Narrow Lots & Skinny Lots or Land Divisions & Lot Confirmations Residential Infill Project Stakeholder Advisory Committee November 17, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subdivision Plat Submittals Subdivision Plat Submittals
Advertisements

WHAT DOES THE CITY of New Orleans ZONING ORDINANCE DO?
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
TA Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Current Features: 1.Floodways, 100 yr 2.Floodplain, outside floodway, 100 yr 3.Jurisdictional Wetlands 4.Stream.
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
City of San José Distinctive Neighborhood Program Policy Options Outreach Presentation.
CBJ Planning Commission Presentation November 9, 2010 Subdivision Ordinance Revision Update.
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
1 Implementing the Municipal Plan. 2 Overview The plan is a vision that must be implemented Many methods of implementation Communities must work to find.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
The “Smith Property” Public Forum March 2, 2011 Photo: Historical Society.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Community Development Department Easement Encroachment A/C Units.
An Overview of Garrett Park Building Regulations Harry Gordon, FAIA Chairman GP Setback Advisory Committee May 2009.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
City of Talent VAR Suncrest Homes Planning Commission October 22, 2015.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Secondary Dwelling Units Orchard Park/Sherwood Forest Ratepayers Association Community Meeting January 29, 2014.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Lowe’s Site Plan Application No. SP-MAJ Lot 3.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Land Use Management Ordinance Update Planning Commission September 1,
Palos Verdes Estates The ABCs of Planning & Building November 17, 2011.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015.
TREE ORDINANCE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION September 3, 2014.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
July 4, 2017 AURORA UNITED CHURCH + SOUTHBOUND DEVELOPMENT LTD Yonge Street, 55&57/57A Temperance Street, 12&16 Tyler Street General Committee Meeting.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Nonconforming Lots and Minimum Lot Sizes
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
AR-315 BUILDING CODES & BYE LAWS
COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Proposed “a” Overlay Impacts Almost All Inner Residential Neighborhoods East of the Willamette River. Now Includes Properties East of I-205 R5 = 5,000.
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment & Future Consent Application
Early Experience with HAA & SB 35 Objective Standards Requirements
City Commission Workshop
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Presentation transcript:

Narrow Lots & Skinny Lots or Land Divisions & Lot Confirmations Residential Infill Project Stakeholder Advisory Committee November 17, 2015

Residential Infill Project| 2 Two Processes and Two Lot Types Land Division: Create new lots from larger parcels of land Results in:  Lots  New Narrow Lots Lot Confirmation: Confirm the legal status of previously created lots Results in:  Lots  “Skinny Lots”

Residential Infill Project| 3 OVERVIEW Land Divisions  Background  Process  Density applies  Lot dimensions  New Narrow Lots Lot Confirmations  Background  Process  Density does not apply  Lot dimensions  “Skinny” Lots

LAND DIVISIONS

1907Early Platting Residential Infill Project| 5

Large tract land divisions 1997 Residential Infill Project| 6 Hawthorne Ridge

Infill - Small Land Divisions Residential Infill Project| 7

Small Land Divisions Residential Infill Project| 8

Land Division (LD) process  2 stages (preliminary plat & final plat)  Neighborhood Contact (mtg with NA)  Notice – to property owners  ’ for most LD cases  400’ (more than 10 lots, or E zone)  Process (typically 6-24 months)  City fees: $8,800 (simple 2 lot partition) to $40,000 (for large subdivisions)  Standards and criteria apply Residential Infill Project| 9

LD Standards and Criteria  Standards  Density  Lot size  Lot width and depth  Streets and infrastructure  Criteria  Tree Preservation  Flood/Landslide Hazard  New Narrow Lots (when proposed) Residential Infill Project| 10

History of Regulations (R5) Land Division Standards Pre-2002 CodePre-2002 Exceptions Current CodeCurrent Code Exceptions Density1 lot/5,000 sfAD or Alt. Dev 1 lot/5,000 sfAlt. Dev Lot Size5,000 sfCluster3,000-8,500 sfAlt. Dev or PD Lot Width50’Cluster36’Narrow Lot or PD Lot Depth100’Cluster50’PD AD: Adjustment (like a variance) PD: Planned Development Alt. Dev: Alternative Development Options  Attached house on corner (1 lot/2,500 s.f.)  Transition sites (1 additional lot on the site) Residential Infill Project| 11

Number of Lots Minimum density – ensures areas are efficiently used for needed housing. Maximum density – ensures the number of lots does not exceed planned intensities of the zones. R7 = 1 lot per 7,000 sq. ft. of site area R5 = 1 lot per 5,000 sq. ft. of site area R2.5 = 1 lot per 2,500 sq. ft. of site area Residential Infill Project| 12

Rounding rules Maximum density calculations are rounded as follows: R5 Example: 19,550 s.f. ÷ 5,000 s.f. = 3.91 or 4 lots Average lot size = 4,887 s.f. # of LotsRound up at > >10.50 Residential Infill Project| 13

Lot Dimension Requirements ZoneMinimum Lot Width* Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Lot Size Maximum Lot Size RF60’ 52,000151,000 R2060’ 12,00034,500 R1050’60’6,00017,000 R740’55’4,20012,000 R536’50’3,0008,500 R2.536’40’1,600none * Exceptions to minimum lot width requires meeting New Narrow Lot or Planned Development review criteria Residential Infill Project| 14

Parcel 2: 4,000 s.f. Parcel 1: 8,500 s.f. Lot Dimension Flexibility Preserve existing homes Residential Infill Project| 15

tree or open space tract ,000 4,000 Residential Infill Project| 16 50’ 40’45’50’65’ Lot Dimension Flexibility Natural resources

R10 site, 108,000 s.f. 9 lots ~6,300 s.f. Residential Infill Project| 17

50x100 Residential Infill Project| 18 Lot Dimension Flexibility Alternative to flag lots

New Narrow Lot Criteria Lot width may be reduced: On balance, lots are consistent with purpose of lot dimension regulations: ˗ Room for house, garage and outdoor area ˗ Can meet development standards ˗ Oriented toward street ˗ Compatible with existing lots Width can be reduced to 25’ for lots that will be developed with detached houses Residential Infill Project| 19

Height: 1.2 x width of house (RF-R5 zones) 1.5 x width of house (R2.5 zone) Main entrance: located within 4’ of grade Access: must be from alley (if available) Garage: No attached garage on street facing façade when houses are less than 22’ wide (except with a PD) Houses on New Narrow Lots Additional Development Standards Residential Infill Project| 20

Land Division Data Lot Totals Residential Infill Project | 21 Zone StandardFlag LotNarrow LotCorner AttTotal RF11000 R R R R R Multi Total

Planned Developments Opportunity for innovative and creative development that:  complements existing neighborhood character  is well-designed  can be successfully integrated into the neighborhood Residential Infill Project| 22

Planned Development Criteria  Visually integrate both the natural and built features of the site and surrounding area.  Orient the site and development to the street  Preserve natural features on the site  Complement positive architectural features of surrounding development;  Mitigate differences in appearance  Minimize potential negative effects  Provide adequate open space Residential Infill Project| 23

Planned Development Process  Can be concurrent with Land Division  Neighborhood Contact (mtg with NA)  Notice – to property owners w/in 150’ – 400’ (depending on # of units, housing type)  Stand alone process (No LD) 4-6 months  City Fees: $6,900 (simple review) to $15,700 (incl. pre-app) – in addition to LD fees  House design approved PD phase  Standards and criteria apply Residential Infill Project| 24

LOT CONFIRMATIONS

Residential Infill Project| 26 OVERVIEW Land Divisions  Background  Process  Density applies  Lot dimensions  New Narrow Lots Lot Confirmations  Background  Process  Density does not apply  Lot dimensions  “Skinny” Lots

Background  Historically, the City has recognized and allowed lawfully created lots to be developed.  In 1985 the State added language further recognizing the status of legal lots: ORS “A lot or parcel lawfully created shall remain a discrete lot or parcel, unless the lot or parcel lines are vacated or the lot or parcel is further divided, as provided by law.” Residential Infill Project| 27

Lot Confirmation  Separates ownership of previously platted lots, or lots of record that were combined under one tax account (tax lot). Residential Infill Project| 28

Helpful Definitions  Lot  Through Lot, Corner Lot, Flag Lot  Adjusted Lot (vs Lot Remnant)  New Narrow Lot vs. “Skinny Lot”  Tax Lot  Lot of Record Residential Infill Project| 29

Lot A lot is a legally defined piece of land other than a tract that is the result of a land division. Described as First Electric Addition, Block 10, Lot Residential Infill Project| 30

Through, Corner, and Flag Lots Residential Infill Project| 31 Flag Lot

Adjusted Lot vs. Lot Remnant  An Adjusted Lot is a lot that was altered through a property line adjustment prior to July 26,  A Lot Remnant is a portion of a lot with 50% or less of the original lot area. Residential Infill Project| 32

Tax Lot Here, tax lot 10700, is comprised of Lots 23 and 24 of Block 1, of the First Electric Addition plat Residential Infill Project| 33

Lot of Record  A lot of record is a plot of land not created through a land division; but rather through a deed or other instrument dividing the land, recorded before July 26, Residential Infill Project| 34

Lot of Record Residential Infill Project| 35

New Narrow Lot / Skinny Lot  New Narrow Lot. A lot that was created by a land division submitted after June 30, 2002 and does not meet the minimum lot width standards.  Skinny Lot – Not a true zoning term. Results from lot confirmations and is a lot that is less than the minimum lot size and width and is not a new narrow lot. Residential Infill Project| 36

Lot Confirmation Process  No notice or neighborhood contact  Process (6-10 weeks)  Fees: <$1,000  Staff reviews application (and supporting deed info) to confirm lots meet dimensional requirements and other qualifications  No standards or criteria, except for replacement parking Process time and fees increase if there is an associated property line adjustment Residential Infill Project| 37

Density  Lot confirmation requests are not reviewed to determine compliance with underlying zone density.  If the lot was lawfully established, the State requires that it be treated as a discrete lot.  The City retains the zoning authority to determine when primary structures may be built. Residential Infill Project| 38

Lot Dimension Requirements  Not all lot confirmations result in substandard lots.  Substandard lots are not a new issue in the zoning code. Residential Infill Project| 39

History of pre-existing lot codes  1959 Code  4 zones (R10, R7, R5, A2.5)  Pre existing lots: 4,000 s.f. min, 40x80’  1983 Code  Added RF and R20 zones  Pre existing lots: Differentiated size and dimensions by zone, but all below standards  1991 – 2002 Code  Created substandard lot review  Removed size requirements for R5 or R2.5 Residential Infill Project| 40

Current Code RFR20R10R7R5R2.5 Size52,00012,0006,0004,2001,600 Width36 - Depth----- R5 ZoneMin. Size / Min. Width Lots, including adjusted lots Not vacant or in e-zone3,000 s.f. / 36 ft. wide Vacant and not in e-zone2,400 s.f. / 25 ft. wide Corner lot PLA1,600 s.f. / 36 ft. wide Lot Remnants3,000 s.f. / 36 ft. wide Lots of Record3,000 s.f. / 36 ft. wide Residential Infill Project| 41

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 1  Conforming Lots (3,000 s.f. and >36’ wide) No special requirements Residential Infill Project| 42

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) Lot must be vacant for at least 5 years Additional development standards apply to house Residential Infill Project| 43

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) 5 year vacancy rule: Residential Infill Project| Vacant skinny lots are confirmed

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) 5 year vacancy rule: Residential Infill Project| Houses are built on confirmed lots

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) 5 year vacancy rule: Residential Infill Project| House is demolished on remaining lots

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) 5 year vacancy rule: Residential Infill Project| New house is built on ½ of remaining lots

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 2  Skinny Lots (2,400 s.f. and/or <36’ wide) 5 year vacancy rule: Residential Infill Project| Five years later, final house is built on last confirmed lot

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 3 Corner Lot Property Line Adjustment Pre 2010 – lots had to be same size as original lots Current Code – lot may be 1,600 s.f. if at least 36 feet wide and the lot line is perpendicular to street Residential Infill Project| 49

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 4 Using a PLA to make conforming lots Residential Infill Project| Existing house sits on three 25x100’ lots. None are confirmable individually as they have not been vacant for 5 years

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 4 Using a PLA to make conforming lots Residential Infill Project| The existing house is demolished.

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 4 Using a PLA to make conforming lots Residential Infill Project| One of the three 25x100 foot lots can be confirmed, in conjunction with a property line adjustment…

R5 Lot Confirmation Scenario 4 Using a PLA to make conforming lots Residential Infill Project| Two 37.5’ wide lots result. Since they are both wider than 36 feet and more than 3,000 s.f., both adjusted lots can have houses.

Lot Confirmation Data Residential Infill Project| 54 ZoneLot Conf. Conf. w/PLA TotalConfor ming Below min 5-yr no build Corner PLA R R Other Total ZoneHistoric Platted Lot Dimensions 25x10040x10050x100other R R Other

Skinny Lots Additional Development Standards  Flexibility:  Attached houses (2) are allowed  No Parking required  Bulk limitation:  Reduced height (1.5 x width)  Reduced building coverage (40%) Residential Infill Project| 55

Skinny Lots Additional Development Standards Residential Infill Project| 56  Design elements:  Main entrance (4’ from grade)  Max 8’ wide garage door  Required exterior finish materials, eaves and trim  Modifications to standards or setbacks only allowed through Design Review

Differences Between Houses on New Narrow Lots and Skinny Lots New Narrow Lots  Main entrance w/in 4’ of grade (attached houses)  Attached garage allowed only with PD review  50% building coverage  Height limited to 1.2x width of house in R5  Height limited to 1.5x width of house in R2.5  Mostly in R2.5 Skinny Lots  Main entrance w/in 4’ of grade (all houses)  12’ wide garage allowed (but not required)  40% building coverage  Height limited to 1.5x width of house in R5  Height limited to 1.5x width of house in R2.5  Mostly in R5 Residential Infill Project| 57

Differences Between Houses on New Narrow Lots and Skinny Lots New Narrow Lots  Created through Land Division process with additional criteria  Exceptions to standards require PD review (not Adjustments) Skinny Lots  Reestablished through Lot Confirmation process on vacant lots.  Exceptions to standards require design review (not Adjustments) Residential Infill Project| 58

Additional Questions?