Bay District Schools 2011-2012 Non-FCAT Tested Decisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southern Regional Education Board WELCOME Strategy Work Session For What Should the Tech Center of the Future Look Like? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Advertisements

School Grades Model and Historical Background
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
Student Persistence and Completion Strategy Twenty-seven Best Practices Milestones and Momentum Points Win/Win Grant Reverse Transfer First-Term to First-Year.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Mary Jane Tappen Executive Vice Chancellor Division of Public Schools.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
Connections College and Career Readiness Dropout Prevention March 2011.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
College and Career Ready Pre K – 12 Public Schools Florida College System State University System 1.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Evaluation Update: Proposed Revisions Pilot Evaluation School Board Workshop Tuesday, August 6, 2013.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Florida’s K-12 Education: The Next Generation Presented by: Dr. Frances Haithcock.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
College Preparatory Course Certification Pilot May 5th,
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
College and Career Readiness Initiative OBJECTIVE To improve the college and career readiness rate of high school students and reduce the percent needing.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Career and Academic Connections Update Superintendents’ Meeting Kelly Arrington and Tommi Leach ODCTE.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
South Carolina Succeeds
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
Santa Rosa District Schools Mr. Lewis Lynn Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
Accountability Committee December 14, CTE Report Card Discussion.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Approved Graduation Diploma and Endorsement Requirements Effective for Incoming 9th Graders Diploma and Endorsement Options Approved September.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Volusia County Schools
TAPCo: College and Career Readiness Plan
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Graduation Requirements Effective
Potential Student Measures
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Florida Progression and Graduation Requirements
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Secondary Data Presentation
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Bay District Schools Non-FCAT Tested Decisions

Sub-Committee Decision Making Teacher Appraisal System Committee (TASC) Sub-committees K-3 Adult Education Advanced Classes (Advanced Placement/International Baccalaureate/Advanced International Certificate of Education /Dual Enrollment) 9-12 (Non-FCAT) Special Diploma

K-3 Teachers Issues Early examination of DEA (Discovery Education Assessment) We weren’t psychometricians or statisticians No ‘clean’ district data to create our own cut scores because DEA had been used in a variety of ways, but not across the board implementation Decision FCAT VAM (Reading) Score for School (Note: Implement DEA in all grades for progress monitoring and to build reliable data information) Moving Forward Continuing to consider DEA (Discovery Education Assessment) Ask for DOE guidance in using for Student Growth

4-10 Non-FCAT Teachers Students who take FCAT, but are not in an FCAT course Includes, for example, Elementary PE, Music, Art Issue As a district, not prepared to administer district or teacher assessments Committee decided against learning targets Decision Student’s assigned to teacher that take FCAT FCAT VAM (Reading) scores Moving Forward Implement state assessments and associated Value-Added scores Hard To Measure Item Bank Working with CFAC (Central Florida Assessment Collaborative)

9-12 Teachers Issues Not prepared to administer district assessments Committee decided against learning targets No ‘neat’ scheduling so that a teacher has all 9 th, all 10 th, etc Decision Student growth based on students teacher instructed that took FCAT, AICE, IB, DE, AP (reliable testing sources) Percentage commensurate with teacher’s overall student enrollment (i.e. If 30% of students are FCAT tested and 70% IB tested, then 30% weighted FCAT VAM and 70% IB score) FCAT FCAT course (FCAT VAM) or Non-FCAT course (FCAT VAM Reading) AICE, IB, AP, DE Based on percentage of students that passed test Scoring rubric based on committee examination of State and Nation (where available) pass rates

AICE, IB, AP Rubric Unsatisfactory 0 Needs Improvement or Developing 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective 3 0%-24% of Students Passed the Exam 25%-39% of the Students Passed the Exam 40%-64% of the Students Passed the Exam 65%-100% of the Students Passed the Exam Dual Enrollment Rubric Unsatisfactory 0 Needs Improvement or Developing 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective 3 Students’ Completion Rate 5% or More Below GCSC* Rate Students’ Completion Rate Equal to the GCSC Rate Plus or Minus 4% Students’ Completion Rate 5% - 9% Above the GCSC Rate Students’ Completion Rate 10% or More Above the GCSC Rate *Gulf Coast State College 9-12, continued

Note: Advanced Placement only to be used for teachers who instruct students in those courses If not an FCAT course and no students taking FCAT, IB, AICE, AP or DE FCAT VAM Reading School Score Moving forward Revisit and revise Advanced Classes rubrics Awaiting DOE Value Added guidance on classes such as IB, AICE, DE, AP Implement statewide assessments and associated Value-Added Hard to Measure Assessments CFAC

Special Diploma Issue No yearly assessment for Pre-K, Grades and Young Adults Not prepared to use strictly FAA for FAA students Decision Learning Targets Teachers of Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA) Eligible Students FAA Learning Targets Brigance Inventory of Early Development II or Brigance Inventory of Basic Skills II or Brigance Transition Skills Inventory Learning Targets Teachers of Special Diploma Track Students Grades Pre-K-3, Grades 11-12, and Young Adults (returning graduates) 40% Brigance Inventory of Early Development II, Brigance Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills II, or Brigance Transition Skills Inventory Learning Targets

Special Diploma, continued Ratings Used for Teacher Level Student Growth Component Unsatisfactory 0 Needs Improvement/ Developing 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective 3 Category 1-4 Teachers Teacher’s total points less than minus 3 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points less than minus 2 but not less than minus 3 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points falls within plus 2 and minus 2 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points greater than plus 2 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teachers of Students Enrolled in Pre-K ESE Ratings Used for Teacher Level Student Growth Component Unsatisfactory 0 Needs Improvement/ Developing 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective 3 Category 1-4 Teachers Teacher’s total points less than minus 3 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points less than minus 2 but not less than minus 3 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points falls within plus 2 and minus 2 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teacher’s total points greater than plus 2 Standard Deviations from the Mean Total Points Value Teachers of Special Diploma Students (Pre-K-12 and Young Adult)

Special Diploma Moving Forward For teachers who have students taking the FAA, use FAA Value Added Continue using Brigance Grades Pre-K-3 Grades Young Adults (returning graduates) Revisit and revise (if necessary) Brigance rubrics and learning targets

Teachers of Students Enrolled in Adult General Education Adult Basic Education (ABE) Adult Student Goal:Measurement for SuccessGrowth Measurement Score for Teacher  Improve basic skills (reading mathematics, language) for CTE program completion (remediation)  TABE Math  TABE Language  TABE Reading  Pre-Post TABE scale scores  HE/E/NI/U based on percent of students passing and/or improving TABE scale score* Adult Secondary Education (ASE)  GED  High School Diploma  GED  Diploma  Degree received  HE/E/NI/U based on percent of students receiving GED or HS Diploma * English Speakers for Other Languages (ESOL)  Improve reading and/or writing the English language  CASAS  Pre-Post CASAS  HE/E/NI/U based on percent of students passing and/or improving CASAS * *Percentages derived from district, state, and national comparisons.

Adult General Education, continued Career and Technical Education (CTE)  Program Completion  Program Completion Certificate  Occupational Completion Points  HE/E/NI/U based on percent of students completing program*  Licensure  State/National Licensure  Occupational Completion Points  Program Completion Certificate  Licensure  HE/E/NI/U based on percent of students receiving licensure* *Percentages derived from district, state, and national comparisons.

Career Technical Education Teacher: Non-Licensure Levels of Proficiency Levels 0123 Ratings used for each student growth component UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/ DEVELOPING EFFECTIVEHIGHLY EFFECTIVE Category 1-4 Teachers Students who do NOT meet TABE in one or more areas. 0-60% of re-TABE at level 5 or above 61-74% of re-TABE at level 5 or above 75-79% of re-TABE at level 5 or above 80% or more of re- TABE at level 5 or above Students who meet ALL TABE areas for program 0-69% earn at least one OCP/no OCP and/or do not obtain employment in training-related field 70% or more earn at least one OCP and/or obtain employment in training-related field 90% or more earn at least one OCP and/or obtain employment in training-related field Adult General Education, continued

Career Technical Education Teacher: Licensure Levels of Proficiency Levels0123 Ratings used for each student growth component UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/ DEVELOPING EFFECTIVEHIGHLY EFFECTIVE Category 1 -4 Less than 40% obtain training-related licensure 40%-59% obtain training- related licensure 60%-79% obtain training- related licensure 80% or more obtain training- related licensure Adult General Education, continued

Adult Basic Education: TABE Remediation Levels of Proficiency Levels0123 Ratings used for each student growth component UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/ DEVELOPING EFFECTIVEHIGHLY EFFECTIVE Category % of re-TABE at level 5 or above 61-74% of re-TABE at level 5 or above 75-79% of re-TABE at level 5 or above 80% or more of re-TABE at level 5 or above Adult General Education, continued

Adult Education: GED Levels of Proficiency Levels0123 Ratings used for each student growth component UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/ DEVELOPING EFFECTIVEHIGHLY EFFECTIVE Category % obtain GED61-74% obtain GED75-79% obtain GED80% or more obtain GED Adult General Education, continued

Adult Education: ESOL Levels of Proficiency Levels0123 Ratings used for each student growth component UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/ DEVELOPING EFFECTIVEHIGHLY EFFECTIVE Category % improve CASAS score 61-74% improve CASAS score75-79% improve CASAS score80% or improve CASAS score Adult General Education, continued

Contact Information Dawn Capes Bay District Schools