Writing Assignments in Mechanical Engineering Anne Parker University of Manitoba A. Parker, CASDW, UVic, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College of Health Sciences Lunch and Learn Series February 12, 2010 Rena Murphy & Sharon Stewart.
Advertisements

What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
Evaluating Student Achievement
CS1203 SCCC/ATS COURSE SYLLABUS Introduction to Computer Concepts and Applications Revised 8/16/2014 Online 7/14 revision Ed Hall Instructor.
Integrating Writing in the Statistics Curriculum 1 Dean Poeth and Jane Oppenlander Union Graduate College eCOTS, May 19-23, 2014.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
USING D2L TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Bruce DeRuntz & Mohamad Ali Department of Technology, Southern Illinois University.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
The Value of Direct Engagement Connecting U: Online. In person. On demand in an Engineering Classroom and an Engineering Faculty.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Welcome to IE496 and IE496 TUT Fall 2006 Dr. Robert E. Barnes Associate Dean, UB Engineering.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Technical Communication 1
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Assessing Student Learning
 Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations  Presentations.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Best Practices In Design Outcomes Of A Survey P. H. King, PhD, PE Joan Walker, PhD Vanderbilt University.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
NMSU Pathways Workshop September 18-20, 2014 Design Thinking, Low Res Prototyping, Assessment and ABET Mashup.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication WORKSHOP SERIES Giving Students Feedback on Oral Presentations.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
CHE 165 Plant Design Introduction. Greensheet Review  Target is Study –Reported Verbally and in Text –Consists of Various Components  Most are submitted.
Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Job description/Overview  What a Electronics engineers do is research, design, develop and test precision components.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
PBL in Team Applied to Software Engineering Education Liubo Ouyang Software School, Hunan University CEIS-SIOE, January 2006, Harbin.
Lecture for Senior Design Classes By Dr. Pam Estes Brewer Associate Professor, TCO Mercer University School of Engineering Brewer (Adapted from presentation.
Design Project Experience: Goals n The goal is to provide our students with a significant design experience which incorporates several technical subject.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages CELTA.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Performance-Based Assessment HPHE 3150 Dr. Ayers.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities Dublin descriptors.
Session 4 Performance-Based Assessment
Fair and Appropriate Grading
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Islamic University of Gaza Engineering Faculty.
ENGR 1181 College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Introduction to Technical Communication.
Wilmer Arellano  Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations.
GET Intermediate Phase CAPS Training 1pas/2012. ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES : At the end of this Activity: participants will be able to differentiate between.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
ECE Assessment Program Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Joe McVeigh Jenny Bixby TESOL New Orleans, Louisiana, USA March 19, 2011.
Communication Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Courses
Getting Prepared for the Webinar
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
ECE361 Engineering Practice
SKILL ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE TESTERS Case Study
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Mapping Life-long Learning: A Deep Dive into a Graduate Attribute
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Writing Criterion Referenced Assessment Criteria and Standards
Presentation transcript:

Writing Assignments in Mechanical Engineering Anne Parker University of Manitoba A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

The Engineering Context Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (C.E.A.B.) – demands that our graduates demonstrate: “an ability to communicate complex engineering concepts within the profession and with society at large” “an ability to comprehend & write effective reports & design documentation, & to give & effectively respond to clear instructions” Accreditation Criteria and Procedures, 2008 A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Outcomes & Attributes specify learning outcomes on the course outlines specify the methods of feedback – formative [comments] or summative [# grades] match to the 12 attributes – including attribute 7 – “communication skills” what we documented for the preliminary study how many courses (at whatever level & in whatever program) identified it – 33 courses in Computer, Electrical & Mechanical Engineering; 34 in Civil Engineering follow Bloom’s Taxonomy – to indicate the “expected competency” level for an attribute or outcome – e.g., level 6 [able to judge the worth of something] A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

For example, A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

MECH 4860 Outcomes 1.Apply and evaluate engineering knowledge, investigation and design skills to solve open-ended “real” design projects. 2.Learn and apply the steps and associated tools in the engineering design process. 3.Analyze designs from technical, practical, cost, social, and environmental perspectives. 4.Build on teamwork skills using tools in project and team management and prepare for teamwork in industry. 5.Maintain appropriate design records such as logbooks and meeting minutes. 6.Enhance technical communication skills with clients, users, and others both orally and in writing. 7.Instill a sense of professionalism. A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

6

Course Outlines: Rough Data Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering University of Manitoba A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

What we’ve found so far…. Component Type# Lab report 14 Proposal 10 Report 9 Other report 5 Poster 1 Project 1 Presentation 1 Explanation of machine design? 1 Unclear 11 A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Type by Year Level Year 2Year 3Year 4TOTAL Explanation of machine design 11 Lab report Other report 4 4 Poster11 Project11 Presentation11 Proposal3 710 Report 99 Unclear5611 A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Nested Assignments Year LevelNoYesTOTAL Year 2404 Year Year TOTAL A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Nested Assignments A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Assignment Length A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Description of Writing Assignment A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Summary Data Other Columns Length:Rarely specified Topics:Always specified Time to complete:Not clear from syllabus Audience:1 in 55 assignments for non- instructor audience Feedback:Rarely made available ahead of grading (3/55-5.5%) Scoring guide/rubricRarely made available (1/55) A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Observations: writing required Students don’t appear to do much writing in their 2 nd year – and then mostly lab reports Technical Communication is a 2 nd year course – & all students must take it – so, there are writing requirements here Students do, however, write more in their 3 rd & especially in their 4 th years (especially proposals & reports) A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Observations: Assignments The course outlines – not very explicit when it comes to assignments Focus – outcomes & attributes & competency levels – but little on the nature of the assignments & what is actually required –however, this information would be available online Example: MECH 4860 A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Evaluation ComponentValue (%)Methods of Feedback Learning outcomes evaluated Design work100%F, S1-7 A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

However….. “technical communication specialists” – part of the course Provide guidelines & individual supports on oral presentations, written reports & “other technical communication aspects” – “tip” sheets & “coaching/mentoring” Mark the submissions – rubrics designed for each assignment – series of 3 written reports, one final oral presentation, poster session, ……. A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Going Forward? A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Discuss the possibility of moving the Technical Communication course to 3 rd year? – to fill the apparent gap between 2 nd year & 4 th year [ when most of the writing seems to occur ]? Encourage the inclusion of more detailed “assignment charts” in the course outlines? – list specific “assignments” [ such as lab reports, problem sets ]? A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,

Thanks! A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,