TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Conducted: January 26-29, 2012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRUG POLICY REFORM BALLOT MEASURE ISSUES SURVEY.
Advertisements

Key Findings from Recent Illinois Voter Survey Survey Conducted: May 12-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy.
Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado We Can’t Afford to Wait.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
January 6-8, 2002 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. Battleground 2002 (XXI)
Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
A Public Opinion Research Project Exploring Attitudes About Government Emily Ekins | Polling Director at Reason Foundation reason.com/poll.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems: National Research Findings from a Survey of 500 Small Business Owners Nationwide.
#13362 Data from a statewide survey of 500 registered voters in Arizona, conducted October 3, 6-7, A survey commissioned by the Conducted by:
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Massachusetts Nurses Association A Statewide Survey of 400 Massachusetts Residents February 2005.
0 RBC contracted with Public Opinion Strategies to conduct a telephone survey in Douglas County School District, Colorado. The survey was completed April.
HART Community Survey Ilium Associates Inc. July–August 2009.
Key findings from a survey of 400 registered Washington voters conducted Sept , 2014.
1 Idaho Voters and a Tobacco Tax Increase October 2010.
Junction City Growth Survey March 2008 Joyce Wolfe Docking Institute of Public Affairs Fort Hays State University Hays, KS
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
PROVIDENCE, RI LIKELY VOTERS ΔΑΠΑ R ESEARCH I NC. May 2014.
Texas Transportation Poll Testimony of Ginger Goodin Transportation Policy Research Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute before the Senate Select.
Community attitudes to transportation Commuting behaviour and attitudes to government involvement and policies Australasian Railways Association Australian.
BLAINE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
New Hanover County Capitol Communications Restricted 1 Survey of New Hanover County Voters February 2, 2010.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
March 2010 Telephone Survey EMC Research, Inc. 811 First Avenue – Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)
Southern Maryland Association of REALTORS® Charles County Issues Survey American Strategies Incorporated and Myers Research | Strategic Services, LLC designed.
2011 Transit Initiatives and Communities Conference Election Trends and Campaign Planning Workshop.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Douglas County, Colorado #12459 May 25-26, 2010.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS 1 December 2007 Presentation of Findings from Research Around Development in Teton County LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS.
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
Fresno County Library Revenue Measure Survey Survey Conducted March 9-14, 2012.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Senior Project Director PID# Sarah Simmons On Behalf of.
March 2007 Conducted for the California Foundation for Commerce and Education Selected Survey Results: Business Executives’ Attitudes on California Education.
Public Opinion and Political Action Chapter 6. Introduction Some Basics: Demography The science of population changes. Census A valuable tool for understanding.
120 Exchange Street Portland Maine 1 October 2010 Maine Voter Preference Study – Wave III Prepared for: Maine Today Media October.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
1 Barriers: Community & Nonprofit Leaders’ Views of Barriers SURVEY ANALYSISSURVEY ANALYSIS We asked community leaders - from your perspective, what are.
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Public Opinion and Political Action Chapter 6. Introduction Public Opinion – The distribution of the population’s beliefs about politics and policy issues.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in the United States Conducted September 7-10, 2003.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Marketing Resource Group for The Michigan Chamber of Commerce A survey of 600 likely voters was conducted by live interview April 2-6, A random sample.
By Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College August 4, 2010.
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Presentation to the River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC August 19, 2014.
Fayette County USA Expansion Opinion Survey Prepared for Cornett-IMS/Fayette Alliance The Matrix Group, Inc August 2006.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Survey Conducted: May 6-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland,
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
The Nationwide Retirement Institute Health Care and Long-term Care Study November 2015 Conducted by Harris Poll NFM-14918AO.
Survey Basics This survey involved 300 completed telephone interviews with registered voters in the Prescott School District. All interviews were completed.
Moving Ahead The American Public Speaks on Roadways and Transportation in Communities Federal Highway Administration Industry Briefing March 20, 2001.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
Get Out the Vote 2015 Campaign in support of Transportation Funding Bill - Texas Proposition 7 on the November 3, 2015 Ballot.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
1 MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
Summary of West Virginia Statewide Polling
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Methodology Survey of 402 randomly-selected Larkspur residents
Presentation transcript:

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Purpose of Survey To measure regional and statewide public attitudes, opinions, and interests relevant to addressing transportation mobility needs, including potential solutions and timing. To measure regional and statewide public attitudes, opinions, and interests relevant to addressing transportation mobility needs, including potential solutions and timing.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation SurveyApproach Survey Survey 1,200 sample size. 1,200 sample size. High-efficacy voters. High-efficacy voters. +/-2.9% at 95 percent confidence level. Analysis by subareas: Maricopa County Pima County Balance of state

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Survey Demographics Balance by County Balance by County Maricopa = 720 Maricopa = 720 Pima/Outlying = 240 each Pima/Outlying = 240 each Gender Gender Male = 48% Male = 48% Female = 52% Female = 52% Average Age Average Age Average Income Average Income $69,000 $69,000 Employment Employment Full-Time = 46% Full-Time = 46% Part-Time = 7% Part-Time = 7% Retired = 34% Retired = 34% Political Party Political Party Republican = 44% Republican = 44% Democrat = 38% Democrat = 38% Other = 18% Other = 18%

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q1. What would you say is the ONE most important problem or issue facing the state of Arizona today?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q2: What do you think the ONE most important issue will be for the state in the next 5-10 years?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Most Important Transportation Issue in Arizona Top Five Issues n=1,224 26% 18% 12% 11% 4% Lack of public transit Gas prices Not enough highways Traffic congestion Road maintenance 0%10%20%30%40% Q3: What do you think is the most important transportation-related issue or problem in Arizona?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q4: Using a 1 to 5 scale where “1” means not at all satisfied and “5” means very satisfied, please indicate your overall level of satisfaction with the statewide transportation system IN ARIZONA.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q5: Using the same 1 to 5 scale, please indicate your OVERALL level of satisfaction with the transportation system IN YOUR AREA

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q6: Using the same 1 to 5 scale where “1” means not at all satisfied and “5” means very satisfied, please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following components of the transportation system IN YOUR AREA.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q7: Using a 1 to 5 scale where “1” means “it is not a problem at all” and a “5” means “it is a major problem,” how big of a problem would you say traffic congestion is IN YOUR AREA?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Traffic Delay Experience

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q8: What do you feel is the ONE most important thing that could be done to improve transportation problems IN YOUR AREA?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Pima County 71% Q10: Would you support additional taxes to… Yes, would support additional taxes for this solution, or No, would not support additional taxes for this solution.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q11: Regional planning agencies and the Arizona Department of Transportation are currently conducting statewide transportation studies to help identify transportation needs and ensure that systems are interconnected. I would like you to tell me which of the following two OPPOSING statements best reflects your perspective concerning a statewide ballot proposition.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q12: Many economists agree the economy is down. Assuming for a moment this is true, I would like you to indicate which of the following statements most accurately reflects your perspective.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q15: Using a 1 to 5 scale where a “1” means you “strongly disagree” and a “5” means you “strongly agree,” please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements.

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Pima County voters allocate more funds - $20 Q14: Let’s pretend it was your job to determine how to distribute our tax dollars on transportation improvements. If you had a total of 100 dollars of our tax money to distribute and you had to spend the full amount, how would you distribute it between the following five areas:

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q18: Currently, Maricopa County residents generate 67% of the sales tax collected in the state and make up over 60 percent of the population. Based on this information, what percentage of a statewide sales tax for transportation improvements do you believe should be spent in Maricopa County?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q17: Based on your response to the previous question on how to increase transportation funding, for what period of time would you support the increase before it is reviewed for continuation of funding? Would you say… a. 20 years b. 30 years c. Permanently

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q19: There is a proposed proposition to the November ballot that would raise the statewide sales tax by one percent. The revenue raised would dedicate 58% to building new freeways and expanding existing freeways—including I-10 and I-17, give 20% to local transportation improvements, 18% to expanding bus and rail transit statewide, and 4% to transportation projects and open space preservation. Would you vote ‘yes’ in favor of increasing the tax or ‘no’ in opposition to increasing the tax?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Voters likely to vote “yes” – 50% say “no delay” Voters likely to vote “no” – 70% say “wait until 2010” Q20. Some believe putting a transportation tax initiative on the ballot in 2010 would provide time for technical transportation studies to be completed, allow for citizen input, and give more time for the economy to improve. Would you prefer waiting until 2010 for a statewide transportation election rather than going in 2008?

Copyright © 2008 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMSStatewide Transportation Survey Q21. Using a 1 to 5 scale where “1” means “not at all likely” and “5” means “very likely,” please indicate how likely you are to vote for a candidate who supports a tax increase for transportation? Likelihood to Vote forCandidate Supporting Transportation Tax n=1,224 Very likely % 4 20% 3 25% 2 9% Not at all likely % Don't know 6%

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS For more information Contact Kelly Taft, MAG Communications Manager