SuperB Physics Closeout Adrian Bevan 1 st SuperB Collaboration Meeting, London 13-16 th Sept. 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards a FT Charm Chapter Jeffrey Appel & Alan Schwartz September 5, 2008 Fermilab.
Advertisements

5 th Physics of the B Factories Meeting Aims and plans for the workshop Adrian Bevan.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c Steven Dytman Univ. of Pittsburgh OUTLINE: 1.Introduction to CLEO 2.D 3-body decays 3.Semileptonic D decay K-K- --
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
23 June 2005Kroll/Bedeschi1 Summary of 8 th CDF B Mixing Workshop Held morning of Thu 6/16/05 and Fri 6/17/05 Topics of discussion –status of updating.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Moriond EW, 3 Mar 2008Tagir Aushev (EPFL, ITEP)1  B → K S  0  0  B → K S K S  B → K S  0  B → D *+ D *-  B → a 1 , a 1 K, b 1 , b 1 K...  
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Systematic errors associated with PID Milind V. Purohit BaBar Analysis Tools Workshop October, 2005.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan Strasbourg 23 rd September 2011
Rare Charm Decays Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 22 nd October 2011
SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 21 st October 2011
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Wouter Verkerke, UCSB Limits on the Lifetime Difference  of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B 0 B 0 mixing Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
Charm Physics at Super B Factories after BESIII, Belle and B A B AR David Hitlin The Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP, Moscow July 24, 2006.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
87 th Plenary ECFA Meeting July 2, 2010 SuperB update M.A.Giorgi INFN & Universita’ di Pisa.
1 JTERM - III Workshop Summary Dan Green LPC co- coordinator.
A. Drutskoy, University of Cincinnati B physics at  (5S) July 24 – 26, 2006, Moscow, Russia. on the Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP Meeting B physics.
Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger (Fermilab) Overview of a Plan for Simulating a Tracking Trigger Harry Cheung (Fermilab)
Memos of Group #1 Discussion T.Higuchi / KEK. Aim of the discussion Rough idea of section design. Discuss overlaps and conflicts across sections.
2 nd workshop on SuperB 16.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Status of the art 2nd Workshop on SuperB.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Elisa manoni FastSim meeting January 21st, FastSim meeting, FastSim meeting, January 21st, 2010 Had Breco code: status report Elisa Manoni INFN.
Physics activities toward the TDR will be coordinated by A. Bevan, D. Brown, M. Ciuchini and A. Stocchi A document, also in Italian is needed by the end.
SuperB Physics Adrian Bevan 1 st SuperB Collaboration Meeting, London th Sept. 2011
Super B, Elba, Italy, 5/30-6/05/2010 Brian Meadows, U. Cincinnati Report from Charm WG (White Paper  TDR) D. Asner, Carleton U, I. Bigi, U. Notre Dame,
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
CHARM2012 experimental summary Stephen Lars Olsen Seoul National University Barrel End-cap.
Elisa manoni SuperB meeting June 17, SuperB meeting, Physics + Computing session July 17, 2009 B reco studies in FastSim: status report Elisa Manoni.
Detector Goals and General Syst. System Parallel Joint Parallel DGWG Mechanical Integ. TDR Organization System Summaries WORKSHOP Structure-Detector +
SuperB: Other experiments session LHCb/LHCb upgrade (see LHCb web site/search Google) & NA62 Adrian Bevan Caveats: (i) this is based on the LHCb upgrade.
Guglielmo De Nardo University of Napoli and INFN
TDR and planning session
Working Group 1 Report from Warwick (Conveners: Adrian Bevan, Chih-hisang Cheng, and Thomas Mannel) With thanks to Tim Gershon for his efforts in the.
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
SuperB: Physics.
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Adrian Bevan, Dave Brown, Marco Ciuchini, and Achille Stocchi
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
Adrian Bevan / Dave Brown
Budker INP, Novosibirsk
SuperB Physics Elba 2011.
Summary/Conclusions of the SuperB PID Sessions.
ATLAS B-physics important periods
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
Planned workshop publications
Summary talk Pierre Lutz Durham Sept.3rd
Adrian Bevan / Dave Brown / Marco Ciuchini / Achille Stocchi
Status of the Physics White Paper
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Physics Workshop at Elba
SuperB: Physics.
Organisation of the Physics activity toward the TDR
Higgs physics at CEPC Physics workshop
Presentation transcript:

SuperB Physics Closeout Adrian Bevan 1 st SuperB Collaboration Meeting, London th Sept

Changes since Elba 2  Charm WG:  Nicola Neri and Miland Purohit have joined Brian.  Mixing and CPV in B Physics:  Jure Zupan has joined AB.  B S :  Alexander Lenz has joined Alexey Drutskoy

Very active meeting 3  Lots of charm (threshold running related studies)  Starting to study triple product correlations (See Marcin's talk from yesterday) using B  φφK  Continuing to hone the precision EW programme: measure ALR and A FB

4  Matteo gave a very complete introduction to the FastSim yesterday  John Ellis gave a nice overview of SUSY after 1/fb of LHC data before lunch.  + a number of discussions on some technical/documentation issues and the December workshop...

WP – Known Short Falls (Need to be done)  Few Fastsim simulations exist  Mixing in D 0  K s  +  - at Y(4S)  Preliminary feasibility study of D 0   +  - at à (3770)  Studies at Y(4S): Mixing  Use of other modes to find x and y are all estimated from Babar analyses  Do not include measurement of |q/p|, arg {q/p} from D 0 -D 0 asymmetries Rare decays  Realistic understanding reach for D 0   +  -, D 0   D 0  h + l + l -, D 0   0 l + l -  Running at  (3770) ~DD threshold  QC phase measurements - how to include them in 4S mixing measurements  Better estimates for  (A SL )  Rare decays such as D 0   +  -, D 0    How to use time-dependent decay correlations  Use of other thresholds (D s,  c ?) Rolf’s talkMike, Gianluca, Adrian, Fernando talks Elaborate in thistalk From Brian

Other Studies  Various physics items added since the WP  D 0 -> invisible,  + invisible, “X 0 ” + invisible at BOTH Y(4S) and threshold.  T-correlations in D 0 -> l + l - h + h - and D 0 -> l + l - l + l -  IFF we ever find any such events, of course !!  CPT Violation  Charm baryons  Run at D s threshold too – f(D s ) and semi-leptonic decays (V cs )  Time-dependent quantum correlated decay studies  Various double-tagged combinations K  D 0 tag Beam pipe D 0  invisible Background From Brian

7 From Marcin

8 NOT ∧ From Mike Can directly measure polarisation of the beams AT the IP, so don't have to rely on the Compton polarimeter and extrapolating the measured polarisation at some source point to the IP.

Physics tools  detector response simulation in FastSim (SVT, DCH, DIRC, EMC, IFR)  PID selectors  simulation of background  physics analysis tools (tagging, vertexing, …)  development of ‘skims’ for physics studies  documentation Many opportunities to contribute: for more information contact Matteo Rama

Tools Documentation 10  Discussion on migrating tools documentation from BaBar to SuperB:  Covered under code transfer agreement,  SuperB would benefit from the following  Workbook  Vertexing  SimpleComposition  BtaTupleMaker  Aim: Provide detailed instructions on how to use BetaCode, tcl and get started.  Would need some minor reworking of the workbook to remove any BaBar-specific information.  Would need to be private.  Need a volunteer to do the work: Please contact Matteo

Request for BaBar internal documentation 11  Not covered by code transfer agreement  All technical documents  Will request these from BaBar to be placed in the private alfresco document repository as internal SuperB notes: Need SuperB note naming scheme. BAD # Title 53 Choice of Kinematic Variables in B Meson Reconstruction---Take Vertexing 509 sPlots 522 EvtGen documentation 1657 A Likelihood-based Charm Flavor Tag 2082 Studies towards an improved tagging algorithm: Tag 246, 332, 497, 1471 Related to backgrounds and trickle injection impacting upon data quality 1500 PID 2126 Summary of Upsilon(2S) Counting 2186 Offline measurement of recorded BaBar luminosity in R24 + Statistics WG recommended practice document

Regular (bi-weekly) physics meetings 12  These are starting up again.  Tuesday: 17:00 (Roma) / 16:00 UK / 08:00 West Coast  Regular intervals: meeting every 2 weeks  Work toward the December physics workshop  Elucidate new areas of the programme  Hone physics interpretation in light of summer conference results  Develop tools for future physics studies.  Meetings will be via EVO, listed on Indico: 

December workshop: 11 th & 12 th December, LNF  Day 1  Welcome: Aims/intro  DESY sll workshop summary  WG5 session  Precision EW  Dark Forces (possibly)  b  sγ session  Theory + Expt overview, esp A CP  B u,d,s session(s)  Bs  gg &/or ASL Fast Sim progress  b  sll inclusive/exclusive FastSim progress  Day 2  Charm  TDCPV progress  tau  LFV/CPV  Planning Session  Discuss tools required, and what FastSim mode studies we need for TDR/Book  TDR chapters/Physics Impact Document/Elba planning session Currently have one room booked for both days: all plenary. + 2 additional parallel session rooms requested for Monday morning. Will also have a few sessions during the CM.

Interim updates 14  On the timescale of the December meeting we will have a honed interpretation of the physics programme accounting for the current constraints from the LHC.  Also need to be mindful of the potential from 2012 data taking at the LHC (e.g. using a sensible value for Λ NP ).  We have considerable levels of activity that will lead to a broader understanding of the programme by the end of the year.  Interim updates should be prepared as and when necessary.  Long term goal is the SuperB physics book a few years from now.

TDR Contributions 15  Need to work with the detector and accelerator teams to prepare:  Physics chapter for the detector TDR: an overview of the whole programme.  Physics motivation for the accelerator features: (i) 4S running (+ adjacent resonances), (ii) Physics requirements for polarisation, and (iii) Physics programme at charm threshold.