Www.floodrisk.org.uk EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach to 2D urban flood modelling A. S. Chen, B. Evans, S. Djordjević, D. A. Savić.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Wallingford Software What’s New in InfoWorks CS v8.5 Andrew Walker.

Advertisements

Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.

Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench

Real-Time Dynamic Wrinkles Caroline Larboulette Marie-Paule Cani GRAVIR Lab, Grenoble, France.

EULER Code for Helicopter Rotors EROS - European Rotorcraft Software Romuald Morvant March 2001.

2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.

OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.

Computational Modeling of Flow over a Spillway In Vatnsfellsstífla Dam in Iceland Master’s Thesis Presentation Chalmers University of Technology 2007.

Copyright © Siemens AG All rights reserved. Fluistcom Project Meeting Belfast 24th of December FLUISTCOM Exchange Program at SIEMENS-Muelheim Daniele.

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Visualising Uncertain Flood Inundation Maps David Leedal 1, Jeff Neal 2, Keith Beven 1,3 and Paul Bates.

Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.

Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.

1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,

Alpine3D: an alpine surface processes model Mathias Bavay WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.

Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment

Professor Paul Bates SWOT and hydrodynamic modelling.

Mesh refinement methods in ROMS Laurent Debreu INRIA, Grenoble, France In collaboration with Patrick Marchesiello and Pierrick Penven (IRD, Brest, France)

Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1

DETAILED TURBULENCE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW

Week 16 GEOG2750 – Earth Observation and GIS of the Physical Environment 1 Lecture 13 Error and uncertainty Outline – terminology, types and sources –

Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.

A Distributed Approach for Planning Radio Communications David Kidner 1, Ian Fitzell 2, Phillip Rallings 3, Miqdad Al Nuaimi 2 & Andrew Ware 3 University.

Civil and Environmental Engineering Applications.

FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management

Grid Generation.

Grid-based Analysis in GIS

Gully performance – connecting above and below ground system EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Ida Sabtu Gavin Sailor John Blanksby Adrian Saul Istvan Galambos.

GIS Data Structure: an Introduction

BUILDING EXTRACTION AND POPULATION MAPPING USING HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES Serkan Ural, Ejaz Hussain, Jie Shan, Associate Professor Presented at the Indiana.

National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,

1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.

Fluvial Geomorphic Analyses of the Llano River and Sandy Creek Basins, Central Texas, using GIS and Arc Hydro Tools Franklin T. Heitmuller CE 394K November.

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 WP4.2 – Performance based inspection of flood defence infrastructure: Integrating visual inspection and.

School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS & Environment Dr Steve Carver

Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.

1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.

CS 484 Load Balancing. Goal: All processors working all the time Efficiency of 1 Distribute the load (work) to meet the goal Two types of load balancing.

Flood Plain Modelling. Flood Plain Model Options Flood Plain Model Options: 1 - D : 1 - D : - Lump River and Flood Plain as Single branch ( Limitation:

 DEM from USGS ◦ Digitized version of 1:24,000 topo quadrangle ◦ Vertical accuracy  5m, 30m resolution  KML files, digitized from Google Earth.

Land and Water Resource Information Systems By David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Presented at UN.

Aerospace Engineering N. C. State University Air Terminal Wake Vortex Simulation D. Scott McRae, Hassan A. Hassan N.C. State University 4 September 2003.

David Tarboton Digital Elevation Models, Flood Inundation Mapping and River Hydraulic Properties David Tarboton

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.

Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation –Accuracy –Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD –Explicit vs. Implicit.

1 CASE 2: Modeling of a synthetic jet in a cross flow Williamsburg, Virginia, USA March 29 th -31 th 2004 C. Marongiu 1, G. Iaccarino 2 1 CIRA Italian.

Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.

HydroEurope Final Presentation Pranav DHAWAN, Wooseok JANG, Kalpesh MALANI, Pablo SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ Clément LUCAS, Anna MSIGWA, Hakim OUERTANI, Malo LAMBERT.

The Need for Speed in Flood Modelling November 13, 2014 Richard Connell Ben Tate Lachlan Inglis Vs.

Amro Elfeki, Hatem Ewea and Nassir Al-Amri Dept. of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment & Arid Land Agriculture,

WORKING WITH REGIONAL MODELS The Conceptual Model Approach.

FLOODPLAIN REPRESENTATION AND ACCURACY OF PROCESSES 1D/2D

Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology

Floodplain Management using ArcGIS and HEC-RAS

Range Image Segmentation for Modeling and Object Detection in Urban Scenes Cecilia Chen & Ioannis Stamos Computer Science Department Graduate Center, Hunter.

POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance

Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies

Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Remo Minero Eindhoven University of Technology 16th November 2005

Surface Analysis Tools

Assessing uncertainties on production forecasting based on production Profile reconstruction from a few Dynamic simulations Gaétan Bardy – PhD Student.

The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.

Boundary Layer Analysis of Flow through a Single Channel PEM Fuel Cell

Water level observations from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for improving probabilistic estimations of interaction between rivers and groundwater Filippo.

Surface Water Virtual Mission

ArcEOR A posteriori error estimate tools to enhance the performance of

The Tous Case study: mesh refinement & optimization data J

Instituto Superior Técnico instituto superior técnico

Under a Concurrent and Hierarchical Scheme

GHOST (Generic Hydrologic Overland-Subsurface Toolkit)

Presentation transcript:

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach to 2D urban flood modelling A. S. Chen, B. Evans, S. Djordjević, D. A. Savić

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Improved efficiency of 2D flood modelling – Reduced-complexity models – Better numerical schemes – Parallelisation (MPI, OPEN-MP, GPU) – Adaptive meshes – Grid coarsening Motivation

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Building Coverage Ratio (BCR)‏ Area occupied by buildings within a grid cell Computing cell Building

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Conveyance Reduction Factors (CRFs) Computing cell Building Widths blocked by buildings on cell boundaries (in both x and y directions)

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Building alignment a bc def y x Computing cell Building

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 BCR & CRF values (calculated by GIS tool)

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Grid coarsening approaches Plain view Longitudinal elevation profile

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Grid coarsening approaches 1m grid resolution as the benchmark 20m grid coarsening approaches – Averaged DEM (average of ground and roof elevation) – Single layer with BCR & CRFs – Multi-layered with BCR & CRFs Error = difference from the benchmark

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Error map Single layer Averaged DEM Multi- layered

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Depth profile along the central longitudinal line

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Accuracy Averaged DEMSingle layerMulti-layered Overall domain RMSE (mm) Middle section RMSE (mm) Efficiency BenchmarkAveraged DEMSingle layerMulti-layered Grid resolution1m20m No of cells40, Computing time [s]27,

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Case study

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Multi-layered approach – Conclusions Keeps fine detail in coarse grid (as in fine grid) Grid-related error propagation reduced More realistic surface flow paths in coarse grid Enables much improved efficiency with little loss in accuracy Applicable to any 2D grid-based model

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1