Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
MTSS – What’s That? Session 1 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) – Work we are doing Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)  What is this.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
DRAFT May 25 rd, 2011 Pearson Common Core Positioning and Value Proposition.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Timberlane Regional School District
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
MFAS Mathematics Formative Assessment System We shall be using tasks from MFAS.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Educational Program Review Mrs. Diane Fisher, CPA Chief Executive Officer High School Cafeteria March 4, 2014.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
DATA INQUIRY TO IMPROVE TEACHING AND LEARNING DAY 1: GETTING STARTED WITH DATA Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Race to the Top Series December 8, 2011.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
School Leadership for Students With Disabilities Project #H325A Course Enhancement Module Anchor Presentation #3.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The School Effectiveness Framework
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Integrating the MTSS Framework at the Secondary Level Dr. Jayna Jenkins, Learning and Development Facilitator, MTSS Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charles.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
AXL Academy and Data: Working Towards our Vision Through Data Present Use and Possible Potential for Students and Teachers.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Dawn Wenzel Spring Great Leadership “What really makes education effective is well- leveraged leadership that ensures great teaching to guarantee.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
 Effective monitoring of adult actions – teaching and leadership – strongly linked to gains in student achievement  “Implementation gap” between intention.
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Student Learning Objectives Briana Timmerman, Ph.D. for Rinice Sauls.
Shelton School District
Using data for instructional decision-making
Presentation transcript:

Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht

Data in the Driver’s Seat by Paul Bambrick- Santoyo  A CLOSE READING OF A Text  Read “Data in the Driver’s Seat” by Paul Bambrick- Santoyo  As a table answer the question below using only information from the text  Each table will be asked to share with the group. How does data driven instruction improve student achievement?

What did you find?  Establish common rigorous assessment  To analyze effectively –go back to the test and look at individual questions to see where students err.  Check for distracters: the errors in the process are important  Item level test in hand analysis results in root cause analysis  Assessment and analysis are now linked

What’s next?  Develop an action plan for re- teaching particular standards  Create a data binder to keep the analyses and the action plans  Action plan must be connected to lesson plans –i.e. Redesign targeted guided reading groups

The Four Keys Assessments (interim, Aligned to CC, re-assessed) Analysis (quick, user-friendly, teacher-owned, test-in- hand, deep) ACTION in a data-driven CULTURE (Data meetings by grade level, data driven changes in instruction)Reflection and feedback Driven By Data, 2010 Bambrick-santoyo

Let us see how it all ties together

Integrating Initiatives – DDI and SLOs Data-Driven Instruction Aspect SLO Connection Transparent Starting Point Student baselines and knowledge of the established SLO inform teacher practice. Teacher Action Plans During SLO development and implementation, teachers develop long- and short-term instructional plans. Common Interim and Ongoing Assessments Interim and in-the-moment assessments provide regular data on student SLO progress. Deep Analysis Teachers’ analyses delve into critical learning issues to improve SLO success. Leadership Team The Leadership Team facilitates analysis meetings to focus and improve student learning. 7

Integrating Initiatives – Common Core and SLOs Common Core Aspect SLO Connection New Standards Teachers have new standards on which to base their SLO learning content. Instructional Shifts Effective teaching must accompany SLO implementation. Next Generation Assessments New assessments will be developed to be used with Common Core and other SLO learning content. Rigorous Expectations As Common Core raises the rigor level of expectations, so must SLO targets be set high. Vertical Synchronicity The continuity of the College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards helps to track more specific student skills and needs year-to-year. 8

Integrating Initiatives – PLCs and SLOs  Common Goals:  Ensure students learn  Focus on results  Foster a collaborative culture  Improve school/district capacity   Common Processes:  Collaborative meetings  Use of common data points to inform instruction  Anchoring discussions around three questions: What do we want each student to learn? How will we know when each student has learned it? How will we respond when a student experiences difficulty in learning? 9

Integrating Initiatives – RtI and SLOs  Common Goals:  Improve student outcomes for all students  Articulate explicit processes to support students  Develop effective interventions for all students  Reflect and evaluate to ensure continuous systems improvement  Common Processes:  Screen students to differentiate instruction and supports  Progress monitor to ensure learning is increasing  Make evidence-based instructional decisions