System Planning 101 ALINA TURNER, PHD TURNER RESEARCH & STRATEGY INC. TurnerResearchandStrategyInc.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presents: The Blue Ridge H M I S.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Retooling Transitional Housing
Introduction to Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
 What are the commonalities among successful Ten Year Plans? › What? › How?  What do the plans propose to measure and how do they plan to measure it?
Using medicaid with HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Systems Approach Workbook A Systems Approach to Substance Use Services and Supports in Canada Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation The original.
RFP Youth Homelessness: Supporting Healthy and Successful Transitions to Adulthood February 13, :00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Location: McDougall Centre.
ZERO: 2016 Ending Chronic and Veteran Homelessness by 2016 Fort Worth/Arlington/Tarrant County CoC.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
Strategic Plan DRAFT January The Pivot 2015 is the final year of King County’s 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness, A Roof Over Every Bed In 2015,
Homeless Management Information System Donna Curley – HMIS Project Manager.
Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Introduction to Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Karen DeBlasio, HUD March 13, 2012 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
Shelters in the HEARTH era The Lyceum, Hartford, CT April 7, 2014 Katharine Gale
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data HMIS Beyond Data Collection Updated 9/14.
OCTOBER 2012 MONTGOMERY COUNTY ROADMAP FOR HOUSING STABILITY.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
Creating a Unified Person-Centered Housing and Homelessness System February 2015.
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
Coordinated Entry.  Helping people move through the system faster  Sends households to intervention best fit from the start  Reduce new entries into.
Virginia Learning Collaboratives Reducing Family Homelessness in Virginia: A Rapid Re-Housing Approach.
Opening Doors Federal Strategic Plan to End Homelessness GOAL Retool the homeless response system by transforming homeless services to crisis response.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
Strategic Plan DRAFT January Homelessness is: A crisis in King County. Cost-effective to solve Transforming lives 10,000 households per year  50%
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Meaghan Bell University of Calgary Housing First & Screening Tools For Communities Stephen Gaetz Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, Professor, York.
Establishing Partnerships with HUD & Housing Groups The HOW.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
Changes to the Federal Approach to Homelessness Kentucky Balance of State Frankfort, KY June 21, 2011 ( Slides adapted from presentations at the September.
REGIONAL CONFERENCE NORFOLK, VA MARCH 16, 2009 CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR URBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 1 South Hampton Roads Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
2010 Florida HMIS Conference 1. Using HMIS to Inform Performance Measurement Outcomes Objective: –Enhance awareness and understanding on using HMIS to.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Community Information Infrastructure Kathy Pettit, The Urban Institute Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Emerging Leaders October 4, 2013.
How HMIS supports multiple funding sources and reporting with new HEARTH standards 1Company Confidential Homelessness Track.
Homeless Management Information Systems The Calgary HMIS - A joint initiative between the CHF and the Homeless Serving Sector in Calgary Date: April 21,
Guide to the Advanced Health Links Model. Advanced Health Links Model To continue the momentum of Health Links it is important for the program to evolve.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
HIP Alignment Jackie Kearney February Overview Responding to demographic changes The journey so far Why change Why now Your concerns Where to from.
The Community Entity’s Role in Housing First: Some Considerations ALINA TURNER, PHD TURNER RESEARCH & STRATEGY INC. TurnerResearchandStrategyInc.com.
STRATEGIC PLANNING KICKOFF MEETING LOCAL HOMELESS COORDINATING BOARD HomeBase Advancing Solutions to Homelessness MONDAY, FEB. 4 TH, 2013.
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR COORDINATED ENTRY Status: Approved by Eastern PA CoC Governing Board on October 19, 2015 Revised:
Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (SPDAT) Introduction to SPDAT & Training Protocol.
Agenda for Change Creating Stable Families Basic Needs Strategies and Guidelines.
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Midland County Continuum of Care
Continuum of care for the homeless
Setting the Foundation – Systems Planning Approach.
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
Building An Effective Coordinated Entry System
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation
Integrated Approaches to Developing and Operating Permanent Supportive Housing CHRA 2019 Congress.
A home for everyone is key
Presentation transcript:

System Planning 101 ALINA TURNER, PHD TURNER RESEARCH & STRATEGY INC. TurnerResearchandStrategyInc.com

“ ” Shifting from a program-by-program to a systems approach to ending homelessness. Restructuring our approach to homelessness following the Housing First philosophy.

Background  Calgary Homeless Foundation – CE in Calgary; led 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness in 2008 based on Housing First.  From went from:  Virtually no program funding to overseeing $35M investment,  From no Housing First to programs for 4,000 clients,  5 staff to 35 staff.  Housing First spurred massive growth and learnings.  Drawing on Alberta experience in 7 Cities implementing Housing First housing over 7,000 clients and US Communities of Care best practices.

Overview  Key components of a Homeless Serving System  Implementation learnings from Alberta  Ask clarifying questions throughout  Time for discussion at the end

Homeless-Serving System  Local or regional system for serving those who are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness  Method of organizing and delivering homeless services appropriate to client needs  Organizations working together towards the same goal of ending homelessness  Ensuring individual programs contribute to system success  Tangible metrics to determine program and system success, and examine how funds are expended

Clients Service Providers Policy Makers & Funders System Planning Aims

11 Key Elements  Purposeful development, design and management of homeless serving system to end homelessness through :  1. Plan to End Homelessness  2. Backbone Organization  3. Community Engagement  4. System Structure  5. Standards of Care  6. Coordinated Intake & Assessment  7. Performance Management  8. Homeless Management Information System  9. Technical Assistance  10. Embedded Research  11. Systems Integration

1. Systems-focused Plan to End Homelessness  Community plan aligned with system planning using Housing First.  More than introducing Housing First programs.  Sets out strategy to transform local service continuum using Housing First approach.

2. The Backbone Organization  Organization leading the Homeless- Serving System to drive Plan goals.  Usually the CE or lead agency implementing Plan to End Homelessness.  Requires transformation of role – including funding processes, performance management, engaging community differently, policy advocacy, etc.

Lead Organizations Calgary Homeless Foundation Medicine Hat Community Housing Society The Community Partnership, DC Non-profit funder, owns and operates supportive & affordable housing Manages federal, provincial funds 35staff, $35M Non-profit funder & social housing provider 3 staff oversee homelessness portfolio $3M Non-profit funder & social housing provider 30 staff, $50M

3. Community Engagement  A transparent process to identify system gaps and priorities that community includes key stakeholders.  Service providers & system partners engaged in formal system planning process & funding allocation.  Client committee integrated in decision- making process to allocate funds and plan services.

4. Defined Structure  Agreed-upon program types across the Homeless-Serving System using common definitions.  Articulates relations between components.

Homeless Population 80% transitionally homeless 10-15% episodically homeless 5-10% chronically homeless

Acuity & Homelessness Patterns Interventions often focus on rapid rehousing, prevention, & access to mainstream supports. Low acuity – Transitionally homeless Interventions focus on treatment, housing stabilization & reducing the frequency of homelessness spells. Moderate acuity – Episodically homeless Interventions focus on permanent housing stabilization and intensive supports. High acuity – Chronically homeless

Programmatic Building Blocks 1.Prevention 2.Outreach 3.Emergency Shelter 4.Transitional Housing 5.Rapid Rehousing 6.Intensity Case Management 7.Permanent Supportive Housing 8.Affordable Housing 9.Other Support Services

Program Building Blocks

Calgary Homeless- Serving System Outreach Prevention Support Services Only Emergency Shelters

5. Standards of Care  Agreed upon standards, policies and protocols to guide program and system operations including:  referral processes,  eligibility criteria,  service standards,  client engagement,  privacy,  safety, etc.

Standards Implementation System Standards Program Standards Standards for entire system to adhere to; e.g.: Prioritization tools (SPDAT, VI, Acuity Scale, etc.) Triage protocols Housing quality standards Client engagement in services Eligibility criteria Program-specific standards, e.g.: Emergency shelters Case management Outreach services, etc.

6. Performance Management  Performance expectations at the program and system levels aligned and monitored to drive Plan targets.  Evaluates system’s impact on target populations.  Articulates what the system aims to achieve.  Illustrates the level of performance expected of everyone.  Empowers clients through participation in quality assurance activities at program and system level.  Promote service integration across sector and with mainstream systems.

Performance Measures System Measures  Examines how the entire system addresses a particular measure of effectiveness.  Improves the system’s planning and structure. Program Measures  Focus on client measures of success.  Often different depending on program type.  Tie directly to clients’ progress in programs. Key Indicators Occupancy Destinations at Exit Return to Homelessness Interaction with Public Systems Income Gains at Exit Length of Stay/ Stability

Benchmarking  Point of reference from which programs can be evaluated against similar program types within homeless serving system and with best performers regionally.  Allows for analysis of data collected on system and program levels.  Presents standards and that can be applied or adapted as best practices.  Tailored to program type, yet able to generate system-level trends.  Can be used to pin-point trouble areas and resolve these systematically.

7. Coordinated Intake & Assessment  Common processes to ensure appropriate program matching, consistent prioritization, and streamlined flow of clients across Homeless-Serving System.  Single place or process for people to access housing services.  Provides information, screening, referral, and intake through one or multiple sites.

Benefits of Coordinated Intake  Simplifies access to services for clients  Improves referrals  Initiates client record, consent & intake into HMIS  Operationalizes common intake and prioritization process  Improves client targeting for system impact  Enhances agency collaboration

8. Homeless Management Information System  Shared information system that aligns data collection, reporting, system planning, common intake, assessment, referrals and service coordination in Homeless-Serving System.  Client-level, system-wide information over time on characteristics and services needs.  Web-based software applications to enter and share client-level data across agencies.

What is HMIS?  Web based application  Collaborative planning tool  Security and privacy standards similar to online banking to benefit the non profit sector  Includes case management, bed utilization, resources directory, information & referral, research & system planning

More than a database  HMIS allows communities to implement and undertake system planning using real time data.  Agencies can track progress at client level, while funder can assess system performance.  Allows for unduplicated count of shelter population longitudinally to assess program gaps.  Fundamental infrastructure to track how clients move through homeless serving system.

9. Technical Assistance  Capacity building support to service providers and mainstream system key partners in areas including:  system planning,  HMIS,  program and system performance management, and  aspects of Standards of Care.

10. Embedded Research  Commitment to evidence-based decision-making and planning, built into backbone organization and community's approach to system planning.

11. Systems Integration  A focus on integrating the Homeless-Serving System with public and community services, including justice, child intervention services, health, poverty reduction, etc. Homeless Serving System JusticeHealthEducation Children’s Services Income Assistance Poverty Reduction

Alina Turner, PhD Turner Research & Strategy Inc. E: T: W: turnerresearchandstrategyinc.com