Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization. Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Superconducting Spoke Resonator Cavities and Cryomodules
SRF_BizPlan_31Oct2010_Rev_14 Production Preparations at JLAB JLab SRF Team EDMS – PLM DESY TeamCenter Meeting at SLAC 31 MAR 2014.
SPX - Cavity WBS U , U , U Genfa Wu SRF Scientist Accelerator Systems Division/RF Group DOE Lehman CD-2 Review of APS-Upgrade.
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 10/10/2015 Peter Quigley, MLC Design Review.
Present status of TTF-cryomodules short overview Bernd Petersen DESY MKS March, 7, 2005 Main design features of TESLA-cryomodules Design changes for XFEL-cryomodule.
Type IV Cryomodule Proposal (T4CM) Don Mitchell, 16 JAN 2006.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
RF Development for ESS Roger Ruber and Volker Ziemann Uppsala Universitet 4 Dec Dec-20091RR+VZ: ESS RF Development.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Americas Region: T4CM Status and Plans H. Carter TD SRF Dev. Dept. July 14, 2006.
JLAB waveguide couplers R. Rimmer for JLab SRF Institute.
LCWS13, November 2013 At the University of Tokyo W.–D. Möller Status of the TTF3 RF Power Coupler.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Horizontal Test Stands and CC2 Results Andy Hocker Testing an alternative ILC cavity design at USPAS (Q 0 =2.23E+02)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Gary McIntyre R&D ERL ERL Status & Schedule Gary McIntyre February 17-18, 2010 ERL Status & Schedule.
October, 2009 Cost of SRF Components Gary McIntyre October, 2009 Internal Review.
Cryostat / Cryogenics Summary and (Proposed) Conclusions T. Peterson 25 April 2008.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
Wish list from ESS Christine Darve H-ECCTD Kick-off meeting 16 March
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
11/12/2013P. Bosland - AD-retreat - Lund Designs of the Spoke and Elliptical Cavity Cryomodules P. Bosland CEA/Saclay IRFU On behalf of the cryomodule.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
JLAB Cryomodule Assembly Facilities Visit Report Tug Arkan, Yuriy Orlov March 26, 2012.
Shuichi NoguchiTTC Meeting at Milano, Injector Cryomodule for cERL at KEK Cavity 2 Prototypes were tested. Input Coupler 2 Couplers were tested.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Darryl Orris 21 January 2015 Final Design Review: Instrumentation.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
R100/C100 Cryomodule Microphonics
CERN – Zanon discussions
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
John Hogan – Jefferson Lab
FRIB Cryogenic Support
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
T5.2: Harmonization - Material and Component Reference
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
WG-1 Session Cavity Performance Cryomodule Performance
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
Jiyuan Zhai ( IHEP ) TTC Meeting, JLAB, 6 Nov 2012
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Optimum cryomodule length at the ESS
Cryomodule design modifications for C75
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
CEPC-650MHz Cavity Cryomodule
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Field Emission and Mitigation in the CEBAF Linacs R Legg, R Geng Jlab SRF Ops Dept. TTC,
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
QCM and C50-12 Status Update
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
Facility for Research Instrumentation and Accelerator Development
Presentation transcript:

Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization

Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV in 5 ½ passes – Increases the energy gain of each linac with 5 new cryomodules – Adds ½ pass to the machine – The new cryomodule design is the basis for this presentation on cost and optimization – 10 cryomodule (5 each linac), 80 cavities and associated couplers, tuners, …..

Production Costs Procurements 49%, Labor 33%, Expenses 18% 12 GeV UPGRADE PROJECT – CRYOMODULE PRODUCTION * J. Hogan, A. Burrill, G. K. Davis, M. Drury and M. Wiseman Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Va 23606, USA Labor QA processes (cavities not included)33% Cavity QA and Qualification21% Cryomodule Assembly26% Acceptance Testing8% Installation and Commissioning7% Tooling Design5%

Production Costs CM Production Costs - Through APR 2013 CM Component BreakdownQuantityQuan/CMPercentage Cavity52.3% Niobium %Niobium Fabrication %Cavity Fabrication Power Couplers8.9% Waveguides8882.8%Waveguides TopHats (Air-side-FPC & HOMs)8886.2%TopHats (Air-side-FPC & HOMs) Cryogenics17.6% Helium Vessels9083.4%Helium Vessels Helium Headers1011.5%Helium Headers Thermal Shield1012.4%Thermal Shield End Cans %End Cans Structural8.4% Vacuum Vessels1015.9%Vacuum Vessels Space Frame1012.5%Space Frame Misc.12.2% Tuners9014.7%Tuners Magnetic Shield1012.6%Magnetic Shield Instrumentation1011.6%Instrumentation Beampipes1013.1%Beampipes Supports (stands & plates)1010.2%Supports (stands & plates) Fixed Costs0.6% Tooling1010.3%Tooling Cavity String Assembly1010.3%Cavity String Assembly

Jlab Cryomodule Cost History Data taken from closed projects, C100 is estimated Engineering costs included Overhead Rates lowered for C100,SNS,CEBAF projects XFEL estimate ~$1.7M? ILC estimate ~$1M? A. McEwen

Optimization For the required voltage, minimize 2K heat load – 40% increase in active length for the same overall length – Maximize Quality Factor Extensive work on magnetic shield design EP processing Minimize the RF power required – High Qext, – Small cavity detuning high resolution tuners Low microphonics Low level rf controls

Optimization Opportunities for improvement – Early prototypical cryomodule had power couplers with a single window, a double window was incorporated into the C100 design, – Leaky instrumentation feedthroughs – Small liquid inventory, liters/watt of 2K power, makes the cryomodule more sensitive to changes