1 DOE Radiation Exposure Monitoring System (REMS) Data Update Nimi Rao Office of Analysis (HS-24) Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7. RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Advertisements

A resource to occupational radiation safety professionals within the DOE community.
RADIATION PROTECTION PRINCIPLES.  Prevent the occurrence of the non-stochastic effect by restricting doses to individuals below the relevant thresholds.
14th Annual RETS/REMP Workshop June 28-30, 2004 U.S. Nuclear Power Sister Plant Radiological Effluent Release Comparisons J.T. Harris 1,3, D.W. Miller.
Radiological Safety and Response
UTAH AMRP RADIATION SAFETY PLAN by Anthony A. Gallegos.
Release of Patients Treated with I-131: An Update Michael Fuller Team Leader Medical Radiation Safety Team U.S. NRC.
Radiation Dosimetry Module Background or Why We Want One Information about a worker’s exposure to radiation during his career would enhance IISP’s examination.
NC Department of Public Instruction Division of Financial Business Services School Allotments Section.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
IAEA Quantities and Measurements - 3 Radiation Protection Quantities Day 3 – Lecture 1 1.
RF Safety. Also Known As RF Non Ionizing Radiation.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Effective and Committed Effective Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Module 6 Exposure Control and Personnel Monitoring.
Radon Awareness Dr Julian MacDonald Radiation Protection Adviser Medical Physics Department.
Washington State Low Income Weatherization Program Evaluation Calendar Year 2011 DRAFT Results Prepared by: Rick Kunkle July 2013.
Onsite Transportation At SRS Robert W. Watkins Manager Packaging & Transportation Services Contractors Transportation Management Association 2015 July.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Chapter III: University of Florida Radiation Short Course Lesley Hines
Radiation Protection Technology Dose Limits Radiological Safety and Response RPT
KINS Analysis on Occupational Exposure of Radiation Workers in Korea by KISOE 2013 ISOE International ALARA Symposium Tokyo, Japan, August, 2013.
Information Management 12-1 Chapter 12. Learning Objectives Describe the purpose of data collection and reporting. Identify the data that should be collected.
10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Overview.
Radioactive Materials Awareness Radiation Safety Training.
RADIATION SAFETY ORIENTATION COURSE. Ionizing Radiation - can deposit energy in neighboring atoms resulting in the removal of electrons. NUCLEAR RADIATION.
Detecting Radiation in our Radioactive World. Nuclear Technology in our Lives Eaten Eggs? Driven over a Metal Bridge? Attached a Postage Stamp? Use Contact.
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and.
Development of Cyber ALARA Program 2012 ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium Choi, Hoon Radiation Health Research Institute Korea Hydro-Nuclear Power Company.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Walk Through of VEEP Online System Updated June 2015 Registering as a ‘New User’ Logging On and Reporting.
Information Management Chapter 12. Learning Objectives Describe the purpose of data collection and reporting. Identify the data that should be collected.
Dose Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program HPT Rev. 4 Page 1 of 63 Radiation Protection Standards and Guidelines.
10 CFR 835 Amendment Peter V. O’Connell, CHP U.S. Department of Energy Accelerator Safety Workshop August 8, 2007 Argonne National Laboratory.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
2009 Savannah River Site Aiken, SC th Quarter CY05.
PET/CT Workshop Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite.
Use of Effective Dose as an RDRC Study Limit
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part III: Radiation Protection Performance Requirements Day 8 – Lecture 5(3)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
Charter School Finance School Business Alexis Schauss, Director October 2015.
10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Overview David Weitzman, CIH Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy (HS-11)
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety – 5. IAEA/RCA Asian Region ALARA Network Meeting Korea Information System on Occupational Exposure (KISOE)
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO EXTERNAL RADIATION SOURCES AND INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Dosimetry Services.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Walk Through of VEEP Online System Updated May 2011.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
06/02/2016radiation safety - level 51 Radiation safety level 5 Frits Pleiter.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
Program Manager’s Review Dosimetry Program Henry Tran (James Liu) September 19, 2005.
Radiation Dosimeters.
We evaluated the length of time (in days) between the reported monitoring End Date and the date of submission to REMS Of the 33 sites (including Service.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lecture 5 – Internal dose assessment and interpretation of measurement results Postgraduate Educational Course.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Revision of the International Basic Safety Standards - BSS Status Report - Renate Czarwinski & Pascal Deboodt.
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
Information for Workers Issued a Radiation Monitoring Badge
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
Lessons learned from the surveillance: Measuring methods and monitoring strategies T. R. Beck, E. Ettenhuber Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Germany.
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
Catalina Chitu, Vasile Simionov, “CNE-PROD Cernavoda” NPP, Romania
Principles of Radiation Protection
IRRS mission in Greece V. Kamenopoulou Greek Atomic Energy Commission
Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Optimisation in Operational Radiological Protection
Presentation transcript:

1 DOE Radiation Exposure Monitoring System (REMS) Data Update Nimi Rao Office of Analysis (HS-24) Office of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Support and Corporate Safety Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) Derek Hagemeyer Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) 31 st Annual International Dosimetry and Records Symposium June 3-7, 2012 Hilton Head Island, SC

Present the 2011 draft data for DOE occupational radiation exposure –Compared to last year and last 5 years –Discuss trends and overview Clarification on Reporting Data Purpose 2 Note: 2011 Data is preliminary and subject to change and is indicated by this symbol Data for previous years have been published and are available on the REMS web site

AECAtomic Energy Commission ARRAAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CEDCommitted Effective Dose CEqDCommitted Equivalent Dose CEqD-SK50 yr Committed Equivalent Dose to the Skin DOEDepartment of Energy EDEffective Dose EqD-EyeEquivalent Dose to the Lens of the Eye EqD-LLEquivalent Dose to the Skin Lower Left Extremity EqD-LREquivalent Dose to the Skin Lower Right Extremity EqD-SkWBEquivalent Dose to the Skin of the Whole Body EqD-ULEquivalent Dose to the Skin Upper Left Extremity EqD-UREquivalent Dose to the Skin Upper Right Extremity ERDAEnergy Research and Development Administration HSSOffice of Health, Safety and Security LANLLos Alamos National Laboratory ORAUOak Ridge Associated Universities REMSRadiation Exposure Monitoring System SRSSavannah River Site TEDTotal Effective Dose TExDTotal Extremity Dose TODTotal Organ Dose TRUTransuranic TSDTotal Skin Dose 3 Acronyms

Collective and Average Measurable TED, DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 4

Current Laws and Requirements Pertaining to Recording and Reporting Occupational Exposure to REMS 5

*Limit applies to the embryo/fetus. DOE Dose Limits from 10 CFR 835 6

*The number of DOE and contractor workers was determined from the total annual work hours at DOE converted to full-time equivalents. DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 Monitoring of the DOE Workforce, 2007–2011 7

* The percentages in parentheses represent the percentage of each dose component to the collective TED. Components of TED, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 8

* Individuals with doses equal to the dose value separating the dose ranges are included in the next higher dose range. Distribution of TED by Dose Range, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 9

Doses in Excess of DOE Limit, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 10

* The number of internal depositions represents the number of internal dose records with positive results reported for each individual. Individuals may have multiple intakes in a year and, therefore, may be counted more than once. Number of Internal Depositions, Collective CED, and Average Measurable CED, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 11

*Individuals with doses equal to the dose value separating the dose ranges are included in the next higher dose range. **Individuals may have multiple intakes in a year and, therefore, may be counted more than once. Internal Dose Distribution from Intakes, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 12

Bioassay Measurements, DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 13

Collective CED by Radionuclide, 2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 14

Collective TEDE by DOE Site for 2009–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 15

* Total number of individuals represents the number of individuals monitored and not the number of records. Dose Distribution of Transient Workers, 2007–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 16

1974 – 1989collective dose = DDE 1990 – 1992collective dose = DDE + AEDE 1993 – 2010collective dose = DDE + CEDE 2011collective dose = ED + CED 1946 – 1974Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) 1974 – 1977Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) 1977 – PresentDepartment of Energy (DOE) Collective Dose and Average Measurable Dose, 1974–2011 DRAFT DATA as of 5/18/12 17

Reporting Total Organ Dose (TOD) Reporting Total Skin Dose (TSD), and Total Extremity Dose (TExD) Special individuals reporting Clarification on Reporting Data 18

As defined in 10 CFR (a)(2): –The sum of the Effective Dose (ED) from external sources to the Committed Equivalent Dose (CEqD) from intakes of radionuclides to the maximally exposed organ or tissue other than the skin or the lens of the eye. –Therefore, do not enter the total skin dose (EqD-SkWB + CEqD-SK) as the TOD –The total skin dose (TSD) and total extremity dose (TExD) will be added as separate data elements in the next revision to the REMS Reporting Guide Reporting Total Organ Dose (TOD) 19

The sum of the Equivalent Dose to the skin of the Whole Body (EqD - SkWB) from external sources to the Committed Equivalent Dose to the skin (CEqD - SK) from intakes of radionuclides for this monitoring period in millirem. In cases where internal monitoring was not provided and therefore the CEqD-SK was not reported, the TSD should be reported as the same value as the EqD- SkWB. Total Skin Dose (TSD) 20

The sum of the Equivalent Dose to the Skin of the maximally exposed extremity (maximum of the EqD – UR, EqD – UL, EqD – LR, EqD – LL values) to the Committed Equivalent Dose to the skin (CEqD-SK) from intakes of radionuclides for this monitoring period in millirem. In cases where internal monitoring was not provided and therefore the CEqD-SK was not reported, the TExD should be reported as the same value as the maximally exposed extremity. Total Extremity Dose (TExD) 21

Reports for special individuals are required to be submitted within 30 days after the assessment of the dose in accordance with DOE Order 231.1B, Attachment 4, (2)(a) We will be adding a reporting category on the web site submittal for special individuals. Special Individuals Reporting 22

The average measurable TED and the dose distribution have remained consistent over the past 5 years, whereas the collective TED increased in 2010 and decreased in The individual who received 32 rems from an intake at SRS in 2010 had a significant impact on the increase in collective CED for that year. The absence of such a large dose in 2011 brings down the collective CED to a value below the 5-year average. The increase in funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), beginning in late 2009 and ending in 2011, increased activities at DOE sites (particularly in environmental cleanup and waste management) and contributed to an elevated collective dose during these years The decrease in collective TED during 2011, is partially due to the reduction in ARRA activities at a few of the DOE sites. Conclusions 23

Derek Hagemeyer, ORAU Nimi Rao, DOE HS Contact 24