Effects of Two Measures of Disposition on Post-weaning Gain of Beef Calves R. L. Weaber, Ph.D. F. E. Creason.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of Age at Weaning and Post-Weaning Management on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Angus and Charolais-Angus Steers John F. Grimes County.
Advertisements

Evaluation of Forage-Based Weaning Systems in Spring Born Cross-Breed Beef Calves Ronnie Helmondollar Randolph Co WVU Extension service.
MEAT GOAT SIRE EVALUATION TEST USING THE GROWSAFE 4000 SYSTEM David Seymour WVU Extension Agent – Pendleton County
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
The Effect of Animal Disposition on Carcass Traits
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Stephen B. Smith Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
 Docility EPD: A Tool for Temperament Devori W. Beckman Iowa State University.
GeneMax™ Mark McCully Certified Angus Beef LLC. Supply challenges for future growth?
BISON BENCHMARK STUDY Cost of Production Results 2009 – 2010 Production Cycle Gerard Woynarski Terry Kremeniuk November 21, 2011.
Residual Feed Intake and the Cow Herd A. M. Meyer 1 *, R. L. Kallenbach 2, M. S. Kerley 1 University of Missouri, Columbia 1 Division of Animal Sciences.
ABSTRACT Two thousand three hundred and sixty-four high-risk calves were procured through sale barns by three order buyers in Arkansas, Mississippi, and.
1 Investigating Opportunities Available in Genetic Selection for Healthy Beef J R Tait and James Reecy Iowa State University.
Economics of beef production systems Integrated suckler calf to beef production systems.
Ractopamine, Response, Economics, and Issues Allan P. Schinckel Purdue University Department of Animal Sciences.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
Improvement of Beef Cow Biological Efficiency
BEEF CATTLE FEED EFFICIENCY: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Dan Faulkner Department of Animal Sciences.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Associate Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry
The Genetics of Feedlot Health—an Update R. Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Cattle Nutrition Feeder and Stocker Cattle. Market Beef Lifecycle Age of animal, months Weaning Birth GrowingFinishing 06-7 Stocker and.
Economic Benefits of using Genetic Selection to Reduce the Prevalence of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex in Beef Feedlot Cattle H.L. Neibergs 1, J.S.
Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair.
Beef Evaluation and Pricing continued. Estimating Yield Grade Visually evaluate animal for differences in fat and muscle Shape.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
1 The Value of SimGenetics to Retail Carcass– a New York case study M. J. Baker, G. Jacimovski, M. E. Hannon, L. Bliven.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
Effects of Endophyte-Infected Fescue on Animal Performance Master Grazer Educational Program.
Introduction to Selection Indexes Bob Weaber, Ph.D. State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
Cost of Gain vs Value of Gain Darrell Rankins, Jr.
NE for Growing/Finishing Beef Cattle NE values of feeds + feed intake can be used to: Predict amount of feed required for particular gain (programmed feeding)
Beef Cattle Production
NE for Growing/Finishing Beef Cattle California Net Energy System Lofgreen & Garrett, 1968 Net Energy for maintenance – NE m Net Energy for gain – NE g.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Fitting Together the Pieces of the Feed Efficiency Puzzle: IGF-I as a biomarker or indicator trait for RFI Gordon Carstens Texas A&M University NBCEC Working.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Summer Supplementation: Plant, Animal and Environmental Response ─ A Nebraska Perspective Terry Klopfenstein, Will Griffin, Kelsey Rolfe Animal Science,
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Relationships between Carcass Quality and Temperament in Beef Cattle Rhonda C. Vann MAFES-Brown Loam Experiment Station- Raymond, MS.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Winter (and Spring) Forage Management Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Agronomist Crop.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
Beef Cattle Evaluation. Back to Basics  Why?  Livestock Improvement  Find functional and useful cattle  3 Areas  Breeding Heifers  Breeding Bulls.
Heifer Development OSU Beef Team Growing Phase Lesson 4.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Division of Animal Sciences University of Missouri-Columbia
KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy By Tom Brink.
Importance of Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency By: Colton Turner.
Livestock Evaluation And Selection
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Work Toward Genetic Improvement of Disposition in Beef Cattle
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Two Measures of Disposition on Post-weaning Gain of Beef Calves R. L. Weaber, Ph.D. F. E. Creason Division of Animal Science University of Missouri-Columbia

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS2 Research Objectives Establish relationship between disposition and production traits Evaluation of subjective and objective measures of disposition Investigate relationship of serial measures of disposition Estimate genetic relationships between measures of disposition and production traits Produce genetic evaluation for selection at MO- AES

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS3 Materials and Methods 111 Spring Born Angus Cross Steers –Known Pedigree –MFA Health Track Program Disposition –Pen Score (PS) 1=Gentle, 5=Aggressive –Exit Velocity (EV) ft/sec Weight Gain –Back-grounding period - 55 days post-weaning –Diet included self-fed concentrate and improved fescue pastures

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS4 Exit Velocity 6 ft Chute Infrared Eye

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS5 Data Collection Steers Weight –Initial- Avg ± 5.39 lbs ( ± 2.45 kg) –Finished- Avg ± 1.78 lbs ( ± 3.08 kg) –55 Day Gain- Avg ± 2.45 lbs (76.23 ± 1.12 kg) ADG=3.05 lbs/day (1.38 kg/day) Steers Disposition –PS= Avg ± 0.11 –EV= Avg ± 0.16 ft/s (2.25 ± 0.05 m/s)

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS6 Data-Distribution

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS7 Data-Distribution

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS8 Data Analysis Fixed Effects –Pen Score –Exit Velocity Random Effect –Sire Full Model (EV, PS, Sire) –EV only significant source of variation (P < 0.05) –Faster flight times were negatively associated with weight gain Reduced Model (EV, Sire) –EV and Sire both significant (P < 0.05)

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS9 Results-Linear Model Steers with faster EV gained less ± 4.7 lb/sec (-5.39 ± 2.13 kg/sec)

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS10 Results-Correlations All P < 0.05 Correlation-a measure of linear relationship between two variables.

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS11 Future 330 head of MFA steers on trial –All weight gain and carcass data collected –2/3 have individual feed intake measured –Establish relationship between disposition, efficiency, gain and carcass merit –Various hormone profiles Half-sib heifers to steers –Correlate disposition scores with conception rates Genetic evaluation of disposition using EV and PS

04/18/06BIF Live Animal, Carcass and End Point, Choctaw, MS12 Questions Thank You!