In vitro - In vivo Correlation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topical Bioequivalence Update Robert Lionberger, Ph.D. Office of Generic Drugs.
Advertisements

Dissolution stability of a modified release product 32 nd MBSW May 19, 2009
Statistical Evaluation of Dissolution for Specification Setting and Stability Studies Fasheng Li Associate Director, Pharmaceutical Statistics Worldwide.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
ivivc - A Tool for in vitro- in vivo Correlation Exploration with R
Development and validation of an in vitro–in vivo correlation for extended buspirone HCl release tablets Sevgi Takka, Adel Sakr and Arthur Goldberg Journal.
Overview of Guidance Documents and Decision process: Biopharmaceutics Section Mehul Mehta, Ph.D. Director Division of Pharmceutical Evaluation I OCPB,
A Seminar on In vitro In vivo Correlation
Pharmacokinetics & Pharmacodynamics of Controlled Release Systems Presented By: Govardhan.P Dept. of pharmaceutics, University College of Pharmaceutical.
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science May 3, 2005 Factors Impacting Drug Dissolution and Absorption : Current State of Science Lawrence X. Yu,
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting GI Drugs
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Quality By Design and Dissolution PhRMA 10/25/05
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy
OVERVIEW OF DACA BIOEQUIVALENCE REPORT EVALUATION Presented by Solomon Shiferaw 31Augst 2010.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July , 2008 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Frank O. Holcombe,
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Pt WHO-consultant 1 WHO Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice &
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Bioavailability Dr Mohammad Issa.
FARMAKOKINETIKA. INTRODUCTION Historically, pharmaceutical scientists have evaluated the relative drug availability to the body in vivo after giving a.
Waiver of In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Ajaz S. Hussain,
Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President.
1 The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Dr Mohammad Issa.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
PHARMACEUTICS- IV (PHT 414 ) Dr. Mohammad Khalid Anwer SALMAN BIN ABDUL AZIZ UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY L111/16/2016.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence General concepts and overview
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
Exact PK Equivalence for a bridging study Steven Novick, Harry Yang (MedImmune) and Xiang Zhang (NC State) NCB, October 2015.
Modified release products. Considerations in the evaluation of modified release products Requirements for preparing extended release products. The bioavailability.
Milan Smid, MD, PhD Tutorial: WHO Prequalification Programme for Priority Medicines, Beijing, March, 2010 Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Roma Mathew.
BSC Biowaiver: Components, Requirements and Criteria
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
1/20 PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
IN VITRO IN VIVO CORRELATIONS
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Chapter 8 BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
BCS based waiver Harmonization
Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Biopharmaceutics 4th year
Presentation transcript:

In vitro - In vivo Correlation Department of Pharmaceutics Hindu College of Pharmacy

In vitro - In vivo Correlation In recent years, the concept and application of the in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for pharmaceutical dosage forms have been a main focus of attention of pharmaceutical industry, academia, and regulatory sectors. The main objective of an IVIVC is to serve as a surrogate for in vivo bioavailability and to support biowaivers.   IVIVCs could also be employed to establish dissolution specifications and to support and/or validate the use of dissolution methods

DEFINITIONS United State Pharmacopoeia (USP) definition The establishment of a rational relationship between a biological property, or a parameter derived from a biological property produced by a dosage form, and a physicochemical property or characteristic of the same dosage form.   Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definition IVIVC is a predictive mathematical model describing the relationship between an in vitro property of a dosage form and a relevant in vivo response. Generally, the in vitro property is the rate or extent of drug dissolution or release while the in vivo response is the plasma drug concentration or amount of drug absorbed.

CORRELATION LEVELS Five correlation levels have been defined in the IVIVC FDA guidance . The concept of correlation level is based upon the ability of the correlation to reflect the complete plasma drug level-time profile which will result from administration of the given dosage form .

Level A Correlation This level of correlation is the highest category of correlation and represents a point-to-point relationship between in vitro dissolution rate and in vivo input rate of the drug from the dosage form. Generally, percent of drug absorbed may be calculated by means of model dependent techniques such as Wagner-Nelson procedure or Loo-Riegelman method or by model-independent numerical deconvolution. These techniques represent a major advance over the single-point approach in that these methodologies utilize all of the dissolution and plasma level data available to develop the correlations

Level B Correlation A level B IVIVC utilizes the principles of statistical moment analysis. In this level of correlation, the mean in vitro dissolution time (MDTvitro) of the product is compared to either mean in vivo residence time (MRT) or the mean in vivo dissolution time (MDTvivo).

Level C Correlation In this level of correlation, one dissolution time point (t50%, t90%, etc.) is compared to one mean pharmacokinetic parameter such as AUC, tmax or Cmax This is the weakest level of correlation as partial relationship between absorption and dissolution is established. Level C correlations can be useful in the early stages of formulation development when pilot formulations are being selected.

Multiple-level C correlation A multiple level C correlation relates one or several pharmacokinetic parameters of interest (Cmax, AUC, or any other suitable parameters) to the amount of drug dissolved at several time points of the dissolution profile. A multiple Level C correlation should be based on at least three dissolution time points covering the early, middle, and late stages of the dissolution profile.

Level D correlation Level D correlation is a rank order and qualitative analysis and is not considered useful for regulatory purposes. It is not a formal correlation but serves as an aid in the development of a formulation or processing procedure

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPING A CORRELATION When the dissolution is not influenced by factors such as pH, surfactants, osmotic pressure, mixing intensity, enzyme, ionic strength, a set of dissolution data obtained from one formulation is correlated with a deconvoluted plasma concentration-time data set . If one or more of the formulations (highest or lowest release rate formulations) may not illustrate the same relationship between in vitro performance and in vivo profiles compared with the other formulations, the correlation is still valid within the range of release rates covered by the remaining formulations

BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (BCS) The (BCS) is a drug development tool that allows estimation of the contribution of three fundamental factors including dissolution, solubility and intestinal permeability, which govern the rate and extent of drug absorption from solid oral dosage forms BCS is also a fundamental guideline for determining the conditions under which IVIVCs are expected. It is also used as a tool for developing the in-vitro dissolution specification

BIOAVAILABILITY STUDIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF IVIVC A bioavailability study should be performed to characterize the plasma concentration versus time profile for each of the formulation. Bioavailability studies for IVIVC development should be performed with sufficient number of subjects to characterize adequately the performance of the drug product under study

EVALUATION OF PREDICTABILITY OF IVIVC An IVIVC should be evaluated to demonstrate that predictability of in vivo performance of a drug product from its in vitro dissolution characteristics is maintained over a range of in vitro dissolution release rates and manufacturing changes Depending on the intended application of an IVIVC and the therapeutic index of the drug, evaluation of prediction error internally and/or externally may be appropriate.

External predictability evaluation is not necessary unless the drug is a narrow therapeutic index, or only two release rates were used to develop the IVIVC, or, if the internal predictability criteria are not met i.e. prediction error internally is inconclusive

Internal predictability All IVIVCs should be studied regarding internal predictability. One recommended approach involves the use of the IVIVC model to predict each formulation’s plasma concentration profile (or Cmax and/or AUC for a multiple Level C IVIVC) from each respective formulation’s dissolution data.

External predictability Most important when using an IVIVC as a surrogate for bioequivalence is confidence that the IVIVC can predict in vivo performance of subsequent lots of the drug product. Therefore, it may be important to establish the external predictability of the IVIVC. This involves using the IVIVC to predict the in vivo performance for a formulation with known bioavailability that was not used in developing the IVIVC model.

CONCLUSION IVIVC includes in vivo relevance to in vitro dissolution specifications and can serve as surrogate for in vivo bioavailability and to support biowaivers. Furthermore, IVIVC can also allow setting and validating of more meaningful dissolution methods and specifications. It can also assist in quality control for certain scale-up and post-approval changes

Reference WIKEPEDIA C.V.S SUBBRAMANYAM MARTIN

THANK YOU THANK YOU