The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Marion Wichmann-Fiebig II 5 Abteilungsleiterin „Luft“ 1 Review of the Gothenburg Protocol Link to potential PM control under CLRTAP: – Specifies control.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Cross Cutting Group B: Ammonia policy context and future challenges Chair: Till Spranger Rapporteur: Zbigniew Klimont Attendees: 13.
Russian experience within the UNECE LRTAP Convention: Bridging policy with science for effective mitigation of transboundary air pollution Mrs. Kristina.
Amy Stidworthy NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint Science Conference 26 th June 2014 Sheffield University, UK Using MACC-II Products as Boundary Conditions for Street-Scale.
Fighting the Great Challenges in Large-scale Environmental Modelling I. Dimov n Great challenges in environmental modelling n Impact of climatic changes.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
DEA - Università degli Studi di Brescia Multi-objective optimization to select effective PM10 control policies in Northern Italy C. Carnevale, E. Pisoni,
LINKING EUROPEAN, NATIONAL & CITY SCALES UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling Helen ApSimon and Tim Oxley, Imperial College in.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling.
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Near Real Time analyzed maps of air quality in Europe Cécile Honoré, Laurence Rouïl.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Transboundary Air Pollution and related Integrated Assessment Modelling Tiziano Pignatelli Enea – Atmospheric Pollution Unit
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
Addo van Pul Eiko Nemitz Tony Dore Liu Xuejun Hilde Fagerli Camilla Geels Ole Hertel Roy van Kruijt Maciej Kryza Robert Bergström Massimo Vieno Rognvald.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
The aim of this work was to create background and roadside maps of pollutant concentrations for Scotland and to compare these with similar maps created.
Monitoring and Modelling in the Malé Declaration Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), UK Bangkok, March 2008 Malé Declaration 6 th Monitoring.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
RAINS Review Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model Contract with CAFE Dec Sept 2004.
Gloream workshop, Paris 2006 Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
A real-time forecast system for air pollution concentrations - Contribution to subproject GLOREAM - GLO-6 Hermann J. Jakobs, Elmar Friese, Michael Memmesheimer,
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
1 Monitoring and assessment in Europe Joining forces between EMEP and EEA Roel van Aalst 30 May 2001.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Assessment and Enhancement of National Capacities for Joining CLRTAP Protocols and Meeting Corresponding.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
21-22 March 2005 LMD, Palaiseau, France CHIMERE workshop Air quality assessment for Portugal A. Monteiro, C. Borrego, A.I. Miranda, R. Vautard Universidade.
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
The CAMS Policy products
Thirtieth meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling
A 1-year simulation of atmospheric concentrations and deposition over Europe and UK Alan Cocks, Vicky Lucas, Ian Rodgers, and Ian Teasdale RWEInnogy Environment.
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Overview of Canada’s Air Quality Activities
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
Presentation transcript:

The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra

Value of air quality modelling in policy development To provide a quantitative link between pollutant emissions at one or many locations, and the resulting concentrations or deposition experienced by humans or the environment, which is being protected. This allows changes in impact resulting from hypothetical changes in emissions to be readily evaluated.

Why use air quality modelling for policy development? To establish the current picture (compliance with legal obligations, or calculate baseline to compare future scenarios against) To establish future scenarios under business as usual (assess progress towards future legislative targets) To establish future scenarios that go beyond business as usual (assess impact of a range of potential abatement strategies to inform a negotiating position, to meet future legislative targets, or effects of proposed development)

Conflicting requirements in using modelling for policy applications Need to have a reasonable turn around time for scenario runs, especially during negotiating periods Need to have confidence in the model predictions - must believe that the model output is an accurate representation of what is currently happening and what will happen in the future – best science

Legislative drivers Air Quality Framework Directive and its Daughter Directives Clean Air For Europe National Emission Ceilings Directive UNECE Gothenburg Protocol IPPC, LCPD National Air Quality Strategy

AEQ7 contracts Modelling concentrations and deposition of long range air pollutants to develop and apply UK scale models for the deposition and concentration of a range of long range air pollutants including S and N compounds The UK Application of the EMEP model to develop and test a mesoscale version of the Unified EMEP Eulerian model for use in the UK at a 5km resolution The UK Application of Eulerian models at fine spatial resolution to investigate the use of state of the art Eulerian models, including Models-3, as possible future replacements for FRAME, the current Lagrangian model used to predict S and N deposition in the UK

WP1- Initial assessment Installation of operating versions of Models-3 and other state of the art Eulerian models Provision of high quality UK meteorology for operation of the models Verification of the atmospheric chemistry components of the models Comparison of the transport processes in the models with other models

WP2 - Implementation across the UK Successful implementation of models at a fine spatial scale (between 1 and 5km) in the UK Connection of models to a continental wide model domain using model nesting Investigation of the use of multiple atmospheric layers close to the ground surface

WP3 - Comparison with modelled and monitored data Comparison of sulphur and nitrogen concentrations and deposition generated by the Eulerian models with each other Comparison of sulphur and nitrogen concentrations and deposition generated by the Eulerian models with output from existing UK models Comparison of sulphur and nitrogen concentrations and deposition generated by the Eulerian models with field measurements

Achievements The model runs for time periods of a month on a 5km UK domain nested with a western European 45km scale domain The model outputs are comparable with observed data The effectiveness of the orographic enhancement of wet deposition is currently being studied.

Constraints Input of UK emissions data proved to be more difficult than expected The computing resource to run the model across the whole UK domain remains considerable The meteorology used comes from MM5 with ECMWF data The sub-grid scale processes (e.g. for NH 3 ) will not be improved within this project

Meteo: Hourly 3D meteorological fields from the PSU/NCAR mesoscale model MM5 BCs and ICs: Boundary and Initial concentrations from the 3D Lagrangian transport chemical model STOCHEM Emissions: CO,NO2,SO2,NH3, PM10 and PM25 from EMEP database ( and NAEI (National Emission Inventory) database ( Episode: June 1999

Concentration maps of CO,NO2,SO2 and O3 at every hour and for 6 different vertical layers Hourly trends of surface concentration in single grid cells Daily averages of surface concentration in single grid cells Scatter plots Statistical parameters Preliminary results from episode: June 1999

Concentration maps

Rochester

Daily averages

Scatter plots

Monthly averages

Future work Extension of the validation to longer periods of time (typical summer and winter periods) and more pollutants (NH3) Sensitivity analysis Emission scenarios Comparison with FRAME

Thank you for your attention