The Indoor Inhalation Exposure Route Heather Nifong Illinois EPA May 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Advertisements

Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day AEHS Annual East Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments.
Learning from the States… Commonwealth of Massachusetts
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Information Item February 25, 2014.
Rhode Island Society of Environmental Professionals in conjunction with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Co-hosted by SAME’s Narragansett.
Brownfields Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
Revisions to Washington’s Cleanup Rules Martha Hankins & Chance Asher Toxics Cleanup Program Department of Ecology Water Quality Partnership May 20, 2010.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
EBC Seminar The IAQ/Mold Assessment – Getting it Right! – Controlling Your Risk Next Speaker Rosemary McCafferty Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
Vapor Intrusion Workgroup July 29,
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Revised TCE Fact Sheet (a.k.a. “Status Update”) Q&A’s & Template IH Notice Form March 27, 2014 Paul W. Locke MassDEP Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup (617)
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS WAITING TO EXHALE – OR HOW TO MANUEVER THROUGH THE INDOOR AIR MAZE Vapor Intrusion Pathway By: Lisa Campe, MPH, LSP.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Vapor Intrusion and Environmental Liability Learning From Past Mistakes EDR Insight Webinar, February 12, 2013 Presented by: Joseph Maternowski Hessian.
Background and lessons learned Managers Meeting February 13, 2014.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Statistical Evaluation of Attenuation Factors at Lowry Air Force Base, CO Helen E. Dawson, PHD Regional Superfund Hydrogeologist US EPA Region VIII Denver,
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance USEPA’s (OSWER) Nov Draft Guidance for Evaluating.
1 RBCA Tool Kit Exercise. 2 Groundwater protection : Tier 1 compliance point Point of compliance=Point of exposure (on site) compliance point (receptor)
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
NFA Letter Template: Tips and Hints to Reduce Comments CP Annual Training October 27, 2015 Sydney Poole – DERR.
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
By Ben Bentkowski, P.G. Scientific Support Section, R4 Superfund Presented at the March 29, 2016 Air & Waste Management Association Regulatory Update Conference.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Brownfields 2004, “Light or Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Cleaners” September 2004 Presented by Matt Shurtliff Roosevelt Towne Apartments.
The World of AUL Presentation by: Atul Pandey, P.E. PANDEY Environmental, LLC 2016 Ohio Brownfield Conference April 7, 2016.
Regulatory Issues for Health Officers. Vapor Intrusion (VI) and The Challenger of Trichloroethylene (TCE) & Soil Management.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
BROWNFIELDS 2005 Dealing with Unexpected Contamination Lowry Air Force Base Redevelopment Denver, CO Tom Markham, Executive Director, Lowry Redevelopment.
Welcome to the World of AUL Avoiding the voidance of your CNS.
GSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Houston, Texas (713) Workshop 1: Assessment and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion at Petroleum.
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Connecticut Remediation Standard Regulations: Volatilization Criteria
Purpose Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994
HSRA Rule Change Reflect changes in scientific understanding since 1994 Provide Consistency in Cleanup Standards Reduce risk from contaminated sites Correct.
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Presentation transcript:

The Indoor Inhalation Exposure Route Heather Nifong Illinois EPA May 5, 2008

Risk-Based Cleanup for Vapor Intrusion in Illinois Began developing approach in early 2006 Builds on work of U.S. EPA and several states Uses existing three-tiered approach in place for other exposure routes (TACO) Reviewed by the Site Remediation Advisory Committee (a legislatively mandated stakeholder group)

Risk-Based Cleanup for Vapor Intrusion in Illinois Remediation objectives (ROs) developed by applying a modified Johnson and Ettinger model to calculate attenuation factor and perform equilibrium conversions. ROs available for volatile chemicals in soil gas, soil and groundwater; choice of residential or industrial/commercial land use. If demonstrate compliance with (1) soil gas or (2) soil and groundwater, then site’s okay.

Risk-Based Cleanup for Vapor Intrusion in Illinois The indoor inhalation route may be excluded if: Volatile chemicals are not present, Existing or potential buildings and man-made pathways are not, and will not be, located over contaminated areas, or An approved building control technology (BCT) is in place and operational.

Challenges Use of soil gas data Selection of building-specific default parameters Design criteria for BCTs Effect on formerly remediated sites

Use of Soil Gas Data Initially resisted calculation of soil gas ROs Limited use at current sites No standardized sampling protocol Risk-based cleanup regulations traditionally avoid site characterization requirements so as not to interfere with individual programs (LUST, VCP, RCRA)

Selection of Building-Specific Default Parameters Less flexibility in Tier 2 than anticipated Wanted to prevent excessive institutional control requirements Fixed parameters for building height, width and length; air exchange rate; slab thickness, etc. Do allow for distinctions between slab-on- grade and basements, residential and industrial-commercial

Design Criteria for BCTs Should active mitigation systems qualify for No Further Remediation Letters? (yes) What about buildings not yet constructed? (approved BCT in place and operational prior to human occupancy) How detailed should the institutional control be? (o & m requirements, provisions for inoperability)

Effect on Formerly Remediated Sites Closed sites will not be re-opened – unless new site-specific information indicates a indoor inhalation problem Sites active at the time the rules take effect will have to account for the indoor inhalation exposure route, regardless of their progress toward cleanup

To Learn More