© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific Methods – Chapter 1. A little confusing!
Advertisements

Chapter 1 Section 2 How Scientists Work.
Scientific Method.
The Scientific Method in Life Science.
Chapter 1 What is Science
Social Science Research and
Doing Social Psychology Research
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
RSBM Business School Research in the real world: the users dilemma Dr Gill Green.
Virginia Standard of Learning BIO.1a-m
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION
S.T.E.M. Science Technology Engineering Mathematics What does S.T.E.M. stand for?
COMM THEORY: On Its Scientific Nature John A. Cagle, Ph.D. Communication California State University, Fresno.
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY Cornell Notes.
Sociologists Doing Research Chapter 2. Research Methods Ch. 2.1.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.
Environmental Science Chapter 2 – Scientific Tools Test Review
Unit: Science & Technology Lesson #3 Scientific Inquiry Essential Question: What is scientific inquiry? How do you design and conduct an experiment? What.
Chapter 1 Section 1 Mrs. Chilek Life Science – 4 th period What is Science?
Lesson 1 What is Science?. What do you wonder about when you see this picture? Inquiring Minds Want to Know.
Introduction to Earth Science Scientific Method & the Metric System Introduction to Earth Science Scientific Inquiry and the Nature of Technology.
METODE PENELITIAN AKUNTANSI. Tugas Tugas Telaah Tugas Riset.
Wood Chapter 2 Theories1 Understanding Communication Theories Review from last class: How does mediated communication affect interpersonal communication?
Chapter 1: Introduction to Earth Science Section 1 – What is Science?
Research Design. Selecting the Appropriate Research Design A research design is basically a plan or strategy for conducting one’s research. It serves.
SCIENCE THE STUDY OF LIVING THINGS!. GROWTH VS DEVELOPMENT Growth is the process by which an organism becomes larger. Development is the process of change.
Theories and Hypotheses. Assumptions of science A true physical universe exists Order through cause and effect, the connections can be discovered Knowledge.
What is Science? Science – A way of learning about the natural world. Uses observation and logical reasoning. Scientific Inquiry – Refers to the various.
Science Science is  The process of trying to understand the world  A way of knowing, thinking and learning  Based on observation and experimentation.
What is Science? Science is  A way of learning about the natural world through observations and logical reasoning.  This information can grow and change.
©2005, Pearson Education/Prentice Hall CHAPTER 1 Goals and Methods of Science.
4/25/2017 Lesson 1-1 Nature of Science.
What is Science? Chapter 1, Lesson 1. Using one or more of your senses and tools to gather information. observing.
The Nature of Science and Technology Chapter 1: What is Science?
Research for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation Chapter 1 What is research? What is nursing research? What are the goals of Nursing research?
What is Science? Science – A way of learning about the natural world through observation and logical reasoning. Scientific Inquiry – Refers to the various.
Scientific Method Chapter 1-1. What is Science?  Science – organized way of gathering and analyzing evidence about the natural world  Described as a.
1-2: Scientific Inquiry What role do models, theories, and laws play in scientific investigation?
Of Ernest Bormann’s Symbolic Convergence Theory In Griffin, Chapter 3
Introduction to Physical Science
Scientific Methodology Vodcast 1.1 Unit 1: Introduction to Biology.
Chapter 2 Perspectives On Human Communication Human Communication in Society 3 rd Edition.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Psychology.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Communication Research: –Process of asking questions.
Weighing the Words Of Ernest Bormann’s Symbolic Convergence Theory In Griffin, Chapter 3.
Lesson 3 Scientific Inquiry.
The Scientific Method. The student will plan and conduct investigations in which: observations of living organisms are recorded in the lab and in the.
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY CHAPTER 1 SECTION 2 PHYSICAL SCIENCE.
Talk About Theory Objective or Interpretation Chapter 2.
Scientific Inquiry A Look at the processes that tell how Science is Done.
Of Ernest Bormann’s Symbolic Convergence Theory In Griffin, Chapter 3
Being the Scientist… What do YOU think? What did YOU find?
What is Science ? Chapter 1.
What is Science?.
Scientific inquiry bingo
Introduction to Scientific Inquiry
Introduction to Scientific Inquiry
Introduction to Earth Science
Chapter 1.1 NOTES: What is Science?.
Qualitative Observation
Evaluative Criteria For Scientific and Interpretive Theories
Life Science Chapter 1 Review
Scientific Method Integrated Sciences.
Scientific Method DR. HERC.
What is science?.
Thinking Like A Scientist
3 Weighing the Words.
Presentation transcript:

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Weighing the Words  What Makes an Objective Theory Good? What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good? What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Contested Turf and Common Ground Among Theorists Contested Turf and Common Ground Among Theorists Slide 2

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Weighing the Words  The work of social scientists and interpreters is so different that it is natural they often have trouble understanding and valuing their counterparts’ scholarship Slide 3

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Twin objectives of scientific knowledge Explains past and present Predicts the future  Four additional criteria for theories: Relative simplicity Testability Practical utility Quantifiable research Slide 4

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 1: Explanation of the Data Objective theory draws order out of chaos Describes process, focuses attention on what’s crucial, helps us ignore that which makes little difference The reason something happens becomes as important as the fact that it does Slide 5

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 2: Prediction of Future Events Objective theory predicts what will happen Only possible when dealing with things we can see, hear, touch, smell, and taste over and over again In social sciences, a certain humility on the part of the theorist is advisable Slide 6

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 3: Relative Simplicity Objective theory should be as simple as possible Rule of parsimony (Occam’s Razor) – Given two plausible explanations for the same event, we should accept the simpler version Slide 7

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 4: Hypotheses That Can Be Tested Objective theory is testable Falsifiability – requirement that scientific theory must be stated in a way that it can be tested and disproved if it is wrong Some theories are so loosely stated that it’s impossible to imagine empirical results that could disprove their hypotheses Slide 8

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 5: Practical Utility Good objective theory is useful Lewin: There is nothing as practical as a good theory Slide 9

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 6: Quantitative Research Most scientific research depends on a comparison of differences Slide 10

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Objective Theory Good?  Scientific Standard 6: (continued) Experiment – research method that manipulates a variable in a tightly controlled situation in order to find out if it has the predicted effect Survey – research method that uses questionnaires and structured interviews to collect self-reported data that reflects what respondents think, feel, or intend to do Slide 11

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  No universally approved model for interpretive theories Create understanding Identify values Inspire aesthetic appreciation Stimulate agreement Reform society Conduct qualitative research Slide 12

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 1: New Understanding of People: Interpretive theory offers fresh insight into human condition Typically examines a one-of-a-kind speech community that exhibits specific language style Self-referential imperative – include yourself as a constituent of your own construction Slide 13

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 2: Clarification of Values Interpretive theory brings people’s values into the open Theorists should reveal ethical commitments Ethical imperative – grant others that occur in a construction the same autonomy that one practices in constructing it Slide 14

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 3: Aesthetic Appeal Interpretive theory can capture readers’ imaginations Critic’s job to spark appreciation Slide 15

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 4: Community of Agreement Interpretive theory must be supported by other scholars Must become the subject of widespread analysis Slide 16

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 5: Reform of Society Interpretive theory often generates change Critical interpreters are reformers who can have an impact on society Critical theorists – scholars who use theory to reveal unjust communication practices that create or perpetuate an imbalance of power Slide 17

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What Makes an Interpretive Theory Good?  Interpretive Standard 6: Qualitative Research Interpretive scholars use words to support their theories Textual analysis – research method that describes and interprets characteristics of any text Ethnography – method of participant observation designed to help a researcher experience a culture’s complex web of meaning Slide 18

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 3-1: Summary of Criteria for Evaluating Communication Theory Slide 19