Program Design and Implementation – Problem Solving as a Process for Teaching Mathematics - Exploring relationships between participants’ teaching and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Number Talks Presented by: Kim Mott, Instructional Coach Beechgrove
Module 1: Teaching functional skills – from building to applying skills 0 0.
Department of Mathematics and Science
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
1 Welcome to Module 6 Classroom Resources and Management.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Grade 5 – Module 3 Module Focus Session
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
The 5 E Instructional Model
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
Number Talks Building student’s communication and number sense.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Micro Teaching and Operations with a Variety of Number Sets Intermediate / Senior Mathematics Winter 2011 SESSION 9 – Jan 27, 2011.
1 Getting to Know the CMSP Three Components of the CMSP- Mathematics Curriculum Guides Pacing Guides Lesson Design Template.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Analyzing Program Design and Implementation through Mathematics Learning Theory - Exploring Representations of Addition and Subtraction – Concepts, Algorithms,
Enhancing Teaching and Learning with Podcasts Mico e-Learning Workshop.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Understanding Diversity of Knowing and Learning Mathematics – Mathematics for All Students - Exploring Representations of Addition and Subtraction – Concepts,
Analyzing Program Design and Implementation through Mathematics Learning Theory - Exploring Representations of Addition and Subtraction – Concepts, Algorithms,
Effective Questioning: Gap Closing Grade 9 Student Success Summer Program 2011 Mathematics 7-12.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows Tamara Smith Regional Mathematics Coordinator Olympic ESD Complete the Math Task on the Table.
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
Meaningful Mathematics
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Assessments Matching Assessments to Standards. Agenda ● Welcome ● What do you think of assessment? ● Overview of all types of evidence ● Performance Tasks.
Investigating Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting Hamilton Wentworth DSB Fri Apr 8, 2011 MaryLou Kestell
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Learning through Problem Solving – Studying Mathematics Instruction in Japan Intermediate / Senior Mathematics Winter 2011 SESSION 10 – Jan 31, 2011.
HOW TO TEACH WRITING IN A NON-ELA SETTING District Learning Day 10:20-11:30 August 5, 2015.
Improving Mathematics Achievement of Students in the Junior Division TDSB and LNS Junior Math Strategy (CIL-M and GCS) Tues Apr 5, 2011.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
SOUTH DAKOTA COUNTS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE Brookings, SD
Fraction Sense Fran Gibson. 2 Sacramento County Office of Education | Welcome and Introductions Please share the following information about.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
+ Revisiting Collaboration and RtI October 11, 2011 Math Alliance Teaching All Learners Judy Winn Beth Schefelker Mary Ann Fitzgerald.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Understanding Diversity of Knowing and Learning Mathematics – Mathematics for All Students - Exploring Representations of Addition and Subtraction – Concepts,
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
Metacognition to Motivate Learning
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Kubota-Zarivnij, 2010 BEFORE 5 to 10 minutes only Activating students’ mathematical knowledge and experience that directly relates to the mathematics in.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Constructivism The 5 E's Lesson Plan ( Internet Resource from slidesare.net adapted for the session )
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Program Design and Implementation – Problem Solving as a Process for Teaching Mathematics - Exploring relationships between participants’ teaching and learning mathematics experiences, beliefs; mathematics content knowledge and mathematics pedagogy within an inquiry and research framework - Making sense of embodied knowledge of mathematics through different data management strategies. Exploring the relationship between societal and technological changes and teaching and learning mathematics through inquiry and math experiences Understanding and implementing Ministry of Education curriculum expectations and Ministry of Education and district school board policies and guidelines related to the adolescent Demonstrating an openness to innovation and change Having the theoretical understanding and foundation necessary to design, implement and assess programs for the adolescent learner Demonstrating an openness to innovation and change Having the theoretical understanding and foundation necessary to design, implement and assess programs for the adolescent learner ABQ Intermediate Mathematics Spring 2010 SESSION 7 – May 5, 2010

Rough Agenda 5:30 – 6:15 6:15 – 6:35 6:35 – 7:05Focused Discussion Adolescent Development 7:15 – 7:45 7:45 – 9:00

Change - Learning Mathematics Through PS - Focusing on Communication and Interactive Learning PLAY … TAKE A RISK! Materials 2 dice, a pencil and paper How To Play Roll the dice and add up your score. Take as many turns as you like before you pass the dice. If the dice adds up to 7, you lose your score for that turn. If the dice adds up to 12, you lose your total score so far. All other numbers are safe. Who Wins First player to reach 99 What mathematics are you doing and learning? What is the student’s role? What is the teacher’s role?

Change - Learning Mathematics Through PS - Using Polya’s Problem Solving Process Make a Plan Take a Risk! How will you calculate and record all the scores? What strategies might you use? Carry Out The Plan Play the game. Record the scores in a graphic organizer. Keep track of the strategies you are using. Look Back Which strategies did you use that were successful or less successful? Why? How did you know when someone was about to win the game? What is the probability of winning 3 times in a row? How can you represent your data so that it looks like you are always winning?

The Mathematics – Probability

3 – 2 – 1 Teaching through Problem Solving Write on a piece of paper you will be able to read from later… 3 – things that characterize Teaching through Problem Solving (“Structured PS” as per TIMSS) 2 – things that Teaching through Problem Solving is NOT! 1 – thing you want to learn about Teaching through Problem Solving

Teaching Through Problem Solving Many solutions to a problem by the students Working on a challenging new problem Students are doing the mathematics, rather than watching the teacher do it or listening to the teacher Students come to the board to post their solutions Teacher facilitate discussion to find the relationship between the solutions Providing a record of the discussion - see the progression of the work from the start of the lesson throughout Lessons and concepts were developed through examples, demonstrations (students), and discussions Using a chalkboard - to record the learning throughout the lesson - keep it recorded (keeps the attention over time, rather than on, off - keeps a record - to summarize learning - highlights/summary on the board Order the writing on the board important Building on previous day’s work - continuum of learning Students spend time inventing new ideas

What Can We Learn From TIMSS? Problem-Solving Lesson Design BEFORE (ACTIVATING PROBLEM 10 min) Activating prior knowledge; discussing previous days’ methods to solve a current day problem DURING (LESSON PROBLEM 20 min) Presenting and understanding the lesson problem Students working individually or in groups to solve a problem Students discussing solution methods AFTER (CONSOLIDATION the thing we think of as the REAL teaching 30 min) Teacher coordinating discussion of the methods (accuracy, efficiency, generalizability) Teacher highlighting and summarizing key points Individual student practise (Stigler & Hiebert, 1999)

Criteria for a Problem Solving Lesson Content Elaboration- developed concepts through teacher and student discussion Nature of Math Content - rationale and reasoning used to derive understanding Who does the work Kind of mathematical work by students - equal time practising procedures and inventing new methods Content Coherence - mathematical relationships within lesson Making Connections - weaving together ideas and activities in the relationships between the learning goal and the lesson task made explicit by teachers Nature of Mathematics Learning - seeing new relationships between math ideas Nature of Learning first struggling to solve math problems − then participating in discussions about how to solve them hearing pros and cons, constructing connections between methods and problems − so they use their time to explore, invent, make mistakes, reflect, and receive needed information just in time

Teacher Inquiry - Annotated Bibliography 6 articles (one person), 8 articles (two people or more) 1st paragraph - describe key math idea 2 nd paragraph explains how you are using the key idea to design your lesson

Reading Strategies for Journal Articles Look for headings - to get an overview of what they are talking about - to skim through and highlight a couple of points (to remember what you read) Re-read the journal and look for those important ideas Look for structure - big idea of the article - go to the summary of the article first and the abstract Articulate or identify what the reading was focused on Capture it if it still sounds promising

Analytic journals Math Task 1 Math Task 2 Learning Theories paper Annotated Bibliography

What are the Range of Solutions for This Problem? What mathematics did we use in our solutions? 3. Record your ideas as a network (knowledge package), showing the interconnections among the curriculum expectations from grades 6 to What is the sorting criteria for these solutions?

Teacher Inquiry Topics Grade 9 Grade 8 Grade 7

Preparation for Saturday May 8, 2010 Treats: Margareta, Andrea, and David Reminder – Continue gathering math topic articles for teacher inquiry – Rationale due Sat May 5, (include change and Japanese instruction Start Reading … a. Describe 2 characteristics of each theory: behaviourism, constructivism, and complexity theory. b. Infer how these theories explain a mathematics teaching/learning experience. Behaviourism and Constructivism : - Funderstandings. Behaviourism, Constructivism (Piaget, Vygotsky) - Clements, D. & Battista, M. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. Arithmetic Teacher, 38(1), Complexity Theory - Davis, B. (2005). Teacher as “consciousness of the collective’. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2, pp Davis, B. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (34)2, pp Assignments