Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Welcome! RGRTA Title VI & Public Participation Plans.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
SFMTA / SJSU Copartnership Kickoff 10 | 15 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Historic Car number 1 and 162.
MUNI Operations Overview and Recent Innovations Julie Kirschbaum San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Operations Planning and Scheduling Manager.
GIS and Transportation Planning
GIS for Transportation Corridor Planning West Corridor.
STRATEGIES FOR ORGANIZATION, VALIDATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSIT GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS DATA Jonathan Wade Manager, Service Development Support.
Chicago Transit AuthorityJune, 2007 Chicago Transit Authority Regional South Metro Transportation Summit June 16, 2007 Matteson, Illinois.
Transit Improvements on East-West Routes in Downtown Minneapolis Michael Mechtenberg Planner Metro Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
GIS for Title VI Compliance
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
North Metro Rail Line FasTracks Citizens Advisory Committee September 18, 2013.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
FasTracks Moving Forward: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment Staff Recommendation Phillip A. Washington and Team August 7, 2012.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Educational Session 101 May 29, 2014.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
PLEASE SIGN IN 1 Welcome to the Title VI Plan Workshop.
The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.
“IF YOU CAN MANAGE IT, YOU CAN MEASURE IT” Robert Hudson, Performance Analyst Dept. Planning/Office of Research & Analysis.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
WMATA BRT Marketing and Branding Presentation Rapid Transit Steering Committee April 30, 2013 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
Redesigned schedules signaled riders to the new transit network and differentiated from old information. Schedules were color coded to easily identify.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
Title VI Program Overview Benjamin Limmer Valley Metro Corridor & Facility Development Manager Phoenix, AZ.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Siskiyou County Short Range Transit Plan Draft Final Report Presentation to the Steering Committee LSC Transportation Consultants.
Comprehensive Operations Analysis LYNX 2013 Comprehensive Operational Analysis John Lewis, CEO.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology September 21, 2007 City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology.
Update to Dublin Chamber of Commerce Network Direct Paddy Doherty Thursday 18 th November 2010.
Project Background  Several recent initiatives have helped transform the system in positive ways – New brand and logo – New website and real-time bus.
Working With Stakeholders. Continuous Effort Stakeholder engagement is the process by which an organization involves people who may be affected by the.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
The Importance of Public Participation and Outreach in Project Development Gary Flunoy – Business Outreach/Public Involvement Coordinator August 27, 2009.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Communications Department Update RTD Board Study Session September 25, 2012.
1 Update on Transit in West Kelowna District of West Kelowna - November 12, 2013 Matthew Boyd – Senior Transit Planner Steve Harvard – Senior Regional.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)
Increasing Success & Credibility of Your Service Through End-User Involvement.
Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan 1.
Proposed Service Changes for March 20, 2016 The mission of the RTA is to provide safe and sustainable mobility services to the citizens of New Orleans.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
North Metro Competitive Procurement RTD Board FasTracks Monitoring Committee October 8, 2013.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Strategic Planning Mapping Process (2014 Example) RTD VisionTo deliver regional multi-modal transportation services and infrastructure improvements that.
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW PAST AND PRESENT YOUR VALUES FOR TRANSIT NETWORK CONCEPTS.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Title VI Program Overview
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
Presentation transcript:

Service Development Process 1

Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous, accessible and cost- effective service throughout the District. 2

Key Takeaways How we develop the proposed service plans How we communicate the plan to the public How we implement the service plan 3

Overview To develop customer focused, market based services: –we gather information –use/evaluate the information to develop proposed service plans –we implement the service plan through a process 4

Service Development The Service Development Division is responsible for design, review and maintenance of bus and light rail operations plans and schedules for the RTD’s 135 regular fixed bus routes and 6 light rail lines. The Division contains Service Planning & Scheduling, Service Development Support and Service Monitoring groups. 5

Major functions of Service Development Exploration and development of new and improved services. Integration of service planning with marketing, systems planning, and facilities planning. Evaluation of service performance according to RTD Service Standards with recommendations for proposed changes. Development and implementation of three system-wide service changes each year. Development of new and restructured network, sub-regional, corridor, and community transit service plans. Maintenance and development of tools for planning and analysis, including, scheduling, runcutting, geographic information systems, ridership monitoring and analysis, and performance evaluation. 6

Service Area The RTD’s 2,300 square mile service area is divided among three area teams designated East, North and West. 7

How we gather information Market Research –Origin & Destination Studies –On-Board Surveys –Telephone Surveys Customer Input –TIC/Customer Service Responses –Constituent Input/GMR’s Municipal/Local Government Contact –Development review –Constituent complaint/suggestion –Business Media 8

How we gather information Operator Feedback –Operator Input Sessions –Operator Bulletin Board –Overload Reports –Operator Suggestion forms –Runboard Committee 9

System Performance Data 10 APC (Automatic Passenger Counting) AVL (Automatic Vehicle Location) Farebox Service Monitoring Street Supervision

11 Ridecheck Plus RTD Collection Staff 43 Street & LRT Supervisors Laptops (pointchecks) 6 Service Monitors Laptops ( ridechecks/pointchecks) 2 Station Starters Desktop (pointchecks) Bus and LRT Schedule Data & Bus Vehicle Assignments (Trapeze & TIES) CAD/AVL System Schedule Adherence Data (ACS data now, INIT data 2013) Schedule Adherence Reports Ridership Analysis Reports Ridership Analysis Maps Init APC System 302 Buses (of ~ 1000) APCs (ridechecks) 42 LRT Cars (of ~ 178) APCs (ridechecks) LRT Factoring APC Validation Automated Survey Validation Technician Analysis and Reporting Ridership and On-Time Performance Information Flow Google Earth Ridership Maps TriTapt and On-Time Performance Toad for Ad Hoc Reporting 56 Commuter Rail (Future 2016) All with APCs (ridechecks) Commuter Rail Schedules & Vehicle Assignments (???)

Guiding Principles for Service Design & Evaluation Service performance evaluation based on the RTD Service Standards. The effects on the overall integrity of the transit network and on transit dependent markets; The availability of alternative services to affected riders; Cost-effective distribution throughout the District and Family of Services and the ability to enhance service when possible; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act: benefits and services are provided without regard to race, color or national origin; also disparate effects on low income and minority populations; and Response to changes in the communities where services are provided 12

Family of Services CBD Local service for Local or Limited routes operating to/from the Denver Central business District Urban Local service for Local and Limited routes that predominantly serve urban areas which have very high residential and/or employment density. Suburban Local service for Local or Limited routes that primarily serve suburban areas that have low to medium density Express services that provide high-speed service from suburban areas of the metro area Regional services that are essentially long-haul routes providing service between outlying areas and employment centers RTD also employs such service standards in evaluating call- n-Ride service and SkyRide service 13

Design Standards Service Delivery – Geographic Standards –Area Coverage –Branches –Deviations –Stop spacing Financial Capacity 14

Evaluation Analyses –Ridership –Schedule adherence –segments Financial Capacity 15

Evaluation Service Standards –Ridership by class of service (pax/hour) –Subsidy per Boarding –Frequency thresholds –Passenger Volume 16

Service Standards by Class of Service 17

Performance by Class of Service 18

Service Change Process Runboard/Votes –January –May –August 19

Service Change Process Key Milestones –Runboard Committee Meeting –Service Change proposals to Board of Directors/Marketing –Public Meetings –Schedule finalization –Runcut –Trailblazer –Public Timetable –Shelter boards 20

Runboard Development Schedule 21

Communication “How we speak to the public” Proposed/Final Service Change brochure Transflux Posters Alerts Social Media Website Social Media Posts re: meetings, changes 22

Communication “How we speak to the public” Proposed/Final e-newsletter articles Press releases and media outreach Additional tactics per route if required Scheduled audits to determine distribution/availability of materials on our vehicles 23

Discussion: Challenges to Process and Communication 24