Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Advertisements

Calibration Techniques
Analytical Method Development and Validation
Instrumental Analysis
Calibration methods Chemistry 243.
Errors in Chemical Analyses: Assessing the Quality of Results
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
Selectivity, Sensitivity, Signal to Noise, Detection Limit
Result validation. Exercise 1 You’ve done an analysis to the best of your ability using the correct procedure. Is your answer correct? possibly, hopefully.
Chapter 1 Introduction Analytical Chemistry deals with methods for determining the chemical composition of samples. Qualitative Analysis (identification)
P. 1 FAQs- before analyzing your sample. p. 2  Temperature (thermal degradable?)  Split or splitless  Split ratio  Injection volume FAQs- injection.
PHARM 462 PART / /31 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) VALIDATION of ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS.
World Health Organization
Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.
Basic Questions Regarding All Analytical & Instrumental Methods (p 17-18) What accuracy and precision are required? How much sample do I have available,
Quality Control Procedures put into place to monitor the performance of a laboratory test with regard to accuracy and precision.
Data Handling l Classification of Errors v Systematic v Random.
Quality Assurance.
Quality Assurance Chapter 29. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Daniel C. Harris, 6 th Edition, New to this edition and a very important topic in industry.
Types of experimental error
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
CALIBRATION METHODS.
Chemometrics Method comparison
Method Comparison A method comparison is done when: A lab is considering performing an assay they have not performed previously or Performing an assay.
Quality Assurance.
Validation of Analytical Method
Data Analysis and Presentation
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Analytical considerations
Chem. 31 – 9/23 Lecture Guest Lecture Dr. Roy Dixon.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry Dr M. Abd-Elhakeem Faculty of Biotechnology General Chemistry Lecture 7.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
Version 2012 Updated on Copyright © All rights reserved Dong-Sun Lee, Prof., Ph.D. Chemistry, Seoul Women’s University Chapter 5 Errors in Chemical.
Chapter 5 Errors In Chemical Analyses Mean, arithmetic mean, and average (x) are synonyms for the quantity obtained by dividing the sum of replicate measurements.
Quality Control Lecture 5
Laboratory QA/QC An Overview.
Data Analysis and Presentation Chapter 5- Calibration Methods and Quality Assurance EXCEL – How To Do 1- least squares and linear calibration curve/function.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
CALIBRATION METHODS. For many analytical techniques, we need to evaluate the response of the unknown sample against the responses of a set of standards.
Data Analysis and Presentation Chapter 5- Calibration Methods and Quality Assurance EXCEL – How To Do 1- least squares and linear calibration curve/function.
1 Exercise 7: Accuracy and precision. 2 Origin of the error : Accuracy and precision Systematic (not random) –bias –impossible to be corrected  accuracy.
Introduction The importance of method validation
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Wenclawiak, B.: Fit for Purpose – A Customers View© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in.
Industrial Technology Institute Test Method Validation & Verification H.P.P.S.Somasiri Principal Research Scientist / SDD-QAD /QM Industrial Technology.
Chapter 1: Introduction Analytical Chemistry Analytical Chemistry Qualitative analysis Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis Quantitative analysis.
Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Type of instrumental methods Radiation Electrical method Thermal properties Others 2. Instruments for analysis Non-electrical.
Quality Control Internal QC External QC. -Monitors a test's method precision and analytical bias. -Preparation of quality control samples and their interpretation.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Chapter 5: Errors in Chemical Analysis. Errors are caused by faulty calibrations or standardizations or by random variations and uncertainties in results.
Chapter 1: The Nature of Analytical Chemistry
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
means to “TO CHECK OR PROVE THE VALIDITY OF” According to FDA – “ The goal of validation is to establish a documented evidence which provides a high degree.
Art PowerPoints Harris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Eight Edition CHAPTER 05: QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CALIBRATION METHODS.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
World Health Organization
Strategies for Eliminating Interferences in Optical Emission Spectroscopy Best practices to optimize your method and correct for interferences to produce.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Quality Assurance Chapter 29. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Daniel C. Harris, 6th Edition, New to this edition and a very important topic in.
Analytical Method Validation
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
Choice of Methods and Instruments
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
World Health Organization
Introduction To Medical Technology
▪Internal quality control:
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods

The Need for Quality Assurance Check “blind” samples to assess the reliability of the lab working Scattered measurements of Pb in river water by different labs certified range: 62.3 M  1.3 nM 181 labs 18 reports  50% above 4 reports  50% below 9 national labs :close to the certified value

Data quality standards: Get the right date Get the data right Quality assurance is what we do get the right answer for our purpose. :The answer should have sufficient accuracy and precision. In this Chapter, 1) Procedures in quality control and 2) Introduction of two more calibration methods Data quality standards: Get the right date Get the data right Keep the date right

5-1 Basics of Quality Assurance Calibration Statistics Raw data Treated data Results Individual measurement (area, volume…) Reported values (mean, SD,…) Concentration Use Objectives : States the purpose for which results will be used. Specifications Sampling requirement: representative samples Accuracy and precision Rate of false results; false positive vs. false negative Specificity (Selectivity) Sensitivity Acceptable blank values; method blank vs. reagent blank vs. field blank Recovery of fortification;, spike(fortification) recovery, matrix effect Calibration checks; analyze standard solution Quality control sample: performance test samples (quality control samples, blind samples)

change in analyte concentration Sensitivity = slope(m) of calibration curve = change of signal change in analyte concentration Accuracy; uses standard reference materials(SRMs) Blanks - Cause interferences (changing signal of analyte) from solvent, reagent, apparatus, instrument, and environment except analyte - Method/Reagent/Field blank - The blank can either be subtracted from analyte signal, or used as zero point in calibration. Matrix - The medium containing analyte. - Everything in the unknown, other than analyte. (Everything else in sample other than analyte) - A matrix effect is a change in the analytical signal caused by anything in the sample other than analyte.

Spike recovery - Add a small volume of concentrated standard to sample solution - Avoid matrix effect - Confirm the signal of analyte Example Spike Recovery Result of unknown sample= 10.0ug/L Spiked known sample = 5.0 ug/L → Concentration of spiked sample = 14.6 ug/L ⇒ Percent recovery? Solution Cspiked sample – Cunspiked sample Percent recovery = X 100 (5-1) Cadded 14.6 μg/L – 10.0 μg/L = X 100 5.0 μg/L = 92 %

Calibration checks - Periodically check - Analyzed solution formulated to contain known concentration of analyte - Ensure that out instrument continues to work properly and calibration remains valid. Performance test samples (quality control samples or blind samples) - To help eliminate bias - Use samples of known composition (SRMs) To gauge accuracy: - calibration checks - spike recovery - quality control samples - blanks To gauge precision: - replicate samples - replicate portions of a sample

Assessment Assessment is the process of 1) collecting data to show that analytical procedures are operating within specified limits and 2) verifying that final results meet use objectives. Control charts (Box 5-1) Shut down conditions from control chart 1 outside the action lines 2 out of 3 consecutive measurements in the warning zones 7 consecutive measurements all above or all below the center line 6 consecutive measurements all steadily increasing or steadily decreasing 14 consecutive measurements alternating up and down obvious nonrandom pattern

5-2 Method Validation Validation determines the suitability of an analysis for providing the desired information. • Validation can apply to sample, to methodologies, and to date. • Validation is often done by the analyst but can also be done by supervisory personal. Method validation; the process of proving that an analytical method is acceptable for its intended - Specificity - Accuracy & precision - Linearity & range; linear range vs. dynamic range vs. linear dynamic range vs. range - Robustness; not affected by small changes in conditions - LOD, LOQ

Specificity or Selectivity - Ability of an analytical method to distinguish the analyte from everything else that might be in the sample. :analyte Peak 3 and 4 are unresolved (incomplete baseline separation) ⇒ poor specificity

Linearity - The R2 (square of correlation coefficient) values must be very close to 1 to represent a linear fit. - A y-intercept of calibration curve (after the response of the blank has been subtracted from each standard) should be close to 0(zero). Range of R2 value = 0~1 - R2 near 1 indicates that a regression line fits the data well. - For major component: >0.995 (or ~0.999) (5-2) Accuracy Nearness to the truth Ways to determine accuracy (systematic error) - Analyze a certified reference material as a standard (known composition and concentration) - Compare your results from two or more different analytical method - Analyze “blank” samples spiked with a known addition of analyte. : The matrix must be same as your unknown sample - Make standard additions(Section 5-3) of analyte to the unknown sample

How is accuracy established ? While precision is easy to measure simply by replication, a measurement of accuracy involves comparing the experimental results to a “known” or “true” value. ⇒ Reference Methods or Standard Reference Materials. http://www.nist.gov/srm/index.cfm

Precision The reproducibility of a result Types of precisions - Instrumental precision (or injection precision): the reproducibility observed when the same quantity of one sample is repeated introduced (precision for repeated sample loading) - Intra-assay precision: analyzing aliquots of a homogeneous material several times by on person on one day with the same equipment. - Intermediate precision (or Ruggedness): observed when an assay is performed by different people on different instruments on different days in the same lab. - Interlaboratory precision: observed when aliquots of the same sample are analyzed by different people in different lab.

BOX 5-2: The Horowitz Trumpet: Variation in Interlaboratoty Precision Coefficient of variation (CV) or Relative Standard Deviation(RSD) = s/x : smaller CV  more precise ⇒ CV is usually expressed as a percentage CV (%) = %RSD = 100×s/x ⇒ Inter laboratory precision becomes poorer as the level of analyte decrease.

Range : Concentration range over which linearity, accuracy, and precision meet specifications for analytical method. for Major component Correlation coefficient(linearity): R2≥ 0.999 Spike recovery(accuracy): 100±2% Interlaboratory precision: ±3% for Impurity Correlation coefficient: R2≥ 0.98 Spike recovery: 100±10% Interlaboratory precision: ±15%

Limits of Detection and Quantitation Detection limit (DL or Lower limit Of Detection(LOD)); the smallest quantity of analyte that is “significantly different” from the blank. Procedures for Determination of Detection Limit (DL, LOD) 1) Prepare a sample whose concentration is ~1 to 5 times the detection limit. 2) Measure the signal from n replicate samples (n≥7). 3) Compute the standard deviation(s) of the n measurements. 4) Measure the signal from n blanks and find the mean, yblank. 5) The minimum detectable signal(ydl) is defined as (5-3) Signal (S) Noise (N) S/N = 3 ydl = yblank + 3s (5-3) 6) Corrected signal (ysample – yblank) is proportional to sample concentration: ysample – yblank = m×sample concentration (5-4) ysample = m×sample concentration + yblank ydl = m×LOD + yblank yblank + 3s = m×LOD + yblank where, ysample = signal of sample yblank = signal of blank m = slope of the linear calibration curve s = SD of sample signal ⇒ Minimum detectable concentration (DL) LOD(DL) = 3s m (5-5) Lower limit of Quantification (LOQ); Lower limit of quantification, or the smallest amount that can be measured with reasonable accuracy. LOQ = 10s m (5-6)

LOD from calibration curve Detection limit Detection limit LOD LOQ 3s 10s LOD from calibration curve Signal detection limit = b + 3sy y = mx + b = mx + yblank LOD = yblank + 3sblank = b + 3sblank

To be useful, a calibration curve must: 5-3 Standard Addition To be useful, a calibration curve must: • Have a defined relationship a measurable quantity (usually concentration) and the signal measure. • Often this relationship is linear, but other relationships can also be useful. • Be collected under the same, or near same, conditions as what exists for the analyte. - Similar matrix - Similar species - Similar experimental conditions (sample holder, lab temperature, instrument settings, etc.) • A minimum of 3 data points over a range of concentrations should be collected to define the line (or other calibration relationship). The concentration of the analyte must lie within the calibration range.

Standard Addition (표준물 첨가) - Known amounts of analyte are added to aliquots of sample - Signals are measured as a function of concentration added - Modeling process: Signal = mC added + b - Equation is solved for concentration where Signal = 0 (an extrapolation process) - Accounts for sample matrix, but not for instrumental drift Why is standard addition used? - Std. Add. is effective at correction of “matrix effects”, i.e., the sensitivity (signal/conc) is sample-dependent - Std. Add. will NOT correct for additive interferences, i.e. if another species is present that contributes signal at the sensor being measured. - Std. Add.is standard practice in some techniques. Processes of standard addition Analyte=Standard Standard (Analyte, known) Step 1: Analyte(unknown) signal Step 2: Analyte(unknown) + Standard(known) signal Step 3: Calculate unknown concentration Analyte (unknown)

(X(analyte, unknown) =S(standard, known)) Standard addition equation: Concentration of analyte in initial solution signal from initial solution = Concentration of analyte plus standard in final solution signal from final solution (X(analyte, unknown) =S(standard, known)) Standard addition equation: (5-7) [X]i: initial conc. of analyte [X]f: diluted conc. of analyte [S]f: conc. of standard in the final solution [S]i: conc. of standard solution V0: initial volume of unknown Vs: added volume of standard Where, Total volume(V) = V0 + Vs (5-8) Dilution factor [S]f = (2.08M)(5.00mL/100mL)=0.104M [X]f = [X]i(95.0mL/100.0mL) ∴[X]i = [Na+]i = 0.113M

Graphical Procedure for Standard Addition to a Single Solution Increasing standard (known, S): IS+X VS V V0 Analyte(unknown, X): IX 9 points (=Is+x) (5-9) (=[S]f) y m x (5-10) Sy : SD of y, m ; slope of the line, ; mean value of y (nine points) xi ; the individual values of x (nine points), n ; number of date points for the calibration line y x ; mean value of x (nine points)

Graphical Procedure for Multiple Solutions with Constant Volume Step 1: Place 5 mL of unknown(X) in each flask 5 IS+X 4 3 Step 2: Add 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mL of standard(S) Unknown only 2 1 Step 3: Fill each flask to the 50 mL mark and mix(X+S) [S]f Step 4: plot IS+X vs. [S]f  [X]I = x-intercept

5-4 internal Standards Requirements for an internal standard • A substance known as an “internal standard” is added to samples and standards (chemically similar to analyte) • Used to correct for instrumental drift (changes in sensitivity over time) and matrix effects (sample-related changes in sensitivity) Requirements for an internal standard - Technique must be multi component-must separately measure signals for analyte and internal standard - No interferences: between analyte and internal std or between sample matrix and internal std - Internal standard must emulate drift and matrix effect behavior - Internal standard is not native in the sample

Concentration determination from Response factor Response factor : differences in the detector signal between the analyte(X) and internal standard(S). Area of analyte signal Area of standard signal = F ( ) (5-9) Concentration of analyte Concentration of standard F=1: equally response to standard(X) and internal standard(S) F=2: doubly response to standard(X) comparing internal standard(S) Where, Ax, As : the peak areas for the analyte(standard) and internal standard [X], [S] : the concentrations of analyte(standard) and internal standard (Sample: Anthracene) (Internal Standard: Naphthalene)

Using an Internal Standard Example Using an Internal Standard 1) For mixture of 0.0837M analyte(X, known) + 0.0666M internal standard(S) ⇒ Signals: AX=423, AS=347 2) 10.0 mL of 0.146M S added to 10.0mL analyte X(unknown), then diluted to 25.0 mL ⇒ Signals: AX=553, AS=582 ⇒ Find [X] Solution 1) Preliminary experiment Standard mixture - For mixture of known(X) + standard(S) 2) Analysis : 10.0 mL of 0.146 M S added to 10.0 mL X(unknown) ⇒ diluted to 25.0 mL Unknown mixture - For mixture of unknown(X) + standard(S)

Concentration determination from Calibration Curve 참 고 Concentration determination from Calibration Curve : A fixed amount of the internal standard species is added to all samples, standards, and blanks. Ix/Is o o o o o Unknown o [X]/[S] [S] [X]