line survey Data collected between September 9 and September 29, 2004 Data collected at both organizational and program levels Mentoring organization representatives involved in design and pre-test Special focus in Wave I on mentoring organizations On-line survey Data collected between September 9 and September 29, 2004 Data collected at both organizational and program levels Mentoring organization representatives involved in design and pre-test Special focus in Wave I on mentoring organizations Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

National Mentoring Partnership online survey of Michigan Organizations (2003) Context and Comparison Three key sources of roughly comparable data: Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. National Mentoring Partnership National Prevalence Study (2002) National Mentoring Partnership National Prevalence Study (2000)

Overview of Findings Key Funnel Measures Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

How Many Inquiries? Applications? 5,823: New inquiries in ,976 : New written applications received from potential mentors 2,017 : Mentors on waiting lists 2,345 : Children on waiting lists 5,823: New inquiries in ,976 : New written applications received from potential mentors 2,017 : Mentors on waiting lists 2,345 : Children on waiting lists Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry 2003 NMP survey showed 475 mentors and 2661 children and on waiting lists

Mentor Background Checks? Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Criminal Background Personal Interviews Written Application Character References 89% 86% 83% 79% Background checks up from 61% in 2003 survey, comparable to national norms

Mentor Background Checks? Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Drivers Lic./ Driving Record Sex Offender Registry Child Abuse Registry Credit Do None of the Above % 60% 40% 3%

Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentor Training Required Percent of Organizations Requiring... Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer 1-2 Hours 2-4 Hours 4-8 Hours 9+ Hours Other/DK 11% 25% 23% 14% 13% 14% Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Only 75% require training, but up from 59% in None

How Many Children Served? How Many Mentors? 16,574:Young people mentored in ,108:Active mentors 22,500:Estimated active mentor/mentee relationships in MI as of fall ,574:Young people mentored in ,108:Active mentors 22,500:Estimated active mentor/mentee relationships in MI as of fall 2004 Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry This compares to 17,710 young people mentored as counted in 2003 online survey and 3,711 from 2000 NMP prevalence study

More or Less Mentoring? 45:Organizations reporting an increase in matches in :Organizations reporting a decrease in matches in ,195: increase in new matches in : decrease in matches in ,347: net increase in matches in :Organizations reporting an increase in matches in :Organizations reporting a decrease in matches in ,195: increase in new matches in : decrease in matches in ,347: net increase in matches in 2004 Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry

Number/Percent of Children Served by Mentoring Type* One to one mentoring is most common and accounts for more than half of all active matches One-to-One 52% 7,696 Group 17% 2,511 Group 17% 2,511 Team 19% 2,778 Peer 12% 1,714 E-mentoring <1% 72 * 1,803 matches not categorized by respondents Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Proportion of one-to-one mentoring is down from 2003 and below national norms

Reported Minimum Weekly Mentoring Intensity Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry No Minimum Time Required 1 Hour per Week 2 Hours per Week 3-5 Hours per Week 6+ Hours per Week 19% 28% 23% 10% 4% Don’t know/no answer not shown Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Intensity has increased slightly since 2003

Reported Average Match Duration Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry Avg. Match Duration <5 Months Avg. Match Duration 6-12 Months Avg. Match Duration 12 Months to 5 Years 7% 48% 34% Don’t know/no answer not shown Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Match duration has increased since 2003 and is well above national norms

Mentor Tenure Only 57% of organizations track tenure of mentors Application Background Checks Training Application Background Checks Training Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Mentoring Duration & Intensity Repeat & Refer Awareness Interest Inquiry Awareness Interest Inquiry 42% 29% 8% 7% 4% 10% 1st Year (1789) 2nd Year (1229) 3rd Year (338) 4th Year (278) 5th Year (169) 6+ Years (453) Referral from existing mentors is most effective recruitment approach: 44% of organizations indicate referrals work best. A distant second is college-based recruitment (11%) and third, faith-based recruitment (9%). Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Evaluation Process Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Outcome Reported evaluation is up significantly from 2003 and comparable to national norms Yes - Internal 57% No/DK 16% 6% 21% Yes - External Yes - Combination Yes - Internal 49% 21% Yes - Combination Yes - External 7% 23% No/DK

Mentee and Mentor Demographics Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Mentee Profile: State Totals Mentee Gender 56% Female 44% Male Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Gender of Mentees and Mentors: State Totals Mentor Gender 66% Female 34% Male Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentee Gender 56% Female 44% Male

Gender of Mentees and Mentors: Tri-County Mentor Gender 61% Female 39% Male Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentee Gender 60% Female 40% Male

Mentee Profile: StateTotals % % % % Mentee Age Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Age of Mentees and Mentors: State Totals <18 17% % % % 65+ 8% Mentor Age Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc % % % % Mentee Age

Age of Mentees and Mentors: Tri-County <18 19% % % % 65+ 4% Mentor Age Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Mentee Age % % % % %

Mentee Profile: State Totals Hispanic 5% Native Am. 2% Arab-Am. <1% Other <1% Mentee Race/Ethnicity Caucasian 44% African-Am. 47% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Race of Mentees and Mentors: State Total Hispanic 2% Native Am. <1% Arab-Am. <1% Other <1% Mentor Race/Ethnicity Caucasian 76% African-Am. 22% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Hispanic 5% Native Am. 2% Arab-Am. <1% Other <1% Mentee Race/Ethnicity Caucasian 44% African-Am. 47%

Race of Mentees and Mentors: Tri-County Hispanic 3% Other <1% Mentor Race/Ethnicity Caucasian 47% African-Am. 49% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Hispanic 3% Other <2% Mentee Race/Ethnicity Caucasian 28% African-Am. 67%

Organizational Profile Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Mentoring Organizational Profile Non-profit organizations account for most mentoring organizations Non-Profits 59% Schools 17% Gov't. Orgs. 9% Faith Based 6% High Ed. 4% Business 1% Other 4% Other 4% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc. Distribution is similar to national

Role of Mentoring Within Organizations About half of the organizations see mentoring as their primary or a major part of their purpose Primary 40% Small Part 13% Small Part 13% One of Several 36% Major Part 11% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Budgets of Mentoring Programs Three of ten programs operate with less than $25K annually 17% operate with more than $300K annually Three of ten programs operate with less than $25K annually 17% operate with more than $300K annually 0-$5K $5-25K $25-100K $ K $500K + Don't Know 19% $ K 11% 21% 9% 8% 11% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Organizational Experience With Mentoring Programs Nearly half of the organizations have more than 10 years experience Fewer than one in ten is in its first year of operations Nearly half of the organizations have more than 10 years experience Fewer than one in ten is in its first year of operations 10+ years 46% 1 year or less 9% 1-2 years 9% 2-3 years 9% 3-5 years 9% 5-10 years 20% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Board Roles and Degree of Involvement Board of Directors 78% YES 22% NO Board Involvement Planning Mentor Recruitment Very Somewhat 21%27% Fundraising 37% 31% 27% 6% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Organizational Needs from Board Boards are actively involved in fundraising, but programs want more board help with mentor recruitment Fundraising Mentor Recruitment Program Planning Mentor Training Match Supervision Program Evaluation 50% 45% 14% 7% 4% Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Potential Mentors Adults 22+: 6,913,793 Michigan’s Mentoring Gap Michigan Population: 10,050,446* * U.S. Census Bureau population estimate, 2002 Recruitment Preparation and Selection Mentoring 22,500 Estimated Matches Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Potential Mentees Youth Age 10-17: 1,205,047 Michigan’s Mentoring Gap Michigan Population: 10,050,446* * U.S. Census Bureau population estimate, 2002 Candidates Low Risk 50% Low Risk 50% 90% Not Candidates Moderate Risk 25% Moderate Risk 25% High Risk 15% High Risk 15% Very High Risk 10% Not Candidates Estimated Michigan youth in need of a Mentor: 602,524 Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Potential Mentors Michigan’s Mentoring Gap Michigan Population: 10,050,446* Potential Mentees GAP: 580,024 children who are good candidates for mentoring and are not currently matched GAP: 580,024 children who are good candidates for mentoring and are not currently matched Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.

Strategic Challenges Q & A Discussion Q & A Discussion Mentor Michigan Census, Wave I, Fall 2004, Kahle Research Solutions Inc.