Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ ® : The UK and Irish Experience Selena Killick Library Quality Officer, Cranfield University J. Stephen Town Director of Information, The University.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
LibQUAL Report Ferdinand Postma Library What is LibQUAL+TM LibQual+TM is a questionnaire that was developed by the Association of Research Libraries.
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
California State University Northridge Oviatt Library Service Assessment, Spring 2007 Summary Results Kathy Dabbour September 27, 2007.
How Assessment Will Inform Our Future 1. Administration of on-going user surveys and focus groups to enhance reference services 2. Analysis of LibStats.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
Standardisation of library statistics Standardisation of library statistics Roswitha Poll Chair of ISO TC 46 SC 8: Quality – Statistics and performance.
Health Center Library Overview Evelyn Morgen, Director March 2007.
MANSFIELD LIBRARY Kate Zoellner Associate Professor Assessment Coordinator Sue Samson Professor Library Instruction Coordinator Outcomes Assessment 1.
Report of River University Libraries Survey Spring Survey Respondents.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
The New Library User in Sweden: a LibQUAL+™ study 6th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services.
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
ORIENTATION Academic Information Service 2007 Akademiese Inligtingsdiens.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Faculty Information Needs: Online Survey at UCSF Gail Persily Janice Contini CNI, April 2007.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Vision Library Media Center serves as an integral part of the school ’ s educational program and is the information hub of the school. All students will.
Going Beyond The Numbers How We Are Benefiting From Our Experience With LibQUAL+® The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Carolyn Gutierrez Associate.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Assessing the impact of libraries Roswitha Poll Chair of ISO TC 46 SC 8: Quality – statistics and performance evaluation Roswitha Poll Chair of ISO TC.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
Interlibrary Loans & Accessibility
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
Presentation transcript:

Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference

22 Johnson & Wales University Multiple Campuses –North Miami –Providence –Denver –Charlotte Business, Culinary Arts, Hospitality Career-Oriented

33 Assessments LibQUAL+ (conducted system-wide in 2003/2004) Annual Surveys – Charlotte (from 2004/ Present) SAILS – Charlotte (from 2007/2008 – Present) SWOTs (with staff) – Charlotte (from 2005 – Present)

44 Min.Des.Perc.SASS AS-1 Employees who instill confidence in users AS-2 Readiness to respond to users questions AS-3 Willingness to help users AS-4 Dependability in handling users’ service problems AS-5 Giving users individual attention AS-6 Employees who have knowledge to answer the questions AS-7 Employees who are consistently courteous AS-8 Employees who deal with users in a caring fashion AS-9 Employees who understand the needs of their users AS Average LP-1 Quiet Space for individual activities LP-2 A comfortable and inviting location LP-3 Library space that inspires study and learning LP-4 Community space for group learning and group study LP-5 A Gateway for study, learning or research LP Average LibQUAL+ Results 2003/2004 North Miami - Undergraduates

55 IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own IC-3 The printed library materials I need for my work IC-4 The electronic information resources I need IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access the needed information IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own IC-7 Making information easily accessible for independent use IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work IC Average LibQUAL+ Results 2003/2004 North Miami - Undergraduates

66 I feel that we should have more computers Needs more books about business Books about business and recreation topics The library website should be more widely published… Need more computers!!! I would enjoy some more literature. LibQUAL+ Results 2003/2004 North Miami – Undergraduates – Comment Samples

77 What have we done (Florida campus)? McNaughton collection Publicized business databases, partnering with CDO to emphasize databases Added computer terminals and wireless More work-study training, spread over time more More structured study room usage Created a blog and IM to emphasize online services

88 Annual Surveys (Charlotte)

99 What did we learn? Not enough accessible hours – specific needs in this regard Need for greater functionality in library computers Desire for popular fiction and movies Need for more comfortable setting and furniture Students valued quiet over access to their phones Loan periods too short in some cases

10 What have we done? Added Saturday and evening hours Added some full service PCs to the front area (provides extra access when lab in use) Added Percolator collection Added décor and soft furniture Crafted more strict noise policy Increased loan periods

11 How do they know we hear them?

12 SAILS (Standard Assessment of Information Literacy Skills) What did we learn? We are relatively “average” overall. The scores of our students were better than average on Standard 2 (accessing information effectively). The scores of our seniors were only slightly higher than average on Standard 4 (evaluating resources) despite significant efforts on our part to address this standard.

13 SAILS What did we do? We completely revamped our required IL module on evaluating resources providing additional examples (one hour session became a two hour session). We incorporated clickers into the standard two- hour session we do to test better for understanding (i.e. more formative assessment).

14 SWOT (with staff) – Sample Weaknesses (Charlotte – 2004) Non-culinary Collections: Business collection lacking in specialization and bulk; Limited physical resources in non-culinary areas and low numbers in culinary even until the other collections are phased in; Business Collection; Fashion Collection; Sports and Event Management collection; Number of books available for class projects Workstudies: Workstudy students and their lack of motivation; Poor workstudies; Limited staff – one person lost and we struggle to maintain day to day (will be worse as student body increases) Hours: Lack of Saturday and late evening hours; Reasonable but limited hours Purchasing Process: Sometimes cumbersome purchasing process; YBP takes too long sometimes

15 What have we done? More money dedicated to the business collections Greater emphasis and planning with regard to training work-study employees Additional hours - Saturday and evening hours Change to Ingram and in-house cataloging

16 Other Efforts Best/Worst exercise with students Focus groups Detailed study of IL session quiz scores

17 Contact Information Dr. Richard J. Moniz, Jr. Director of Library Services Johnson & Wales University, Charlotte Campus