©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Demand Response May 9, United States 40 Million People 8 States Canada 10 Million People 7 Provinces Cost $6.0 to 10.0 Billion.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MIDWEST ISO By Bill Malcolm Manager-State Regulatory Affairs Pierre, South Dakota June 9, 2006.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Roles and Responsibilities network owners system operator(s) regulators Infrastructure brokers power exchange(s) Market Places generatorsconsumerssupplierstraders.
2013 Summer Overview Jeffrey S McDonald Power System Operator CUEA San Diego, CA June 6, 2013.
DOD Microgrids The Missing Link: Microgrid Applications Michael Dempsey P.E. Burns & McDonnell June 12, 2013 © 2013 Burns & McDonnell. All Rights Reserved.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
 2005 Pinnacle West Capital Corporation Palo Verde Hub Participant Meeting May 27, 2005 Arizona Public Service Company Tom Glock – Manager Power Operations.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Demand Response Working Group AESO ‘As Is’ and Needs Assessment.
Reliability Risks and Lessons Learned In The Wake Of The Polar Vortex OPSI Annual Meeting October 14, 2014.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Tucson Area Reliability Mike Flores Control Area Operations Tucson Electric Power May 2000.
Recent ERCOT Events Lessons Learned
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
1 Dale Osborn Midwest ISO February 27, Wisconsin Renewable Energy Summit Transmission Expansion Opportunities with Wind Energy.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
2001 & 2002 Energy Preparedness Tucson Electric Power February 16, 2001 Michael Flores, Manager Control Area Operations David Hutchens, Manager Wholesale.
New Zealand & Australian Wholesale Electricity Markets A Comparative Review Dr Ralph Craven Transpower NZ Ltd.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
5/17/2000Summer Preparedness /17/2000Summer Preparedness SRP SUMMER PREPAREDNESS 2000 Presented to the Arizona Corporation Commission May.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
An Overview of the Australian National Electricity Market Brian Spalding Chief Operating Officer.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
1 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW NETWORK OPERATING COMMITTEE April 17, 2007 New Mexico Transmission System Overview.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
©2004 PJMwww.pjm.com 1 PJM's Perspective on Reliability – Summer 2004 and Beyond Karl Pfirrmann President -- PJM Western Region FERC Summer Reliability.
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
Review of SONI Power System Operations Alex Baird Grid Operations Manager Real Time.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
RFPEG2013 PRE-BID MEETING RFPEG2013 – Pre-Bid meeting January 9, 2014 Presentation by Derek Davis – Public Utilities Commission.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
May 4, 2001 Maryland PSC Summer Reliability Assessment Allegheny Power May 4, 2001.
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
penetration of wind power
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Solar Eclipse Overview August 2017
EU-IPA12/CS02 Development of the Renewable Energy Sector
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
Wind Development & Policy Options
Planning Reserve Margin
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003

©2003 PJM 2 ã Scheduled Capacity ã Projected Peak Demand and Capacity ã Reserves ã Bulk Power Purchases/Sales ã Unavailable capacity ã Summer Overview ã PJM Load Response Programs ã Emergency Procedures ã Reserve Shortages: Generation Loading & Pre-Arranged Load Reductions ã Reserve Shortages: Load Relief Procedures ã Transmission System Events ã Assistance from neighboring systems ã Emergency Procedures Summary ã Grid Control Security - Second by Second Preparedness ã Market Growth Initiative- Backbone Transmission Systems Agenda

©2003 PJM 3 ãBetween June 1, 2002 and April 1, 2003 PJM RTO’s summer generating capacity increased by a net of 2,125 MW to 74,175 MW (2,075 MW east, 50 MW west) ãAn additional 1,275 MW is expected by June 1, 2003 (in the PJM Classic footprint) ãAll nuclear units are expected to be in service and at full capacity (13,203 MW) at the time of the peak ãPJM has begun recognizing Intermittent Capacity Resources by extending capacity factor values to Wind Turbine installations. 130MW over four separate installations can now apply. Scheduled Capacity

©2003 PJM 4 Projected Peak Demand & Capacity ã The 2003 RTO Summer forecast net peak demand is 64,301 MW ã The 2003 forecast is 539 MW higher than the actual PJM RTO all-time summer peak of 63,762 MW that occurred on August 14, ã This forecast includes effects of Active Load Management (interruptible demand and load management capabilities) estimated to be 1,273 MW ã The Winter 2003/2004 PJM RTO forecast load is 52,622MW.

©2003 PJM 5 ã The PJM installed reserve margin is expected to be 17.3% as of June 1, 2003 ã Additionally, 925 MW of generating capacity is expected to be added throughout the summer demand period raising the installed reserve margin to 18.8% ã Installed reserve margin is based on “Iron-in-the- Ground” capacity resources and does not include the impact of external purchases or sales. Reserves

©2003 PJM 6 Bulk Power Purchases / Sales ã At the present time, PJM has 698 MW of firm transmission service in place for energy sales out of PJM through the summer peak period ã Presently, the transactions above are not capacity backed and therefore can be curtailed in the event of a PJM capacity emergency ã Historically, approximately 1200 MW of the reserved firm transmission service has been used to transfer capacity out of PJM on peak summer days, and can therefore decrease the capacity margin by 1.3%

©2003 PJM 7 ã During the summer peak period, 6.41% of PJM capacity is historically forced out of service ã Planned outages are not permitted during the summer peak period ã Scheduled maintenance is coordinated to minimize peak period impacts Unavailable Capacity

©2003 PJM 8 Summer Overview Period Forecast Load (MW) Total Forecast Load (MW) (less Load Mgmt & Contractually Interruptible) Actual Load (MW) Summer ,30163,028 To be Determined Summer ,02361,22563,762 All-Time Summer Peak: 63,762 on 8/14/02

©2003 PJM 9 PJM Load Response Programs EMERGENCYECONOMIC Designed to provide an incentive to customers or curtailment service providers to reduce consumption when PJM LMP prices are high Two options: Day Ahead Option Real Time Option Designed to provide a method by which end-use customers may be compensated by PJM for voluntarily reducing load during an emergency event.

©2003 PJM 10 Sites and MW Volume EMERGENCY ECONOMIC 2002 u 61 Registered Sites u 548 MW u Payments $177, u To be Determined ECONOMIC 2002 u 116 Registered Sites u 337 MW u Payments $895, u 5 New Registered Sites u 26 MW u Payments $13,000 Total Sites: 182 Total MW: 911 MW 911 MW is approximately 1.4 % of the 2003 Peak Demand

©2003 PJM 11 ã Solicit emergency energy through marketers ã Recall energy sales out of PJM ã Purchase emergency energy ã Load maximum emergency generation ã Initiate load management programs and require load reductions by interruptible service customers under contract Emergency Procedures During Reserve Shortages: Generation Loading & Pre-Arranged Load Reductions

©2003 PJM 12 ã If additional load reduction is necessary the following procedures will be implemented in sequence as required: ã Radio and TV load curtailment appeal ã Curtailment of non-essential utility load ã 5% voltage reduction ã Voluntary customer load curtailment ã Rotating short-duration load shedding During Reserve Shortages: Load Relief Procedures Emergency Procedures

©2003 PJM 13 ã Close coordination between transmission outages and expected generation patterns ã Operator action to control flow patterns ã Coordination of generation and transmission patterns in PJM to maintain a reliable and secure transmission grid ã Congestion management system using LMP ã Coordination of interregional actions ã Rotating short-duration load shedding implemented in the most effective areas During Transmission System Events Emergency Procedures

©2003 PJM 14 Assistance ãAn integral part of bulk power supply reliability ãAllows lower installed reserve margins ãThis summer, no assistance will be required if: ãWeather is normal ãUnits perform as expected ãIf required, assistance from neighboring systems should be available Assistance from Neighboring Systems

©2003 PJM 15 Emergency Procedures Summary

©2003 PJM 16 Grid Control Security - Second by Second Preparedness Primary Control Center n Transmission n Simulation of Loss of Each Transmission Line and Generator and Protection of Actual Problems Once Every Minute. n Generation n Reserves Scheduled and Operated to Cover Loss of Major Generators. n Information Transfer n Redundant Telecommunications n Planned Intrusion (Hacking) Tests n Market Operations n Back-up System Automatically Live in 10 Minutes, if Needed. n Business Rules for Price Calculation if Data not Viable n Alternate Options for Bid Submission Back -Up Control Center n Security Programs for Physical Facilities Provided by Owners or Operators n Over 20,000 Data Points of Live Information from Transmission Lines, Generating Stations, Switching Stations, and Tie line Meters is Sent to Both Primary and Back-Up Control Centers every 2-14 Seconds Normal Operating Procedures 7x24

©2003 PJM 17 Market Growth Initiative

©2003 PJM 18 Phone (610) FAX (610) Internet site If you have questions... Contact PJM Customer Relations Questions