S. Ferrag, G. Steele University of Glasgow. RooStats and MClimit comparison Exercise to use RooStats by an MClimit-formatted person: – Use two programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using the Profile Likelihood in Searches for New Physics / PHYSTAT 2011 G. Cowan 1 Using the Profile Likelihood in Searches for New Physics arXiv:
Advertisements

Probability and Statistics Basic concepts II (from a physicist point of view) Benoit CLEMENT – Université J. Fourier / LPSC
27 th March CERN Higgs searches: CL s W. J. Murray RAL.
Using Profile Likelihood ratios at the LHC Clement Helsens, CERN-PH Top LHC-France, CC IN2P3-Lyon, 22 March 2013.
Manufacturing Variation Plotting a Normal Distribution.
Statistics In HEP 2 Helge VossHadron Collider Physics Summer School June 8-17, 2011― Statistics in HEP 1 How do we understand/interpret our measurements.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Profile likelihood for systematic uncertainties page 1 Use of profile likelihood to determine systematic uncertainties ATLAS Top.
8. Statistical tests 8.1 Hypotheses K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10 Frequent problem: Decision making based on statistical information.
Bayesian Analysis of X-ray Luminosity Functions A. Ptak (JHU) Abstract Often only a relatively small number of sources of a given class are detected in.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Comment on use of LR for limits page 1 Comment on definition of likelihood ratio for limits ATLAS Statistics Forum CERN, 2 September,
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Higgs combination note status page 1 Status of Higgs Combination Note ATLAS Statistics/Higgs Meeting Phone, 7 April, 2008 Glen Cowan.
RooStatsCms: a tool for analyses modelling, combination and statistical studies D. Piparo, G. Schott, G. Quast Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Universität.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Bayesian Higgs combination page 1 Bayesian Higgs combination using shapes ATLAS Statistics Meeting CERN, 19 December, 2007 Glen Cowan.
8. Hypotheses 8.2 The Likelihood ratio at work K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10.
Statistical aspects of Higgs analyses W. Verkerke (NIKHEF)
Discovery Experience: CMS Giovanni Petrucciani (UCSD)
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 Glen Cowan Statistics Forum News Glen Cowan Eilam Gross ATLAS Statistics Forum CERN, 3 December, 2008.
Why do Wouter (and ATLAS) put asymmetric errors on data points ? What is involved in the CLs exclusion method and what do the colours/lines mean ? ATLAS.
Results of combination Higgs toy combination, within and across experiments, with RooStats Grégory Schott Institute for Experimental Nuclear Physics of.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #23.
1 Proposal to change limits for exclusion N.Andari, L. Fayard, M.Kado, F.Polci LAL- Orsay Y.Fang, Y.Pan, H.Wang, Sau Lan Wu University of Wisconsin-Madison.
1 TTU report “Dijet Resonances” Kazim Gumus and Nural Akchurin Texas Tech University Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab Jan. 26, 2006.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #25.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics page 1 Status of search procedures for ATLAS ATLAS-CMS Joint Statistics Meeting CERN, 15 October, 2009 Glen Cowan Physics Department.
G. Cowan, RHUL Physics Discussion on significance page 1 Discussion on significance ATLAS Statistics Forum CERN/Phone, 2 December, 2009 Glen Cowan Physics.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Input from Statistics Forum for Exotics page 1 Input from Statistics Forum for Exotics ATLAS Exotics Meeting CERN/phone, 22 January,
Z, W bosons: well calibrated probe in pp LHC energies: access to Z, W in pA and AA Electroweak bosons in dilepton channel: No final state modification.
Easy Limit Statistics Andreas Hoecker CAT Physics, Mar 25, 2011.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 8 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 8 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
Projected Exclusion Limits on the SM Higgs Boson Cross Section by Combining Higgs Channels at LHC Tommaso Dorigo (INFN and University of Padova) for the.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
DIJET STATUS Kazim Gumus 30 Aug Our signal is spread over many bins, and the background varies widely over the bins. If we were to simply sum up.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
E.Nagy - Low Mass Higgs 8/9/2011 Update on the ZZ-->llbb search1 Update on the ZZ  llbb search E. Nagy CPPM/Fermilab for the zh-llbb Team S.B. Beri, S.
2005 Unbinned Point Source Analysis Update Jim Braun IceCube Fall 2006 Collaboration Meeting.
G. Cowan, RHUL Physics Statistics for early physics page 1 Statistics jump-start for early physics ATLAS Statistics Forum EVO/Phone, 4 May, 2010 Glen Cowan.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Status of Higgs combination page 1 Status of Higgs Combination ATLAS Higgs Meeting CERN/phone, 7 November, 2008 Glen Cowan, RHUL.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
The Higgs boson Faster-than-light neutrino’s 09:00-12:3014:00-17:00 Aart Heijboer and Ivo van Vulpen Nikhef Topical lectures on Statistics (3 rd day)
G. Cowan Statistical methods for HEP / Freiburg June 2011 / Lecture 2 1 Statistical Methods for Discovery and Limits in HEP Experiments Day 2: Discovery.
1 Studies on Exclusion Limits N.Andari, L. Fayard, M.Kado, F.Polci LAL- Orsay LAL meeting 23/07/2009.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
G. Cowan CERN Academic Training 2010 / Statistics for the LHC / Lecture 21 Statistics for the LHC Lecture 2: Discovery Academic Training Lectures CERN,
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
G. Cowan SLAC Statistics Meeting / 4-6 June 2012 / Two Developments 1 Two developments in discovery tests: use of weighted Monte Carlo events and an improved.
Max Baak (CERN) 1 Summary of experiences with HistFactory and RooStats Max Baak (CERN) (on behalf of list of people) RooFit / RooStats meeting January.
23 Jan 2012 Background shape estimates using sidebands Paul Dauncey G. Davies, D. Futyan, J. Hays, M. Jarvis, M. Kenzie, C. Seez, J. Virdee, N. Wardle.
G. Cowan CERN Academic Training 2012 / Statistics for HEP / Lecture 21 Statistics for HEP Lecture 2: Discovery and Limits Academic Training Lectures CERN,
Using RooFit/RooStat in rare decay searches Serra, Storaci, Tuning Rare Decays WG.
Discussion on significance
Hands-on Session RooStats and TMVA Exercises
(Day 3).
Status of the Higgs to tau tau
The expected confident intervals for triple gauge coupling parameter
Statistical Methods used for Higgs Boson Searches
Two Interpretations of What it Means to Normalize the Low Energy Monte Carlo Events to the Low Energy Data Atms MC Atms MC Data Data Signal Signal Apply.
CMS RooStats Higgs Combination Package
Grégory Schott Institute for Experimental Nuclear Physics
Comment on Event Quality Variables for Multivariate Analyses
Joint IPPP-Imperial Workshop 28th May 2009 Jonathan Hays
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
TAE 2018 / Statistics Lecture 3
THE CLs METHOD Statistica per l'analisi dei dati – Dottorato in Fisica – XXIX Ciclo Alessandro Pistone.
Statistical Methods for the LHC
Statistical Methods for HEP Lecture 3: Discovery and Limits
Application of CLs Method to ATLAS Higgs Searches
Why do Wouter (and ATLAS) put asymmetric errors on data points ?
Presentation transcript:

S. Ferrag, G. Steele University of Glasgow

RooStats and MClimit comparison Exercise to use RooStats by an MClimit-formatted person: – Use two programs with the same test statistic and the same format of toy-MC material: signal, background and data plots, s/b, nuisance parameters… – Vary s, b and nuisance parameters and compare the output results on test statistic distribution, sensitivities and Confidence Levels – Not all the Mclimit outputs provided by RooStats  manipulate the input data to get RooStats to produce the same outpu Two approaches in RooStats: – Build WorkSpace, ModelConfig and PDFs à la RooFit – Use of HistFactory

MClimitRooStats with WorkSpace à la RooFit Test Statistic Simple Log Likelihood Ratio (SLLR) With HybridCalculator SLLR Profile Likelihood Ratio Ratio of Maximum Likelihood Other tests Input: HistogramsNormalised to required Luminosity: Signal: variation of Xsec factor Background Data: PDF Normalised to unity using RootHistPdf Signal: variation of Xsec Background: same as s+b with Xsec=0 Data: RooDataSet object Nuisance parameters: Normalisation, Can be asymmetric Varition of above shapes Gaussian constraints Normalisation, can be asymmetric Variation of above shapes Gaussian, Gamma, LogNormal constraints

MC LimitRooStats Number of toy PseudoExperiments (NPE) Same NPE for b only and s+b hypotheses Different NPE between b only and s+b hypotheses Output: Histogram of SLLR test Observed and expected Confidence Levels, CLs, CLb, CLsb Observed test statistic Obs + exp: CLs/  SM CLs/  SM +1,+2,-1,-2 sigma Luminosity Scale factor for 95% exclusion Histogram of SLLR test Observed Confidence Levels, CLs, CLb, CLsb Observed test statistic

3 channels for signal, background and data (1bin, 2bins and 3bins with an empty bin) Format: plots shown Cross sections factors – Signal rate=0.1, or 0.4 – Background rate= 1 S and B rates varied between 0-100% of above values – Expected median and ±1  CLs – Expected median and ±1  test statistics distributions for B and S+B Varying nuisance parameter from 0-50% in MClimit Signal Background 1 bin 2 bins 3 bins

RooStats provides only: Observed Confidence Levels, CLs, CLb, CLsb but not the expected median and ±1  test statistic values nor the corresponding Confidence levels Needed 3 plots: plot for S, plot for B, plot for data If data plot taken as: – B plot  median in test statistics distribution for Null Hypothesis and median expected confidence levels – S+B plot  median in test statistics distribution for Test hypothesis. and median expected confidence levels – Above + renormalized by 1±1  for ±1  values in test statistic distributions and ±1  expected confidence levels –  Useful to draw expected bands with RooStats Data=B Data=S+B Data=(S+B)*(1+1 

Median (black) and ±1  (red, blue) expected CLs RooStats in dashed and Mclimit in plain plots Good agreement of RooStats with Mclimit when Mclimit poisson flag switched off. Mclimit without poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots Mclimit with poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots

Mclimit without poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots Mclimit with poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots Median (black) and ±1  (red, blue) expected CLs RooStats in dashed and Mclimit in plain plots Good agreement of RooStats with Mclimit when Mclimit poisson flag switched off.

Mclimit with poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots Mclimit without poisson fluctuation on input S and B plots Buggy results They were agreeing this morning !

3 bin plots with 1 empty (non empty for signal) bin for background plot RooStats and Poisson flag off MClimit crashed for low S rate values Poisson flag on MClimit worked but non usual

Nuisance Parameter Value (%)

We didn’t see equivalence of poisson flag in RooStats 1 st satisfactory agreement between RooStats and Mclimits without Poisson fluctions on input plots Detailed study with nuisance parameters