Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Prof. Dr. Rik Leemans ESSP, Transition Team Member & Wageningen University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Importance for Africa ipBes side event at AMCEN. May 28th 2009,
Advertisements

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
1 African ICT Roadmap to Achieve NEPAD Objectives Arusha, Tanzania, 1-3 April 2003 Roles of Government and ATU in the Implementation of NEPAD ICT objectives.
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
Future Earth: Research for global sustainability in Asia
RESPONSE TO THE THEMATIC EVALUATION: INCREASING WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AND PARTICIPATION IN PEACE AND SECURITY AND IN HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Saraswathi Menon,
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
(The Global Programme of Research On Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts and Adaptation) Adaptation Knowledge Day V: Climate Change Adaptation Gaps BONN,
The way we work – Issues and Options. SUSTAINABILITY: PRACTICE CHANGE EVIDENCE UNDERSTAND PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES TOOLS GUIDANCE (RULES) INCENTIVES.
BELMONT FORUM E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT PROJECT Updates and Next Steps to Deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Maria.
Lobbying for Food Security: FAO advocacy interventions
The Current Debate on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Assistant Secretary-General Thomas Gass December 2014.
1 Katherine Sierra Vice President, Sustainable Development Network The World Bank April 14, 2008 Proposed Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) Recap.
A New Initiative on Earth System Research for Global Sustainability
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Strengthening International Science for the Benefit of Society Celebrating 75 years:
" ICT SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSALISATION OF SECONDARY EDUCATION“ Ashish Garg Asia Regional Coordinator Global eSchools and Communities Initiative 27 th May 2009,
European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing 07 April 2011 Jorge Pinto Antunes Strategy and Analysis Unit DG SANCO, European Commission.
WLE and the INTEGRATING ECOSYSTEM SOLUTIONS INTO POLICY and INVESTMENTS (IES) FLAGSHIP Nathanial Matthews Global Research Coordinator IES Flagship Leader.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
Future Earth: Vision and implementation Royal Irish Academy 17th September 2014 Frans Berkhout.
Research funding challenge to enable key research for climate services? Attract stakeholders (public, private, community) to co-design research question.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Heide Hackmann Stockholm, 31 January Introduction: process, objectives and audiences 2.Why a world social science report on global environmental.
Green Paper on National Strategic Planning The Presidency November 2009.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
1 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) SAICM Secretariat.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 September Human Resource Development Council for South Africa (HRDCSA)
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
Assessing Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate-related Risks A Flavour of SEI Activities Stockholm Environment Institute Frank Thomalla with contributions.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK Tel: National Marine Coordination Office.
Integrating GEF in Environment and Sustainable Development Plans and Policies - – Jamaica’s Experience GEF CSP Sub-regional Workshop for Caribbean Focal.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
Visioning: Towards a new initiative on Earth system research for global sustainability research Prof. Deliang CHEN, ICSU Executive Director.
Towards an European Network of Earth Observation Networks (ENEON): Addressing Challenges and Facilitating Collaboration for non-space based Earth Observations.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
Integrated Knowledge System on Climate Change Adaptation Conceptual & Technological Framework OneWorld South Asia December 2008.
Main outcomes of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: Institutional Framework An ECA Presentation at the Eighth Session of the Committee.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
GFG-BACG Meeting: Harnosand, Sweden March 14,
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
How define and implement a Funding Strategy for Future Earth ?
Six global challenges were identified in policy for development cooperation: Oppression Economic exclusion Migration flows Climate change and environmental.
Questions to be discussed: How can the research framework be further improved? What additional priority research questions should be included or how should.
Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Rik Leemans & Peter Liss Transition Team Members photos:
Identify boundaries (GEC for sustainability) Breaking down the “broad research themes” to provide more relevance in AP regions Need to incorporate: technology.
Implementation Management Project Steven Wilson, Jakob Rhyner  Objective: Implementing Future Earth, based on the initial desgn of the Transition Team.
External Action: Thematic Programme For Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy Structure: I- INTRODUCTION II - CONTEXT.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
How define and implement a Funding Strategy for Future Earth ? Prepared for Future Earth regional workshops Kuala Lumpur, November 2012 P. Monfray.
Renewing our focus on Impact Becky Murray Nairobi, 15 March 2016 Twitter: #impactafrica.
Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability photos:
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
What is the Belmont Forum?
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Background to The Conference
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Primary Health Care Improvement Global Stakeholder Meting, Geneva
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
Presentation transcript:

Future Earth research for global sustainability: The governance structure mechanisms Prof. Dr. Rik Leemans ESSP, Transition Team Member & Wageningen University photos:

1.Introduction 2.The Stakeholders 3.The governance structure 4.Next steps 5.Funding structure Future Earth: Research for global sustainability 2 1.Introduction

The background documents 3 Report will be made available on Friday

4 High-impact science magazines follow Future Earth challenges and developments closely and with very high expectations!

Outcomes of Rio+20 “The Future We want” and implications for Future Earth Engaging major groups and other stakeholders “48. We recognize the important contribution of the scientific and technological community to sustainable development. We are committed to working with and fostering collaboration among the academic, scientific and technological community, in particular in developing countries, to close the technological gap between developing and developed countries, and strengthen the science-policy interface, as well as to foster international research collaboration on sustainable development.” [This is implicit support to Future Earth] 5

Pathways to Sustainability Transformations and Solutions and human security Human well-being Human and natural drivers Global Environmental Changes Conceptual framework for Future Earth

Principles for Future Earth’s implementation 1.Science collaboration: Future Earth must provide a platform for collaboration between scientists across all disciplines. It must build upon earlier accomplishments of the Global Environmental Change programmes and all the underpinning disciplinary knowledge. 2.Engagement with various users: Future Earth must serve as a contact point between scientists and science users. Engaging users in research processes is critical in order to enhance the importance, legitimacy, relevance and applicability of the research. 3.Relevance to global environmental and societal challenges: Future Earth should support the delivery of science- derived solutions that address global environmental and societal challenges, and should be designed to broaden global change science to promote a transition to sustainability. 7

Guiding principles for Future Earth’s design o Sound scientific basis : Future Earth aims to strengthen our understanding of the Earth system, and provide solid science for a transition towards a sustainable society. o Co-design with stakeholders : Future Earth aims to better connect knowledge and action by producing science that society needs to engage in action, and that can better inform decisions towards global sustainability. o International reach : Future Earth will have a global and regional focus. o Responsiveness and innovative : The governance structure should serve the initiative and provide an adequate framework for implementation. o Diversity : Future Earth must give special attention to disciplinary, geographical and gender balance, and ensure that its activities reflect a diversity of viewpoints. o Sustainable implementation : Environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of Future Earth should be minimized. 8

A system to be phased in as from January 2013 and be fully operational by May 2014

1.Introduction 2.The Stakeholders 3.The governance structure 4.Funding structure 5.Next steps Future Earth: Research for global sustainability 10

Without understanding the social and political dynamics, aspirations, beliefs and values, and their impact on our own behavior, we only describe the world’s physical, biological and chemical phenomena, observe and document their changes, and apply technology to secure access to resources but would ultimately fail to ensure sustainability. Transdisciplinary research can contribute to solutions for a sustainable world. There is no other viable way forward. The sustainability challenges must be met and the Earth system science community will have an important role. Lessons learned from integrated ESSP science

So who are the stakeholders? 12 Research Science-Policy Interfaces Funders Governments Development organisations Business and Industries Civil Society (NGOs etc.) Media

Slide from G. Klepper’s presentation at Planet Under Pressure Co-design and co-production of knowledge requires the involvement of researchers and stakeholders during the entire research process.

1.Introduction 2.The Stakeholders 3.The governance structure 4.Next steps 5.Funding structure Future Earth: Research for global sustainability 14

A 10-year initiative by a new international Science and Technology Alliance for Global Sustainability Future Earth: research for global sustainability 15 WMO is an observer

A growing, multi-stakeholder partnership Established Future Earth Will promote and support the further development of Future Earth By building and maintaining the enabling conditions for Future Earth to operate successfully

Executive Secretariat Governing Council Science Committee Engagement Committee o The overarching decision-making body, providing strategic guidance on and oversight of Future Earth’s operations and resource mobilisation o To comprise scientists from different fields, policymakers, business, industry and other stakeholders from different parts of the world o Will be appointed by the Alliance o Between now and May 2014 the Alliance will function as an interim Governing Council

They must work closely together Executive Secretariat Governing Council Science Committee Engagement Committee The Engagement Committee: o To guide and oversee the implementation of credible processes of co-design, co- production & co-dissemination of research o To include voices from business, civil society and government (i.e. all stakeholders) o Will be established by late 2013 and appointed by the Alliance The Science Committee: o To provide scientific guidance, propose new projects and priority issues, and secure the highest quality research o To represent the full spectrum of scientific fields, as well as scientists from other sectors o Will be established early 2013; appointed by ICSU/ISSC on behalf of the Alliance

o To implement the strategies and activities approved by the Governing Council, carrying out the day-to-day functions of Future Earth o To act as an integrator and facilitator, also coordinating access to cross-cutting capabilities o To be established via an open, competitive call that will be issued by the Alliance o An interim Secretariat, bringing together capacities of existing GEC Programme Secretariats will be operational as from early 2013 Executive Secretariat Governing Council Science Committee Engagement Committee

Executive Secretariat Governing Council Science Committee Engagement Committee o A global, integrated knowledge trust o To develop distributed knowledge nodes around existing and new, co- designed projects o Promoting the underpinning science and synthesis

Role of regions in linking across scales, integrating knowledge, catalysing transformative initiatives Future Earth as a globally representative platform But also a globally distributed platform to ensure that research, capabilities and partnerships are developed at the most relevant level(s)

22 Establishing an Institutional design for Future Earth Develop distributed knowledge nodes and regional initiatives to address real-world problems at local and regional scales Co-design with users Steering Committee & Office

1.Introduction 2.The Stakeholders 3.The governance structure 4.Next steps 5.Funding structure Future Earth: Research for global sustainability 23

The next steps for Future Earth Spring 2012: First Belmont Forum call for integrative research Oct-2012 – Jan-2013: Regional Consultation meetings Nov-2012: GEC-projects Consultation meeting Dec-2012 – Apr-2012: Future Earth presentations (e.g. AGU, EGU, AAAS) Oct-2012: Establishing the Transition Management Project Board Oct-2012 – Apr-2013: The Alliance will function as an interim Governing Council Dec-2012 – Apr-2013: Nomination Governing council members and committee members April-2013: Appointing Governing council members and Science committee members Dec-2013: Appointing Engagement committee members Spring-2013: Competitive Belmont Forum call for funding and hosting executive secretariat April-2014: Future Earth fully operational 24

1.Introduction 2.The Stakeholders 3.The governance structure 4.Next steps 5.Funding structure Future Earth: Research for global sustainability 25

A 10-year initiative by a new international Science and Technology Alliance for Global Sustainability Future Earth: research for global sustainability 26 WMO is an observer

IGFA/Belmont Forum: a key funders group World’s major and emerging funders of global environmental change research, and international science councils Initiated in 2009, by NSF (US) and NERC (UK) Acting as Council of Principals for IGFA, a larger group of funding agencies group since 1990s o Australia/CSIRO o Austria/BMWF o Brazil/FAPESP o Canada/NSERC o China/NSFC o European Commission/DG R&I o France/CNRS&ANR o Germany/DFG&BMBF o India/MoES o Japan/MEXT&JST o Norway/RCN o South Africa/NRF o United Kingdom/NERC o United States/NSF o International Council for Science (ICSU) o International Social Sciences Council (ISSC)

The complex funding situation of the current GEC programmes GEC Funding is heterogeneous and includes: o Governments o National funding agencies o Intergovernmental organisations o Institutes o In-kind

Key Funding Challenges for Future Earth Unprecedented scale: Attract and involve various disciplines and new actors in highly complex issues at science-society interface Fragmentation: No one agency is controlling in their own country the multiplicity of opportunities for environmental research, neither for development research Transition: Experienced GEC projects and programs have developed effective funding networks but not always in a coordinated way e.g. 43 heads at Global Research Council… e.g. 13 partners for USGCRP 23 for EU JPI Climate 27 for French Env. Alliance … e.g. 46 countries support IGBP secretariat … The diversity:

Future Earth’s funding thus calls for: o Clear marketable brand of Future Earth, promoting global sustainability research and providing information for adaptation and mitigation o New incentive tools from basic research to international coordination, to network and attract a growing community of researchers and users o Better funders coordination or co-alignment through innovative partnership, at national, regional and international levels o Involvement of science and development funders, private foundations and others o Smooth transition of GEC budget towards extended funding with new stakeholders o A group of key funders to facilitate and network the wide range of funding sources/institutions… The IGFA/Belmont Forum has been asked by the Alliance to coordinate and diffuse a Funding Strategy for Future Earth

The strategy should address the whole funding pyramid ≈ 100* M€ Emergent Research ≈ 10* M€ International Research ≈ 1* M€ Coordination Build a coherent global web of regional & international offices Sustain research teams across countries & disciplines Develop proactive programs on emergent fields, including inter- and trans-disciplinary & solution-oriented research * Typical Money Unit ≈ 1000* M€ Basic Disciplinary Research National Thematic Programs National Blue Sky Programs International Research Actions International glue money Typical incentive tools: Some key issues for Future Earth: Create high visibility flagship to engage existing scientists & build-up a new generation

Proposed FE Funding strategy o After GEC projects and regional consultation meetings, National Funders Meetings and Regional Funders Meetings should be convened. o Animation by IGFA and Belmont Forum Members in their own country or region, by targeting relevant ministries, others research agencies, foundations, development funders, key regional actors. o Co-organization with GEC Secretariats, Project IPOs and National Committees are required to be efficient, in particular to map current funding landscape and institutions o Deployment in first part of 2013 to allow significant impulse in FY2014 o Around 20 National Funders Meetings could be envisioned, complemented by Regional Funders Meetings with involvement of APN, IAI, START Common guidelines to co-organize Funding Meetings will be draft by the Transition Management Project Board before 2013.

For more information on Future Earth 33