Appeal of School Concurrency Vested Rights Denial Vested Rights Denial Case: DRCA-15-10-312 Bridgewater West Apartments a/k/a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Hearing February 26, Case:LUP Project:North of Alberts LUP Appellant:Duke Woodson Applicant:Duke Woodson District:1 Request: To.
Advertisements

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 28, 2008.
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Public School Concurrency Plat Implementation Process Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management October
Board of County Commissioners
Public Hearings November 19, Case: PSP Project: Moss Park PD / Parcel E Phase 3 PSP Applicant: Lance Bennett, Poulos & Bennett District:
Virginia Land Use Law 101 Transition Area/ Interfacility Traffic Area Committee May 2, 2013.
Alachua County Plat Review – Southampton Traditional Neighborhood Development – Phase 1 February 24, 2009.
Public Hearing June 26, Case:CDR Project:Stillwater Crossings and Center Bridge Planned Development / Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial.
DRIs After 360. Transportation Methodology § (7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.— The levels of service required in the transportation methodology shall.
Public Hearings January 6, Case: PSP Project: Northeast Resort Parcel (NERP) PD / NERP Phase 4 PSP Applicant: Kathy Hattaway-Bengochea,
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 21, 2007.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 15, 2009.
Alachua County Plat Review Process February 26, 2008.
Public Hearings August 6, Case: LUP Project: Ivey Groves PD/LUP Applicant: Thomas Daly, Daly Design Group, Inc. District: 1 Proposed Use:R-CE.
1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 5, 2010.
Public Hearings June 30, Case: CDR Project: Orangewood Neighborhood – 2 PD / LUP Applicant: Jim Hall, VHB, Inc. District: 1 Acreage:588.7.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
Public Hearings September 15, Case: PSP Project: North of Albert’s PD / Westside PSP Applicant: Jennifer J. Stickler, Kimley - Horn and.
Public Hearings September 15, Case: CDR Project: Universal Boulevard PD / West and Northwest Parcels Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP)
Board of County Commissioners School Concurrency June 10, 2008 Adoption Public Hearing.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Public Hearing February 26, Case:CDR Project:Beck/Overstreet Planned Development / Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:Kevin.
Villagio at Waterford Lakes Planned Development Alta Development, LLC.
Case: LUP Project: Jama PD / LUP Applicant: Momtaz Barq, Terra-Max Engineering, Inc. District: 1 Acreage:8.94 gross acres Request:To rezone the.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
Public Hearings August 25, Case: PSP Project: Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD / Vineyards Townhomes Phases 2A-5 PSP Applicant:
Public Hearings April 22, Case: PSP Project: Rose Town Homes Preliminary Subdivision Plan (PSP) Applicant: Majid Kalaghchi, SK Consortium,
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Public Hearings February 24, Case: LUP Project: Wedgefield K-8 School PD / LUP Applicant: Tyrone Smith, OCPS Planning & Governmental Relations.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2009.
Public Hearings June 16, Case: PSP Project: Reams Road Parcel Commercial PSP Applicant: Constance A. Owens, Tri3 Civil engineering Design.
Public Hearings August 4, Case: PSP Project: Village F Master PD / Parcels S-1 & S-2 – Panther View PSP Applicant: Scott Stearns, Dewberry.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Stanton Energy Center Solar Facility Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners February 22,
Public Hearings June 30, Case: CDR Project: Village F Master PD / LUP Applicant: Eric Warren, Poulos & Bennett District: 1 Acreage:1,
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII,
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 13, 2009.
Amendments to Concurrency Management Regulations.
Sanctuary agreements Executed November 25, 2015.
Public Hearings October 6, Case: CDR Project: Reams Road Parcel Commercial PSP Applicant: Constance A. Owens Tri3 Civil Engineering Design.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #VA APPLICANT/APPELLANT: China Garden Orange County Zoning Division December 15, 2015.
Public Hearings September 15, Case: DP Project: Hamlin PD / UNP - Publix PSP / DP Applicant: Scott M. Gentry - Kelly, Collins & Gentry,
Public Hearings October 6, Case: PSP Project: North of Albert’s PD / Westside Village Home District PSP Applicant: Jennifer J. Stickler.
Public Hearings January 26, Case: CDR Project: Lakeside Village Center South PD / LUP Applicant: Dennis Seliga, Boyd Development Corporation.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 12, 2007.
Public Hearings December 15, Case: CDR Project: Vineland Pointe PD/LUP Applicant: Tom R. Sullivan, Gray Robinson District: 1 Acreage:113.0.
Public Hearings December 15, Case: CDR Project: Gooding’s Plaza PD/LUP Applicant: Jennifer Stickler Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. District:
Public Hearings August 4, 2015 Public Hearing Village F Master PD LUP Substantial Change.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
Public Hearings October 20, Case: CDR Project: Ginn Property PD / LUP Applicant: Heather Isaacs, Tavistock Development Company District:
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
Alachua County Plat Review Process April 8, 2008.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
Public Hearings April 26, Case: DP Project: Orangewood N-2 PD / Parcel 11A - Westwood Reserve at Grande Pines DP Applicant: Marc D. Stehli,
Board of County Commissioners
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Don’t bother me now Sailor, we’re making good time!
Board of County Commissioners
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

Appeal of School Concurrency Vested Rights Denial Vested Rights Denial Case: DRCA Bridgewater West Apartments a/k/a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings and Center Bridge PD

Case: DRCA Project: Bridgewater West Apartment School Concurrency Vested Rights Determination – DRC Appeal Appellant:Alison M. Yurko for Clarcona, Inc. Applicant: Clarcona, Inc. District: 1 Acreage:15.0 gross acres Request:To consider an appeal of a Development Review Committee (DRC) decision from February 10, 2016, to uphold a decision of the Concurrency Management Official (CMO) to deny school concurrency vested rights for 316 multi-family residential dwelling units on parcel Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

VESTED RIGHTS: Legal theory that states that if you have started to develop a parcel and have received certain approvals at the time a new regulation is implemented which would otherwise require you to do something additional in order to develop your property, then, by virtue of the approvals you have received, you should be vested from having to comply with the new regulation in order to complete the development of your property. Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD ORANGE COUNTY CODE Sec Developments entitled to exemption from school concurrency. (4)Common law. Any other project for which there is proof that, as of September 16, 2008: a.A development order has been issued or the county has otherwise taken official action specifically with respect to development of the property; AND b.Extensive obligations or expenses (other than land purchase costs and payment of taxes) including, but not limited to, legal and professional expenses related directly to the development have been incurred or there has otherwise been a substantial change in position; AND c.Such obligations, expenses, and changes in position were undertaken by the property owner in good faith reliance on the actions taken by the county; AND d.It would be unfair to deny the property owner the opportunity to complete the project based on the project's effects on the levels of service for public schools as adopted by the comprehensive plan and implemented through the county concurrency management system.

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD FIRST REQUIREMENT in Section (4): As of September 16, 2008, has a development order been issued or has the county otherwise taken official action specifically with respect to development of the Property? Applicant relied upon: ● Approval of PD on 7/27/99 ● Approval of Stillwater Crossings and Centerbridge PD…Development Agreement on 7/27/99 ● Approval of Special Exception on 8/13/02 → EXPIRED on 8/13/07

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD SECOND REQUIREMENT in Section (4): As of September 16, 2008, have extensive obligations or expenses (other than land purchase costs and payment of taxes) including, but not limited to, legal and professional expenses related directly to the development been incurred or has there otherwise been a substantial change in position ? Applicant relied upon: ● Approximately $16 million spent by Bridgewater → Bridgewater spent after applicant acquired property ● Only approximately $39,000 in incidental expenses incurred by applicant over a 9-year period from 1999 to 2008 (≈$4,400/yr) → Extensive? Related directly to development?

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD THIRD REQUIREMENT in Section (4): As of September 16, 2008, were such obligations, expenses, and changes in position undertaken by the property owner in good faith reliance on the actions taken by the county? AGREEMENT REGARDING APF CREDITS November 16, …. nor shall [the applicant] be required to expend monies or incur costs to comply with the terms or conditions of the Development Agreement between Orange County and Bridgewater, recorded at O.R. Book 5805, Page 1483, hereinafter the “Development Agreement.”

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD FOURTH REQUIREMENT in Section (4): Would it be unfair to deny the property owner the opportunity to complete the project based on the project's effects on the levels of service for public schools as adopted by the comprehensive plan and implemented through the county concurrency management system? ● Development not started prior to September 16, 2008 → Development Plan not approved until January 27, 2016

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD CMA / OCPS -Concurrency Mitigation Agreement (“CMA”) approved by OCPS on January 26, Requires proportionate share mitigation for middle school -All affected schools over capacity, but middle school is over LOS standard -Pursuant to Section 18.2(l) of the Interlocal Agreement, the School Board may contest a vested rights determination as provided in our Code.

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD SUMMARY TEST FOR COMMON LAW VESTING NOT MET: ●Only development approval is the Development Agreement, but applicant exempted itself from complying with its terms ● Even if the applicant hadn’t, none of the requisite expenses under the Development Agreement had been spent as of the date applicant acquired the property ● Neither the good faith reliance, nor the requisite commencement of development are present, therefore, the project does not meet the test for common law vesting → Approval of the CMA will ensure that development will not be delayed

Action Requested Uphold the February 10, 2016, decision of the DRC to uphold a decision of the CMO to deny school concurrency vested rights for 316 multi-family dwelling units on parcel Uphold the February 10, 2016, decision of the DRC to uphold a decision of the CMO to deny school concurrency vested rights for 316 multi-family dwelling units on parcel Approve the CMA District 1 District 1

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CB-9 TOWNHOME/APT. DISTRICT 438 UNITS Master Public Facilities Plan for Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD and Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Center Bridge Parcels : CB-10, CB-20 Orange County, Florida October 27, 1999; REVISED December 20, 1999; REVISED March 15, 2000

Preliminary Subdivision Plan for Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge P.D. Center Bridge Parcels : CB-8, CB-9, CB-12, CB-13, CB-18, CB-24, CB-25 & CB-26 Orange County, Florida April 4, 2001; REVISED May 14, 2001; REVISED June 15, 2001;REVISED SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Plat of Summerport Village Center Phase 1 PB 52 PG 8 October 8, 2002

Section 3. Definitions.    Site Plan Approval: a subdivision approval or its functional equivalent under the Land Development Regulations of the Applicable Local Government, for any Residential Development or any phase of a Residential Development, whether single-family or multi- family. The Parties acknowledge that the County and the Municipalities may each have different terms within their individual Land Development Regulations describing this process. Residential Development: any development that is comprised of Residential Units, in whole or in part, for non-transient human habitation, and includes single-family housing and multi- family housing, regardless of whether the Applicable Local Government’s approval procedure for such development is Considered commercial or residential. Residential Unit: any occupied structure or part thereof, which is designed exclusively for human habitation and meets all applicable government requirements for residential use on a continuous basis; i.e., having hot and cold running water and adequate facilities for heating, cooking, sleeping, and the sanitary elimination of wastes. Hotels, motels, and temporary lodging facilities are specifically excluded. Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Sec Definitions.    Residential Development: Any development that is comprised of residential units, in whole or in part, for non-transient human habitation, and includes single-family and multi-family dwelling units, regardless of whether the approval procedure for such development is considered commercial or residential.    Site plan: Site plan shall be the point at which school concurrency is imposed. For multifamily projects this shall mean commercial site plan. For single-family projects, this shall mean preliminary subdivision plan; provided, however, that a capacity reservation certificate shall not be required until prior to plat approval.

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD

Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD Bridgewater West Apartments – a / k / a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD