Business Process Review Academic Registry Student Systems and Administration Business Process Review Team Karen Williams February 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Corporate Interface Architecture George Palios. Contents Outlines the activities undertaken to enhance the quality of service of the Corporate interfacing.
Academic Database at DMU. Outline History and Context Discussion Please ask questions as we go along.
Staff Council Presentation You and Your PSD “Position Source Document” Human Resources Eduardo Salaz Associate Vice President and Chief Human Resources.
Info1409 De Montfort University Lecture 3 The Systems Development Life Cycle Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9.
NATIONAL TREASURY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE UNIT (TAU) Enabling Change for Development Programme and Project Management (PPM) Update Project Management Interest.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Student Administration Improvement Programme. What do we mean by SAIP? A review of the processes we undertake to support the University in delivering.
Process Mapping Library at the University of Kent Melissa Bradley, Humanities Faculty Administration Manager 5 th January 2012.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Technical Services Assessment in Pennsylvania Academic Libraries Rebecca L. Mugridge University at Albany, SUNY American Library Association ALCTS Affiliates.
How Halton ICT Business Services climbed the management Ziggurat Mike Horsley Lead Analyst, ICT services, Halton BC.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Ofsted framework 2012 Feedback from inspections carried out under the new framework and implications for clerks and governing bodies Clerks briefings April.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Foundation Degree IT Project Methodologies (for reference)
Student Administration Finance Human Resources Research Administration Mosaic Improving Business and Administrative Processes at McMaster University.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
1 Secondary Head Teachers’ Meeting Thursday 9 January 2014.
Reflections on Broadening Recruitment and Widening Participation: The Challenge of Diversity A WP Development Programme for the University of Borås, 2010.
Web Technologies Working Group October 25, Approval Needed Web Standards and Guidelines – Development of an online resource with the objective of.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
Successfully recording Continuing Professional Development.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Administrator Briefing Spring Quarter 2009.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Improving Government responsiveness as key to meaningful public participation in decision-making processes: Croatian experience Igor Vidačak Government.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Engagement and regulation of public health practitioners.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Assessment & Program Review President’s Retreat 2008 College of Micronesia - FSM May 13 – 15, 2008 FSM China Friendship Sports Center.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Chapter 6.  OM, previously known as productions management is the management of resources to achieve efficient output of goods or services.  It involves.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Technical Services Assessment in Pennsylvania Academic Libraries Rebecca L. Mugridge Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania Library Association September.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
true potential An Introduction to the Middle Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
Engagement Plan Pre-Programme Plan to support SDM and Service Reform Programme Document Control: Version: Version 1.4 Date: 2 nd March 2015 Status: For.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Systems Analysis Lecture 5 Requirements Investigation and Analysis 1 BTEC HNC Systems Support Castle College 2007/8.
true potential An Introduction to the First Line Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
Data Management Program Introduction
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
JOB, ROLE, COMPETENCY AND SKILLS ANALYSIS
INTRODUCING THE TOOLKIT L3 & L5
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
2 Selecting a Healthcare Information System.
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
The Two Most Common Types of Contemporary Planning Techniques
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
The Two Most Common Types of Contemporary Planning Techniques
PMB Review Update PO’s Forum
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Business Process Review Academic Registry Student Systems and Administration Business Process Review Team Karen Williams February 2008

 What is a Business Process?  Why is the Academic Registry conducting a Business Process Review?  How will the Business Process Review be undertaken?  Where will the information be stored once the Business Process Review is completed? Business Process Review

What is a Business Process? A business process is a series of steps designed to produce a service (or a product) & involves Steps may be all contained within a corporate/service department or a faculty but usually they span across the organisation structure of the University input  transformation  output Business Process Review

So a Business Process Review is : An assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of administrative, financial and operational business processes, and an evaluation of the alternatives. The analysis and design of workflows and processes in an organisation. Business Process Review

Why is the Academic Registry conducting a Business Process Review? One of the Academic Registry’s key strategic aims for is : to deliver an institutional framework for the management of student administration in which duplication is eradicated and where students themselves have primary responsibility for their records management In order to achieve this strategic aim the Academic Registry is undertaking a student administration facing business process review which will involve the mapping and documenting of key student administrative processes from registration to graduation. Business Process Review

The current situation: Different processes for the same task across faculties and even within faculties Staff are unsure where to find a definitive answer on the process for different tasks Processes no longer fit for purpose Administration staff are having to design new processes under pressure to cope with new Regulations or University initiatives without being given the opportunity or resources to do so effectively Good practice is not always being shared Business Process Review

The Business Process Review will allow us to:  describe, define and analyse the student administration processes currently in place to identify inconsistencies, ineffectiveness and inefficiency operating across the University in nine separate schools  identify best (standard) practice for adoption across the whole institution within a centrally managed student administration framework and reduce duplication of effort  identify and approve specific deviations from the centrally agreed business process  create a web powered library interface of standard process maps Business Process Review

 use the defined and agreed business processes as a basis for identifying software change requests to the student records system  allow us to identify where manual activities could better be achieved using appropriate technology  facilitate communication between services where decisions made in student administration impacts upon other services and vice versa  act as a showcase for the rest of the University who may wish to use the software  enhance the quality of the student and staff experience. Business Process Review

How will the Business Process Review be undertaken? The Project has been split into a number of phases. Phase One – Assessment Phase Two – Registration Phase Three – Graduation Phase Four – Review and Re-evaluation Business Process Review

USAC Subgroup decides on Best Practice and Agreed Deviations Methodology Analysis Phase - in consultation with faculty and service experts, draw up proposals for University-wide version of process Map Faculty versions of process via workshops with Faculty representatives Map basic process – in consultation with Faculty and Service experts Business Process Review

Methodology USAC Subgroup makes recommendations to USAC. USAC Reports decision to ISCG and LTAC where necessary. Business Process Maps created and made available in online library. Training will be provided. The Business Process Team will invite feedback and contribute to regular reviews, incorporate changes as a result of Regulatory changes etc. Business Process Review

Methodology Gather information through Workshops and in consultation with Faculty Administrative staff involved in the process. Workshops Staff involved in the doing the process will be asked to attend. They will need to do some preparation – thinking in advance about the current process and any known issues At the workshop - draw the process and begin redesigning the process through discussion Business Process Review

Workshops Continued The workshops will cover fundamental questions such as: What is the purpose, the objective of the activity? What objective should it have? Where does it starts and where does it end? What is the output and what it this used for? How is the activity measured at the moment (if at all)? Does it meet the objective & how well? Business Process Review

Workshops Continued And gather essential information about: specific Professional Body requirements suggestions for improving processes where bottlenecks occur where a manual process could be done more efficiently using electronic means whether ISIS2 supports the process appropriately Business Process Review

Next steps: A proposal is drawn up and discussed at the Business Process Review Project Group meeting. A recommendation goes to USAC. The agreed process is reported to ISCG and LTAC. The Business Process Review Team create the Process Maps. Business Process Review

Where will the information be stored once the Business Process Review is completed? The agreed Process Maps are created using Triaster’s Process Navigator software. They are prepared and issued to the process owner for them to confirm that the map is an accurate reflection of the agreed process. Finally the Process Maps are then published into a searchable Webpowered Library – giving all staff access to the agreed processes whenever they need that information. Business Process Review

Webpowered Library Homepage Business Process Review

Creation of the Process Map in a Customised Node Business Process Review

And finally … Communication As the Process Maps are agreed, the Business Process Review Team will publish updates through :  A Business Process Review Website  A bi-monthly electronic Bulletin  Regular meetings between Project Team and Faculty Academic Registrars  Reports to University Student Administration Committee  Bi-monthly forum to which staff will be invited for training, discussion and updating on new mapped processes. Business Process Review