Learning Progressions in Climate Change Education Research J. Randy McGinnis Wayne Breslyn 2 Chris McDonald Emily Hestness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
College of Education Critical thinking in Earth Science: Using the Model-Evidence Link Diagram Doug Lombardi
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
How do scientists predict future climate?. Models Scientists use models to predict future climate: including temperature, CO2 levels in the atmosphere,
Sensitive/Controversial Topics in Science Education (USA)
Enhancing Geoscience Education at Minority-Serving Institutions AMS Diversity Projects Dr. James Brey Director, Education Program | American Meteorological.
MADE-CLEAR CCEP Grant J. Randy McGinnis and Chris McDonald University of Maryland 2.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Lindsey Mohan and Andy Anderson (Michigan State University)
The Climate Prediction Project Global Climate Information for Regional Adaptation and Decision-Making in the 21 st Century.
Teachers’ Uses of Learning Progression- Based Tools for Reasoning in Teaching about Water in Environmental Systems Kristin L. Gunckel, University of Arizona.
Michigan Department of Education April 23, 2009 Margaret Heritage Learning Progressions: Supporting Instruction and Formative Assessment.
Climate Change Problem Solving (AOSS 480 // NRE 480) Richard B. Rood Cell: Space Research Building (North Campus)
1 NARST Annual Conference, Puerto Rico, 2013 Symposium - The Policy, Practice, and Research Nexus of Climate Change Education Symposium Co-Presenters:
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
How can we better understand the mental steps learners take as they come to understand science topics? Recent insights: Learning Progressions and Trajectories.
Maryland Climate Change Commission Scientific and Technical Working Group Regional Assessment of Climate Change Impacts Metropolitan Washington COG Climate.
Land-Atmosphere Interaction : Vegetation Feedback P. Friedlingstein Stephen Guendert Arts & Sciences Climatic Studies 4/1/15.
POLICIES AND IMPLICATIONS CLIMATE CHANGE EDUCATION RESEARCH J. Randy McGinnis, Emily Hestness, Wayne Breslyn, Chris McDonald University of Maryland, College.
Climate Modeling Jamie Anderson May Monitoring tells us how the current climate has/is changing Climate Monitoring vs Climate Modeling Modeling.
What is Geography?.  More than just map skills!
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Carbon Dioxide Process Tool Power point Presentation to accompany Carbon Teaching Experiment Written by: Jonathon Schramm A, Eric Keeling B, Dijanna Figueroa.
Promise and Problems of Learning Progression-guided Interventions Hui Jin, Hyo Jeong Shin, Michele Johnson, Jinho Kim.
Center for Curriculum Materials in Science AAAS, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Michigan Organizers Andy Anderson, Michigan.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
CO2 and Temperature Investigation Does global climate data show evidence of a relationship between the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere and average.
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
Climate Change Problem Solving (AOSS 480 // NRE 480) Richard B. Rood Cell: Space Research Building (North Campus)
MADE CLEAR: MARYLAND AND DELAWARE CLIMATE CHANGE EDUCATION ASSESSMENT AND RESEARCH MARYLAND AND DELAWARE CLIMATE CHANGE EDUCATION ASSESSMENT.
Out of Thin Air: Technology Integration in the Delaware Recommended Curriculum Project Dr. Michael Stetter Director, Curriculum Development Suzanne Keenan.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
An Overview of the Observations of Sea Level Change R. Steven Nerem University of Colorado Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Colorado Center.
Using Science In Decision Making Type of Material (Student/PD/Assessment/etc.) Written by: Beth Covitt (University of Montana) and Cornelia Harris (Cary.
Practice-Based Professional Development Daniel C. Edelson GEODE Initiative School of Education and Social Policy Northwestern University.
The Pacific Islands Climate Education Partnership (PCEP) A 5-year Phase II CCE project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Photo by Susan Burger.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
What is High Quality Instruction? What does it mean for me? Donna Eustace Education Technology Consultant Kentucky Department of Education 1.
MSU Environmental Literacy Project Kristin L. Gunckel & Blakely K. Tsurusaki MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
Learning Progressions to Inform the Development of Standards 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Charles W. (Andy) Anderson & Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Investigating Mass Gain and Mass Loss Power point Power point to accompany Carbon Teaching Experiment Written by: Jonathon Schramm A, Eric Keeling B, Dijanna.
J. Randy McGinnis, University of Maryland, College Park
Interview Responses: Job Satisfaction
MADE-CLEAR (MC) CCEP Grant
Design strategies for research-based activities Joshua S
Discussion and Conclusion
Science, Technology, and Engineering
Maia Binding, SEPUP, Lawrence Hall of Science
Local to Global Perspectives on Sea Level Rise
Written by: Jennifer Doherty, Cornelia Harris, Laurel Hartley
(Michigan State University)
Title of Poster Site Visit 2017 Introduction Results
Long Term Ecological Research Math Science Partnership
Title of session For Event Plus Presenters 12/5/2018.
How well do you know the new science standards?
Supporting Material for the Biodiversity Teaching Experiment
Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary, 2009
Climate change (1) David Bailey 06/04/2019 © Class Leading Ltd. 2013
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
1.2 Climate.
The Scientific Method.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Opening Activity: Jan. 28, 2019 Grab a computer and log in – go to our class website to link on “communities take charge”. When done…. How do patterns.
Project Title: I. Research Overview and Outcome
Presentation transcript:

Learning Progressions in Climate Change Education Research J. Randy McGinnis Wayne Breslyn 2 Chris McDonald Emily Hestness

Project Overview Maryland and Delaware Climate Change Education, Assessment, and Research (MADE CLEAR) 5-year project supported by NSF Phase II Climate Change Education Partnership (CCEP) grant Partners include: Core institutions in DE and the University System of MD Maryland and Delaware Departments of Education Maryland Public Television

Research Goals with Learning Progressions To investigate: 1.how teaching a particular climate change impact helps students in a particular geographic region to learn about climate change science. 2.how teachers can use these hypothetical learning progressions to teach about climate change science. 3.growth over time of students’ knowledge of climate change.

Learning Progressions “Fundamentally speaking, LPs are hypothetical constructs that model learning in a domain. They include conjectures about the type, number, and order of levels (or steps) learners go through as they develop expertise in the domain.” (Shea & Duncan, 2012) “… are seen as de riguere strategies for formulating and developing environments of learning that align curriculum, instruction and assessment.” (Duschl et al., 2011)

Learning to Ride a Bike: What Knowledge is Needed to Keep Progressing More advanced understanding over time.

Three Climate Change Learning Progressions 1.Extreme Weather 2.Sea Level Rise 3.Urban Heat Island Effect

Background Our hypothetical learning progressions are structured based on Andy Anderson's research team's work on carbon cycling (2009) and energy (2012). The NGSS provided guidance on core disciplinary climate change constructs and impacts.

Example Progression: Sea Level Rise For Sea Level Rise we have four components to our hypothetical learning progression: Causes Impacts Mechanisms Representations

Example Progression: Sea Level Rise The following is a draft hypothetical learning progression for the Impacts of Sea Level Rise.* * Based on our review of the NGSS. Still needs to be empirically validated.

Impacts of Sea Level Rise Level 1 Students identify that an impact of sea level rise is that some land in coastal areas and islands will be underwater, though they are not able to elaborate on specific consequences of sea level rise.

Impacts of Sea Level Rise Level 4 Students understand that local sea level changes can differ from global trends based on regional variations in factors such as geographic uplift or subsidence and ocean currents. Students are able to elaborate on specific consequences of local sea level rise. Students recognize that sea level rise projections are based on available data and may be lower or higher than predicted.

Data Collection Data collection and analysis often consists of different methods at different points in research (Shea & Duncan, 2011). In addition to the use of interviews, observations, and instructional interventions the validation work of Neumann et al. (2013) has influenced our research.

Sample Assessment Instrument Question How would the land in the picture above be impacted if the sea level were to rise by one meter? A. There will be no change since the land will also rise. B. Some or all of the land will become submerged by water. C. There will be no change since sea water will spread out around the land. D. Some of the land that was originally under water would no longer be under water. The picture above shows an aerial view of a coastal land area that is projected to experience significant sea level rise.

Sample Assessment Instrument Question Which of the following is the best description of the scientific projections of sea level rise in the above graph? A. Sea level rise projections are based on available data and may be lower or higher than predicted. B. Sea level rise projections are based on available data and tell us the exact amount sea level will rise. C. Sea level rise projections are not reliable because they are based on scientists’ opinions, which can be wrong. D. Sea level rise projections are not useful because it is impossible to predict what will happen in the future. The graph above represents sea level rise projections based on several different scientific models.

J. Randy McGinnis Wayne Breslyn 16 Chris McDonald Emily Hestness This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thank you!